Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800481.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800481
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 496K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749118938793

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 10:22:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 10:22:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 75 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Transformed 283 places.
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Transformed 263 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 283 places and 263 transitions and 654 arcs in 165 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 123 out of 283 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 283/283 places, 263/263 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 264 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 264 transition count 244
Applied a total of 38 rules in 37 ms. Remains 264 /283 variables (removed 19) and now considering 244/263 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 264 cols
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 483 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 243 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:22:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/264 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 6/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 244/508 variables, 264/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 2/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 1/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 1/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/508 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 508/508 variables, and 354 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/264 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 50/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/508 variables, 264/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 243/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 20/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 12/626 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 6/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 3/635 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 10/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 508/508 variables, and 650 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60093ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60105ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/283 places, 244/263 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60642 ms. Remains : 264/283 places, 244/263 transitions.
Support contains 123 out of 264 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 264 places (down from 123) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1200 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 3/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 199 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/91 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 173/264 variables, 26/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 244/508 variables, 264/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/508 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 508/508 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 148 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/91 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 173/264 variables, 26/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 244/508 variables, 264/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/508 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 508/508 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 728 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 882ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 287 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 264 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 264 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 212 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 211 transition count 191
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 211 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 189 transition count 169
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 173 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 173 transition count 153
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 173 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 161 transition count 141
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 93 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 93 transition count 72
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 92 transition count 71
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -7
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 81 transition count 78
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 81 transition count 77
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 372 place count 81 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 373 place count 80 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 78 transition count 76
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 375 place count 78 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 77 transition count 75
Applied a total of 377 rules in 57 ms. Remains 77 /264 variables (removed 187) and now considering 75/244 (removed 169) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 77/264 places, 75/244 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 608 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (9 resets) in 61 ms. (645 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2597255 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=865 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2597255 steps, saw 528002 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=864 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/42 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 38/80 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 44/126 variables, 22/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 9/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 4/132 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 20/152 variables, 16/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 6/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 75 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/42 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 38/80 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/82 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 44/126 variables, 22/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 9/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/128 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 4/132 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 20/152 variables, 16/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 6/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 3/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 228 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 310ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 7 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 77 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 77/77 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 77/77 places, 75/75 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 77/77 places, 75/75 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 75/75 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [64]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 76/77 places, 75/75 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 75 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 75 transition count 74
