Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532900522.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-020A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900522
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749132909903

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-020A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 82 ms
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Transformed 383 places.
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Transformed 283 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 383 places and 283 transitions and 1206 arcs in 172 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Support contains 141 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 383 cols
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 387 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:15:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:15:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 335 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 751 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:15:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20836 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50978ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50989ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51781 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Support contains 141 out of 383 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 14:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
Support contains 139 out of 383 places (down from 141) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 62 to 61
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2194 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 5/61 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 240 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 193 ms. (206 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-05 14:16:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 30/55 variables, 25/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 30/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 328/383 variables, 156/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 328/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 364 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 25/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 30/55 variables, 25/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 30/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 328/383 variables, 156/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 328/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 4/951 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/951 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/951 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 951 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 765 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1137ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 2422 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 383 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 382 transition count 281
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 280
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 38 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 38 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 381 transition count 280
Applied a total of 42 rules in 71 ms. Remains 381 /383 variables (removed 2) and now considering 280/282 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 381/383 places, 280/282 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1003 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 584685 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=194 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 584685 steps, saw 546220 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=194 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-05 14:16:11] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 10/18 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 10/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 363/381 variables, 173/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 363/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 280/661 variables, 381/943 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/661 variables, 22/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/661 variables, 0/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/661 variables, 0/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 661/661 variables, and 965 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 225 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 381/381 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 10/18 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 10/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 363/381 variables, 173/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 363/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 280/661 variables, 381/943 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/661 variables, 22/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/661 variables, 1/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/661 variables, 0/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/661 variables, 0/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 661/661 variables, and 966 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 347 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 381/381 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 381/381 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 589ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 265 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 381 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 280/280 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 381 /381 variables (removed 0) and now considering 280/280 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 381/381 places, 280/280 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 381/381 places, 280/280 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 381 /381 variables (removed 0) and now considering 280/280 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned [373, 374]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 203 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 379/381 places, 280/280 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 379 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 378 transition count 279
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 378 /379 variables (removed 1) and now considering 279/280 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned [367]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 203 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 377/381 places, 279/280 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 376 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 376 transition count 278
Applied a total of 2 rules in 28 ms. Remains 376 /377 variables (removed 1) and now considering 278/279 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 376 cols
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 14:16:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 384 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 552 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 376/381 places, 278/280 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 1015 ms. Remains : 376/381 places, 278/280 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 204 ms. (195 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 605306 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=201 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 605306 steps, saw 565459 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=201 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-05 14:16:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 14:16:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/18 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 358/376 variables, 170/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 278/654 variables, 376/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 19/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 0/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/654 variables, 0/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 654/654 variables, and 573 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 179 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 178/178 constraints, State Equation: 376/376 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 10/18 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 358/376 variables, 170/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 278/654 variables, 376/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 19/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 1/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 0/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/654 variables, 0/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 654/654 variables, and 574 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 178/178 constraints, State Equation: 376/376 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 488ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 48993 steps, including 187 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 253 ms. (steps per millisecond=193 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 257 ms.
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 383 cols
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 290 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 474 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:16:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20294 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50361ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50844 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8692025938162091400.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8593439167723342620.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8692025938162091400.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8593439167723342620.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.559835,23736,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((((p63==1)&&(p72==1))||((p223==1)&&(p238==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (((p63==1)&&(p72==1))||((p223==1)&&(p238==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.592501,23992,1,0,8,80864,8,1,3330,128611,2
