Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800482.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800482
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 496K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749118944041

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 73 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Transformed 283 places.
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Transformed 263 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 283 places and 263 transitions and 654 arcs in 162 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 111 out of 283 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 283/283 places, 263/263 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 261 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 261 transition count 241
Applied a total of 44 rules in 37 ms. Remains 261 /283 variables (removed 22) and now considering 241/263 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 261 cols
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 28 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 243 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 462 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 144 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 18/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 241/502 variables, 261/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 1/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/502 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 502/502 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 52/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 241/502 variables, 261/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 240/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 20/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 9/623 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 6/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 502/502 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60109ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/283 places, 241/263 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60626 ms. Remains : 261/283 places, 241/263 transitions.
Support contains 111 out of 261 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
Support contains 110 out of 261 places (down from 111) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 81 to 80
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1127 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 4/80 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 64 ms. (615 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 36668 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (572 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
Computed a total of 71 stabilizing places and 71 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 242 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 42 rules in 28 ms. Remains 240 /261 variables (removed 21) and now considering 220/241 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 9/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 38/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 8/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 573 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60291 ms. Remains : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13984298633127048025.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6895115281859924162.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13984298633127048025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6895115281859924162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28015e+23,9.17591,279020,2,3621,5,781743,6,0,1182,2.02108e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX(AF((p182==1)))) * ((AG(AX(((p160==0)||(p162==0)))) + AX((p88==0))) + (AX(((p105==0)&&((p15==0)||(p69==0)))) + A(A(!(((p147==1)&&(p...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(EX(!(EG(!((p182==1))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((p160==0)||(p162==0))...503
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t17, t22, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...512
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8138941587788634133.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8138941587788634133.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8138941587788634133.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8138941587788634133.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8138941587788634133.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5262829899403176729.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3122721191954605719.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5262829899403176729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3122721191954605719.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28015e+23,1.27402,42616,616,29,62504,312,544,225805,49,736,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX(AF((i9.i1.u59.p182==1)))) * ((AG(AX(((i9.i0.u50.p160==0)||(i9.i0.u50.p162==0)))) + AX((i5.i0.u29.p88==0))) + (AX(((i6.u33.p105==0)...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(EX(!(EG(!((i9.i1.u59.p182==1))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i9.i0.u50....677
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t43, t88, t133, t173, i0.t177, i0.i0.u7.t179, i0.i1.t175, i0.i1.u6.t180, i0.i1.u9.t176, ...963
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 42 rules in 7 ms. Remains 240 /261 variables (removed 21) and now considering 220/241 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:25:27] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:25:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:25:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 8/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 29394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 35/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 8/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 575 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 59428ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59429ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59650 ms. Remains : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14192397630554585058.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17915030163838506066.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14192397630554585058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17915030163838506066.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23649e+23,7.90135,243572,2,3630,5,691920,6,0,1182,1.74335e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((!(A(EF((p106==1)) U AF((p174==1)))) * (p95==0)) * ((p240==0)&&(p16==0))) * !(E((p186==1) U ((p160==1)&&(p162==1)))))) * AF((((p197...292
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((p174==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((p174==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (p106==1))) * !(!(EG...555
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t33, t39, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t52, t56, t61, t65,...502
