Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800497.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800497
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749122853899

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Transformed 353 places.
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Transformed 328 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 353 places and 328 transitions and 816 arcs in 200 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 100 out of 353 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 353/353 places, 328/328 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 325 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 325 transition count 300
Applied a total of 56 rules in 59 ms. Remains 325 /353 variables (removed 28) and now considering 300/328 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 325 cols
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 283 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 248 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 571 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 299 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:27:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/325 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 20/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 9/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 300/625 variables, 325/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 4/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 2/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 625/625 variables, and 434 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 325/325 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 299/299 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/325 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 63/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 300/625 variables, 325/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 299/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 20/754 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 19/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 5/778 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 12/790 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 625/625 variables, and 790 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 325/325 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 299/299 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 325/353 places, 300/328 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60768 ms. Remains : 325/353 places, 300/328 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 325 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 11:28:36] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 11:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:36] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 11:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
Support contains 85 out of 325 places (down from 100) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1594 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 4/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 176 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 119/129 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 196/325 variables, 29/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 300/625 variables, 325/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/625 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 625/625 variables, and 371 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 218 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 325/325 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 119/129 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 4/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 196/325 variables, 29/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 300/625 variables, 325/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 4/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 1/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 1/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/625 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/625 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 625/625 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1605 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 325/325 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 1828ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 125 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 325 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 325 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 254 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 252 transition count 226
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 252 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 225 transition count 199
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 211 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 211 transition count 185
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 211 transition count 177
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 203 transition count 177
Performed 84 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 84 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 84 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 168 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 119 transition count 93
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -8
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 106 transition count 101
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 106 transition count 100
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 106 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 446 place count 105 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 103 transition count 99
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 103 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 450 place count 102 transition count 98
Applied a total of 450 rules in 78 ms. Remains 102 /325 variables (removed 223) and now considering 98/300 (removed 202) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 102/325 places, 98/300 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 900 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-05 11:28:39] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/27 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 13/67 variables, 6/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 17/84 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/87 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 19/106 variables, 10/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 18/126 variables, 10/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 2/129 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 18/147 variables, 10/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 17/164 variables, 8/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 2/167 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (OVERLAPS) 16/183 variables, 10/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 9/192 variables, 4/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 56 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 58 (OVERLAPS) 6/200 variables, 4/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 60 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 61 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 160 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 44/44 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 17/27 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 13/67 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 17/84 variables, 8/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/85 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/87 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 19/106 variables, 10/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 18/126 variables, 10/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 2/129 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 18/147 variables, 10/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 4/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 17/164 variables, 8/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 3/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 1/165 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 2/167 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 16/183 variables, 10/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 4/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 9/192 variables, 4/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 56 (OVERLAPS) 1/194 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 58 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (OVERLAPS) 6/200 variables, 4/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 60 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 61 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 62 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 44/44 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 389ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 11 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 98/98 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 102 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 99 transition count 95
