Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532900513.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900513
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 728K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 178K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 167K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749127329203

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Transformed 703 places.
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Transformed 653 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 703 places and 653 transitions and 1626 arcs in 197 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 120 out of 703 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 703/703 places, 653/653 transitions.
Discarding 79 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 79 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 624 transition count 574
Iterating global reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 624 transition count 574
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 623 transition count 573
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 623 transition count 573
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 622 transition count 572
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 622 transition count 572
Applied a total of 162 rules in 177 ms. Remains 622 /703 variables (removed 81) and now considering 572/653 (removed 81) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 572 rows 622 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:10] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 28 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 372 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:42:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 436 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 839 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 571 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/622 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 194 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/622 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/622 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30124ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 571 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30135ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 622/703 places, 572/653 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31172 ms. Remains : 622/703 places, 572/653 transitions.
Support contains 120 out of 622 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 61 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 572 transitions.
Support contains 118 out of 622 places (down from 120) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1816 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 1/69 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 12:42:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/106 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 516/622 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/622 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 572/1194 variables, 622/713 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1194 variables, 0/713 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/1194 variables, 0/713 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1194/1194 variables, and 713 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 311 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 622/622 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/106 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 516/622 variables, 79/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/622 variables, 10/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/622 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 572/1194 variables, 622/723 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1194 variables, 1/724 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1194 variables, 8/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1194 variables, 3/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1194 variables, 0/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/1194 variables, 0/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1194/1194 variables, and 735 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 2281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 622/622 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2606ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 132 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 622 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 125 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 125 transitions
Performed 125 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 125
Iterating post reduction 0 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 622 transition count 447
Reduce places removed 125 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 497 transition count 447
Performed 66 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 66 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 497 transition count 381
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 431 transition count 381
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 402 place count 411 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 411 transition count 361
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 411 transition count 347
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 397 transition count 347
Performed 169 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 169 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 169 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 338 rules applied. Total rules applied 788 place count 228 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 789 place count 228 transition count 177
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 791 place count 227 transition count 176
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -17
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 849 place count 198 transition count 193
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 850 place count 198 transition count 192
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 851 place count 198 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 852 place count 197 transition count 191
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 862 place count 197 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 863 place count 196 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 865 place count 194 transition count 190
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 865 place count 194 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 867 place count 193 transition count 189
Applied a total of 867 rules in 110 ms. Remains 193 /622 variables (removed 429) and now considering 189/572 (removed 383) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 193/622 places, 189/572 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 33013 steps (7 resets) in 436 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 572 transitions.
Computed a total of 166 stabilizing places and 166 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 123 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 123 transitions
Performed 123 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 123
Iterating post reduction 0 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 621 transition count 448
Reduce places removed 123 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 498 transition count 446
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 446
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 382
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 432 transition count 382
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 399 place count 411 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 361
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 395 transition count 345
Performed 152 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 152 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 152 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 304 rules applied. Total rules applied 756 place count 243 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 757 place count 243 transition count 192
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 242 transition count 191
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 760 place count 242 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 762 place count 240 transition count 189
Applied a total of 762 rules in 102 ms. Remains 240 /622 variables (removed 382) and now considering 189/572 (removed 383) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [229]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 119 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/622 places, 189/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 239 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 238 transition count 188