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3322226612312082637.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3322226612312082637.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3322226612312082637.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3322226612312082637.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3322226612312082637.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13312894312167096316.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15936423711857589131.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13312894312167096316.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15936423711857589131.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23649e+23,0.719008,31712,681,29,47724,257,540,156170,48,742,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((!(A(EF((i6.u32.p106==1)) U AF((i11.u54.p174==1)))) * (i5.i1.u30.p95==0)) * ((i12.u76.p240==0)&&(i0.i1.u6.p16==0))) * !(E((i8.i1.u5...461
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((i11.u54.p174==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((i11.u54.p174==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (i6....760
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t89, t133, t177, i0.t175, i0.i1.t173, i0.i1.u6.t180, i0.i1.u10.t174, i0.i2.u1.t181, i0.i...925
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 218
Applied a total of 46 rules in 21 ms. Remains 238 /261 variables (removed 23) and now considering 218/241 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 10:27:27] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:27:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:27:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 34/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 217/526 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 8/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 9/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 6/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 1)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 1)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 1)
(s23 1)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 1)
(s28 1)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 1)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 1)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 1)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 1)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 1)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 1)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 1)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 1)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 1)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 1)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 1)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 1)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 1)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 1)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 1)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 1)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 1)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/456 variables, and 573 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/261 places, 218/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60264 ms. Remains : 238/261 places, 218/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13754194707703489736.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8970574414303539582.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13754194707703489736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8970574414303539582.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11772e+23,8.62376,255600,2,3674,5,713488,6,0,1172,1.82932e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((p151==1)) U EG((p102!=1))) + (A(AF(AG((p82==1))) U EG(((EF((p265==1)) + ((p37==1)&&(p151==1))) + AF((p266==1))))) * AF((((p266==1)...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG((p102!=1))) U (!(EX((p151==1))) * !(EG((p102!=1))))) + EG(!(EG((p102!=1)))))))),!(...769
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1557348739249656566.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1557348739249656566.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1557348739249656566.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1557348739249656566.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1557348739249656566.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14575540180721669275.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3446221197217954002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14575540180721669275.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3446221197217954002.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11772e+23,2.15496,64348,857,43,104605,523,562,292141,56,1184,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((i9.i1.u49.p151==1)) U EG((i5.u32.p102!=1))) + (A(AF(AG((i7.i1.u26.p82==1))) U EG(((EF((i13.i1.u85.p265==1)) + ((i3.u13.p37==1)&&(i...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG((i5.u32.p102!=1))) U (!(EX((i9.i1.u49.p151==1))) * !(EG((i5.u32.p102!=1))))) + EG(...1038
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t42, t86, t131, t173, t175, i0.i1.t171, i0.i1.u6.t178, i0.i1.u10.t172, i0.i2.t142, i0.i2...928
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 260 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 205 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 204 transition count 183
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 204 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 182 transition count 161
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 165 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 165 transition count 144
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 165 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 152 transition count 131
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 95 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 93 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 91 transition count 72
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 91 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 90 transition count 71
Applied a total of 337 rules in 45 ms. Remains 90 /261 variables (removed 171) and now considering 71/241 (removed 170) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-05 10:29:27] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [76]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/261 places, 71/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 88 transition count 70
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 88 /89 variables (removed 1) and now considering 70/71 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/261 places, 70/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 214 ms. Remains : 88/261 places, 70/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 7 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16091652525645800139.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9360894241870715580.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16091652525645800139.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9360894241870715580.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 248 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 248 transition count 228
Applied a total of 26 rules in 7 ms. Remains 248 /261 variables (removed 13) and now considering 228/241 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 248 cols