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 75 /76 variables (removed 1) and now considering 74/75 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 10:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 75/77 places, 74/75 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 75/77 places, 74/75 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 124 ms. (320 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2685372 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=894 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2685372 steps, saw 535297 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=894 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/42 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 37/79 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 9/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 44/123 variables, 22/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 9/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 2/125 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/129 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 20/149 variables, 16/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 6/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 111 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 72 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 25/42 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 37/79 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 9/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 44/123 variables, 22/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 9/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/125 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/129 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 20/149 variables, 16/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 6/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 335ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 75 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 75/75 places, 74/74 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 75/75 places, 74/74 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 5/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/149 variables, 75/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 1838 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 5/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/149 variables, 75/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 72/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 5417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 7279ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7279ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7428 ms. Remains : 75/75 places, 74/74 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 10 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 75 transition count 74
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] After 26ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 34 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] After 5ms SMT Verify possible using 8 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] After 12ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] After 95ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 137 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
Computed a total of 70 stabilizing places and 70 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 244 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 244 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 243 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 243 transition count 223
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 242 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 242 transition count 222
Applied a total of 44 rules in 20 ms. Remains 242 /264 variables (removed 22) and now considering 222/244 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 222 rows 242 cols
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 221 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 9/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 222/464 variables, 242/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 464/464 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 221/221 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 41/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 222/464 variables, 242/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 221/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 16/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 8/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 1/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 3/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 464/464 variables, and 585 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 242/242 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 221/221 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 242/264 places, 222/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60286 ms. Remains : 242/264 places, 222/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:24:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 222 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:24:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11348547251012391499.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:24:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2697496978762717309.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11348547251012391499.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2697496978762717309.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88327e+23,11.4093,359204,2,5201,5,946210,6,0,1192,2.67752e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(!(AG((AG((p148==1)) * !(((p70==0)||(p259==1)))))) U E(AF((((p261==0)||(p67==1))||(p44==1))) U (((p87==1)&&((p105==0)||(p130==1)))&&(...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!(E(!(EG(!((((p261==0)||(p67==1))||(p44==1))))) U (((p87==1)&&((p105==0)||(p130==1)))&&(p...544
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t21, t23, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59,...534
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3444909425626281845.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3444909425626281845.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3444909425626281845.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3444909425626281845.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3444909425626281845.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2691327248770943589.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15972539429230395900.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2691327248770943589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15972539429230395900.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88327e+23,1.37964,53636,895,43,88913,604,560,267698,58,1424,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(!(AG((AG((i11.i0.u49.p148==1)) * !(((i3.u23.p70==0)||(i14.u84.p259==1)))))) U E(AF((((i12.u86.p261==0)||(i3.u25.p67==1))||(i0.i2.u17...344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!(E(!(EG(!((((i12.u86.p261==0)||(i3.u25.p67==1))||(i0.i2.u17.p44==1))))) U (((i7.i1.u31.p...787
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t88, t129, t175, i0.t179, i0.i0.t177, i0.i0.u7.t182, i0.i0.u10.t178, i0.i1.u8.t181, i0.i...1019
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 263 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 211 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 210 transition count 190
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 210 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 190 transition count 170
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 174 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 174 transition count 154
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 174 transition count 142
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 162 transition count 142
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 99 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 99 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 98 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 96 transition count 75
Applied a total of 333 rules in 32 ms. Remains 96 /264 variables (removed 168) and now considering 75/244 (removed 169) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 96 cols