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 238 /239 variables (removed 1) and now considering 188/189 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 90 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [222]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 237/622 places, 188/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 236 transition count 187
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 236 /237 variables (removed 1) and now considering 187/188 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 174 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 236/622 places, 187/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 644 ms. Remains : 236/622 places, 187/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16530979922074029254.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7229442012930448857.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16530979922074029254.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7229442012930448857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.90422e+34,0.630067,28196,2,2898,5,107865,6,0,1130,142950,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((E(AF(((p220==0)||(p371==1))) U ((p464==0)||(p670==1))) + !(E(!(((p440==0)||(p58==1))) U AF((p305==1))))) U (p149==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p149==1))) * !((p149==1))) * !(E(!(EG(!(((p220==0)||(p371==1))))) U ((p464==0)...276
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 184/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,1.12683,36092,1,0,16,204603,20,3,5782,142950,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 593 transition count 543
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 593 transition count 543
Applied a total of 58 rules in 26 ms. Remains 593 /622 variables (removed 29) and now considering 543/572 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 543 rows 593 cols
[2025-06-05 12:42:47] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:42:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:42:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 346 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 506 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 542 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:42:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 593/1136 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/593 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 542/542 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/593 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 14/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 543/1136 variables, 593/759 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1136 variables, 542/1301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 177 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 173 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60173ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 542 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60179ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 593/622 places, 543/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60718 ms. Remains : 593/622 places, 543/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 543 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8218486634438371543.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:43:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11723738429940931435.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8218486634438371543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11723738429940931435.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:44:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:44:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17760155153931104843.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17760155153931104843.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17760155153931104843.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17760155153931104843.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17760155153931104843.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6223194495464266326.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5304700051973527144.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6223194495464266326.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5304700051973527144.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 597 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 597 transition count 547
Applied a total of 50 rules in 30 ms. Remains 597 /622 variables (removed 25) and now considering 547/572 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 547 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-05 12:44:49] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:44:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 377 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 538 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 546 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:44:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/1144 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 546/546 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 14/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 1)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 1)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 1)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 1)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 1)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 1)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 1)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 1)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 1)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 1)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 1)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 1)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 1)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 1)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 1)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 1)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 1)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 1)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 1)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 1)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 1)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 1)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 1)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 1)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 1)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 1)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s209 1)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 1)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 1)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 1)
(s234 0)
(s235 0)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 1)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 0)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 0)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 1)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 1)
(s260 0)
(s261 0)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 0)
(s265 1)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 1)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 0)
(s272 0)
(s273 0)
(s274 1)
(s275 0)
(s276 0)
(s277 0)
(s278 0)
(s279 0)
(s280 0)
(s281 1)
(s282 0)
(s283 0)
(s284 0)
(s285 0)
(s286 0)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 0)
(s290 0)
(s291 1)
(s292 0)
(s293 0)
(s294 0)
(s295 0)
(s296 0)
(s297 0)
(s298 1)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 0)
(s302 0)
(s303 0)
(s304 0)
(s305 0)
(s306 0)
(s307 0)
(s308 0)
(s309 0)
(s310 0)
(s311 0)
(s312 0)
(s313 0)
(s314 0)
(s315 0)
(s316 1)
(s317 0)
(s318 0)
(s319 1)
(s320 0)
(s321 0)
(s322 0)
(s323 0)
(s324 0)
(s325 1)
(s326 0)
(s327 0)
(s328 1)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 0)
(s332 0)
(s333 0)
(s334 1)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 0)
(s338 0)
(s339 0)
(s340 0)
(s341 1)
(s342 0)
(s343 0)
(s344 0)
(s345 0)
(s346 0)
(s347 0)
(s348 0)
(s349 0)
(s350 0)
(s351 1)
(s352 0)
(s353 0)
(s354 0)
(s355 0)
(s356 0)
(s357 0)
(s358 0)
(s359 1)
(s360 0)
(s361 0)
(s362 0)
(s363 0)
(s364 0)
(s365 0)
(s366 0)
(s367 0)
(s368 0)
(s369 0)
(s370 0)
(s371 0)
(s372 0)
(s373 0)
(s374 1)
(s375 0)
(s376 0)
(s377 1)
(s378 0)
(s379 0)
(s380 0)
(s381 0)
(s382 0)
(s383 1)
(s384 0)
(s385 0)
(s386 1)
(s387 0)
(s388 0)
(s389 0)
(s390 0)
(s391 0)
(s392 1)
(s393 0)
(s394 0)
(s395 0)
(s396 0)
(s397 0)
(s398 0)
(s399 1)
(s400 0)
(s401 0)
(s402 0)
(s403 0)
(s404 0)
(s405 0)
(s406 0)
(s407 0)
(s408 0)
(s409 0)
(s410 1)
(s411 0)
(s412 0)
(s413 0)
(s414 0)
(s415 0)
(s416 0)
(s417 0)
(s418 0)
(s419 0)
(s420 1)
(s421 0)