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 94
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 97 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 95 transition count 93
Applied a total of 12 rules in 13 ms. Remains 95 /102 variables (removed 7) and now considering 93/98 (removed 5) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 95/102 places, 93/98 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1606206 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=535 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1606206 steps, saw 970920 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=534 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 95 cols
[2025-06-05 11:28:42] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 6/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/10 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 14/24 variables, 10/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 22/46 variables, 12/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 6/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/188 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 60 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/44 constraints, State Equation: 22/95 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 66ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 11:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
Computed a total of 89 stabilizing places and 89 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 324 transition count 227
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 252 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 250 transition count 224
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 250 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 223 transition count 197
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 219 place count 207 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 207 transition count 181
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 207 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 199 transition count 173
Performed 79 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 79 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 409 place count 120 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 118 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 116 transition count 92
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 116 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 115 transition count 91
Applied a total of 415 rules in 35 ms. Remains 115 /325 variables (removed 210) and now considering 91/300 (removed 209) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 115 cols
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [100]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/325 places, 91/300 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 113 transition count 90
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 113 /114 variables (removed 1) and now considering 90/91 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/325 places, 90/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 113/325 places, 90/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5060533550712576832.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11720822239914964296.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5060533550712576832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11720822239914964296.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.59177e+16,0.113675,8888,2,423,5,22283,6,0,544,30467,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p122==0)&&((p56==0)||(p344==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p122==0)&&((p56==0)||(p344==1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/3/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.169954,9144,1,0,8,31541,19,3,2702,30467,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 300 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 300 transition count 275
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 54 rules in 23 ms. Remains 298 /325 variables (removed 27) and now considering 273/300 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 15/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 0/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/571 variables, 2/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 38/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/656 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/676 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 16/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 9/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60052ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60367 ms. Remains : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10654875643283387507.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11234321076296490806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10654875643283387507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11234321076296490806.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.45883e+28,18.4709,520444,2,4929,5,1.39247e+06,6,0,1467,3.86158e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((A(AG(((p151==0)||(p330==1))) U (p74!=1)) + EX(EG(((p227==0)||(p103==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((p74!=1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p151==0)||(p330==1)))))) * !((p74!=1)))) + EG(!((p...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...597
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9959081818696414666.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9959081818696414666.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9959081818696414666.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9959081818696414666.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9959081818696414666.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality670674526109078591.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5537300583529498313.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality670674526109078591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5537300583529498313.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.45883e+28,4.9232,127876,929,43,216258,513,607,605801,58,1391,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((A(AG(((i12.i0.u47.p151==0)||(i20.u104.p330==1))) U (i3.u22.p74!=1)) + EX(EG(((i15.i1.u72.p227==0)||(i4.u33.p103==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((i3.u22.p74!=1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i12.i0.u47.p151==0)||(i20.u104.p330==1)))))...272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t83, t127, t176, t219, i0.t193, i0.u20.t197, i1.t221, i1.i1.t217, i1.i1.u6.t224, i1.i1.u...1144
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 300 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 300 transition count 275
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 54 rules in 24 ms. Remains 298 /325 variables (removed 27) and now considering 273/300 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 11:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 3/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 11/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 40/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/677 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 19/696 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 5/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 2/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60047ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60371 ms. Remains : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2263669235455363543.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:31:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13789749212567705114.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2263669235455363543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13789749212567705114.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87464e+28,17.3326,480320,2,4741,5,1.29459e+06,6,0,1467,3.53564e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(!(A(EX(TRUE) U EF(((p138==0)||(p1==1)))))) * ((p2==0)||(p190==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p2==0)||(p190==1))) * !(EX(!(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((p138==0)||(p1==1)))) U (!(EX(TRUE)) * !(...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...591
(forward)formula 0,1,20.8141,480320,1,0,673,1.29459e+06,575,281,8432,3.53564e+06,664
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 324 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 253 transition count 225
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 251 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 250 transition count 224
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 250 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 225 transition count 199
