About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldIIPt-PT-005B
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 663018.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | FFFFFFFFFFFTFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800500.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005B, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800500
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749126461785
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 12:27:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 12:27:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Transformed 353 places.
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Transformed 328 transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 353 places and 328 transitions and 816 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 42 out of 353 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 353/353 places, 328/328 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 310 transition count 285
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 310 transition count 285
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 309 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 309 transition count 284
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 308 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 308 transition count 283
Applied a total of 90 rules in 77 ms. Remains 308 /353 variables (removed 45) and now considering 283/328 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 283 rows 308 cols
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 275 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 239 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 542 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 282 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:27:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 18/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 283/591 variables, 308/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 4/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 2/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 1/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 1/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 2/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/591 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 282/282 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/308 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 49/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/308 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 283/591 variables, 308/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 282/686 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 20/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 19/725 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 7/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 5/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 591/591 variables, and 737 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 308/308 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 282/282 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 282 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 308/353 places, 283/328 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60736 ms. Remains : 308/353 places, 283/328 transitions.
Support contains 42 out of 308 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 12:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 283 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7438 steps (1 resets) in 333 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 0/36 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 82 stabilizing places and 82 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 63 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 63 transitions
Performed 63 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 63
Iterating post reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 307 transition count 219
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 244 transition count 219
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 244 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 210 transition count 185
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 202 place count 202 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 202 transition count 177
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 202 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 196 transition count 171
Performed 83 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 113 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 113 transition count 87
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 112 transition count 86
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 99 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 97 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 95 transition count 91
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 95 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 94 transition count 90
Applied a total of 423 rules in 60 ms. Remains 94 /308 variables (removed 214) and now considering 90/283 (removed 193) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [83]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/308 places, 90/283 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 92 transition count 89
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 92 /93 variables (removed 1) and now considering 89/90 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 92 cols
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/308 places, 89/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 269 ms. Remains : 92/308 places, 89/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 167 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-02 finished in 486 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(((p1&&X(X(X(F(p2)))))||G(F(p2))))||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 20 rules in 14 ms. Remains 298 /308 variables (removed 10) and now considering 273/283 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:28:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 4/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 4/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 46/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 19/681 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 13/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 6/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 571/571 variables, and 707 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60369 ms. Remains : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 212 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0), (AND (NOT p2) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 76 reset in 330 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1431 steps with 1 reset with depth 1181 and stack size 1181 in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-03 finished in 60952 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 62 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 62 transitions
Performed 62 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 62
Iterating post reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 307 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 245 transition count 220
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 245 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 210 transition count 185
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 201 place count 203 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 203 transition count 178
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 203 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 218 place count 198 transition count 173
Performed 84 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 84 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 168 rules applied. Total rules applied 386 place count 114 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 114 transition count 88
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 389 place count 113 transition count 87
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -9
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 99 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 97 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 95 transition count 94
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 95 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 94 transition count 93
Applied a total of 423 rules in 44 ms. Remains 94 /308 variables (removed 214) and now considering 93/283 (removed 190) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [83]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/308 places, 93/283 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 92 transition count 92
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 92 /93 variables (removed 1) and now considering 92/93 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 92 cols
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 92/308 places, 92/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 92/308 places, 92/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-04 finished in 326 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&F(p1)&&X(X(X(X(F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 296 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 296 transition count 271
Applied a total of 24 rules in 14 ms. Remains 296 /308 variables (removed 12) and now considering 271/283 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 296 cols
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 279 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 270 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:29:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 6/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 29788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 38/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 270/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 20/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/689 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 2/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 567/567 variables, and 696 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59838ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59841ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60134 ms. Remains : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6652 reset in 106 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6684 reset in 184 ms.
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Detected a total of 78/296 stabilizing places and 78/271 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 34 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (6 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 156 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 46 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 209 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 46 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 168 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:30:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 270/406/270 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 14 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Added : 230 causal constraints over 46 iterations in 1290 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 1 out of 296 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 296/296 places, 271/271 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 296 /296 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 270 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 6/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 29853 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 38/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 270/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 20/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/689 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 2/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 59893ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59894ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60163 ms. Remains : 296/296 places, 271/271 transitions.
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Detected a total of 78/296 stabilizing places and 78/271 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/1 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 68 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 77 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-06-05 12:31:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 46 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 205 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 46 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 167 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 12:31:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 270/406/270 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:31:52] [INFO ] Added : 230 causal constraints over 46 iterations in 1244 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6787 reset in 106 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6637 reset in 133 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 1 out of 296 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 296/296 places, 271/271 transitions.
