Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532900514.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900514
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 728K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 178K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749127363147

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Transformed 703 places.
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Transformed 653 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 703 places and 653 transitions and 1626 arcs in 201 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 134 out of 703 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 703/703 places, 653/653 transitions.
Discarding 73 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 73 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 630 transition count 580
Iterating global reduction 0 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 630 transition count 580
Applied a total of 146 rules in 108 ms. Remains 630 /703 variables (removed 73) and now considering 580/653 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 580 rows 630 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 518 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 441 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1020 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 579 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/629 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/630 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 185 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 630/1210 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved in 30037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/630 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 579/579 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/629 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/630 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 56/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 20/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 19/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 630/1210 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/630 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/579 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60218ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 579 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60231ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 630/703 places, 580/653 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61380 ms. Remains : 630/703 places, 580/653 transitions.
Support contains 134 out of 630 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 580 transitions.
Support contains 130 out of 630 places (down from 134) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2113 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 9/94 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 248 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 233 ms. (170 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-06-05 12:43:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 250/271 variables, 31/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 359/630 variables, 60/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 580/1210 variables, 630/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 0/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/1210 variables, 0/721 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1210/1210 variables, and 721 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved in 558 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 630/630 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 210/227 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 403/630 variables, 67/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 11/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/630 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 580/1210 variables, 630/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 6/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 4/742 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 5/747 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 4/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1210 variables, 0/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/1210 variables, 0/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1210/1210 variables, and 751 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved in 3800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 630/630 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/7 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 4371ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2182 ms.
Support contains 15 out of 630 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 122 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 122 transitions
Performed 122 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 122
Iterating post reduction 0 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 630 transition count 458
Reduce places removed 122 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 508 transition count 456
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 507 transition count 456
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 507 transition count 393
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 444 transition count 393
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 398 place count 419 transition count 368
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 419 transition count 368
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 419 transition count 352
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 403 transition count 352
Performed 166 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 166 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 166 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 332 rules applied. Total rules applied 787 place count 237 transition count 186
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -15
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 837 place count 212 transition count 201
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 838 place count 212 transition count 200
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 840 place count 212 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 842 place count 210 transition count 198
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 9 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 851 place count 210 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 852 place count 209 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 854 place count 207 transition count 197
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 854 place count 207 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 856 place count 206 transition count 196
Applied a total of 856 rules in 120 ms. Remains 206 /630 variables (removed 424) and now considering 196/580 (removed 384) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 206/630 places, 196/580 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 37457 steps (8 resets) in 598 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 580 transitions.
Support contains 125 out of 630 places (down from 126) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 169 stabilizing places and 169 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 594 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 594 transition count 544
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 593 transition count 543
Applied a total of 74 rules in 64 ms. Remains 593 /630 variables (removed 37) and now considering 543/580 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 543 rows 593 cols
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 354 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 520 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 542 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:43:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 152 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 593/1136 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 542/542 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 4/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 543/1136 variables, 593/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1136 variables, 542/1297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 180 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 175 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1136/1136 variables, and 1307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 593/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 542/542 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 593/630 places, 543/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60678 ms. Remains : 593/630 places, 543/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 543 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15230687875471471497.gal : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10220390459356792363.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15230687875471471497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10220390459356792363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17372719546886695455.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17372719546886695455.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17372719546886695455.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17372719546886695455.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17372719546886695455.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 70 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability977442983925595461.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17188566603265025649.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability977442983925595461.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17188566603265025649.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 593 transition count 543