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:29:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 14/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 228/476 variables, 248/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/476 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 476/476 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 25870 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 248/248 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/247 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/248 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 43/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/248 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 228/476 variables, 248/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 227/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 20/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 6/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 2/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 1/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 3/593 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 55903ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55904ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 248/261 places, 228/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56102 ms. Remains : 248/261 places, 228/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1189752449199143045.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11908931121923639956.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1189752449199143045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11908931121923639956.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12355e+23,13.8411,398876,2,5270,5,1.0379e+06,6,0,1222,2.96444e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((((p160==0)||(p162==0)) + (!(A((p275==1) U ((p63==1)||((p86==1)&&(p119==1))))) + AG((((p181==1)&&(p268==1))&&(p54==0))))) + (((AG(E(...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * !(EG(((((p160==0)||(p162==0)) + (!(!((E(!(((p63==1)||((p86==1)&&(p119==1)))) U (!((p275==1)) * !...492
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t12, t13, t17, t22, t24, t27, t31, t36, t37, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50,...562
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7661625566582035573.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7661625566582035573.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7661625566582035573.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7661625566582035573.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7661625566582035573.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15510117233045077291.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3461406178155600705.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15510117233045077291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3461406178155600705.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12355e+23,1.83369,58552,910,30,91183,330,577,311939,54,1000,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((((i10.i0.u54.p160==0)||(i10.i0.u54.p162==0)) + (!(A((i13.u96.p275==1) U ((i1.u22.p63==1)||((i8.i1.u31.p86==1)&&(i6.i1.u39.p119==1))...482
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * !(EG(((((i10.i0.u54.p160==0)||(i10.i0.u54.p162==0)) + (!(!((E(!(((i1.u22.p63==1)||((i8.i1.u31.p8...723
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t94, t139, t183, i0.i1.u2.t189, i0.i1.u10.t184, i1.t162, i1.u20.t161, i1.u21.t157, i1.u2...1065
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 242 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 42 rules in 10 ms. Remains 240 /261 variables (removed 21) and now considering 220/241 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 20629 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 29/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 11/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 8/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 574 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 50656ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50657ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50863 ms. Remains : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8764729428697581942.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17267441626739567871.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8764729428697581942.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17267441626739567871.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27362e+23,10.4225,304476,2,4229,5,836035,6,0,1182,2.21894e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(AG(E((p151!=1) U (p142==1)))) U !((((((p226==1)||((p224==1)&&(p257==1)))&&((p20==1)||((p92==1)&&(p131==1))))||(((p60==1)&&(p186==1))...356
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E((p151!=1) U (p142==1)))))) U !((((((p226==1)||((p224==1)&&(p257==1)))&&((p20...1033
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t50, t55, t59, t63,...507
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17790235055646420276.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17790235055646420276.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17790235055646420276.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17790235055646420276.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17790235055646420276.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4919418126814584268.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8158975158291041401.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4919418126814584268.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8158975158291041401.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27362e+23,0.931092,35828,658,29,59682,336,530,160498,49,890,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(AG(E((i10.i1.u49.p151!=1) U (i9.u46.p142==1)))) U !((((((i14.i0.u74.p226==1)||((i14.i1.u73.p224==1)&&(i14.i2.u82.p257==1)))&&((i1.i0...590
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E((i10.i1.u49.p151!=1) U (i9.u46.p142==1)))))) U !((((((i14.i0.u74.p226==1)||(...1620
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t87, t128, t175, t177, i0.i1.u2.t181, i0.i1.u9.t176, i1.i0.u7.t179, i1.i1.t158, i1.i1.t1...941
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 55 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 55 transitions
Performed 55 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 55
Iterating post reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 260 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 55 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 205 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 204 transition count 183
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 204 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 182 transition count 161
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 166 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 166 transition count 145
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 166 transition count 133
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 154 transition count 133
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 94 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 92 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 90 transition count 71
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 90 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 89 transition count 70
Applied a total of 339 rules in 34 ms. Remains 89 /261 variables (removed 172) and now considering 70/241 (removed 171) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 89 cols
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 88/261 places, 70/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 87 transition count 69
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 87 /88 variables (removed 1) and now considering 69/70 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 87 cols
