Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533000609.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533000609
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 572K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 179K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749184145168

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 45 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Transformed 71 places.
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Transformed 66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 71 places and 66 transitions and 180 arcs in 130 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 51 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 66/66 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 70/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 14/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 66/137 variables, 71/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 77 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 4215 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 70/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 19/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 66/137 variables, 71/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 65/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 8/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 261 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 15167 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 19414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19428ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19740 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 71 places (down from 51) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 51 to 50
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (120 resets) in 973 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 2/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (35 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (59 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-06 04:29:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 30/37 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 30/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/71 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 34/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 66/137 variables, 71/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 213 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 25/27 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 25/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/71 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 44/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 66/137 variables, 71/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 228 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 445ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 9 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 71 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 59 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 53 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 48
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 53 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 51 transition count 46
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 35 transition count 30
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 35 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 34 transition count 29
Applied a total of 78 rules in 24 ms. Remains 34 /71 variables (removed 37) and now considering 29/66 (removed 37) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 24 ms. Remains : 34/71 places, 29/66 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 247 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 35295 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 175761 steps, saw 35295 distinct states, run finished after 178 ms. (steps per millisecond=987 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 35295 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 175761 steps, saw 35295 distinct states, run finished after 105 ms. (steps per millisecond=1673 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
Computed a total of 16 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 67 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 67 transition count 62
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 67 /71 variables (removed 4) and now considering 62/66 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 4534 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 17/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 61/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 6/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 5/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 6548 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/71 places, 62/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11206 ms. Remains : 67/71 places, 62/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12019507351647204202.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:29:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16655176099067949597.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12019507351647204202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16655176099067949597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.09446e+06,1.36802,57152,2,5619,5,178790,6,0,332,357795,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(AF((E(((p60==0)||(p46==1)) U (p31==1)) * (((p5==0)||(p53==1))||(p45==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!((E(((p60==0)||(p46==1)) U (p31==1)) * (((p5==0)||(p53==1))||(p45==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t25, t26, t29, t31, t32, t34, t35, t37, ...273
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,28.8113,861808,1,0,986,3.84364e+06,157,578,1973,6.88223e+06,894
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 66 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 66 transition count 61
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 66 /71 variables (removed 5) and now considering 61/66 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2453 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 12/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 60/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 12163 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 14623ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14625ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14723 ms. Remains : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3083448934110444945.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13065370339492138479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3083448934110444945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13065370339492138479.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.99122e+06,1.41504,54292,2,5267,5,166192,6,0,327,339072,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AG(((EX((p36==1)) * (p56==0)) * ((p4==1)&&((p20==0)||(p66==1)))))) U A((!(AG((p12!=1))) * EF(!(AF((p4==1))))) U EF((A((p56==1) U (p3...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (!((E(!((p31==1)) U (!((p56==1)) * !((p31==1)))) + EG(!((p31==1))))) * EG((p47=...1319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t25, t26, t28, t31, t33, t34, t36, t37, ...273
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15574485987065089623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15574485987065089623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15574485987065089623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15574485987065089623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15574485987065089623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9474054366862627429.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13805606651329883833.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9474054366862627429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13805606651329883833.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.99122e+06,0.137488,10348,500,41,13826,281,199,19378,50,801,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AG(((EX((i6.u15.p36==1)) * (i7.u20.p56==0)) * ((i0.u1.p4==1)&&((i2.u8.p20==0)||(u23.p66==1)))))) U A((!(AG((i1.i1.u5.p12!=1))) * EF(...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (!((E(!((i5.u12.p31==1)) U (!((i7.u20.p56==1)) * !((i5.u12.p31==1)))) + EG(!((i...1736
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t34, t37, u23.t9, u23.t10, u23.t11, u23.t12, i0.u0.t41, i1.i1.u5.t40, i1.i1.u18.t25, i1....409
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.08338,149356,1,0,334202,401,1073,367832,240,867,478128