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 10:25:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 7/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/171 variables, 96/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 1546 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/96 variables, 7/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/171 variables, 96/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 74/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4038ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/264 places, 75/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4209 ms. Remains : 96/264 places, 75/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9784988769490898988.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:25:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality522044843626226717.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9784988769490898988.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality522044843626226717.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76319e+14,0.05903,6688,2,449,5,12853,6,0,459,16856,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((EF(((p250==0)||(p26==1))) * (p245==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((p250==0)||(p26==1))) * (p245==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t5, t16, t18, t21, t24, t26, t28, t31, t35, t37, t39, t41, t44, t46, t48, t50...260
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11833178144702177384.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11833178144702177384.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11833178144702177384.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11833178144702177384.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11833178144702177384.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17944211641166196154.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10409163004765987508.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17944211641166196154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10409163004765987508.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76319e+14,0.033004,5376,82,24,2887,162,213,5598,46,666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((EF(((i9.u30.p250==0)||(i0.u3.p26==1))) * (i10.u29.p245==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((i9.u30.p250==0)||(i0.u3.p26==1))) * (i10.u29.p245==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t70, i0.u3.t5, i0.u7.t35, i1.u2.t0, i1.u6.t18, i2.u15.t39, i3.u8.t37, i4.u5.t31, i5.u18.t2, i...397
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 245 transition count 225
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 245 transition count 225
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 244 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 244 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 243 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 243 transition count 223
Applied a total of 42 rules in 25 ms. Remains 243 /264 variables (removed 21) and now considering 223/244 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 243 cols
[2025-06-05 10:26:42] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:26:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 360 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:26:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 12/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 41/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 222/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 20/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 5/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 7/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 9/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 593 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 60032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60418 ms. Remains : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality677719611503472539.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3121287734403335054.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality677719611503472539.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3121287734403335054.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85843e+23,9.82568,297364,2,5269,5,813394,6,0,1197,2.1813e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX((A((AG(((p67==0)||(p263==1))) * !(((p20==0)||(p54==1)))) U ((p41==0)||(p88==1))) * (!(EF(((p12==0)||(p129==1)))) + ((AF((p0==0)) + (...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,EX((!((E(!(((p41==0)||(p88==1))) U (!((!(E(TRUE U !(((p67==0)||(p263==1))))) * !(((p20==0)||(p...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t12, t13, t17, t22, t23, t25, t28, t32, t37, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48,...540
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3131641857533709321.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3131641857533709321.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3131641857533709321.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3131641857533709321.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3131641857533709321.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11023079479951907250.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13786030949520758136.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11023079479951907250.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13786030949520758136.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.85843e+23,1.02975,40556,863,43,66620,678,580,181495,58,1516,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX((A((AG(((i4.u27.p67==0)||(i15.u86.p263==1))) * !(((i2.i1.u9.p20==0)||(i1.i2.u22.p54==1)))) U ((i3.u16.p41==0)||(i8.i0.u32.p88==1))) ...480
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,EX((!((E(!(((i3.u16.p41==0)||(i8.i0.u32.p88==1))) U (!((!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.u27.p67==0)||(i15.u8...651
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t89, t133, t176, i0.i0.u53.t91, i0.i1.t70, i0.i1.t74, i1.i0.u2.t184, i1.i1.u11.t177, i1....1032
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 263 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 211 transition count 191
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 211 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 188 transition count 168
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 173 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 173 transition count 153
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 173 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 161 transition count 141
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 97 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 97 transition count 76
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 96 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 94 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 92 transition count 73
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 92 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 91 transition count 72
Applied a total of 341 rules in 36 ms. Remains 91 /264 variables (removed 173) and now considering 72/244 (removed 172) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/264 places, 72/244 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 89 transition count 71
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 89 /90 variables (removed 1) and now considering 71/72 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 89 cols
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/264 places, 71/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 89/264 places, 71/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 431 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality46961854020667082.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4440927071887654849.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality46961854020667082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4440927071887654849.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 238 transition count 218
Applied a total of 52 rules in 14 ms. Remains 238 /264 variables (removed 26) and now considering 218/244 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:28:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 6/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 37/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 217/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 18/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 7/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 6/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 7/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/456 variables, and 571 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 60034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60275 ms. Remains : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12445801970979490713.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10286403182989265115.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12445801970979490713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10286403182989265115.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11225e+23,8.66883,267012,2,4065,5,753369,6,0,1172,1.92886e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((A(((p190==0)||(p37==1)) U (p186==1)) * (p36!=0)) * (EX(TRUE) + AG(((p64==0)||(p199==1))))) U !(E(((p223==0)||(p104==1)) U (p266==...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(E(((p223==0)||(p104==1)) U (p266==1)))) U (!(((!((E(!((p186==1)) U (!(((p190==0)||(p37==1...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t63,...500