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/261 places, 69/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 87/261 places, 69/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 770 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (128 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9824394738984781540.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5848092384348390789.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9824394738984781540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5848092384348390789.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 217
Applied a total of 48 rules in 12 ms. Remains 237 /261 variables (removed 24) and now considering 217/241 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 237 cols
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/454 variables, 237/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/454 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 454/454 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 34/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 217/454 variables, 237/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 216/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 12/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 454/454 variables, and 578 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 60028ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60028ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/261 places, 217/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60236 ms. Remains : 237/261 places, 217/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13962842235001248202.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14981355600861805577.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13962842235001248202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14981355600861805577.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.84081e+22,8.01738,238364,2,3480,5,675767,6,0,1167,1.69148e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX((EG((p11==0)) * (p176==0))) + (p185==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(EY(Init)) * (p176==0)),(p11==0))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (p185==1))] != FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 215/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,10.6192,238364,1,0,93,675767,20,4,5441,1.69148e+06,91
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 218
Applied a total of 46 rules in 21 ms. Remains 238 /261 variables (removed 23) and now considering 218/241 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 10:34:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:34:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:34:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 27417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 30/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 217/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 11/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 8/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 9/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/456 variables, and 583 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 57445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57445ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/261 places, 218/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57671 ms. Remains : 238/261 places, 218/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability140202251672949470.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6502824878005560934.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability140202251672949470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6502824878005560934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11213e+23,8.61767,251148,2,3639,5,707290,6,0,1172,1.7873e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EX(A(((p104==1)&&(p163==1)) U (p61==1)))) + EG(!(E((p147==1) U (p2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((p61==1)) U (!(((p104==1)&&(p163==1))) * !((p61==1)))) + EG(!((p61==1))))))))))] ...218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15759319707803935751.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15759319707803935751.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15759319707803935751.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15759319707803935751.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15759319707803935751.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4459103744687458245.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17056112231964801809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4459103744687458245.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17056112231964801809.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11213e+23,1.18925,42676,681,29,64409,312,531,229982,49,766,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(EX(A(((i8.u35.p104==1)&&(i10.i1.u54.p163==1)) U (i2.u20.p61==1)))) + EG(!(E((i10.i0.u48.p147==1) U (i5.i0.u1.p2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX(!((E(!((i2.u20.p61==1)) U (!(((i8.u35.p104==1)&&(i10.i1.u54.p163==1))) * !((i2.u20.p61==...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t86, t130, t175, i0.t29, i0.t25, i1.i0.u52.t88, i1.i1.t67, i1.i1.t71, i2.t146, i2.u19.t1...928
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 260 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 212 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 211 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 209 transition count 188
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 209 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 187 transition count 166
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 171 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 171 transition count 150
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 171 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 159 transition count 138
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 102 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 100 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 98 transition count 79
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 98 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 97 transition count 78
Applied a total of 323 rules in 36 ms. Remains 97 /261 variables (removed 164) and now considering 78/241 (removed 163) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 97 cols
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [81]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/261 places, 78/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 95 /96 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 95 cols
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/261 places, 77/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 202 ms. Remains : 95/261 places, 77/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8593431732682142590.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18222599691777858696.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8593431732682142590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18222599691777858696.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.96651e+13,0.142193,10520,2,463,5,28757,6,0,458,42841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((E(((p270==1) + AG((p117!=1))) U AF(((p36==1)||(p29==1)))) + (p65==1)) U (((p96==1)&&(p109==1))&&(p143==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((p96==1)&&(p109==1))&&(p143==1)))))) * !(E(!((((p96==1)&&(p109==1))&&(p143==1))) U (!((E(((p2...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t6, t9, t21, t24, t28, t30, t32, t34, t36, t39, t41, t43, t45, t48, t50, t62,...259