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 76 rules in 36 ms. Remains 592 /630 variables (removed 38) and now considering 542/580 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 12:45:55] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:45:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 346 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 536 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:45:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 9/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 3/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
(s537 0timeout
^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 1)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 1)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 1)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 1)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 1)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 1)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 1)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 1)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 1)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 1)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 1)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 1)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 1)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 1)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 1)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 1)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 1)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 1)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 1)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 1)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 1)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 1)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 1)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 1)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 1)
(s208 0)
(s209 0)
(s210 1)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 1)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 1)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 0)
(s234 0)
(s235 1)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 0)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 1)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 1)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 1)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 0)
(s260 0)
(s261 0)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 0)
(s265 1)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 1)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 0)
(s272 0)
(s273 0)
(s274 0)
(s275 0)
(s276 1)
(s277 0)
(s278 0)
(s279 0)
(s280 1)
(s281 0)
(s282 0)
(s283 0)
(s284 0)
(s285 0)
(s286 0)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 0)
(s290 0)
(s291 0)
(s292 0)
(s293 1)
(s294 0)
(s295 0)
(s296 0)
(s297 0)
(s298 0)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 0)
(s302 1)
(s303 0)
(s304 0)
(s305 0)
(s306 0)
(s307 0)
(s308 0)
(s309 0)
(s310 0)
(s311 1)
(s312 0)
(s313 0)
(s314 1)
(s315 0)
(s316 0)
(s317 0)
(s318 0)
(s319 0)
(s320 0)
(s321 0)
(s322 0)
(s323 1)
(s324 0)
(s325 0)
(s326 1)
(s327 0)
(s328 0)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 0)
(s332 0)
(s333 0)
(s334 1)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 0)
(s338 1)
(s339 0)
(s340 0)
(s341 0)
(s342 0)
(s343 0)
(s344 0)
(s345 0)
(s346 0)
(s347 0)
(s348 0)
(s349 0)
(s350 0)
(s351 1)
(s352 0)
(s353 0)
(s354 0)
(s355 0)
(s356 0)
(s357 0)
(s358 0)
(s359 0)
(s360 1)
(s361 0)
(s362 0)
(s363 0)
(s364 0)
(s365 0)
(s366 0)
(s367 0)
(s368 0)
(s369 1)
(s370 0)
(s371 0)
(s372 1)
(s373 0)
(s374 0)
(s375 0)
(s376 0)
(s377 0)
(s378 0)
(s379 0)
(s380 0)
(s381 1)
(s382 0)
(s383 0)
(s384 1)
(s385 0)
(s386 0)
(s387 0)
(s388 0)
(s389 0)
(s390 0)
(s391 0)
(s392 1)
(s393 0)
(s394 0)
(s395 0)
(s396 1)
(s397 0)
(s398 0)
(s399 0)
(s400 0)
(s401 0)
(s402 0)
(s403 0)
(s404 0)
(s405 0)
(s406 0)
(s407 0)
(s408 0)
(s409 1)
(s410 0)
(s411 0)
(s412 0)
(s413 0)
(s414 0)
(s415 0)
(s416 0)
(s417 0)
(s418 1)
(s419 0)
(s420 0)
(s421 0)
(s422 0)
(s423 0)
(s424 0)
(s425 0)
(s426 0)
(s427 1)
(s428 0)
(s429 0)
(s430 1)
(s431 0)
(s432 0)
(s433 0)
(s434 0)
(s435 0)
(s436 0)
(s437 0)
(s438 0)
(s439 1)
(s440 0)
(s441 0)
(s442 1)
(s443 0)
(s444 0)
(s445 0)
(s446 0)
(s447 0)
(s448 0)
(s449 0)
(s450 1)
(s451 0)
(s452 0)
(s453 0)
(s454 0)
(s455 1)
(s456 0)
(s457 0)
(s458 0)
(s459 0)
(s460 0)
(s461 0)
(s462 0)
(s463 0)
(s464 0)
(s465 0)
(s466 0)
(s467 0)
(s468 1)
(s469 0)
(s470 0)
(s471 0)
(s472 0)
(s473 0)
(s474 0)
(s475 0)
(s476 0)
(s477 1)
(s478 0)
(s479 0)
(s480 0)
(s481 0)
(s482 0)
(s483 0)
(s484 0)
(s485 0)
(s486 1)
(s487 0)
(s488 0)
(s489 1)
(s490 0)
(s491 0)
(s492 0)
(s493 0)
(s494 0)
(s495 0)
(s496 0)
(s497 0)
(s498 1)
(s499 0)
(s500 0)
(s501 1)
(s502 0)
(s503 0)
(s504 0)
(s505 0)
(s506 0)
(s507 0)
(s508 0)
(s509 1)
(s510 0)
(s511 0)
(s512 0)
(s513 1)
(s514 0)
(s515 0)
(s516 0)
(s517 0)
(s518 0)
(s519 0)
(s520 0)
(s521 0)
(s522 0)
(s523 0)
(s524 0)
(s525 0)
(s526 1)
(s527 0)
(s528 0)
(s529 0)
(s530 0)
(s531 0)
(s532 0)
(s533 0)
(s534 0)
(s535 1)
(s536 0)
(s537 0timeout
)
(s538 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 592/1134 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/541 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/630 places, 542/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60655 ms. Remains : 592/630 places, 542/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 542 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability87456041293913445.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3467791503348436343.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability87456041293913445.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3467791503348436343.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10727223743037371130.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10727223743037371130.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10727223743037371130.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10727223743037371130.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10727223743037371130.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6650733558179289801.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7920761751637382146.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6650733558179289801.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7920761751637382146.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 592 transition count 542
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 78 rules in 32 ms. Remains 591 /630 variables (removed 39) and now considering 541/580 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 12:47:56] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:47:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 378 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 584 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:47:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 158 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60095ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/630 places, 541/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60714 ms. Remains : 591/630 places, 541/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 541 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6597488928400992371.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13652058550474980169.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6597488928400992371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13652058550474980169.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1528054438320929985.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1528054438320929985.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1528054438320929985.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1528054438320929985.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1528054438320929985.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16741409869515597931.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability927801116281507055.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16741409869515597931.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability927801116281507055.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 131 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 131 transitions
