fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r198-tall-174894532900516
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-010B

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 771495.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFFTTFFFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532900516.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900516
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 728K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 178K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749130778722

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 13:39:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 13:39:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 98 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Transformed 703 places.
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Transformed 653 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 703 places and 653 transitions and 1626 arcs in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 45 out of 703 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 703/703 places, 653/653 transitions.
Discarding 101 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 101 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 602 transition count 552
Iterating global reduction 0 with 101 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 602 transition count 552
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 203 place count 601 transition count 551
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 601 transition count 551
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 600 transition count 550
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 600 transition count 550
Applied a total of 206 rules in 169 ms. Remains 600 /703 variables (removed 103) and now considering 550/653 (removed 103) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 550 rows 600 cols
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 364 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:39:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 394 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 789 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 549 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:39:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/599 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/600 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 600/1150 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/600 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 549/549 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/599 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/600 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 16/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/600 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 550/1150 variables, 600/770 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1150 variables, 549/1319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 165 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 166 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 158 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60201ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 549 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60331ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 600/703 places, 550/653 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61307 ms. Remains : 600/703 places, 550/653 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 600 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 550 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 600 places (down from 45) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 38047 steps (8 resets) in 1916 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/33 properties
Computed a total of 160 stabilizing places and 160 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&X((F(p1)&&X(X(F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 18 rules in 26 ms. Remains 591 /600 variables (removed 9) and now considering 541/550 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 13:40:43] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:40:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 345 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 525 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:40:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 174 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 173 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 125 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1132/1132 variables, and 1310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 591/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60641 ms. Remains : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 348 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 139 reset in 385 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2411 steps with 4 reset with depth 336 and stack size 336 in 9 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-00 finished in 61447 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 118 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 118 transitions
Performed 118 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 118
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 599 transition count 431
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 481 transition count 431
Performed 76 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 76 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 481 transition count 355
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 405 transition count 355
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 394 place count 399 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 399 transition count 349
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 399 transition count 344
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 394 transition count 344
Performed 168 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 168 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 168 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 336 rules applied. Total rules applied 746 place count 226 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 747 place count 226 transition count 175
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 749 place count 225 transition count 174
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 807 place count 196 transition count 193
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 196 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 810 place count 194 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 812 place count 192 transition count 191
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 812 place count 192 transition count 190
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 814 place count 191 transition count 190
Applied a total of 814 rules in 202 ms. Remains 191 /600 variables (removed 409) and now considering 190/550 (removed 360) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 191 cols
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [180]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 114 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/600 places, 190/550 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 189 transition count 189
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 189 /190 variables (removed 1) and now considering 189/190 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 189 cols
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 13:41:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 174 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 279 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 189/600 places, 189/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 607 ms. Remains : 189/600 places, 189/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-01 finished in 664 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((X((X(F(p1))||p0))&&(p1||X((X(p2) U (p1&&X(p2)))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 18 rules in 28 ms. Remains 591 /600 variables (removed 9) and now considering 541/550 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 13:41:45] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:41:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 356 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 513 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:41:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 182 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 162 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60125ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60671 ms. Remains : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 272 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 6 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-02 finished in 60970 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(G((G(p0)||X((p1&&X(p1)))))) U (p2&&X(G((G(p0)||X((p1&&X(p1))))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 16 rules in 28 ms. Remains 592 /600 variables (removed 8) and now considering 542/550 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 13:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 395 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 568 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 9/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 541/1296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 1296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60695 ms. Remains : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 297 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16708 reset in 133 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16628 reset in 241 ms.
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Detected a total of 158/592 stabilizing places and 158/542 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 152 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 282 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 394 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 1/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/79 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 513/592 variables, 81/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 3/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 0/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/1134 variables, 0/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1134/1134 variables, and 695 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1247 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/79 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 513/592 variables, 81/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 11/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 6/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 4/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/707 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 2/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/1134 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 709 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1739 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2994ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 85 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 592 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 592/592 places, 542/542 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 118 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 118 transitions
Performed 118 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 118
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 592 transition count 424
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 474 transition count 423
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 473 transition count 423
Performed 80 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 80 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 473 transition count 343
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 393 transition count 343
Performed 169 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 169 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 169 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 338 rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 737 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 739 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 194 transition count 191
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 798 place count 194 transition count 190
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 194 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 809 place count 193 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 191 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 191 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 190 transition count 188
Applied a total of 813 rules in 51 ms. Remains 190 /592 variables (removed 402) and now considering 188/542 (removed 354) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 190/592 places, 188/542 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 9952 steps (1 resets) in 38 ms. (255 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 350 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 332 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 291 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
[2025-06-05 13:43:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 91 positive place invariants in 55 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:43:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 983 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:43:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:43:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 91 positive place invariants in 55 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:43:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 988 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:43:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/812/541 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 26 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:44:00] [INFO ] Added : 540 causal constraints over 110 iterations in 6108 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 3 out of 592 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 592/592 places, 542/542 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 592 /592 variables (removed 0) and now considering 542/542 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:44:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:44:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 346 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 506 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:44:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 9/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 541/1296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 1296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60627 ms. Remains : 592/592 places, 542/542 transitions.