(s422 0)
(s423 0)
(s424 0)
(s425 0)
(s426 0)
(s427 0)
(s428 0)
(s429 0)
(s430 0)
(s431 0)
(s432 0)
(s433 1)
(s434 0)
(s435 0)timeout

(s436 1) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 597/1144 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/546 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 597/622 places, 547/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60640 ms. Remains : 597/622 places, 547/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 547 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1347756115135520158.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:45:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14510566736330272691.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1347756115135520158.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14510566736330272691.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4616658343518500055.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4616658343518500055.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4616658343518500055.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4616658343518500055.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4616658343518500055.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10120734846014387061.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8192596525453288576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10120734846014387061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8192596525453288576.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 597 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 597 transition count 547
Applied a total of 50 rules in 33 ms. Remains 597 /622 variables (removed 25) and now considering 547/572 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 547 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-05 12:46:50] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:46:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:46:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 369 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 535 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 546 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:46:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/1144 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 546/546 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/597 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 14/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 547/1144 variables, 597/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1144 variables, 546/1310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 134 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 145 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1144/1144 variables, and 1324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 546/546 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60076ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 546 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 597/622 places, 547/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60648 ms. Remains : 597/622 places, 547/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 547 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9037937339545972029.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 12:47:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10473409212107183915.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9037937339545972029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10473409212107183915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6037143421342886136.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6037143421342886136.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6037143421342886136.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6037143421342886136.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6037143421342886136.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5198881061867747623.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16745706720886338346.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5198881061867747623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16745706720886338346.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 127 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 127 transitions
Performed 127 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 127
Iterating post reduction 0 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 621 transition count 444
Reduce places removed 127 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 494 transition count 444
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 494 transition count 379
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 429 transition count 379
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 406 place count 407 transition count 357
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 407 transition count 357
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 407 transition count 341
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 391 transition count 341
Performed 158 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 158 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 316 rules applied. Total rules applied 776 place count 233 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 777 place count 233 transition count 182
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 232 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 230 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 228 transition count 179
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 228 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 785 place count 227 transition count 178
Applied a total of 785 rules in 60 ms. Remains 227 /622 variables (removed 395) and now considering 178/572 (removed 394) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 227 cols
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [213]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/622 places, 178/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 225 transition count 177
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 225 /226 variables (removed 1) and now considering 177/178 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 225 cols
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 225/622 places, 177/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 446 ms. Remains : 225/622 places, 177/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 177 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 221 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10485529923683752268.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17645703654337874056.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10485529923683752268.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17645703654337874056.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 124 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 124 transitions
Performed 124 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 124
Iterating post reduction 0 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 621 transition count 447
Reduce places removed 124 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 497 transition count 446
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 446
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 382
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 432 transition count 382
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 399 place count 411 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 361
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 395 transition count 345
Performed 152 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 152 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 152 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 304 rules applied. Total rules applied 756 place count 243 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 757 place count 243 transition count 192
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 759 place count 242 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 761 place count 240 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 762 place count 239 transition count 189
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 762 place count 239 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 764 place count 238 transition count 188
Applied a total of 764 rules in 56 ms. Remains 238 /622 variables (removed 384) and now considering 188/572 (removed 384) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 90 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [221]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/622 places, 188/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 236 transition count 187