Performed 131 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 131
Iterating post reduction 0 with 131 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 629 transition count 448
Reduce places removed 131 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 133 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 498 transition count 446
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 497 transition count 445
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 496 transition count 445
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 496 transition count 384
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 435 transition count 384
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 414 place count 410 transition count 359
Iterating global reduction 4 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 410 transition count 359
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 410 transition count 341
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 475 place count 392 transition count 341
Performed 159 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 159 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 159 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 318 rules applied. Total rules applied 793 place count 233 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 231 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 229 transition count 180
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 229 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 799 place count 228 transition count 179
Applied a total of 799 rules in 59 ms. Remains 228 /630 variables (removed 402) and now considering 179/580 (removed 401) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 228 cols
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [214]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/630 places, 179/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 226 transition count 178
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 226 /227 variables (removed 1) and now considering 178/179 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 226 cols
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 226/630 places, 178/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 443 ms. Remains : 226/630 places, 178/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3516207319553101263.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9650255950426335421.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3516207319553101263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9650255950426335421.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69976e+34,0.260358,14536,2,900,5,45213,6,0,1084,65394,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p404==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p404==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 176/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.517581,20236,1,0,9,105138,19,3,5421,65394,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 594 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 594 transition count 544
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 593 transition count 543
Applied a total of 74 rules in 29 ms. Remains 593 /630 variables (removed 37) and now considering 543/580 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 543 rows 593 cols
[2025-06-05 12:49:59] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:49:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 348 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 492 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 542 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 183 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 593/1136 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 542/542 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 11/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 593/1136 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/542 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 593/630 places, 543/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60599 ms. Remains : 593/630 places, 543/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 543 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability745484255885503345.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8105053356681714008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability745484255885503345.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8105053356681714008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14203560118175792463.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14203560118175792463.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14203560118175792463.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14203560118175792463.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14203560118175792463.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14863281044436666574.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12888760850877196516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14863281044436666574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12888760850877196516.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 129 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 129 transitions
Performed 129 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 129
Iterating post reduction 0 with 129 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 629 transition count 450
Reduce places removed 129 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 131 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 500 transition count 448
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 499 transition count 447
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 498 transition count 447
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 498 transition count 386
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 437 transition count 386
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 414 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 4 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 414 transition count 363
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 414 transition count 348
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 461 place count 399 transition count 348
Performed 160 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 239 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 237 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 784 place count 236 transition count 186
Applied a total of 784 rules in 48 ms. Remains 236 /630 variables (removed 394) and now considering 186/580 (removed 394) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Computed 90 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 323 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 83/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 186/422 variables, 236/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/422 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 422/422 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 10694 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 90/90 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 83/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 7/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 186/422 variables, 236/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 183/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 3/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 1/515 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/515 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/422 variables, 0/515 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 422/422 variables, and 515 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 15980 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 90/90 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 26687ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26687ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/630 places, 186/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27072 ms. Remains : 236/630 places, 186/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 186 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2560245134943991483.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3651515301994054780.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2560245134943991483.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3651515301994054780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.22363e+35,0.324834,16808,2,879,5,54546,6,0,1132,80525,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF((E((p133==1) U (p114==1)) * A((p521==1) U (p686==1)))) + (p18==1)) U ((p648==1)&&(p667==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!((E((p133==1) U (p114==1)) * !((E(!((p686==1)) U (!((p521==1)) * !((p686==1)))) + EG(!((p686=...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t46, t48, t50, t118, t138, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed...193