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 296 transition count 271
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 296 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 296 transition count 287
Performed 98 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 178 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 296 transition count 287
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 296 transition count 286
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 257 transition count 247
Deduced a syphon composed of 139 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 257 transition count 247
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 140 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 257 transition count 247
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 255 transition count 245
Deduced a syphon composed of 138 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 255 transition count 245
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -104
Deduced a syphon composed of 157 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 255 transition count 349
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 300 place count 236 transition count 311
Deduced a syphon composed of 138 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 236 transition count 311
Deduced a syphon composed of 138 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 236 transition count 302
Deduced a syphon composed of 138 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 328 rules in 74 ms. Remains 236 /296 variables (removed 60) and now considering 302/271 (removed -31) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 301 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-05 12:31:53] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD271 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD272 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD274 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD279 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD283 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD284 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD286 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD289 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD290 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD295 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD296 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD297 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 111 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 201 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD291 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD292 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 301/537 variables, 236/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 64/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/538 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/538 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 538/538 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved in 9578 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 139/236 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 43/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 301/537 variables, 236/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 64/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 94/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 1/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/537 variables, 0/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/538 variables, 1/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/538 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 538/538 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/301 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39651ms problems are : Problem set: 207 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 207 dead transitions in 39652ms
Found 207 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 207 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 207 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/296 places, 95/271 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 349 edges and 236 vertex of which 98 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 138 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 138 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /236 variables (removed 138) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 98/296 places, 95/271 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39751 ms. Remains : 98/296 places, 95/271 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11358033410661516905
[2025-06-05 12:32:33] [INFO ] Built C files in 18ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11358033410661516905
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11358033410661516905;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 521 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11358033410661516905;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11358033410661516905;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8081016634937087251.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 168 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-05 finished in 167381 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(p0)&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 296 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 296 transition count 271
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 296 /308 variables (removed 12) and now considering 271/283 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 296 cols
[2025-06-05 12:32:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:32:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 270 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:32:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 6/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 38/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 270/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 20/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/689 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 2/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 567/567 variables, and 696 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60291 ms. Remains : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 124 reset in 178 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 120 steps with 0 reset with depth 121 and stack size 121 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-06 finished in 60656 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((p0 U (p1||G(p0)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 298 /308 variables (removed 10) and now considering 273/283 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 12:33:34] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:33:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 295 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:33:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/571 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 6/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 39/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/655 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/675 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 6/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/708 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60036ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60341 ms. Remains : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 119 reset in 189 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1776 steps with 2 reset with depth 154 and stack size 154 in 4 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-07 finished in 60684 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G((F((G(F(!p0))||(p1&&F(!p0))))&&F(G(p1)))) U p2))'
Support contains 4 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 307 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 247 transition count 222
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 247 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 213 transition count 188
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 205 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 205 transition count 180
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 205 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 199 transition count 174
Performed 82 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 82 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 82 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 164 rules applied. Total rules applied 380 place count 117 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 117 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 116 transition count 90
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 103 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 101 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 99 transition count 95
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 99 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 98 transition count 94
Applied a total of 415 rules in 35 ms. Remains 98 /308 variables (removed 210) and now considering 94/283 (removed 189) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [87]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/308 places, 94/283 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 96 transition count 93
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 96 /97 variables (removed 1) and now considering 93/94 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 96 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 96/308 places, 93/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 242 ms. Remains : 96/308 places, 93/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-09 finished in 416 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0) U (p1 U (p2||G(p1)))) U p3))'
Support contains 4 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 307 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 248 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 246 transition count 221
Performed 35 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 35 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 246 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 211 transition count 186
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 204 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 204 transition count 179
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 204 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 199 transition count 174
Performed 83 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 83 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 166 rules applied. Total rules applied 382 place count 116 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 116 transition count 90
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 385 place count 115 transition count 89
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -5
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 103 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 102 transition count 93
Applied a total of 410 rules in 28 ms. Remains 102 /308 variables (removed 206) and now considering 93/283 (removed 190) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [93, 94]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/308 places, 93/283 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 100 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 99 transition count 92
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /100 variables (removed 1) and now considering 92/93 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:35] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [87]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 98/308 places, 92/283 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 97 transition count 91
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 97 /98 variables (removed 1) and now considering 91/92 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 97 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 97/308 places, 91/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 319 ms. Remains : 97/308 places, 91/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-10 finished in 442 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||(((p1 U p2)||G(p3)) U (!p2&&X(!p4)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 296 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 296 transition count 271
Applied a total of 24 rules in 10 ms. Remains 296 /308 variables (removed 12) and now considering 271/283 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 296 cols
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 302 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 270 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:34:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 6/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/567 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 270/270 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/296 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 38/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 271/567 variables, 296/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 270/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 20/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/689 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 3/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 2/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 1/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60032ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 270 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60346 ms. Remains : 296/308 places, 271/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 399 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) p2) (AND (NOT p0) p4)), (AND (NOT p0) p4), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) p4), (AND (NOT p0) p4), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p4), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3) p4), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 233 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 156 ms.