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Detected a total of 158/592 stabilizing places and 158/542 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 108 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 312 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 274 ms. (145 steps per ms) remains 1/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/79 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 513/592 variables, 81/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 3/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 0/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/1134 variables, 0/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1134/1134 variables, and 695 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1299 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 77/79 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 513/592 variables, 81/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 11/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 6/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 4/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 1/707 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 2/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/1134 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 709 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1587 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2891ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 72 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 592 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 592/592 places, 542/542 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 118 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 118 transitions
Performed 118 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 118
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 592 transition count 424
Reduce places removed 118 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 474 transition count 423
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 473 transition count 423
Performed 80 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 80 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 473 transition count 343
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 393 transition count 343
Performed 169 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 169 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 169 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 338 rules applied. Total rules applied 736 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 737 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 739 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 194 transition count 191
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 798 place count 194 transition count 190
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 194 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 809 place count 193 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 191 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 191 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 190 transition count 188
Applied a total of 813 rules in 52 ms. Remains 190 /592 variables (removed 402) and now considering 188/542 (removed 354) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 190/592 places, 188/542 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 10666 steps (1 resets) in 25 ms. (410 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 345 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 260 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 271 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
[2025-06-05 13:45:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 91 positive place invariants in 52 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:45:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 926 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:45:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 91 positive place invariants in 52 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:45:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 959 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 13:45:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 541/812/541 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 27 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:45:14] [INFO ] Added : 540 causal constraints over 110 iterations in 6121 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 258 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16651 reset in 117 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16671 reset in 207 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, false, true, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 276 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 592 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 592/592 places, 542/542 transitions.
Performed 118 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 592 transition count 542
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 592 transition count 573
Deduced a syphon composed of 159 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 592 transition count 573
Performed 199 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -1
Deduced a syphon composed of 358 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 592 transition count 574
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 592 transition count 573
Discarding 80 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 80 rule applications. Total rules 439 place count 512 transition count 492
Deduced a syphon composed of 278 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 512 transition count 492
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 279 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 520 place count 512 transition count 492
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 522 place count 510 transition count 490
Deduced a syphon composed of 277 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 524 place count 510 transition count 490
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -200
Deduced a syphon composed of 314 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 561 place count 510 transition count 690
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 598 place count 473 transition count 616
Deduced a syphon composed of 277 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 635 place count 473 transition count 616
Deduced a syphon composed of 277 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 473 transition count 607
Deduced a syphon composed of 277 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 644 rules in 174 ms. Remains 473 /592 variables (removed 119) and now considering 607/542 (removed -65) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 27 ms returned []
Running 606 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 607 rows 473 cols
[2025-06-05 13:45:16] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 126 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/472 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 606 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/473 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 606 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD270 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD271 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD274 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD275 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD276 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD278 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD279 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD281 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD283 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD284 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD286 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD288 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD526 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD527 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD530 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD531 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD532 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD533 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD536 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD537 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD538 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD539 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD542 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD543 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD544 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD545 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD550 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD551 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD552 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD553 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD556 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD557 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD560 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD561 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD562 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD563 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD566 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD567 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD568 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD569 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD570 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD571 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD576 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD577 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD578 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD579 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD584 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD585 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD588 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD589 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD590 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD591 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD594 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD595 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD600 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD601 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD606 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 107 solved, 499 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD462 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD463 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD464 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD465 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD468 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD469 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD470 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD471 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD474 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD475 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD476 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD477 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD478 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD479 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD484 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD485 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD486 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD487 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD492 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD493 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD494 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD495 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD498 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD499 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD502 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD503 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD504 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD505 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD508 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD509 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD510 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD511 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD512 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD513 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD518 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD519 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD520 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD521 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 202 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD366 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD370 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD371 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD386 