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11399446013562459150.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11399446013562459150.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11399446013562459150.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11399446013562459150.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11399446013562459150.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 28 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5375491282320998847.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14770462171539893375.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5375491282320998847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14770462171539893375.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.22363e+35,0.171585,11480,98,22,15743,144,436,32318,56,774,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF((E((i1.i2.u17.p133==1) U (i2.u14.p114==1)) * A((i9.u63.p521==1) U (i11.i0.u81.p686==1)))) + (i0.i2.u1.p18==1)) U ((i11.i1.u77.p648=...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!((E((i1.i2.u17.p133==1) U (i2.u14.p114==1)) * !((E(!((i11.i0.u81.p686==1)) U (!((i9.u63.p521=...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t138, i0.i0.u8.t50, i0.i1.u7.t48, i0.i1.u9.t118, i0.i2.u6.t46, i2.u14.t14, Intersection with...236
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 592 transition count 542
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 78 rules in 29 ms. Remains 591 /630 variables (removed 39) and now considering 541/580 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 12:53:27] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:53:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 377 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 558 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:53:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 174 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60138ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60140ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/630 places, 541/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60729 ms. Remains : 591/630 places, 541/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 541 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4671788768719701969.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14727189182643417765.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4671788768719701969.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14727189182643417765.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5464535660506198793.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5464535660506198793.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5464535660506198793.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5464535660506198793.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5464535660506198793.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10148196178313054501.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10675023268361102755.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10148196178313054501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10675023268361102755.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 130 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 130 transitions
Performed 130 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 130
Iterating post reduction 0 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 629 transition count 449
Reduce places removed 130 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 499 transition count 447
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 498 transition count 446
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 497 transition count 446
Performed 60 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 60 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 497 transition count 386
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 437 transition count 386
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 414 transition count 363
Iterating global reduction 4 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 414 transition count 363
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 414 transition count 347
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 463 place count 398 transition count 347
Performed 161 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 161 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 322 rules applied. Total rules applied 785 place count 237 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 787 place count 235 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 789 place count 233 transition count 184
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 789 place count 233 transition count 183
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 791 place count 232 transition count 183
Applied a total of 791 rules in 66 ms. Remains 232 /630 variables (removed 398) and now considering 183/580 (removed 397) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [217]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 231/630 places, 183/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 230 transition count 182
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 230 /231 variables (removed 1) and now considering 182/183 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 230 cols
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 230/630 places, 182/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 461 ms. Remains : 230/630 places, 182/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11596186606258605077.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15223634952678567042.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11596186606258605077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15223634952678567042.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.69639e+34,0.324335,17652,2,1353,5,57630,6,0,1104,87238,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((p693==1)) * A((p457==1) U E(((p158==1) * EG((p452==1))) U (p439==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p693==1))))) * !(EG(!(E(((p158==1) * EG((p452==1))) U (p439==1)))))) * !(E(!...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t44, t46, t48, t51, t53, t55, t57, t60, t62, t64, t66, t69, t72, t75,...389
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7708868096658802575.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7708868096658802575.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7708868096658802575.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7708868096658802575.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7708868096658802575.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15948420139388767968.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2175047802501742388.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15948420139388767968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2175047802501742388.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.69639e+34,0.216084,13736,241,50,19567,310,383,46641,58,1948,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG((i11.i1.u78.p693==1)) * A((i8.u53.p457==1) U E(((i3.i0.u18.p158==1) * EG((i8.u53.p452==1))) U (i6.i2.u50.p439==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((i11.i1.u78.p693==1))))) * !(EG(!(E(((i3.i0.u18.p158==1) * EG((i8.u53.p452==1...376
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t149, i0.i0.u7.t48, i0.i1.u6.t46, i0.i1.u8.t114, i0.i2.u5.t44, i1.i0.u15.t53, i1.i1.u14.t51, ...792
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 128 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 128 transitions
Performed 128 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 128
Iterating post reduction 0 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 629 transition count 451
Reduce places removed 128 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 501 transition count 449
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 500 transition count 449
Performed 62 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 62 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 500 transition count 387
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 438 transition count 387
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 413 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 3 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 413 transition count 362
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 413 transition count 344
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 395 transition count 344
Performed 160 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 789 place count 235 transition count 184
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 790 place count 235 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 792 place count 233 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 794 place count 231 transition count 182
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 794 place count 231 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 796 place count 230 transition count 181
Applied a total of 796 rules in 43 ms. Remains 230 /630 variables (removed 400) and now considering 181/580 (removed 399) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 230 cols
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [216]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 229/630 places, 181/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 228 transition count 180