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 236 /237 variables (removed 1) and now considering 187/188 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 187 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-05 12:48:51] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 236/622 places, 187/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 449 ms. Remains : 236/622 places, 187/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 187 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1030845978722506956.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16667591974530029648.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1030845978722506956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16667591974530029648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.06541e+34,0.433745,21692,2,1101,5,75730,6,0,1130,113874,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AF(!(EG(((p387==0)||(p294==1)))))) U !(E(E((p655==1) U ((p484==0)||(p82==1))) U (p247!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(E((p655==1) U ((p484==0)||(p82==1))) U (p247!=1))))) * !(!(!(EG(!(!(EG(((p387==0)||(p29...313
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t11, t13, t45, t48, t50, t53, t55, t58, t60, t62, t65, t6...454
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9240860925769574374.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9240860925769574374.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9240860925769574374.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9240860925769574374.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9240860925769574374.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16349807197518040596.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11624127510180894883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16349807197518040596.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11624127510180894883.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.06541e+34,0.291019,17008,214,26,26111,161,455,66739,46,793,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AF(!(EG(((i7.u47.p387==0)||(i5.i1.u33.p294==1)))))) U !(E(E((i12.i2.u79.p655==1) U ((i9.u58.p484==0)||(i1.i1.u12.p82==1))) U (i4.u2...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(E((i12.i2.u79.p655==1) U ((i9.u58.p484==0)||(i1.i1.u12.p82==1))) U (i4.u29.p247!=1)))))...435
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t146, t149, t155, t164, t175, i0.i0.u2.t0, i0.i0.u5.t45, i0.i0.u7.t50, i0.i1.u6.t48, i0.i1.u8...947
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 125 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 125 transitions
Performed 125 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 125
Iterating post reduction 0 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 621 transition count 446
Reduce places removed 125 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 125 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 446
Performed 66 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 66 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 496 transition count 380
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 430 transition count 380
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 400 place count 412 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 412 transition count 362
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 418 place count 412 transition count 350
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 400 transition count 350
Performed 159 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 159 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 159 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 318 rules applied. Total rules applied 760 place count 241 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 761 place count 241 transition count 190
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 763 place count 240 transition count 189
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 764 place count 240 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 766 place count 238 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 768 place count 236 transition count 187
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 768 place count 236 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 770 place count 235 transition count 186
Applied a total of 770 rules in 54 ms. Remains 235 /622 variables (removed 387) and now considering 186/572 (removed 386) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 235 cols
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned [221]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 104 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/622 places, 186/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 233 transition count 185
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 233 /234 variables (removed 1) and now considering 185/186 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 233 cols
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 233/622 places, 185/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 436 ms. Remains : 233/622 places, 185/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10516677454236650927.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:49:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4943901035148755621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10516677454236650927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4943901035148755621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.2895e+35,0.267866,15500,2,1275,5,49526,6,0,1119,71581,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((p96==0)&&(p545==1))) + (EG(EF((p612!=1))) * ((((p148==0)||(p417==1))||((p518==0)||(p15==1)))||(p464==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EG(E(TRUE U (p612!=1))) * ((((p148==0)||(p417==1))||((p518==0)||(p15==1)))||(p464==0))))...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t12, t13, t14, t47, t50, t52, t55, t57, t60, t62, t64, t66, t69, t71, t74, t76, t78, t80,...369
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:50:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:50:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4287935755574758031.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4287935755574758031.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4287935755574758031.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4287935755574758031.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4287935755574758031.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15448761783527978081.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15838433102197461552.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15448761783527978081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15838433102197461552.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.2895e+35,0.198774,12880,247,41,18715,163,456,40532,59,798,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((i1.i2.u12.p96==0)&&(i8.i0.u65.p545==1))) + (EG(EF((i9.i0.u73.p612!=1))) * ((((i1.i1.u18.p148==0)||(i7.i1.u50.p417==1))||((i9.i0....210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EG(E(TRUE U (i9.i0.u73.p612!=1))) * ((((i1.i1.u18.p148==0)||(i7.i1.u50.p417==1))||((i9.i...279
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t140, t144, i0.i1.u6.t47, i0.i2.u7.t50, i0.i2.u8.t52, i0.i2.u9.t55, i1.i0.u17.t60, i1.i1.u18....729
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 596 transition count 546
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 596 transition count 546
Applied a total of 52 rules in 24 ms. Remains 596 /622 variables (removed 26) and now considering 546/572 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 546 rows 596 cols
[2025-06-05 12:50:53] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:50:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:50:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 521 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 545 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:50:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/596 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 596/1142 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/596 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 545/545 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/596 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 11/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/596 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 546/1142 variables, 596/761 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1142 variables, 545/1306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 140 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 147 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60081ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60083ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 596/622 places, 546/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60630 ms. Remains : 596/622 places, 546/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 546 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11415187838135943827.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:51:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9553593171225719482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11415187838135943827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9553593171225719482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3207107544094172057.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3207107544094172057.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3207107544094172057.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3207107544094172057.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3207107544094172057.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 96 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8233014442847288457.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality545222242620269385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8233014442847288457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality545222242620269385.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 127 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 127 transitions