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD387 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD388 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD389 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD394 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD395 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD396 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD397 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD400 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD401 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD404 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD405 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD406 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD407 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD410 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD411 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD412 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD414 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD415 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD420 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD422 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD423 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD428 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD429 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD430 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD431 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD434 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD435 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD438 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD439 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD440 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD441 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD444 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD445 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD447 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD448 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD449 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD454 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD455 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD456 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD457 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 309 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD292 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD293 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD294 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD295 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD298 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD299 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD302 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD303 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD305 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD308 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD309 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD310 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD311 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD312 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD313 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD319 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD320 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD321 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD329 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD333 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD336 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD354 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD378 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD379 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD380 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 410 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD290 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD596 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD597 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 606/1079 variables, 473/647 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1079 variables, 125/772 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1079 variables, 0/772 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/1080 variables, 1/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1080 variables, 0/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1080/1080 variables, and 773 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 473/473 constraints, ReadFeed: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 606/606 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 278/473 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 83/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 606/1079 variables, 473/647 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1079 variables, 125/772 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1079 variables, 190/962 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1079/1080 variables, and 963 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 473/473 constraints, ReadFeed: 125/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/606 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60174ms problems are : Problem set: 416 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 416 dead transitions in 60175ms
Found 416 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 416 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 416 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/592 places, 191/542 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 699 edges and 473 vertex of which 196 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 277 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 277 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 196 /473 variables (removed 277) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 196/592 places, 191/542 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60395 ms. Remains : 196/592 places, 191/542 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin6934820552589447197
[2025-06-05 13:46:16] [INFO ] Built C files in 23ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin6934820552589447197
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6934820552589447197;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 901 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin6934820552589447197;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 46 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin6934820552589447197;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased13574091986834883124.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 526 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-03 finished in 211724 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(G(p0)) U ((p1||G(!p1)) U X(p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 16 rules in 23 ms. Remains 592 /600 variables (removed 8) and now considering 542/550 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 13:46:17] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:46:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 447 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 635 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:46:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
(s429 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 1.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 1.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 1.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 1.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 1.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 1.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 1.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 1.0)
(s361 0.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 0.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 0.0)
(s367 0.0)
(s368 1.0)
(s369 0.0)
(s370 0.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 0.0)
(s374 0.0)
(s375 0.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 0.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 0.0)
(s380 1.0)
(s381 0.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 0.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 1.0)
(s387 0.0)
(s388 0.0)
(s389 0.0)
(s390 0.0)
(s391 0.0)
(s392 0.0)
(s393 0.0)
(s394 0.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 0.0)
(s397 0.0)
(s398 0.0)
(s399 0.0)
(s400 0.0)
(s401 0.0)
(s402 0.0)
(s403 1.0)
(s404 0.0)
(s405 0.0)
(s406 0.0)
(s407 0.0)
(s408 0.0)
(s409 0.0)
(s410 0.0)
(s411 0.0)
(s412 1.0)
(s413 0.0)
(s414 0.0)
(s415 0.0)
(s416 0.0)
(s417 0.0)
(s418 0.0)
(s419 0.0)
(s420 0.0)
(s421 0.0)
(s422 0.0)
(s423 0.0)
(s424 0.0)
(s425 0.0)
(s426 0.0)
(s427 0.0)
(s428 1.0)
(s429 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 8/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 5/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 592/1134 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/541 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60099ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60761 ms. Remains : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 248 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 268 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2238 steps with 0 reset with depth 2239 and stack size 2239 in 7 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-04 finished in 61309 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0) U G(p1))||F((G(F(p2))||(F(p2)&&(p3||X(p4)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 593 transition count 543
Applied a total of 14 rules in 19 ms. Remains 593 /600 variables (removed 7) and now considering 543/550 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 543 rows 593 cols
[2025-06-05 13:47:19] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 280 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:47:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 368 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 665 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 542 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:47:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 593/1136 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 542/542 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 11/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 543/1136 variables, 593/756 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1136 variables, 542/1298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 205 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 164 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 145 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 138 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60149ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60151ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 593/600 places, 543/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60836 ms. Remains : 593/600 places, 543/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 252 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p4)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p4))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 206 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 201 ms.
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Detected a total of 158/593 stabilizing places and 158/543 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/5 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0 p2 (NOT p3) p4), (X p2), (X p3), (X p4), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p4)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p4)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p4)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p4)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p4)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X p4)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p4))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 14 edges and 5 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-06 finished in 61591 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 16 rules in 29 ms. Remains 592 /600 variables (removed 8) and now considering 542/550 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 13:48:20] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:48:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 345 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 501 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 8/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 4/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 541/1296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 158 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 1314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60079ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60613 ms. Remains : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 177 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 187 ms.