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9073015284430232360.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9073015284430232360.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9073015284430232360.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9073015284430232360.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9073015284430232360.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15581894656133391425.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7012737957078263377.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15581894656133391425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7012737957078263377.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.96651e+13,0.057216,6596,115,25,5721,157,243,9281,52,827,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((E(((i13.u30.p270==1) + AG((i5.u15.p117!=1))) U AF(((i3.u6.p36==1)||(i6.u4.p29==1)))) + (i2.u9.p65==1)) U (((i3.u12.p96==1)&&(i10.u14.p...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i3.u12.p96==1)&&(i10.u14.p109==1))&&(i7.u17.p143==1)))))) * !(E(!((((i3.u12.p96==1)&&(i10.u1...390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t65, i0.u8.t43, i1.u2.t0, i1.u7.t24, i2.u9.t21, i2.u9.t62, i3.u5.t41, i4.u24.t32, i5.u11.t1, ...399
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 261 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 208 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 207 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 206 transition count 185
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 206 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 184 transition count 163
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 168 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 168 transition count 147
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 168 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 156 transition count 135
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 99 transition count 78
Applied a total of 325 rules in 33 ms. Remains 99 /261 variables (removed 162) and now considering 78/241 (removed 163) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-05 10:37:24] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [88, 89]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/261 places, 78/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 97 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 96 transition count 77
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 96 /97 variables (removed 1) and now considering 77/78 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 96 cols
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 95/261 places, 77/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 94 transition count 76
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /95 variables (removed 1) and now considering 76/77 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 94/261 places, 76/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 94/261 places, 76/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2588337323163292160.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6972195673146483829.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2588337323163292160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6972195673146483829.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.8882e+13,0.337224,19112,2,448,5,55713,6,0,454,109737,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((E((EF(EG(((p160==1)&&(p162==1)))) + EG(!(((p6==1)&&(p25==1))))) U AF((p170!=1))) + (p1==1)) U ((p97==1)&&(p195==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((p97==1)&&(p195==1)))))) * !(E(!(((p97==1)&&(p195==1))) U (!((E((E(TRUE U EG(((p160==1)&&(p162...268
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t5, t18, t21, t23, t25, t39, t41, t43, t48, t54, t59, t62, t66, t68, t71, Intersection w...238
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10805236464449022130.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10805236464449022130.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10805236464449022130.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10805236464449022130.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10805236464449022130.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15592535473003117888.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9248119555721043532.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15592535473003117888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9248119555721043532.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.8882e+13,0.090753,7640,122,22,7616,180,261,14968,45,856,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((E((EF(EG(((i9.u19.p160==1)&&(i9.u19.p162==1)))) + EG(!(((i1.u1.p6==1)&&(i1.u4.p25==1))))) U AF((i9.u22.p170!=1))) + (i10.i0.u0.p1==1))...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((i8.u13.p97==1)&&(i8.u25.p195==1)))))) * !(E(!(((i8.u13.p97==1)&&(i8.u25.p195==1))) U (!((E((E...353
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t54, t59, t62, t66, t68, u9.t21, i1.u4.t5, i1.u8.t41, i2.u16.t25, i3.u3.t0, i3.u7.t18, i4.u6....306
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 260 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 208 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 207 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 206 transition count 185
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 206 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 184 transition count 163
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 168 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 168 transition count 147
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 168 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 156 transition count 135
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 96 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 94 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 92 transition count 73
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 92 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 91 transition count 72
Applied a total of 335 rules in 24 ms. Remains 91 /261 variables (removed 170) and now considering 72/241 (removed 169) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [77]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/261 places, 72/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 89 transition count 71
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 89 /90 variables (removed 1) and now considering 71/72 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 89 cols
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/261 places, 71/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 183 ms. Remains : 89/261 places, 71/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16576068145908751408.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13342771324495535670.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16576068145908751408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13342771324495535670.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.13457e+13,0.064797,6576,2,265,5,12868,6,0,430,16230,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(AG(EF((p125==1)))) U EG(A(EG((p88==1)) U (p209!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((E(!((p209!=1)) U (!(EG((p88==1))) * !((p209!=1)))) + EG(!((p209!=1)))))))) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE...387