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 228 /229 variables (removed 1) and now considering 180/181 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 228 cols
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 228/630 places, 180/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 448 ms. Remains : 228/630 places, 180/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6773566988417408965.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5567477205744720065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6773566988417408965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5567477205744720065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1298e+34,0.180919,12652,2,791,5,37678,6,0,1094,52012,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((EF((p395==1)) + EG((p214!=1))) U (((p231==1)&&(p259==1))&&(p214==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((p231==1)&&(p259==1))&&(p214==1))) U (!((E(TRUE U (p395==1)) + EG((p214!=1)))) * !((((p231==...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t65, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13210456810894653703.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13210456810894653703.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13210456810894653703.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13210456810894653703.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13210456810894653703.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability904216035945974439.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability378124614900424155.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability904216035945974439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability378124614900424155.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1298e+34,0.14919,11032,68,17,14093,119,395,35304,45,663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((EF((i6.u48.p395==1)) + EG((i1.i3.u25.p214!=1))) U (((i3.i1.u27.p231==1)&&(i3.i1.u31.p259==1))&&(i1.i3.u25.p214==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((i3.i1.u27.p231==1)&&(i3.i1.u31.p259==1))&&(i1.i3.u25.p214==1))) U (!((E(TRUE U (i6.u48.p395...349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i3.i1.t10, i3.i1.u32.t65, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rever...187
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 595 transition count 545
Iterating global reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 595 transition count 545
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 594 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 594 transition count 544
Applied a total of 72 rules in 36 ms. Remains 594 /630 variables (removed 36) and now considering 544/580 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 544 rows 594 cols
[2025-06-05 12:57:29] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:57:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 375 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 543 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:57:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/594 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 594/1138 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/594 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 543/543 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/594 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 12/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 544/1138 variables, 594/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1138 variables, 543/1300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 154 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 148 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1138 variables, 20/1320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1138/1138 variables, and 1325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 594/594 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 543/543 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 594/630 places, 544/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60645 ms. Remains : 594/630 places, 544/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 544 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9929865668545997751.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14391881214202488098.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9929865668545997751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14391881214202488098.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1683865171906489034.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1683865171906489034.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1683865171906489034.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1683865171906489034.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1683865171906489034.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1052538700747347904.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11619039008642359744.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1052538700747347904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11619039008642359744.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 119 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 119 transitions
Performed 119 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 119
Iterating post reduction 0 with 119 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 629 transition count 460
Reduce places removed 119 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 121 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 510 transition count 458
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 509 transition count 451
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 502 transition count 451
Performed 59 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 59 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 502 transition count 392
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 443 transition count 392
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 393 place count 423 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 423 transition count 372
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 423 transition count 359
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 410 transition count 359
Performed 159 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 159 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 159 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 318 rules applied. Total rules applied 757 place count 251 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 249 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 761 place count 247 transition count 198
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 761 place count 247 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 763 place count 246 transition count 197
Applied a total of 763 rules in 41 ms. Remains 246 /630 variables (removed 384) and now considering 197/580 (removed 383) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 246 cols
[2025-06-05 12:59:30] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [232]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/630 places, 197/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 244 transition count 196
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 244 /245 variables (removed 1) and now considering 196/197 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-05 12:59:30] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:59:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 303 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 244/630 places, 196/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 465 ms. Remains : 244/630 places, 196/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2564073886792657506.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10840269643584558583.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2564073886792657506.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10840269643584558583.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.72106e+35,0.699078,31224,2,1342,5,109782,6,0,1174,173741,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((AF((p114==1)) * (p93==1)) * (p121==1)) + (!((EF((p17!=1)) * !(((EG((p82==1)) + (p411==1)) + (p77==1))))) * (AG((p631==1)) + (EG((p60...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p459==1) + !((E((p261==1) U (p120==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((p112==1)))))))))))))) * !...569
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t19, t20, t22, t23, t25, t26, t54, t61, t63, t65, t67, t69, t141, t155, t158, Intersecti...244
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13647738778005545969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13647738778005545969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13647738778005545969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13647738778005545969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13647738778005545969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9005446949781136285.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2502749461855753095.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9005446949781136285.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2502749461855753095.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.72106e+35,0.489909,23900,175,30,39677,274,505,104370,62,1355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((AF((i2.u15.p114==1)) * (i3.i0.u12.p93==1)) * (i3.i1.u17.p121==1)) + (!((EF((i1.i1.u1.p17!=1)) * !(((EG((i1.i0.u10.p82==1)) + (i9.u52...416