Computed a total of 159 stabilizing places and 159 stable transitions
Computed a total of 159 stabilizing places and 159 stable transitions
Detected a total of 159/592 stabilizing places and 159/542 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-07 finished in 61110 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 119 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 119 transitions
Performed 119 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 119
Iterating post reduction 0 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 599 transition count 430
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 480 transition count 429
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 479 transition count 429
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 479 transition count 354
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 404 transition count 354
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 397 place count 397 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 397 transition count 347
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 397 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 392 transition count 342
Performed 167 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 167
Deduced a syphon composed of 167 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 167 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 334 rules applied. Total rules applied 748 place count 225 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 749 place count 225 transition count 174
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 751 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -18
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 807 place count 196 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 809 place count 194 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 192 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 192 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 191 transition count 188
Applied a total of 813 rules in 71 ms. Remains 191 /600 variables (removed 409) and now considering 188/550 (removed 362) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 191 cols
[2025-06-05 13:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [180]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 103 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/600 places, 188/550 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 189 transition count 187
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 189 /190 variables (removed 1) and now considering 187/188 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 189 cols
[2025-06-05 13:49:21] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 189/600 places, 187/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 425 ms. Remains : 189/600 places, 187/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-08 finished in 537 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(G(p0)) U p1))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 120 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 120 transitions
Performed 120 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 120
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 599 transition count 429
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 479 transition count 429
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 479 transition count 354
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 404 transition count 354
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 396 place count 398 transition count 348
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 398 transition count 348
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 398 transition count 344
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 394 transition count 344
Performed 170 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 170 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 170 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 340 rules applied. Total rules applied 750 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 751 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 753 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -17
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 809 place count 195 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 193 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 191 transition count 187
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 191 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 815 place count 190 transition count 186
Applied a total of 815 rules in 46 ms. Remains 190 /600 variables (removed 410) and now considering 186/550 (removed 364) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 190 cols
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [179]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 189/600 places, 186/550 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 188 transition count 185
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 188 /189 variables (removed 1) and now considering 185/186 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 188 cols
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 188/600 places, 185/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 446 ms. Remains : 188/600 places, 185/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-09 finished in 522 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 16 rules in 18 ms. Remains 592 /600 variables (removed 8) and now considering 542/550 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 13:49:22] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:49:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 361 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 614 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:49:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 1.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 1.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 1.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 1.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 1.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 1.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 1.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 1.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 1.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 1.0)
(s266 1.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 1.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 1.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 1.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 0.0)
(s361 0.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 0.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 0.0)
(s367 0.0)
(s368 0.0)
(s369 0.0)
(s370 1.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 1.0)
(s374 0.0)
(s375 0.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 0.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 1.0)
(s380 0.0)
(s381 0.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 0.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 1.0)
(s387 0.0)
(s388 0.0)
(s389 0.0)
(s390 0.0)
(s391 0.0)
(s392 0.0)
(s393 0.0)
(s394 0.0)
(s395 1.0)
(s396 0.0)
(s397 0.0)
(s398 0.0)
(s399 0.0)
(s400 0.0)
(s401 0.0)
(s402 0.0)
(s403 1.0)
(s404 0.0)
(s405 0.0)
(s406 0.0)
(s407 0.0)
(s408 0.0)
(s409 0.0)
(s410 0.0)
(s411 0.0)
(s412 1.0)
(s413 0.0)
(s414 0.0)
(s415 0.0)
(s416 0.0)
(s417 0.0)
(s418 0.0)
(s419 0.0)
(s420 0.0)
(s421 0.0)
(s422 0.0)
(s423 0.0)
(s424 0.0)
(s425 0.0)
(s426 0.0)
(s427 0.0)
(s428 1.0)
(s429 0.0)
(s430 0.0)
(s431 1.0)
(s432 0.0)
(s433 0.0)
(s434 0.0)
(s435 0.0)
(s436 0.0)
(s437 1.0)
(s438 0.0)
(s439 0.0)
(s440 0.0)
(s441 1.0)
(s442 0.0)
(s443 0.0)
(s444 1.0)
(s445 0.0)
(s446 0.0)
(s447 0.0)
(s448 0.0)
(s449 0.0)
(s450 0.0)
(s451 0.0)
(s452 0.0)
(s453 1.0)
(s454 0.0)
(s455 0.0)
(s456 0.0)
(s457 0.0)
(s458 0.0)
(s459 0.0)
(s460 0.0)
(s461 1.0)
(s462 0.0)
(s463 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 8/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 541/1296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 174 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60221ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60223ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60858 ms. Remains : 592/600 places, 542/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-10 finished in 61001 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||G(F(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 121 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 121 transitions
Performed 121 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 121
Iterating post reduction 0 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 599 transition count 428
Reduce places removed 121 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 478 transition count 428
Performed 76 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 76 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 478 transition count 352
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 394 place count 402 transition count 352
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 396 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 396 transition count 346
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 406 place count 396 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 392 transition count 342
Performed 168 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 168 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 168 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 336 rules applied. Total rules applied 750 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 751 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 753 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 194 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 192 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 815 place count 190 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 815 place count 190 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 817 place count 189 transition count 188