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:17:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 214 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:17:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:17:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 304 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 520 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:17:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20621 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50692ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50693ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51217 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5011017947110193488.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13991468310540365060.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5011017947110193488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13991468310540365060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.532707,23776,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(!(A(((EX(((p174==1)&&(p191==1))) + ((p345==1)&&(p362==1))) + (p225==1)) U (EX(((p52==1)&&(p67==1))) + EF(((p318==1)&&(p333==1))))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(!((E(!((EX(((p52==1)&&(p67==1))) + E(TRUE U ((p318==1)&&(p333==1))))) U (!(((EX(((p...372
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.37998,30532,1,0,9,148898,23,1,9729,128611,10
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 296 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 476 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20416 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50477ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50477ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50957 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14805377590620409460.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 14:18:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12531800483239787327.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14805377590620409460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12531800483239787327.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.543648,23780,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p318==1) + A(AG(EF((p320==1))) U ((p189==1) + (!(AX((p35==1))) * !((((p318==1)&&(p333==1))||(((p239==1)&&(p243==1))&&(p249==1)))))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p318==1))),!(((p189==1) + (!(!(EX(!((p35==1))))) * !((((p318==1)&&(p333==1))||(...730
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,13.3644,472084,1,0,81,1.36761e+06,22,74,9497,4.4895e+06,80
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:19:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 464 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20353 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50415ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50886 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3854213613046779250.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6314615460184751776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3854213613046779250.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6314615460184751776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.544922,23772,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(A((!(A(((p3==1)&&(p20==1)) U ((p45==1)&&(p47==1)))) * AF(((p31==1)&&(p56==1)))) U AF((p16==1)))) U AX(((EG((AF(((p102==1)&&(p104==1))...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p16==1))))) U (!((!(!((E(!(((p45==1)&&(p47==1))) U (!(((p3==1)&&(p20==1))) * !(((p4...415
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.35452,29800,1,0,16,149635,27,5,9732,128611,12
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 298 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 497 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20433 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50491ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50492ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50994 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12170482326368375793.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2831275532788691613.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12170482326368375793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2831275532788691613.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.532834,23784,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(EX(AG(EX(((p212==1)&&(p229==1)))))) U ((((p327==1)&&(p340==1)) * (EG((AX(((p14==1)&&(p29==1))) + ((p330==1)&&(p332==1)))) * (((p331=...403
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U EX(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p212==1)&&(p229==1))))))))) * (((p327==1)&&(p340==1)) * (EG((...766
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.37488,31168,1,0,26,154385,44,7,10022,128611,24
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:20:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 304 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 487 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:20:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20321 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50377ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50378ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50868 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17810165295397336705.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3597480332809890986.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17810165295397336705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3597480332809890986.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.539885,23780,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF(((((p368==0)||(p370==0))&&(((p89==0)||(p95==0))||(p97==0)))||((p282==0)&&((p69==0)||(p94==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(((((p368==0)||(p370==0))&&(((p89==0)||(p95==0))||(p97==0)))||((p282==0)&&((p69==...185
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.35406,30888,1,0,8,154276,19,1,9508,128611,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 382 transition count 280
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 380 transition count 280
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 378 transition count 279
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 378 transition count 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 377 transition count 278
Applied a total of 8 rules in 23 ms. Remains 377 /383 variables (removed 6) and now considering 278/282 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 377 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned [366]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 191 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 375 transition count 277
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 375 /376 variables (removed 1) and now considering 277/278 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 277 rows 375 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 287 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 456 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 375/383 places, 277/282 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 684 ms. Remains : 375/383 places, 277/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 277 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2452 steps (0 resets) in 18 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13972735170900050535.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6356799032336323340.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13972735170900050535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6356799032336323340.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 383 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 382 transition count 281
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 280
Applied a total of 4 rules in 20 ms. Remains 381 /383 variables (removed 2) and now considering 280/282 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:43] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [373, 374]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/383 places, 280/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 379 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 378 transition count 279
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 378 /379 variables (removed 1) and now considering 279/280 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned [367]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 181 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 377/383 places, 279/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 376 transition count 278
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 376 /377 variables (removed 1) and now considering 278/279 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 376 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 297 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 474 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 886 ms. Remains : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 278 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability37294712995368455.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4362099638747133908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability37294712995368455.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4362099638747133908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+55,0.509967,23180,2,986,5,78484,6,0,1784,124824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!((p101==1)&&(p110==1)))||(!((p212==1)&&(p229==1))))||(p248!=1)) U (!(EG(!(EG((p77==1))))) + ((p261==1)&&(p276==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(((!((p101==1)&&(p110==1)))||(!((p212==1)&&(p229==1))))||(p248!=1))) * !(EG(!(EG((p77==1))))))] != ...280
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 263/0/15
(forward)formula 0,1,11.5442,394904,1,0,10,1.31485e+06,30,3,9807,3.12206e+06,11
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 383 cols