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 68/0/3
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1335254515064699883.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1335254515064699883.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1335254515064699883.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1335254515064699883.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1335254515064699883.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1920487276069913644.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9350036553893837559.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1920487276069913644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9350036553893837559.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.13457e+13,0.035661,5296,32,22,2749,161,198,5206,56,822,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(AG(EF((i7.u15.p125==1)))) U EG(A(EG((i6.u10.p88==1)) U (i9.u24.p209!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((E(!((i9.u24.p209!=1)) U (!(EG((i6.u10.p88==1))) * !((i9.u24.p209!=1)))) + EG(!((i9.u24.p20...478
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 219
Applied a total of 44 rules in 10 ms. Remains 239 /261 variables (removed 22) and now considering 219/241 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 218 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 3/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 5/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 37/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 218/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 20/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 8/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 5/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 7/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 578 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/261 places, 219/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60263 ms. Remains : 239/261 places, 219/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14215786609312415927.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6203314810305374136.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14215786609312415927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6203314810305374136.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27739e+23,9.37092,276412,2,3925,5,765467,6,0,1177,2.01693e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((p263==1)) U !(E(EG((p186!=1)) U (EX((((p35==1)&&(p94==1))||(p245==1))) * EG(E((p58==1) U (p102==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((p263==1))))) * !(E(EG((p186!=1)) U (EX((((p35==1)&&(p94==1))||(p245==1))) * EG(E((p58==1) U ...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59,...506
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph984262314508556953.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph984262314508556953.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph984262314508556953.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph984262314508556953.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph984262314508556953.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4415382593197929980.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1293526826352060941.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4415382593197929980.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1293526826352060941.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27739e+23,1.24655,45844,686,29,75045,383,519,218814,45,1126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((i13.i1.u89.p263==1)) U !(E(EG((i10.i2.u61.p186!=1)) U (EX((((i4.u13.p35==1)&&(i7.i1.u31.p94==1))||(i15.u79.p245==1))) * EG(E((i5.i1...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((i13.i1.u89.p263==1))))) * !(E(EG((i10.i2.u61.p186!=1)) U (EX((((i4.u13.p35==1)&&(i7.i1.u31.p...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t83, t132, t176, i0.i1.t11, i0.i1.u90.t7, i1.t103, i1.u41.t107, i2.t172, i2.i0.u11.t173,...953
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 238 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 237 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 237 transition count 217
Applied a total of 48 rules in 15 ms. Remains 237 /261 variables (removed 24) and now considering 217/241 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 237 cols
[2025-06-05 10:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/454 variables, 237/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/454 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 454/454 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/237 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 34/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 217/454 variables, 237/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 216/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 20/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 12/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 4/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/454 variables, 2/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 454/454 variables, and 576 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 237/237 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 237/261 places, 217/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60251 ms. Remains : 237/261 places, 217/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5265811092596894536.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5961725036989529296.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5265811092596894536.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5961725036989529296.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.84081e+22,8.16234,238680,2,3480,5,675767,6,0,1167,1.69148e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(!(E(!(EG((p8==1))) U AF(EG((p277==1)))))) + EG((((p23==1)&&(p62==1)) + E(!((EF((((p168==1)&&(p200==1))&&(p212==1))) * AX((p100==1))))...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(!(EG((p8==1))) U !(EG(!(EG((p277==1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(((p23==1)&&(p62==1)) + E(!...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...495
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph577803262272207279.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph577803262272207279.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph577803262272207279.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph577803262272207279.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph577803262272207279.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17100873256047498004.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13592325206114810800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17100873256047498004.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13592325206114810800.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.84081e+22,2.31877,77264,631,29,129700,341,517,428304,50,844,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(!(E(!(EG((i1.i0.u3.p8==1))) U AF(EG((i14.i3.u89.p277==1)))))) + EG((((i0.i0.u9.p23==1)&&(i3.u19.p62==1)) + E(!((EF((((i10.i0.u54.p168...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(!(EG((i1.i0.u3.p8==1))) U !(EG(!(EG((i14.i3.u89.p277==1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(((i0.i...329
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t126, t174, i0.i0.u8.t176, i0.i1.t155, i0.i1.t159, i1.t170, i1.i1.u11.t171, i1.i2.t172, ...910