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 70 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 63 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 57
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 59 transition count 54
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 54 transition count 49
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 54 transition count 49
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 54 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 53 transition count 48
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 40 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 39 transition count 34
Applied a total of 61 rules in 17 ms. Remains 39 /71 variables (removed 32) and now considering 34/66 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 1115 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 6/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 33/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 1233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2352ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2354ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2453 ms. Remains : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6547474277156182071.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1374182321435859438.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6547474277156182071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1374182321435859438.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72754,0.20096,13564,2,1582,5,36655,6,0,192,62909,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((p49==1)) * A(!((((p50==0)||(p45==1))&&(p10==1))) U (p57!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p49==1))))) * !(EG(!((p57!=1))))) * !(E(!((p57!=1)) U (!(!((((p50==0)||(p45=...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t9, t12, t19, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t30, t31, t32, t33, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.872992,40472,1,0,306,198352,101,112,1205,256254,338
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 71 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 57
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 62 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 50 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 50 transition count 45
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 50 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 48 transition count 43
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 33 transition count 28
Applied a total of 76 rules in 11 ms. Remains 33 /71 variables (removed 38) and now considering 28/66 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 28 rows 33 cols
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 46 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 406 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 27/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 827ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/71 places, 28/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 937 ms. Remains : 33/71 places, 28/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5636576535830071059.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15800941800827071741.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5636576535830071059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15800941800827071741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49029,0.049832,6348,2,631,5,9820,6,0,162,15567,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p43==0)&&(p0==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p43==0)&&(p0==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t20, t24, t25, t26, t27, Intersection with reachable at each...217
(forward)formula 0,0,0.091847,7116,1,0,82,18086,83,32,1075,15567,76
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 66 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 66 transition count 61
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 66 /71 variables (removed 5) and now considering 61/66 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 3437 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 19/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 60/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 8833 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12275ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12359 ms. Remains : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11056640558154172950.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8231210100099689187.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11056640558154172950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8231210100099689187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.56901e+06,1.49459,60832,2,10739,5,199142,6,0,327,338673,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((A((((p70==1)&&(p56==0))&&(((p58==1)||(p69==0))||(p61==1))) U AF((p15==0))) * (AX(AF((p45==1))) + EG((((p22==1)||(p14==0))||(p26==1...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((!((E(!(!(EG(!((p15==0))))) U (!((((p70==1)&&(p56==0))&&(((p58==1)||(p69==0))||(p61==1)...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t16, t19, t21, t28, t30, t31, t33, t34, t36, t37, t39, ...263
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6643593979600176867.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6643593979600176867.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6643593979600176867.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6643593979600176867.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6643593979600176867.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11182207912552897671.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7259451188093849538.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11182207912552897671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7259451188093849538.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.56901e+06,0.115253,9708,446,33,12900,188,212,17300,43,545,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((A((((i8.u24.p70==1)&&(i6.u20.p56==0))&&(((i6.u21.p58==1)||(i8.u22.p69==0))||(i8.u22.p61==1))) U AF((i2.u6.p15==0))) * (AX(AF((i5.u...232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((!((E(!(!(EG(!((i2.u6.p15==0))))) U (!((((i8.u24.p70==1)&&(i6.u20.p56==0))&&(((i6.u21.p...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t34, t37, u23.t9, u23.t10, u23.t11, i0.u0.t41, i1.i1.u5.t40, i2.u6.t39, i3.u9.t36, i4.u1...378
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.9984,161132,1,0,365804,295,1111,393670,217,675,466801
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 58
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 58/66 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 1484 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 57/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 5153ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5155ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5253 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12112490156860012130.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4937759628780647580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12112490156860012130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4937759628780647580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.49598e+06,0.957979,42952,2,5935,5,136158,6,0,312,235490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(AG((p18==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p18==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t20, t29, t31, t32, t34, t35, t37, t38, t39, Inte...248
(forward)formula 0,1,2.22428,74780,1,0,200,331497,144,67,1866,368282,194
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 70 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 57
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 57 transition count 52
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 55 transition count 50
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 55 transition count 50
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 55 transition count 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 54 transition count 49
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 39 transition count 34