Performed 127 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 127
Iterating post reduction 0 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 621 transition count 444
Reduce places removed 127 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 127 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 494 transition count 444
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 494 transition count 379
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 384 place count 429 transition count 379
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 405 place count 408 transition count 358
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 408 transition count 358
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 408 transition count 343
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 456 place count 393 transition count 343
Performed 160 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 776 place count 233 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 777 place count 233 transition count 182
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 232 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 230 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 228 transition count 179
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 228 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 785 place count 227 transition count 178
Applied a total of 785 rules in 38 ms. Remains 227 /622 variables (removed 395) and now considering 178/572 (removed 394) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 227 cols
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [213]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 226/622 places, 178/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 225 transition count 177
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 225 /226 variables (removed 1) and now considering 177/178 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 225 cols
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 225/622 places, 177/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 427 ms. Remains : 225/622 places, 177/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 177 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3595918444204352479.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4774878886673307776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3595918444204352479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4774878886673307776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.26635e+34,0.160257,10848,2,1088,5,30611,6,0,1080,40727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p612==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p612==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 175/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.601598,26616,1,0,10,138403,19,4,5373,59678,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 60 rules in 33 ms. Remains 592 /622 variables (removed 30) and now considering 542/572 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 12:52:55] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:52:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:52:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 375 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 527 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:52:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 542/1134 variables, 592/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1134 variables, 541/1296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 160 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
(s499 1timeout
^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 1timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 1)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0)
(s232 0)
(s233 0)
(s234 0)
(s235 0)
(s236 0)
(s237 0)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 0)
(s241 0)
(s242 0)
(s243 0)
(s244 0)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 0)
(s248 0)
(s249 0)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 0)
(s254 0)
(s255 0)
(s256 0)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 0)
(s260 0)
(s261 0)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 0)
(s265 0)
(s266 0)
(s267 0)
(s268 0)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 0)
(s272 0)
(s273 0)
(s274 0)
(s275 0)
(s276 0)
(s277 0)
(s278 0)
(s279 0)
(s280 0)
(s281 0)
(s282 0)
(s283 0)
(s284 0)
(s285 0)
(s286 0)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 0)
(s290 0)
(s291 0)
(s292 0)
(s293 0)
(s294 0)
(s295 0)
(s296 0)
(s297 0)
(s298 0)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 0)
(s302 0)
(s303 0)
(s304 0)
(s305 0)
(s306 0)
(s307 0)
(s308 0)
(s309 0)
(s310 0)
(s311 0)
(s312 0)
(s313 0)
(s314 0)
(s315 0)
(s316 0)
(s317 0)
(s318 0)
(s319 0)
(s320 0)
(s321 0)
(s322 0)
(s323 0)
(s324 0)
(s325 0)
(s326 0)
(s327 0)
(s328 0)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 0)
(s332 0)
(s333 0)
(s334 0)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 0)
(s338 0)
(s339 0)
(s340 0)
(s341 0)
(s342 0)
(s343 0)
(s344 0)
(s345 0)
(s346 0)
(s347 0)
(s348 0)
(s349 0)
(s350 0)
(s351 0)
(s352 0)
(s353 0)
(s354 0)
(s355 0)
(s356 0)
(s357 0)
(s358 0)
(s359 0)
(s360 0)
(s361 0)
(s362 0)
(s363 0)
(s364 0)
(s365 0)
(s366 0)
(s367 0)
(s368 0)
(s369 0)
(s370 1)
(s371 0)
(s372 0)
(s373 0)
(s374 0)
(s375 0)
(s376 0)
(s377 1)
(s378 1)
(s379 0)
(s380 1)
(s381 0)
(s382 0)
(s383 0)
(s384 1)
(s385 0)
(s386 0)
(s387 0)
(s388 1)
(s389 0)
(s390 0)
(s391 0)
(s392 0)
(s393 0)
(s394 0)
(s395 0)
(s396 0)
(s397 0)
(s398 0)
(s399 0)
(s400 0)
(s401 1)
(s402 0)
(s403 0)
(s404 0)
(s405 1)
(s406 0)
(s407 0)
(s408 0)
(s409 0)
(s410 0)
(s411 0)
(s412 0)
(s413 0)
(s414 0)
(s415 0)
(s416 0)
(s417 0)
(s418 0)
(s419 1)
(s420 0)
(s421 0)
(s422 0)
(s423 0)
(s424 0)
(s425 0)
(s426 0)
(s427 1)
(s428 0)
(s429 0)
(s430 0)
(s431 0)
(s432 0)
(s433 0)
(s434 0)
(s435 0)
(s436 0)
(s437 0)
(s438 1)
(s439 0)
(s440 0)
(s441 1)
(s442 0)
(s443 0)
(s444 0)
(s445 1)
(s446 0)
(s447 0)
(s448 0)
(s449 0)
(s450 0)
(s451 0)
(s452 0)
(s453 0)
(s454 1)
(s455 0)
(s456 0)
(s457 0)
(s458 0)
(s459 0)
(s460 0)
(s461 0)
(s462 1)
(s463 0)
(s464 0)
(s465 0)
(s466 0)
(s467 0)
(s468 0)
(s469 0)
(s470 0)
(s471 1)
(s472 0)
(s473 0)
(s474 0)
(s475 0)
(s476 0)
(s477 0)
(s478 0)
(s479 0)
(s480 0)
(s481 0)
(s482 0)
(s483 0)
(s484 0)
(s485 0)
(s486 0)
(s487 1)
(s488 0)
(s489 1)
(s490 0)
(s491 0)
(s492 0)
(s493 0)
(s494 0)
(s495 0)
(s496 0)
(s497 0)
(s498 1)
(s499 1timeout
) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1134/1134 variables, and 1313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 592/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60082ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/622 places, 542/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60646 ms. Remains : 592/622 places, 542/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 542 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11618126678364169516.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:53:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality847106468417821027.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11618126678364169516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality847106468417821027.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4072965309231349836.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4072965309231349836.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4072965309231349836.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4072965309231349836.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4072965309231349836.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12617569333722176622.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2024523624533473186.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12617569333722176622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2024523624533473186.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 595 transition count 545