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Computed a total of 78 stabilizing places and 78 stable transitions
Detected a total of 78/296 stabilizing places and 78/271 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 4/5 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p4)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p3 p4))), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p3))), (X (NOT p4)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3) p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p3))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p3 p4))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p4) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3 p4)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p3 p4))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p4))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p4))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p3 p4)))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT p4))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3) p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p3 p4)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p3 p4)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 p4) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3 p4))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p4)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p3) (G (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 49 factoid took 31 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 30 edges and 5 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-11 finished in 61194 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0||G((p1 U X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 20 rules in 7 ms. Remains 298 /308 variables (removed 10) and now considering 273/283 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 12:35:37] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:35:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 253 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:35:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 4/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 392 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 42/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/661 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/681 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 12/693 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 6/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
SMT process timed out in 60031ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60032ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60292 ms. Remains : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 195 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13 reset in 253 ms.
Computed a total of 79 stabilizing places and 79 stable transitions
Computed a total of 79 stabilizing places and 79 stable transitions
Detected a total of 79/298 stabilizing places and 79/273 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 17 factoid took 269 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 13 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 484 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 4/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 1/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 57 ms. (689 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 12:36:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 27/29 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 269/298 variables, 44/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/571 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 141 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 29/571 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 17 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/46 constraints, State Equation: 0/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 167ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2)))), (G (OR (NOT p2) p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p2) p0) (OR p0 (NOT p1))))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 702 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 13 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 121 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Support contains 2 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 273/273 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 297 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 238 transition count 213
Performed 39 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 39 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 238 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 39 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 199 transition count 174
Performed 84 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 84 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 168 rules applied. Total rules applied 364 place count 115 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 115 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 114 transition count 88
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -9
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 100 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 98 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 96 transition count 95
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 96 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 95 transition count 94
Applied a total of 401 rules in 22 ms. Remains 95 /298 variables (removed 203) and now considering 94/273 (removed 179) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 95 cols
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [84]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/298 places, 94/273 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 93 transition count 93
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 93 /94 variables (removed 1) and now considering 93/94 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 93 cols
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 12:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 93/298 places, 93/273 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 93/298 places, 93/273 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
Detected a total of 2/93 stabilizing places and 2/93 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 2/3 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 865 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 459 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 2/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 15053 steps (4 resets) in 26 ms. (557 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 1320 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-12 finished in 65797 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((X((G(p0)||(p0&&F(p1)))) U (X(G((G(p0)||(p0&&F(p1)))))||(p2&&X((G(p0)||(p0&&F(p1))))))) U (!p1 U p3))))'
Support contains 4 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 20 rules in 12 ms. Remains 298 /308 variables (removed 10) and now considering 273/283 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 12:36:43] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:36:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:36:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 17/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 396 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 46/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/664 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/684 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 17/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/707 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60047ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60302 ms. Remains : 298/308 places, 273/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 488 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 769 reset in 215 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 261 steps with 1 reset with depth 145 and stack size 145 in 1 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-13 finished in 61043 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 308 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 308/308 places, 283/283 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 297 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 297 transition count 272
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 297 /308 variables (removed 11) and now considering 272/283 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 297 cols
[2025-06-05 12:37:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 12:37:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:37:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 3/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 0/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 569/569 variables, and 383 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 271/651 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 20/671 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 19/690 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 6/696 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 5/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60037ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/308 places, 272/283 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60288 ms. Remains : 297/308 places, 272/283 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1345 steps with 0 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-LTLFireability-14 finished in 60420 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 661808 ms.
BK_STOP 1749127124803
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005B, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800500"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;