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17002990576929346719.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17002990576929346719.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17002990576929346719.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17002990576929346719.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17002990576929346719.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3789869308482692308.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6245581174418075483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3789869308482692308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6245581174418075483.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11225e+23,1.71518,56120,783,29,85733,310,521,268037,49,739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((A(((i10.i1.u59.p190==0)||(i2.u11.p37==1)) U (i10.i1.u58.p186==1)) * (i2.u11.p36!=0)) * (EX(TRUE) + AG(((i3.u20.p64==0)||(i8.u61.p...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(E(((i13.i1.u70.p223==0)||(i4.u33.p104==1)) U (i16.u83.p266==1)))) U (!(((!((E(!((i10.i1.u...546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t87, t131, t173, t175, i0.i1.t171, i0.i1.u6.t178, i0.i1.u10.t172, i0.i2.t142, i0.i2.u22....926
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 239 transition count 219
Applied a total of 50 rules in 16 ms. Remains 239 /264 variables (removed 25) and now considering 219/244 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 10:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 218 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:30:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 26719 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 29/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 218/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 20/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 13/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 3/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 7/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/571 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 571 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 56746ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56747ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/264 places, 219/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56963 ms. Remains : 239/264 places, 219/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16572130984087773687.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:31:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7238095637712373825.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16572130984087773687.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7238095637712373825.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13441e+23,7.87071,243408,2,3769,5,690466,6,0,1177,1.73429e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(AF((((p258==0)||(p67==1))||(p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG(!((((p258==0)||(p67==1))||(p1==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t26, t31, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4524929468489383302.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4524929468489383302.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4524929468489383302.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4524929468489383302.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4524929468489383302.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3441042533108761003.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16900975455097306028.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3441042533108761003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16900975455097306028.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13441e+23,0.938868,42176,609,29,73197,404,524,196895,47,1080,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX(AF((((i15.u80.p258==0)||(i2.u23.p67==1))||(i8.i0.u0.p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG(!((((i15.u80.p258==0)||(i2.u23.p67==1))||(i8.i0.u0.p1==1))))))))))] != ...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t87, t127, t172, i0.i0.u2.t180, i0.i1.u11.t173, i0.i2.t148, i0.i2.u21.t152, i1.t176, i1....928
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 239 transition count 219
Applied a total of 50 rules in 9 ms. Remains 239 /264 variables (removed 25) and now considering 219/244 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 10:32:41] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:32:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 218 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:32:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 26411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/239 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 36/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 219/458 variables, 239/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 218/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 20/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 7/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 4/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 2/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 1/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 3/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 5/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 574 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 218/218 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 56441ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 218 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56441ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 239/264 places, 219/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56677 ms. Remains : 239/264 places, 219/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12135884398416684856.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15857932117669158385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12135884398416684856.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15857932117669158385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27074e+23,9.19472,284692,2,4704,5,808172,6,0,1177,2.04456e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p67==0)&&(p111==0)) * ((p273==1) * !(E(!((AX((p230==1)) + AX((p180==1)))) U EX(((p50==1)||(p176==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p67==0)&&(p111==0)) * ((p273==1) * !(E(!((!(EX(!((p230==1)))) + !(EX(!((p180==1)))))) U EX(((p50...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t12, t14, t17, t21, t26, t30, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59,...506
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11339072046260037220.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11339072046260037220.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11339072046260037220.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11339072046260037220.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11339072046260037220.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4029894953249130297.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17651761817168121129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4029894953249130297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17651761817168121129.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27074e+23,1.619,59004,961,29,94081,415,543,282284,49,1001,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((i0.i2.u25.p67==0)&&(i5.u34.p111==0)) * ((i13.i2.u88.p273==1) * !(E(!((AX((i15.i0.u75.p230==1)) + AX((i11.u58.p180==1)))) U EX(((i3....195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((i0.i2.u25.p67==0)&&(i5.u34.p111==0)) * ((i13.i2.u88.p273==1) * !(E(!((!(EX(!((i15.i0.u75.p230==1...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t83, t131, t174, t176, i0.i1.t172, i0.i1.u7.t179, i0.i1.u11.t173, i0.i2.t142, i0.i2.u22....950