[2025-06-05 14:21:56] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:21:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:21:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 299 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 474 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:21:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20603 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50660ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50660ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51143 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11514935819906108050.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 14:22:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14561964198122269805.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11514935819906108050.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14561964198122269805.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.53739,23784,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((!(((p111==1)&&(p305==1))&&((((p125==1)&&(p129==1))&&(p135==1))||((p369==1)&&(p380==1)))))||(p115==1)) U ((EG(EX((p111==1))) * AF((((...368
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(EX((p111==1))) * !(EG(!((((p279==1)&&(p285==1))&&(p287==1)))))) * ((((p318==1)&&(p156==1)...793
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7441466717299864199.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7441466717299864199.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7441466717299864199.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7441466717299864199.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7441466717299864199.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-06-05 14:23:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-05 14:23:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16998429447351414897.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 14:23:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16920679543409376608.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16998429447351414897.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16920679543409376608.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.343873,19228,130,15,30980,326,511,74999,31,1462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((!(((i5.i1.u46.p111==1)&&(i15.i1.u128.p305==1))&&((((i5.i2.u51.p125==1)&&(i6.i2.u53.p129==1))&&(i6.i1.u56.p135==1))||((i19.i1.u154.p3...631
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(EX((i5.i1.u46.p111==1))) * !(EG(!((((i15.i2.u116.p279==1)&&(i14.i0.u119.p285==1))&&(i14.i...1282
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:23:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:23:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:23:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:23:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 304 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 495 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:23:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20426 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50488ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50489ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50993 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9920647339779019266.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6478414752745056467.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9920647339779019266.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6478414752745056467.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.583171,23780,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((p284==1) * AX(((p115==0)&&(p341==0)))) * (AX(((p251==1)&&(p264==1))) * ((p221==0)||(p246==0)))) * ((p322==1)||((p189==1)&&((p341==...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p322==1)||((p189==1)&&((p341==1)||(((p108==1)&&(p114==1))&&(p116==1)))))) * ((p284==1) ...263
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.11572,26084,1,0,6,128295,11,0,8740,128611,4
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 383 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 382 transition count 281
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 280
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 381 /383 variables (removed 2) and now considering 280/282 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned [373, 374]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 186 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/383 places, 280/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 379 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 378 transition count 279
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 378 /379 variables (removed 1) and now considering 279/280 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned [367]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 177 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 377/383 places, 279/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 376 transition count 278
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 376 /377 variables (removed 1) and now considering 278/279 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 376 cols
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:24:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 291 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 471 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 871 ms. Remains : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 278 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability795908195408138405.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7777085714723506982.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability795908195408138405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7777085714723506982.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+55,0.526522,23300,2,986,5,78484,6,0,1784,124824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((((p328==1)&&(p339==1))||((p117==1)&&(p134==1)))) U ((p137==1)&&(p150==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (((p328==1)&&(p339==1))||((p117==1)&&(p134==1))))) * ((p137==1)&&(p150==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.49328,44944,1,0,8,208399,16,1,9672,152453,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 383 cols
[2025-06-05 14:24:42] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:24:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:24:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 295 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 467 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:24:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 19957 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50010ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50011ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50485 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11649621288674863750.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2241843840310906420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11649621288674863750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2241843840310906420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.543661,23772,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EX((p35==1))) + ((EF((((p99==0)||(p112==0)) + AF(((p175==1)&&(p188==1))))) * (AG((((p222==1)&&(p228==1))&&(p230==1))) + ((p83==1)&...347
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE))) * (p35==1))] != FALSE + ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U (((p99==0)||(p112==0)) + !(E...805
(forward)formula 0,1,0.574565,24028,1,0,8,80864,8,1,3324,128611,3
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:25:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:25:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 293 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 482 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:25:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 20301 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50346ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50346ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50839 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18137575664011279827.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6345251936896813407.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18137575664011279827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6345251936896813407.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.548792,23780,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(((p193==1)&&(p210==1))) U EX(EX(((p183==1)&&(p208==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((p193==1)&&(p210==1)))))) * ((p183==1)&&(p208==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.62071,46836,1,0,9,216238,16,1,9964,157786,10
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 383 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 382 transition count 281
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 280
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 381 /383 variables (removed 2) and now considering 280/282 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [373, 374]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/383 places, 280/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 379 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 378 transition count 279
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 378 /379 variables (removed 1) and now considering 279/280 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned [367]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 178 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 377/383 places, 279/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 376 transition count 278
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 376 /377 variables (removed 1) and now considering 278/279 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 376 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:26:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 290 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 467 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 860 ms. Remains : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 278 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6217288264523254818.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6974241237010363613.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6217288264523254818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6974241237010363613.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 333 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6974241237010363613.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 5188 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 )