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 215 place count 209 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 209 transition count 183
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 209 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 202 transition count 176
Performed 74 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 74 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 148 rules applied. Total rules applied 393 place count 128 transition count 102
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 395 place count 126 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 124 transition count 100
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 124 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 123 transition count 99
Applied a total of 399 rules in 53 ms. Remains 123 /325 variables (removed 202) and now considering 99/300 (removed 201) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [109]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/325 places, 99/300 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 121 transition count 98
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 121 /122 variables (removed 1) and now considering 98/99 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 121/325 places, 98/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 286 ms. Remains : 121/325 places, 98/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13370315866936355885.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14756438361728513776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13370315866936355885.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14756438361728513776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.82111e+17,0.184776,12488,2,641,5,35148,6,0,583,55057,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((EF((EG(((p179==0)||(p78==1))) + (p269==1))) * EF((AF(((p219==0)||(p294==1))) + (((p146==0)||(p213==1))&&(p27==0)))))) * EF((p130==0)...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG((E(TRUE U (EG(((p179==0)||(p78==1))) + (p269==1))) * E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(((p219==0)||(p294==1))))...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t10, t12, t26, t30, t32, t34, t36, t37, t40, t42, t45, t47, t49, t55, t56, t59, t...282
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16526943271517207037.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16526943271517207037.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16526943271517207037.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16526943271517207037.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16526943271517207037.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15555990379412954014.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5152132707488266454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15555990379412954014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5152132707488266454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.82111e+17,0.101996,8800,160,22,10514,201,334,20011,48,835,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((EF((EG(((i8.u23.p179==0)||(i4.i1.u9.p78==1))) + (i7.u34.p269==1))) * EF((AF(((i10.u27.p219==0)||(i13.i1.u36.p294==1))) + (((i6.u21.p...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * EG((E(TRUE U (EG(((i8.u23.p179==0)||(i4.i1.u9.p78==1))) + (i7.u34.p269==1))) * E(TRUE U (!(EG(!((...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t78, t80, t84, t87, t89, u35.t49, i0.u6.t30, i0.u8.t55, i1.i0.u3.t12, i1.i1.u2.t0, i1.i1.u7.t...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 70 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 70 transitions
Performed 70 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 70
Iterating post reduction 0 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 324 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 254 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 252 transition count 225
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 251 transition count 225
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 251 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 223 transition count 197
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 217 place count 209 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 209 transition count 183
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 209 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 201 transition count 175
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 399 place count 125 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 123 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 121 transition count 97
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 121 transition count 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 120 transition count 96
Applied a total of 405 rules in 31 ms. Remains 120 /325 variables (removed 205) and now considering 96/300 (removed 204) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [104]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/325 places, 96/300 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 118 transition count 95
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 118 /119 variables (removed 1) and now considering 95/96 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 118/325 places, 95/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 271 ms. Remains : 118/325 places, 95/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11318007336695791441.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15851670660423912456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11318007336695791441.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15851670660423912456.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30142e+17,0.297661,17840,2,469,5,55924,6,0,566,96231,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(EG(E(((p304==1)&&((p203==0)||(p14==1))) U ((p127==1)||(p154==0))))) U (p328==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(E(((p304==1)&&((p203==0)||(p14==1))) U ((p127==1)||(p154==0)))))) * (p328==1))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t7, t9, t22, t24, t27, t29, t31, t32, t35, t37, t39, t54, t56, t58, t66, ...268
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph984750623305241012.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph984750623305241012.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph984750623305241012.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph984750623305241012.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph984750623305241012.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6618046656860008355.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:33:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6794826808050228022.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6618046656860008355.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6794826808050228022.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30142e+17,0.203202,13268,128,32,18581,183,284,47652,46,898,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(EG(E(((i12.i1.u37.p304==1)&&((i9.u25.p203==0)||(i0.u1.p14==1))) U ((i5.u16.p127==1)||(i6.u18.p154==0))))) U (i13.u38.p328==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(E(((i12.i1.u37.p304==1)&&((i9.u25.p203==0)||(i0.u1.p14==1))) U ((i5.u16.p127==1)||(i6.u18.p154=...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t66, t75, t87, u26.t58, i0.u1.t9, i0.u3.t0, i0.u7.t29, i1.u5.t24, i2.u6.t27, i2.u8.t54, i3.u1...394
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 306 transition count 281
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 306 transition count 281
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 305 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 305 transition count 280
Applied a total of 40 rules in 10 ms. Remains 305 /325 variables (removed 20) and now considering 280/300 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 280 rows 305 cols
[2025-06-05 11:34:06] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 279 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:34:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 19/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 280/585 variables, 305/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 4/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 4/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 4/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 1.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 1.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 1.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 timeout
0.0)