Applied a total of 62 rules in 9 ms. Remains 39 /71 variables (removed 32) and now considering 34/66 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 520 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 33/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1325ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1325ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1415 ms. Remains : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16434516154125896758.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14343195538290502930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16434516154125896758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14343195538290502930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,204378,0.07917,7428,2,953,5,14784,6,0,192,22480,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(EG((p47==1)))) U ((p39==1) + (AG((AG(((p66==0)||(p38==1))) + (p60==0))) * ((p2!=0) + EG((p54==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(EG((p47==1))))))) * (p39==1))] != FALSE + ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(EG((p47==1))))))) * !(E(T...374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t17, t18, t28, t30, t31, t33, Interse...245
(forward)formula 0,1,0.807672,38184,1,0,364,192726,97,143,1249,258169,405
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 66 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 66 transition count 61
Applied a total of 10 rules in 7 ms. Remains 66 /71 variables (removed 5) and now considering 61/66 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 5/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1545 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 60/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 7731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9281ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9281ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9374 ms. Remains : 66/71 places, 61/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13158965116379655686.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15539412217339306203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13158965116379655686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15539412217339306203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.5057e+06,1.72939,62056,2,9169,5,200826,6,0,327,343045,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(AF(!(AG(((p39==0)||(p64==1))))) U (!(((p10==0)||(p38==1))) * AG((((p49==1)&&(p34==0))||(p49!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p39==0)||(p64==1)))))))))) * !(((p10==0)||(p38==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t17, t22, t28, t31, t33, t34, t36, t37, t39, ...268
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18132565130267618594.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18132565130267618594.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18132565130267618594.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18132565130267618594.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18132565130267618594.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14991913940670863381.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6805591104052380459.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14991913940670863381.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6805591104052380459.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.5057e+06,0.105851,9184,478,48,11444,278,212,16138,51,885,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(AF(!(AG(((i6.u15.p39==0)||(u22.p64==1))))) U (!(((i1.i1.u3.p10==0)||(i6.u15.p38==1))) * AG((((i1.i0.u17.p49==1)&&(i5.u13.p34==0))||(...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i6.u15.p39==0)||(u22.p64==1)))))))))) * !(((i1.i1.u3.p10==0)||(i6.u15.p...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t34, t37, u22.t10, u22.t11, u22.t12, u22.t13, i0.u0.t41, i1.i1.u4.t40, i2.u5.t39, i3.u8....391
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.96245,139232,1,0,319586,520,1085,344408,256,1538,422375
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 65 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 65 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /71 variables (removed 7) and now considering 59/66 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1384 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 58/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 3/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 6/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 5191 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6581ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6581ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/71 places, 59/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6667 ms. Remains : 64/71 places, 59/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4518833412353061945.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13955389818854809576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4518833412353061945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13955389818854809576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.99973e+06,0.99196,41660,2,5923,5,130654,6,0,317,227811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E((EG((p30!=0)) * !(EG((p29==1)))) U (AG(((p3==1)&&(p19==1))) + !((AF(((p53==0)||(p26==1))) * EG(((p54==0)||(p1==1)))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),(EG((p30!=0)) * !(EG((p29==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p3==1)&&(p19==1))))))] = FALSE * ([FwdG(FwdU...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t30, t32, t33, t35, t36, t38, t39, t40, ...253
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14960468479949247543.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14960468479949247543.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14960468479949247543.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14960468479949247543.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14960468479949247543.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3675270761349824681.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12627320721974213494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3675270761349824681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12627320721974213494.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.99973e+06,0.143794,10796,432,34,15047,266,222,21046,46,822,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E((EG((i3.u12.p30!=0)) * !(EG((i3.u12.p29==1)))) U (AG(((i2.u0.p3==1)&&(i1.u7.p19==1))) + !((AF(((u19.p53==0)||(i2.u10.p26==1))) * E...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),(EG((i3.u12.p30!=0)) * !(EG((i3.u12.p29==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u0.p3==1)&&(i1.u7.p19==1)))...400
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t33, t36, u19.t6, u19.t7, u19.t8, u19.t9, u22.t10, u22.t11, u22.t12, i0.i1.u5.t39, i1.u6...350
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.63629,76076,1,0,159291,365,1118,213672,229,1059,253669
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 70 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 66 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 58
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 63 transition count 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 56 transition count 51
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 51 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 51 transition count 46
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 51 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 50 transition count 45
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 39 transition count 34
Applied a total of 62 rules in 27 ms. Remains 39 /71 variables (removed 32) and now considering 34/66 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 953 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 33/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 2834 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 3791ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3791ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3890 ms. Remains : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8398167484586393336.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1434885130738108803.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8398167484586393336.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1434885130738108803.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79389,0.131312,10240,2,1785,5,22829,6,0,192,42197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p40==1) * ((p25==0) + ((AF(AG(((p19==0)&&(p20==1)))) * (p60==0)) * ((p50==1)&&((p2==0)||(p22==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p40==1)) * (p25==0))] != FALSE + [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p40==1)) * ((p50==1)&&((p2==0)||...239
(forward)formula 0,1,0.133527,10496,1,0,8,22829,9,2,197,42197,2
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 58