Applied a total of 817 rules in 40 ms. Remains 189 /600 variables (removed 411) and now considering 188/550 (removed 362) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 189 cols
[2025-06-05 13:50:23] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [178]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/600 places, 188/550 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 187 transition count 187
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 187 /188 variables (removed 1) and now considering 187/188 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 187 cols
[2025-06-05 13:50:23] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 187/600 places, 187/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 409 ms. Remains : 187/600 places, 187/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 417 steps with 0 reset in 7 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-12 finished in 539 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 117 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 117 transitions
Performed 117 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 117
Iterating post reduction 0 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 599 transition count 432
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 482 transition count 430
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 480 transition count 430
Performed 76 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 76 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 480 transition count 354
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 404 transition count 354
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 397 place count 397 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 397 transition count 347
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 404 place count 397 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 392 transition count 342
Performed 168 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 168 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 168 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 336 rules applied. Total rules applied 750 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 751 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 753 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -16
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 807 place count 196 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 809 place count 194 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 192 transition count 186
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 192 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 191 transition count 185
Applied a total of 813 rules in 41 ms. Remains 191 /600 variables (removed 409) and now considering 185/550 (removed 365) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 191 cols
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [180]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/600 places, 185/550 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 189 transition count 184
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 189 /190 variables (removed 1) and now considering 184/185 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 189 cols
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 189/600 places, 184/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 402 ms. Remains : 189/600 places, 184/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 865 steps with 1 reset in 11 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-13 finished in 496 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p1)&&p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 18 rules in 25 ms. Remains 591 /600 variables (removed 9) and now considering 541/550 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 13:50:24] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 367 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 520 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 161 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 190 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 175 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 181 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 193 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 139 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 139 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60130ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60131ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60677 ms. Remains : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-14 finished in 60818 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(F(!(p0 U p1)))&&(G(X(p2))||p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 550/550 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 18 rules in 22 ms. Remains 591 /600 variables (removed 9) and now considering 541/550 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:51:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 344 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:51:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 180 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 180 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 201 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 179 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 174 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 180 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 142 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 153 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60084ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60634 ms. Remains : 591/600 places, 541/550 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(OR p1 (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), p1, (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33269 reset in 144 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33278 reset in 148 ms.
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Computed a total of 158 stabilizing places and 158 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 129 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(OR p1 (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), p1, (AND (NOT p2) p0), true]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 10 to 9
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 250 ms. (159 steps per ms) remains 1/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 551/591 variables, 87/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/1132 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1132/1132 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 811 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 591/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 36/40 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 551/591 variables, 87/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 7/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/698 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 1/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 5/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 4/708 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 1/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/1132 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1132/1132 variables, and 709 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1787 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 591/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2612ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 78 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 591 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 591/591 places, 541/541 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 117 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 117 transitions
Performed 117 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 117
Iterating post reduction 0 with 117 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 591 transition count 424
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 474 transition count 423
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 473 transition count 423
Performed 81 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 81 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 473 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 81 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 392 transition count 342
Performed 168 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 168 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 168 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 336 rules applied. Total rules applied 734 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 735 place count 224 transition count 173
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 737 place count 223 transition count 172
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 194 transition count 191
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 796 place count 194 transition count 190
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 9 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 805 place count 194 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 806 place count 193 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 191 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 191 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 810 place count 190 transition count 188
Applied a total of 810 rules in 30 ms. Remains 190 /591 variables (removed 401) and now considering 188/541 (removed 353) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 190/591 places, 188/541 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2900 steps (0 resets) in 18 ms. (152 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)) (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (F (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F p1)]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 276 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-LTLFireability-15 finished in 64508 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 770304 ms.

BK_STOP 1749131550217

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900516"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;