(s205 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 1/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 585/585 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/304 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/305 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 55/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 280/585 variables, 305/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 279/688 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 20/708 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 12/720 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 8/728 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/585 variables, 1/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 585/585 variables, and 730 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 279/279 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 279 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/325 places, 280/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60323 ms. Remains : 305/325 places, 280/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 280 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3091833328781352014.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15001941470858009956.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3091833328781352014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15001941470858009956.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09387e+29,27.5675,763272,2,7329,5,1.95007e+06,6,0,1502,5.73058e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8787813903284915523.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8787813903284915523.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8787813903284915523.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8787813903284915523.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8787813903284915523.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7218777774592548768.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:35:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16123796637368000210.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7218777774592548768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16123796637368000210.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09387e+29,3.85168,115808,1133,43,176260,447,660,713777,58,1113,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(E(((AF((i7.i0.u27.p80==0)) + (E((i7.i1.u43.p125==0) U (i6.i0.u31.p93==0)) * AX(((i2.i4.u24.p69==0)||(i13.i0.u72.p216==1))))) * ((AX((i...677
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!((i15.u88.p268==1)) U (!(!((E(TRUE U (i16.i1.u95.p288==0)) * !((((i6.i2.u41....1976
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t90, t178, t228, i0.t78, i0.u81.t83, i0.u82.t79, i0.u82.t85, i1.i0.u8.t230, i1.i1.t213, ...1290
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 297 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 297 transition count 272
Applied a total of 56 rules in 16 ms. Remains 297 /325 variables (removed 28) and now considering 272/300 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 297 cols
[2025-06-05 11:36:07] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:36:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:36:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 15/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 4/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 569/569 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 44/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 271/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 20/678 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 14/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 7/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 6/705 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/707 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 569/569 variables, and 707 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60321 ms. Remains : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16632806527432382391.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14337038358230203422.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16632806527432382391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14337038358230203422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.80598e+28,17.8874,499684,2,4734,5,1.34832e+06,6,0,1462,3.68007e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(AX((p257==1))) * (p74==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(!(EX(!((p257==1))))))) * (p74==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...591
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4875940490156938433.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4875940490156938433.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875940490156938433.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4875940490156938433.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875940490156938433.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5472078951311522337.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:37:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9223707762014967120.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5472078951311522337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9223707762014967120.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.80598e+28,1.49326,56852,886,43,94800,413,625,278594,58,1024,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(AX((i13.i1.u81.p257==1))) * (i1.i2.u24.p74==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i13.i1.u81.p257==1))))))) * (i1.i2.u24.p74==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t87, t131, t175, t220, i0.i0.u2.t224, i0.i2.t192, i0.i2.u21.t196, i1.t216, i1.i0.u11.t21...1139
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Applied a total of 52 rules in 6 ms. Remains 299 /325 variables (removed 26) and now considering 274/300 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 299 cols
[2025-06-05 11:38:07] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:38:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 273 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:38:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 274/573 variables, 299/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 2/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 573/573 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 299/299 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 273/273 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/299 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 41/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 3/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 274/573 variables, 299/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 273/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 20/682 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 10/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 5/697 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 7/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 5/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/573 variables, 1/710 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 573/573 variables, and 710 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 299/299 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 273/273 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 273 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 299/325 places, 274/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60308 ms. Remains : 299/325 places, 274/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:39:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 274 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:39:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10581840372801058319.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality797024248189050498.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10581840372801058319.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality797024248189050498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71264e+28,15.6216,452928,2,4706,5,1.24127e+06,6,0,1472,3.33366e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((AF(((p84==1)&&((p25==0)||(p245==1)))) * AX((p228==0))) * (((p72==0)||(p339==1)) * (((EG((p192==0)) + A(!(((p319==0)||(p352==1))) U (...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY(Init),!(((p84==1)&&((p25==0)||(p245==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(EY(Init)) * !((p228==0)))] = FALSE) * ([(...462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t14, t18, t22, t27, t31, t35, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57, t62, t66,...592
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6851080986021047365.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6851080986021047365.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6851080986021047365.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6851080986021047365.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6851080986021047365.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10316220175282753426.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:39:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7315915740823421696.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10316220175282753426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7315915740823421696.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.71264e+28,3.02838,100864,759,29,157964,377,622,644339,51,918,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((AF(((i7.i0.u27.p84==1)&&((i3.i0.u8.p25==0)||(i14.u75.p245==1)))) * AX((i13.i0.u72.p228==0))) * (((i4.i3.u23.p72==0)||(i19.u105.p339=...413