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 595 transition count 545
Applied a total of 54 rules in 45 ms. Remains 595 /622 variables (removed 27) and now considering 545/572 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 545 rows 595 cols
[2025-06-05 12:54:56] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:54:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 394 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 546 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 544 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:54:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/595 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 595/1140 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/595 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 544/544 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/595 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 14/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/595 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 545/1140 variables, 595/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1140 variables, 544/1304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1140 variables, 20/1324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 153 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 158 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1140/1140 variables, and 1328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved in 30036 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 595/595 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 544/544 constraints, Known Traps: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60093ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 544 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 595/622 places, 545/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60688 ms. Remains : 595/622 places, 545/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 545 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13473957717609869552.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:55:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9530784631176621516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13473957717609869552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9530784631176621516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12173292611058935507.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12173292611058935507.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12173292611058935507.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12173292611058935507.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12173292611058935507.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:56:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5887026079363276884.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9730074540998636920.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5887026079363276884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9730074540998636920.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 126 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 126 transitions
Performed 126 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 126
Iterating post reduction 0 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 621 transition count 445
Reduce places removed 126 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 495 transition count 445
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 495 transition count 382
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 432 transition count 382
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 399 place count 411 transition count 361
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 361
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 411 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 452 place count 395 transition count 345
Performed 160 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 772 place count 235 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 773 place count 235 transition count 184
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 775 place count 234 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 777 place count 232 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 230 transition count 181
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 230 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 229 transition count 180
Applied a total of 781 rules in 44 ms. Remains 229 /622 variables (removed 393) and now considering 180/572 (removed 392) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 229 cols
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned [215]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/622 places, 180/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 227 transition count 179
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 227 /228 variables (removed 1) and now considering 179/180 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 227 cols
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 280 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 227/622 places, 179/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 459 ms. Remains : 227/622 places, 179/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 179 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1639 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5945578134342584926.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16734275865466145497.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5945578134342584926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16734275865466145497.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 592 transition count 542
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 592 transition count 542
Applied a total of 60 rules in 25 ms. Remains 592 /622 variables (removed 30) and now considering 542/572 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 542 rows 592 cols
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:56:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:56:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 370 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 536 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 541 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:56:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 592/1134 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 541/541 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/592 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/592 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 592/1134 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/592 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/541 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 541 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 592/622 places, 542/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60622 ms. Remains : 592/622 places, 542/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 542 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18327388499224295474.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10573139141164719239.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18327388499224295474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10573139141164719239.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5845470671764790084.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5845470671764790084.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5845470671764790084.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5845470671764790084.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5845470671764790084.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12018337926044597865.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12886676197071222943.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12018337926044597865.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12886676197071222943.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 594 transition count 544
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 594 transition count 544
Applied a total of 56 rules in 24 ms. Remains 594 /622 variables (removed 28) and now considering 544/572 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 544 rows 594 cols