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 260 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 206 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 205 transition count 184
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 205 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 182 transition count 161
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 165 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 165 transition count 144
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 165 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 152 transition count 131
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 94 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 93 transition count 72
Applied a total of 334 rules in 21 ms. Remains 93 /261 variables (removed 168) and now considering 72/241 (removed 169) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 93 cols
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [82, 83]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/261 places, 72/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 91 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 90 transition count 71
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /91 variables (removed 1) and now considering 71/72 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [76]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/261 places, 71/241 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 88 transition count 70
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 88 /89 variables (removed 1) and now considering 70/71 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 88/261 places, 70/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 88/261 places, 70/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9678961656775845029.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14181013338863068808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9678961656775845029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14181013338863068808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46933e+13,0.051798,6060,2,343,5,10232,6,0,424,13147,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((p216==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p216==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 68/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.083193,6444,1,0,10,14962,19,2,2125,13147,10
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 241/241 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 242 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 242 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 42 rules in 16 ms. Remains 240 /261 variables (removed 21) and now considering 220/241 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:43:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 36/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 18/553 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 572 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60253 ms. Remains : 240/261 places, 220/241 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1044687365918626625.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13531052526722584244.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1044687365918626625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13531052526722584244.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13684e+23,8.43838,245792,2,3559,5,691489,6,0,1182,1.74826e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG((E((p52==1) U ((p45==1)&&(p259==1))) + E(((p75==1)||(p256==1)) U A((p48==1) U (p266==1)))))) + AF((AX((p270==1)) + EX((EG((p7==1))...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((E((p52==1) U ((p45==1)&&(p259==1))) + E(((p75==1)||(p256==1)) U !((E(!((p...334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t17, t22, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10937898695472157209.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10937898695472157209.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10937898695472157209.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10937898695472157209.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10937898695472157209.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15125496684957057156.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14143879159337756456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15125496684957057156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14143879159337756456.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13684e+23,0.814333,32144,661,29,49721,335,527,152455,45,841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG((E((i4.i1.u14.p52==1) U ((i4.i1.u15.p45==1)&&(i15.u83.p259==1))) + E(((i3.i2.u24.p75==1)||(i15.u81.p256==1)) U A((i4.i1.u17.p48==1...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((E((i4.i1.u14.p52==1) U ((i4.i1.u15.p45==1)&&(i15.u83.p259==1))) + E(((i3....457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t87, t131, t175, t177, i0.i1.u2.t181, i0.i1.u9.t176, i1.t148, i1.u19.t152, i2.t166, i2.u...931
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6193149665324383112.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6193149665324383112.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6193149665324383112.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6193149665324383112.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6193149665324383112.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13039300979174734263.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7801300454199035473.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13039300979174734263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7801300454199035473.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.33841e+23,2.42728,75808,1313,30,128484,279,606,334280,52,780,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX(AF((i9.i1.u63.p182==1)))) * ((AG(AX(((i9.i0.u55.p160==0)||(i9.i0.u55.p162==0)))) + AX((i5.i1.u31.p88==0))) + (AX(((i6.u36.p105==0)...337
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(EX(!(EG(!((i9.i1.u63.p182==1))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i9.i0.u55....678
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t100, t144, t198, i0.i0.u7.t200, i0.i1.t182, i0.i1.t183, i0.i1.u14.t177, i0.i1.u15.t181,...1287
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 5 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9791370802610041247.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18387821052411316411.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9791370802610041247.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18387821052411316411.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.33841e+23,117.497,3504288,1838,379,6.00424e+06,919,361,3.01463e+07,133,9753,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX(AF((i0.i1.i0.i0.u53.p182==1)))) * ((AG(AX(((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u48.p160==0)||(i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u49.p162==0)))) +...522
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(EX(!(EG(!((i0.i1.i0.i0.u53.p182==1))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i0.i...983
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.u4.t202, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t156, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t160, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t161, i0.i0.i0....2367

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800482"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;