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY(Init),!(((i7.i0.u27.p84==1)&&((i3.i0.u8.p25==0)||(i14.u75.p245==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(...656
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t90, t178, t222, i0.t167, i0.u35.t171, i1.t194, i1.u21.t198, i2.t211, i2.u12.t215, i3.i0...1140
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 297 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 297 transition count 272
Applied a total of 56 rules in 11 ms. Remains 297 /325 variables (removed 28) and now considering 272/300 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 297 cols
[2025-06-05 11:40:08] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:40:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:40:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 5/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 0/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 569/569 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 37/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 271/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 20/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 17/689 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 4/693 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 2/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 3/698 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60036ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60334 ms. Remains : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12360668372882511153.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14989148741953748764.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12360668372882511153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14989148741953748764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.28945e+28,15.4355,445512,2,4577,5,1.23158e+06,6,0,1462,3.28216e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX(((p328==0)&&(p132==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX(((p328==0)&&(p132==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t27, t32, t36, t37, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t46, t47, t51, t55, t60, t64,...585
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10061488545021714566.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10061488545021714566.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10061488545021714566.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10061488545021714566.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10061488545021714566.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17093546058082260624.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:41:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11639219690621464508.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17093546058082260624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11639219690621464508.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.28945e+28,1.28801,47632,896,29,84031,396,613,198200,50,1044,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(EF(EX(((i19.u101.p328==0)&&(i7.u41.p132==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U EX(((i19.u101.p328==0)&&(i7.u41.p132==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t84, t132, t176, t216, t218, i0.i0.u94.t46, i0.i1.t36, i0.i1.t37, i1.i1.u2.t224, i1.i1.u...1122
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 297 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 297 transition count 272
Applied a total of 56 rules in 19 ms. Remains 297 /325 variables (removed 28) and now considering 272/300 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 297 cols
[2025-06-05 11:42:08] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:42:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:42:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 1/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 0/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 569/569 variables, and 385 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/297 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 272/569 variables, 297/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 271/653 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 20/673 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 14/687 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 7/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 5/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/569 variables, 3/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60033ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60308 ms. Remains : 297/325 places, 272/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17614351192043584916.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10333284853804623650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17614351192043584916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10333284853804623650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.88691e+28,15.5387,445936,2,4580,5,1.22853e+06,6,0,1462,3.27606e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(AG(((p128==0)||(p321==1)))) + EG((p85==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((p85==0))))),TRUE) * !(((p128==0)||(p321==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t32, t36, t37, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t46, t47, t51, t55, t60, t64,...585
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8134698883647308474.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8134698883647308474.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8134698883647308474.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8134698883647308474.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8134698883647308474.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality926395405273346485.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:43:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10361756153559912300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality926395405273346485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10361756153559912300.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.88691e+28,0.821239,33160,882,29,56780,401,606,139363,47,1053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX(AG(((i7.u40.p128==0)||(i19.u101.p321==1)))) + EG((i6.i0.u27.p85==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((i6.i0.u27.p85==0))))),TRUE) * !(((i7.u40.p128==0)||(i19.u101.p321==1))))] = F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t84, t132, t176, t218, t220, i0.i0.u93.t46, i0.i1.t36, i0.i1.t37, i1.i1.u2.t224, i1.i1.u...1129
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 300 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 300 transition count 275
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 299 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 299 transition count 274
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 298 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 298 transition count 273
Applied a total of 54 rules in 20 ms. Remains 298 /325 variables (removed 27) and now considering 273/300 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-05 11:44:09] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:44:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:44:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 13/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 6/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 0/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/571 variables, 0/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 385 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved in 28325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 272/272 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 35/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 273/571 variables, 298/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 272/653 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 20/673 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 19/692 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 7/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 4/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 1/704 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 58348ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 272 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58350ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58638 ms. Remains : 298/325 places, 273/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2974203411114763045.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18214133428544060264.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2974203411114763045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18214133428544060264.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.88362e+28,18.8168,519516,2,4640,5,1.38513e+06,6,0,1467,3.8668e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(!(A((((p283==1)||(p221==0))||(p146==1)) U EX(((p3==0)||(p184==1)))))) * (p26==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(!(!((E(!(EX(((p3==0)||(p184==1)))) U (!((((p283==1)||(p221==0))||(p146==1))) * !(EX(((p3==0)||(...229