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i7.u58.p459==1) + !((E((i5.i0.u34.p261==1) U (i3.i1.u18.p120==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !...783
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t141, t155, t158, i0.u19.t19, i1.i0.u8.t65, i1.i1.u3.t0, i1.i1.u6.t61, i1.i1.u7.t63, i1.i1.u9...352
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 127 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 127 transitions
Performed 127 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 127
Iterating post reduction 0 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 629 transition count 452
Reduce places removed 127 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 129 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 502 transition count 450
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 501 transition count 450
Performed 60 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 60 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 501 transition count 390
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 441 transition count 390
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 418 transition count 367
Iterating global reduction 3 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 418 transition count 367
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 418 transition count 350
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 401 transition count 350
Performed 160 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 777 place count 241 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 239 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 237 transition count 188
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 237 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 236 transition count 187
Applied a total of 783 rules in 40 ms. Remains 236 /630 variables (removed 394) and now considering 187/580 (removed 393) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [222]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/630 places, 187/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 234 transition count 186
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 234 /235 variables (removed 1) and now considering 186/187 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 234 cols
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 234/630 places, 186/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 435 ms. Remains : 234/630 places, 186/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 186 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9222512581441716565.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16387676076174440079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9222512581441716565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16387676076174440079.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.80314e+34,0.326946,18304,2,880,5,62258,6,0,1122,90029,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(A((p402!=1) U ((p507==1)&&(p535==1)))) * AF((((p588==1)&&(p620==1))&&(p632==1)))) * (AF((p81==1)) + EF((p113==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(!((E(!(((p507==1)&&(p535==1))) U (!((p402!=1)) * !(((p507==1)&&(p535==1))))) + EG(!(((p507==1)&...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t11, t12, t18, t47, t49, t50, t102, t144, Intersection with reachable at each step e...212
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1220021109569719062.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1220021109569719062.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1220021109569719062.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1220021109569719062.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1220021109569719062.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9089683589062034664.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5406963992671187236.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9089683589062034664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5406963992671187236.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.80314e+34,0.2298,14040,98,21,20031,125,411,49833,44,753,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(A((i7.i0.u49.p402!=1) U ((i10.i2.u60.p507==1)&&(i10.i2.u66.p535==1)))) * AF((((i12.i0.u72.p588==1)&&(i9.u75.p620==1))&&(i11.i2.u76...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(!((E(!(((i10.i2.u60.p507==1)&&(i10.i2.u66.p535==1))) U (!((i7.i0.u49.p402!=1)) * !(((i10.i2.u60...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, i0.i0.u7.t50, i0.i1.u2.t0, i0.i1.u6.t49, i0.i2.u5.t47, i0.i3.t18, i6.i1.u44.t5, i7.i0.t...288
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 597 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 597 transition count 547
Applied a total of 66 rules in 24 ms. Remains 597 /630 variables (removed 33) and now considering 547/580 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 547 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-05 13:01:31] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:01:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 401 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 572 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 546 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:01:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/1144 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 546/546 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 15/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 3/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 597/1144 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/546 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 597/630 places, 547/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60678 ms. Remains : 597/630 places, 547/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 547 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11544176439887325165.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8836734596430077419.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11544176439887325165.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8836734596430077419.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4899355688687814974.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4899355688687814974.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4899355688687814974.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4899355688687814974.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4899355688687814974.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7171987301286729925.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17561750100468931539.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7171987301286729925.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17561750100468931539.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 128 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 128 transitions
Performed 128 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 128
Iterating post reduction 0 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 629 transition count 451
Reduce places removed 128 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 501 transition count 449
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 500 transition count 448
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 499 transition count 448
Performed 61 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 61 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 499 transition count 387
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 438 transition count 387
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 408 place count 413 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 4 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 413 transition count 362
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 413 transition count 344
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 469 place count 395 transition count 344
Performed 161 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 161 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 161 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 322 rules applied. Total rules applied 791 place count 234 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 793 place count 232 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 230 transition count 181
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 230 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 229 transition count 180
Applied a total of 797 rules in 42 ms. Remains 229 /630 variables (removed 401) and now considering 180/580 (removed 400) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 229 cols