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 58/66 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 1490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 57/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3629 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 5124ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5124ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5214 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15889445749415833300.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10578187748751942830.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15889445749415833300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10578187748751942830.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.49598e+06,1.01942,42932,2,5935,5,136158,6,0,312,235490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AG(((p2==1)||(p26==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p2==1)||(p26==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t20, t29, t31, t32, t34, t35, t37, t38, t39, Inte...248
(forward)formula 0,0,3.15302,96844,1,0,168,487689,138,78,1838,461386,165
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 71 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 61 transition count 56
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 56 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 56 transition count 51
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 56 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 55 transition count 50
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 39 transition count 34
Applied a total of 64 rules in 14 ms. Remains 39 /71 variables (removed 32) and now considering 34/66 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 33 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 557 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 33/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved in 1036 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1597ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 33 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1597ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1693 ms. Remains : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15718084340709542521.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11955159201803129428.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15718084340709542521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11955159201803129428.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,95883,0.107753,9216,2,1618,5,20710,6,0,192,36473,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG((p14==1)) + EF((EG(((p68==1)||(p13==0))) * E(((p45==0)||(p43==1)) U ((p0==0)||(p70==1)))))) + AG((p54==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((EG((p14==1)) + E(TRUE U (EG(((p68==1)||(p13==0))) * E(((p45==0)||(p43==1)) U ((p0==0)||(p70==1...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t10, t12, t23, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30, t32, t33, Intersection w...238
(forward)formula 0,1,5.1075,170600,1,0,989,988763,107,440,1236,1.31943e+06,1101
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 65 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 65 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /71 variables (removed 7) and now considering 59/66 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1405 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 58/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 4/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 5171 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6582ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6583ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/71 places, 59/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6677 ms. Remains : 64/71 places, 59/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9544794561978911502.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5628307097319668465.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9544794561978911502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5628307097319668465.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.4962e+06,1.14497,43656,2,5998,5,139200,6,0,317,239964,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EF(!(EX((p27!=0)))) U (p25!=0)) + EX(EG(AG(!(E((p35==1) U (p51==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX((p27!=0))))) * (p25!=0))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(TRUE U !(!(E((p35==1) U (p51=...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t21, t23, t30, t32, t33, t35, t36, t38, t39, t40, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,4.21275,120236,1,0,174,515423,141,79,1931,630498,168
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 70 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 63 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 57
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 62 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 58 transition count 53
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 52 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 47
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 52 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 50 transition count 45
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 40 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 39 transition count 34
Applied a total of 61 rules in 17 ms. Remains 39 /71 variables (removed 32) and now considering 34/66 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 32 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/39 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 73/73 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 544 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/39 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/73 variables, 39/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 32/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/73 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 73/73 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 1075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1622ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1717 ms. Remains : 39/71 places, 34/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12008147669130383906.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8175595534810878228.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12008147669130383906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8175595534810878228.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,130349,0.111644,8816,2,1174,5,18584,6,0,192,31589,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((p49==1)) + AF(AG((p11!=1)))) + (EF((p29==1)) * ((p63==0) + EF((p51==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (p49==1)) + !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p11!=1)))))))) + (E(TRUE U (p29==1)) * ((p63==0) + E(TRUE...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t12, t13, t14, t20, t31, t32, t33, Intersection wit...236
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.621614,29892,1,0,279,133031,104,155,1292,166110,335
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 66/66 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 64 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 58
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 58/66 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 1441 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/121 variables, 63/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 57/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 5076ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5165 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 58/66 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality617868248392482501.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18253068294194598392.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality617868248392482501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18253068294194598392.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.49598e+06,1.02214,42944,2,5935,5,136158,6,0,312,235490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(!(AX(((p29==0)||(p40==1)))) U AX(FALSE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(!(EX(!(((p29==0)||(p40==1)))))) U !(EX(!(FALSE))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t20, t29, t31, t32, t34, t35, t37, t38, t39, Inte...248
(forward)formula 0,0,25.586,731556,1,0,542,3.16805e+06,142,352,1802,5.57751e+06,476
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-06 04:34:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:34:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Total runtime 314308 ms.

BK_STOP 1749184460675

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533000609"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;