[2025-06-05 12:58:58] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:58:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:58:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 328 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 478 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 543 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:58:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/594 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 594/1138 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/594 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 543/543 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/593 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/594 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/594 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 594/1138 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/594 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/543 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 543 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60067ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 594/622 places, 544/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60571 ms. Remains : 594/622 places, 544/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 544 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12318293226543346650.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 12:59:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4559092949014519663.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12318293226543346650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4559092949014519663.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2890775130892320941.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2890775130892320941.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2890775130892320941.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2890775130892320941.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2890775130892320941.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2790877787721215603.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10621859666715920889.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2790877787721215603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10621859666715920889.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Discarding 31 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 31 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 591 transition count 541
Iterating global reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 591 transition count 541
Applied a total of 62 rules in 38 ms. Remains 591 /622 variables (removed 31) and now considering 541/572 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 541 rows 591 cols
[2025-06-05 13:00:59] [INFO ] Computed 91 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 364 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 517 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 540 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/1132 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 0/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/590 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/591 variables, 91/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 60/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 10/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 541/1132 variables, 591/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1132 variables, 540/1295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1132/1132 variables, and 1311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 91/91 constraints, State Equation: 591/591 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 540/540 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 540 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 591/622 places, 541/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60625 ms. Remains : 591/622 places, 541/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 541 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10079903184331234532.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9938131945467437264.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10079903184331234532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9938131945467437264.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8413581420832027283.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8413581420832027283.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8413581420832027283.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8413581420832027283.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8413581420832027283.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17469654145581636883.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 13:02:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9560002934094762222.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17469654145581636883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9560002934094762222.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 622/622 places, 572/572 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 126 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 126 transitions
Performed 126 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 126
Iterating post reduction 0 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 621 transition count 445
Reduce places removed 126 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 495 transition count 445
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 495 transition count 380
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 430 transition count 380
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 404 place count 408 transition count 358
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 408 transition count 358
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 408 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 392 transition count 342
Performed 158 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 158 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 316 rules applied. Total rules applied 774 place count 234 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 775 place count 234 transition count 183
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 777 place count 233 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 779 place count 231 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 229 transition count 180
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 229 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 783 place count 228 transition count 179
Applied a total of 783 rules in 49 ms. Remains 228 /622 variables (removed 394) and now considering 179/572 (removed 393) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 179 rows 228 cols
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Computed 89 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [214]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/622 places, 179/572 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 226 transition count 178
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 226 /227 variables (removed 1) and now considering 178/179 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 226 cols
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Computed 88 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 226/622 places, 178/572 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 414 ms. Remains : 226/622 places, 178/572 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
RANDOM walk for 15 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7603779040422371958.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1164002311360856348.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7603779040422371958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1164002311360856348.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5674071764996386644.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5674071764996386644.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5674071764996386644.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5674071764996386644.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5674071764996386644.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14309980755950500255.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 13:03:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14813170109854542114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14309980755950500255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14813170109854542114.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 135 ms
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 13:30:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 156 ms
[2025-06-05 13:30:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-06-05 13:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5464181140722446033.gal : 35 ms
[2025-06-05 13:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15953983366998371583.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5464181140722446033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15953983366998371583.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532900513"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;