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 240 /264 variables (removed 24) and now considering 220/244 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:34:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 16067 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 27/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 13/556 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 573 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 46095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/264 places, 220/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46287 ms. Remains : 240/264 places, 220/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality473831698697322974.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12429096036048034803.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality473831698697322974.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12429096036048034803.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24699e+23,9.00465,276432,2,3772,5,770297,6,0,1182,1.99795e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(A(A((p7==1) U ((p249==0)||(p257==1))) U (p66==1))) * EG((EX((p24==0)) + (p143==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG(!((E(!((p66==1)) U (!(!((E(!(((p249==0)||(p257==1))) U (!((p7==1)) * !(((p249==0)||(...278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t33, t37, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t46, t47, t51, t55, t60, t64,...507
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6590606051752297250.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6590606051752297250.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6590606051752297250.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6590606051752297250.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6590606051752297250.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11746546550478392147.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:35:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7556122502146616156.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11746546550478392147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7556122502146616156.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24699e+23,1.22753,48004,579,29,84160,512,520,225601,49,1382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(A(A((i2.i0.u3.p7==1) U ((i13.u80.p249==0)||(i16.i1.u84.p257==1))) U (i4.u24.p66==1))) * EG((EX((i1.i1.u8.p24==0)) + (i8.u44.p143==...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG(!((E(!((i4.u24.p66==1)) U (!(!((E(!(((i13.u80.p249==0)||(i16.i1.u84.p257==1))) U (!(...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t84, t128, t173, t175, i0.i1.u2.t181, i0.i1.u10.t176, i1.t177, i1.i0.u7.t180, i1.i1.u8.t...932
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 244 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 244 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 243 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 243 transition count 223
Applied a total of 42 rules in 6 ms. Remains 243 /264 variables (removed 21) and now considering 223/244 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 243 cols
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:36:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 11/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 (/ 6.0 7.0))
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 (/ 1.0 7.0))
(s23 (/ 1.0 7.0))
(s24 0.0)
(s25 (/ 13.0 14.0))
(s26 (/ 1.0 14.0))
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 (/ 37.0 42.0))
(s74 0.0)
(s75 (/ 5.0 42.0))
(s76 (/ 41.0 42.0))
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 (/ 1.0 42.0))
(s81 0.0)
(s82 (/ 1.0 42.0))
(s83 (/ 11.0 14.0))
(s84 (/ 3.0 14.0))
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 (/ 1.0 42.0))
(s104 0.0)
(s105 (/ 41.0 42.0))
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 1.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 1.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 1.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 1.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 timeout
0.0)
(s231 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/466 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 43/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 222/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 20/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 6/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 6/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 6/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 4/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 8/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 602 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 60035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60275 ms. Remains : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9379062529042231494.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8793481712407005415.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9379062529042231494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8793481712407005415.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.689e+23,11.3875,347676,2,5124,5,935704,6,0,1197,2.56399e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((p141!=1) U (!(AG(((p253==0)||(p136==1)))) + EF((((p234==0)||(p245==1))&&(p72==1)))))) + (!(A(EG(AX((p132==0))) U E(((p268==0)||(p26...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * !(!(!((E(!((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p253==0)||(p136==1)))))) + E(TRUE U (((p234==0)||(p245==1))&&(p72==1)))...947
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t21, t22, t24, t27, t31, t34, t37, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t52,...533
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5160186630513229620.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5160186630513229620.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5160186630513229620.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5160186630513229620.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5160186630513229620.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8903696900290394218.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15470183044455804481.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8903696900290394218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15470183044455804481.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.689e+23,0.913648,41352,979,30,73633,348,541,177607,52,908,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((i6.i2.u44.p141!=1) U (!(AG(((i14.i3.u84.p253==0)||(i6.i2.u47.p136==1)))) + EF((((i14.i0.u76.p234==0)||(i15.u80.p245==1))&&(i2.u23.p...335
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((Init * !(!(!((E(!((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i14.i3.u84.p253==0)||(i6.i2.u47.p136==1)))))) + E(TRUE U (((i14.i0.u76....1356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t90, t136, t178, i0.i1.u2.t184, i0.i1.u9.t179, i1.t180, i1.i1.t176, i1.i1.u6.t183, i1.i1.u10....1001
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 242 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 242 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 241 transition count 221
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 241 transition count 221