Probabilistic random walk after 5188 steps, saw 4980 distinct states, run finished after 37 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 383 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 382 transition count 281
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 381 transition count 280
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 381 /383 variables (removed 2) and now considering 280/282 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 381 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned [373, 374]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 178 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/383 places, 280/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 379 transition count 279
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 378 transition count 279
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 378 /379 variables (removed 1) and now considering 279/280 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Computed 179 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [367]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 377/383 places, 279/282 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 376 transition count 278
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 376 /377 variables (removed 1) and now considering 278/279 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 278 rows 376 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:27] [INFO ] Computed 178 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 285 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 455 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 834 ms. Remains : 376/383 places, 278/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 278 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18098003561338815422.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13725279710110991576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18098003561338815422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13725279710110991576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+55,0.528743,23180,2,986,5,78484,6,0,1784,124824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((p327==1)&&(p340==1))) U (!((((((p137==1)&&(p150==1))&&((p3==1)&&(p20==1)))&&(((p50==1)&&(p75==1))&&((p45==1)&&(p47==1)))) + !(AF(...288
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(((p327==1)&&(p340==1)))) * !((((((p137==1)&&(p150==1))&&((p3==1)&&(p20==1)))&&(((p50==1)&&(p...343
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 273/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,1.62886,44104,1,0,15,205399,30,4,9625,146836,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 383 /383 variables (removed 0) and now considering 282/282 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 282 rows 383 cols
[2025-06-05 14:26:30] [INFO ] Computed 181 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 14:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 14:26:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 314 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 492 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:26:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 665/665 variables, and 947 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 19721 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 382/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/382 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/383 variables, 181/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 282/665 variables, 383/947 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 281/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/665 variables, 0/1228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 665/665 variables, and 1228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 383/383 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 181/181 constraints, State Equation: 383/383 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 49767ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49767ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50264 ms. Remains : 383/383 places, 282/282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 282 transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17191237489461861634.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4357975217335660090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17191237489461861634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4357975217335660090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.550268,23784,2,1006,5,80864,6,0,1816,128611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(EG(AX(((p22==1)&&(p39==1))))) U AG((((p60==1)&&(p77==1)) + !(E(((p240==1)&&(p265==1)) U (((p372==1)&&(p376==1))&&(p382==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(EX(!(((p22==1)&&(p39==1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p60==1)&&(p77==1)) + !(E(((p240==1)&&(p265=...213
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 276/5/6
(forward)formula 0,1,1.21943,29804,1,0,12,147650,22,3,9092,128611,9
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-020A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6191423824663114405.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6191423824663114405.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6191423824663114405.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6191423824663114405.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6191423824663114405.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14746871258518092792.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 14:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2958156714087578772.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14746871258518092792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2958156714087578772.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.377929,20584,128,15,32936,342,536,80192,31,1406,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((!(((i5.i2.u46.p111==1)&&(i15.u128.p305==1))&&((((i5.i1.u51.p125==1)&&(i6.i2.u53.p129==1))&&(i6.i1.u56.p135==1))||((i19.i1.u154.p369=...617
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(EX((i5.i2.u46.p111==1))) * !(EG(!((((i15.u116.p279==1)&&(i14.i3.u119.p285==1))&&(i14.i0.u...1266
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 80 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 14:51:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 14:51:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7198382671691836146.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 14:51:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6329136441003242953.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7198382671691836146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6329136441003242953.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.65846e+56,0.628793,28804,334,5,56216,559,832,70798,12,418,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((!(((u59.p111==1)&&(u161.p305==1))&&((((u66.p125==1)&&(u68.p129==1))&&(u71.p135==1))||((i154.u195.p369==1)&&(u200.p380==1)))))||(u61....497
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG(EX((u59.p111==1))) * !(EG(!((((u147.p279==1)&&(u150.p285==1))&&(u151.p287==1)))))) * ((((...1028
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 101
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 102
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 103
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 104
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 106
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 108
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 109
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 110
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 111
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 112
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 114
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 116
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 117
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 118
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 119
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 121
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 123
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 124
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 125
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 126
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 127
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 129
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 130
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 131
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 132
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 134
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 135
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 137
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 138
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 139
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 140
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 141
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 142
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 143
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 145
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 146
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 148
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 149
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 150
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 151
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 152
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 154
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 156
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 157
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 158
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 159
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 160
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 161

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-020A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-020A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900522"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-020A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-020A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;