[2025-06-05 13:03:32] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned [214]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 123 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/630 places, 180/580 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 227 transition count 179
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 227 /228 variables (removed 1) and now considering 179/180 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 227 cols
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 227/630 places, 179/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 451 ms. Remains : 227/630 places, 179/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2691162550065566915.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability383188069350479290.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2691162550065566915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability383188069350479290.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.02907e+34,0.163727,11104,2,737,5,31611,6,0,1090,41619,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG(((p686==1) + !(A((p522==1) U (p387==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p686==1) + !(!((E(!((p387==1)) U (!((p522==1)) * !((p387==1)))) + EG(!((p387=...179
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 177/0/2
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 177/0/2
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1265998061018524707.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1265998061018524707.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1265998061018524707.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1265998061018524707.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1265998061018524707.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8687662591452640906.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11755377285844937081.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8687662591452640906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11755377285844937081.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.02907e+34,0.111173,9212,60,15,11021,117,398,21257,50,621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG(((i11.i2.u78.p686==1) + !(A((i9.u62.p522==1) U (i6.u46.p387==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((i11.i2.u78.p686==1) + !(!((E(!((i6.u46.p387==1)) U (!((i9.u62.p522==1)) * !((...218
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 605 transition count 555
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 605 transition count 555
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 604 transition count 554
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 604 transition count 554
Applied a total of 52 rules in 36 ms. Remains 604 /630 variables (removed 26) and now considering 554/580 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 554 rows 604 cols
[2025-06-05 13:04:33] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:04:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 393 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 563 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 553 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:04:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/604 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 1.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 604/1158 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/604 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 553/553 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/604 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 14/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 5/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/604 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 554/1158 variables, 604/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1158 variables, 553/1327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1158/1158 variables, and 1335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 604/604 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 553/553 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60071ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 553 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 604/630 places, 554/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60672 ms. Remains : 604/630 places, 554/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 554 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1192495607669745054.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:05:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15102960535751242628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1192495607669745054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15102960535751242628.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18210663932653074228.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18210663932653074228.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18210663932653074228.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18210663932653074228.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18210663932653074228.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 89 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14931694578127873283.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11246361323831437366.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14931694578127873283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11246361323831437366.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 580/580 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 593 transition count 543
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 76 rules in 35 ms. Remains 592 /630 variables (removed 38) and now considering 542/580 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 13:06:34] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:06:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 349 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 503 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:06:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 11/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 1299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60102ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60103ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/630 places, 542/580 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60642 ms. Remains : 592/630 places, 542/580 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 542 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2292006618649186727.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:07:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15407421058889955725.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2292006618649186727.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15407421058889955725.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5693259948893650056.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5693259948893650056.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5693259948893650056.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5693259948893650056.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5693259948893650056.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7227778566779054356.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15505286863079046491.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7227778566779054356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15505286863079046491.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16800262842578163686.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16800262842578163686.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16800262842578163686.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16800262842578163686.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16800262842578163686.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 68 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1896252233904631750.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:08:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15658360403221455121.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1896252233904631750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15658360403221455121.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:37:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:37:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 108 ms
[2025-06-05 13:37:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:37:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:37:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:37:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 179 ms
[2025-06-05 13:37:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:37:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12873117976959540098.gal : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 13:37:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8995372841117062304.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12873117976959540098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8995372841117062304.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900514"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;