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Applied a total of 48 rules in 18 ms. Remains 240 /264 variables (removed 24) and now considering 220/244 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 3/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/240 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 36/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 220/460 variables, 240/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 219/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 20/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 8/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 9/576 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 1/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 579 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 240/240 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/264 places, 220/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60283 ms. Remains : 240/264 places, 220/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4052699770218716091.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4114075631871500876.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4052699770218716091.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4114075631871500876.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45814e+23,12.413,369888,2,4538,5,995920,6,0,1182,2.70325e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(EG(((p277==0)||(p118==1)))) * ((AF(((p0==0)||(p113==1))) + (p204==0)) + ((p130==1) + ((p122==1) * EX(((p0==1)||(p231==0))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(EG(((p277==0)||(p118==1)))))) * ((!(EG(!(((p0==0)||(p113==1))))) + (p204==0)) + ((p130==1) + ...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t54, t56, t59,...518
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13267761929080507349.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13267761929080507349.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13267761929080507349.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13267761929080507349.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13267761929080507349.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7943528180108673439.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1934844072619587976.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7943528180108673439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1934844072619587976.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45814e+23,1.51476,54120,848,29,77566,296,522,306704,49,680,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(EG(((i0.i3.u88.p277==0)||(i6.i1.u38.p118==1)))) * ((AF(((i0.i0.u0.p0==0)||(i6.i1.u39.p113==1))) + (i9.i2.u67.p204==0)) + ((i7.u42....235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(EG(((i0.i3.u88.p277==0)||(i6.i1.u38.p118==1)))))) * ((!(EG(!(((i0.i0.u0.p0==0)||(i6.i1.u39.p1...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t87, t133, t177, i0.t38, i0.i1.u76.t39, i0.i2.t40, i0.i2.u72.t45, i0.i2.u75.t41, i0.i3.t...964
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 238 transition count 218
Applied a total of 52 rules in 18 ms. Remains 238 /264 variables (removed 26) and now considering 218/244 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 18439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 28/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 217/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 13/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 6/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/456 variables, and 569 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 48460ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48460ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48689 ms. Remains : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17703520069170289272.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12701211970865809329.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17703520069170289272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12701211970865809329.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11216e+23,7.92879,248564,2,3508,5,706765,6,0,1172,1.76872e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((p104==0)) + EX(!(A((p149==1) U ((p141==0)||(p39==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p104==0)))))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),!(((p141==0)||(p39==1)))) * (!((p149==...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...501
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2782941140949477100.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2782941140949477100.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2782941140949477100.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2782941140949477100.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2782941140949477100.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4902616396016080483.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7065311975930940547.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4902616396016080483.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7065311975930940547.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11216e+23,2.74803,92640,958,29,165701,411,549,409539,49,1208,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AG((i7.u34.p104==0)) + EX(!(A((i12.i0.u48.p149==1) U ((i6.i2.u43.p141==0)||(i4.u14.p39==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((i7.u34.p104==0)))))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),!(((i6.i2.u43.p141==0)||(i4.u14...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t82, t130, t171, t175, i0.t38, i0.i1.u76.t39, i0.i2.t40, i0.i2.u72.t45, i0.i2.u75.t41, i...921
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,9.3525,247520,1,0,467518,411,3358,1.09132e+06,282,1208,552628
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 240 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 240 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 239 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 239 transition count 219
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 238 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 238 transition count 218
Applied a total of 52 rules in 9 ms. Remains 238 /264 variables (removed 26) and now considering 218/244 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 10:41:53] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:41:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 188 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:41:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 3/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/456 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/456 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 25768 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 238/238 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 30/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 218/456 variables, 238/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 217/522 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 7/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 6/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 2/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 1/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 55789ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55789ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55988 ms. Remains : 238/264 places, 218/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5814957663453782197.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:42:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15817860441221758577.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5814957663453782197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15817860441221758577.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13752e+23,10.9613,240488,2,3561,5,681628,6,0,1172,1.71334e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(AX(((p29!=0)&&(p44!=1)))) * !(E(E(AG((p19==1)) U (p115!=1)) U ((p74==1) * AG((p76==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG(!(EX(!(((p29!=0)&&(p44!=1))))))) * !(E(E(!(E(TRUE U !((p19==1)))) U (p115!=1)) U ((p74==...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...501
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,14.3466,240616,1,0,555,791267,478,235,6987,1.71334e+06,558
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 243 transition count 223
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 243 transition count 223
Applied a total of 42 rules in 11 ms. Remains 243 /264 variables (removed 21) and now considering 223/244 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 243 cols