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t51, t56, t60, t64,...591
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:45:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17431400941463798398.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17431400941463798398.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17431400941463798398.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17431400941463798398.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17431400941463798398.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:45:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:45:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:45:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:45:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18095920308142425287.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:45:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4547808528894539452.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18095920308142425287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4547808528894539452.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.88362e+28,1.64243,50440,817,29,82127,383,610,243862,47,1114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(!(A((((i13.i3.u90.p283==1)||(i13.i1.u71.p221==0))||(i9.i0.u46.p146==1)) U EX(((i2.i2.u1.p3==0)||(i8.i1.u61.p184==1)))))) * (i2.i0....167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(!(!((E(!(EX(((i2.i2.u1.p3==0)||(i8.i1.u61.p184==1)))) U (!((((i13.i3.u90.p283==1)||(i13.i1.u71....327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t88, t133, t173, t219, t221, i0.t217, i0.i0.u10.t218, i0.i1.u6.t224, i0.i2.t188, i0.i2.u...1126
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 325/325 places, 300/300 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 300 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 300 transition count 275
Applied a total of 50 rules in 16 ms. Remains 300 /325 variables (removed 25) and now considering 275/300 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 275 rows 300 cols
[2025-06-05 11:46:08] [INFO ] Computed 46 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 11:46:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 183 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 274 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:46:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/300 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 14/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 275/575 variables, 300/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 2/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 2/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 7/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 0/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 575/575 variables, and 392 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 300/300 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 274/274 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/300 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 39/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 275/575 variables, 300/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 274/659 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 20/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 16/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 6/701 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 5/706 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 11:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 5/711 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 7/718 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 575/575 variables, and 718 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/46 constraints, State Equation: 300/300 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 274/274 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 274 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 300/325 places, 275/300 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60336 ms. Remains : 300/325 places, 275/300 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 275 transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15342806059597217826.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5789895638077015264.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15342806059597217826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5789895638077015264.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33618e+28,20.7312,574268,2,5361,5,1.52196e+06,6,0,1477,4.30398e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(EF((((p229==0)&&(p43==1))||(p312==0)))) + A(A(EX((p212==1)) U ((p84!=0)&&(p300==1))) U AX(!(((p145==1)||(p330==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((p229==0)&&(p43==1))||(p312==0)))))) + !((E(!(!(EX(!(!(((p145==1)||(p330==1)...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t12, t17, t21, t26, t30, t34, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t52, t56, t61, t65,...604
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1279631867838969107.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1279631867838969107.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1279631867838969107.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1279631867838969107.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1279631867838969107.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8742668521513893012.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:47:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12989511061239544477.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8742668521513893012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12989511061239544477.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33618e+28,2.11558,66568,803,30,107401,375,627,321150,53,978,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(EF((((i15.i0.u72.p229==0)&&(i2.u14.p43==1))||(i18.u99.p312==0)))) + A(A(EX((i9.i2.u65.p212==1)) U ((i7.i1.u27.p84!=0)&&(i19.i0.u93...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((i15.i0.u72.p229==0)&&(i2.u14.p43==1))||(i18.u99.p312==0)))))) + !((E(!(!(EX...546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t89, t134, t179, t219, t221, i0.i0.u2.t227, i0.i0.u10.t222, i0.i1.t195, i0.i1.u20.t199, ...1166
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13237922147738871802.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13237922147738871802.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13237922147738871802.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13237922147738871802.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13237922147738871802.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14998586645529060916.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 11:48:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10292702142597742623.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14998586645529060916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10292702142597742623.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14676e+29,6.70717,158700,1434,40,246327,553,680,824275,58,1586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((A(AG(((i9.i1.u56.p151==0)||(i16.u117.p330==1))) U (i2.u25.p74!=1)) + EX(EG(((i13.i1.u83.p227==0)||(i5.u39.p103==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((i2.u25.p74!=1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i9.i1.u56.p151==0)||(i16.u117.p330==1))))))...271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t94, t149, t194, t244, i0.i1.t217, i0.i1.t223, i0.i1.u22.t221, i0.i2.u2.t252, i1.i0.u11....1511
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16393936080772600458.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 12:14:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15997802998613804005.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16393936080772600458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15997802998613804005.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.14676e+29,513.646,13251368,3091,327,2.21818e+07,764,396,1.16509e+08,129,7253,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((A(AG(((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u103.p151==0)||(i1.i0.u89.p330==1))) U (i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u22.p74!=1)) + EX(EG(((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0....213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u22.p74!=1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u103.p151=...363
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.t252, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u22.t206, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u22.t207, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u22.t21...2854

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800497"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;