[2025-06-05 10:43:04] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 11/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 5/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/466 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 466/466 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 25083 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/243 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 36/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 223/466 variables, 243/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 222/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 20/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 12/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 3/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 2/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 5/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 466/466 variables, and 587 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 243/243 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 55108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55109ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55347 ms. Remains : 243/264 places, 223/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 223 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8047031575152382587.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15972778434214922400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8047031575152382587.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15972778434214922400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.8805e+23,10.7916,328368,2,4591,5,873383,6,0,1197,2.42387e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p125==1) + (AX(((p275==0)||(p82==1))) * (!((((p12==0)&&(p13==1)) * ((p226==1) * EG(((p42==0)||(p154==1)))))) + ((A(EF(((p166==0)||(p1...383
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!(!(((p157==0)||(p93==1)))))) + EG((!(EX(!((p113==0)))) + E((p190!=1) U (((p153==0)||(p2...873
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t12, t17, t21, t22, t27, t31, t35, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57,...524
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3890586940141910082.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3890586940141910082.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3890586940141910082.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3890586940141910082.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3890586940141910082.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality471279608489294110.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15887497100384294616.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality471279608489294110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15887497100384294616.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.8805e+23,0.390683,20588,824,29,31648,378,531,78969,47,955,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i7.u41.p125==1) + (AX(((i16.u92.p275==0)||(i6.i1.u26.p82==1))) * (!((((i4.i0.u5.p12==0)&&(i4.i0.u5.p13==1)) * ((i14.i1.u73.p226==1) *...617
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(EX(!(!(((i11.i0.u51.p157==0)||(i5.i0.u28.p93==1)))))) + EG((!(EX(!((i5.i1.u38.p113==0)))) +...1323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t90, t136, t178, t180, i0.i1.u76.t43, i1.i0.u2.t184, i1.i0.u9.t179, i1.i1.t152, i1.i1.u1...978
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 264/264 places, 244/244 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 51 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 51 transitions
Performed 51 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 51
Iterating post reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 263 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 212 transition count 190
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 210 transition count 190
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 210 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 188 transition count 168
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 172 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 172 transition count 152
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 172 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 161 transition count 141
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 99 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 99 transition count 78
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 98 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 96 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 94 transition count 75
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 94 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 93 transition count 74
Applied a total of 337 rules in 25 ms. Remains 93 /264 variables (removed 171) and now considering 74/244 (removed 170) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 93 cols
[2025-06-05 10:44:59] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [77]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/264 places, 74/244 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 91 transition count 73
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 91 /92 variables (removed 1) and now considering 73/74 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-05 10:44:59] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:44:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 10:44:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/264 places, 73/244 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 208 ms. Remains : 91/264 places, 73/244 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15463136659465080978.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15762267743463822223.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15463136659465080978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15762267743463822223.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.9441e+13,0.111954,9172,2,441,5,22168,6,0,438,33512,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((p271==0)||(p234==0)) + ((p94==0) + AG((p175==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((p271==0)||(p234==0)) + ((p94==0) + !(E(TRUE U !((p175==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t5, t15, t17, t20, t24, t26, t29, t31, t33, t36, t37, t40, t43, t45, t49, t56...260
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9168654321659921938.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9168654321659921938.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168654321659921938.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9168654321659921938.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168654321659921938.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9785456984890585951.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 10:45:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17923476409285311844.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9785456984890585951.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17923476409285311844.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.9441e+13,0.067672,6852,96,23,6166,151,200,12932,44,709,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((i12.u29.p271==0)||(i13.u27.p234==0)) + ((i4.u11.p94==0) + AG((u21.p175==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((i12.u29.p271==0)||(i13.u27.p234==0)) + ((i4.u11.p94==0) + !(E(TRUE U !((u21.p175==1)))))))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t64, u16.t26, u21.t4, i0.u7.t36, i1.u8.t37, i2.u2.t0, i2.u6.t17, i4.u5.t33, i4.u11.t5, i...383
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17873574906603595726.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17873574906603595726.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17873574906603595726.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17873574906603595726.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17873574906603595726.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10109107053847025192.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:46:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14455527081218211937.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10109107053847025192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14455527081218211937.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16708e+24,26.2917,443800,1967,32,604875,482,610,1.92356e+06,53,1888,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(!(AG((AG((i10.i0.u50.p148==1)) * !(((i0.u23.p70==0)||(i14.i2.u90.p259==1)))))) U E(AF((((i16.u95.p261==0)||(i0.u24.p67==1))||(i4.i1....344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!(E(!(EG(!((((i16.u95.p261==0)||(i0.u24.p67==1))||(i4.i1.u17.p44==1))))) U (((i6.i0.u30.p...781
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t101, t150, t201, i0.t165, i0.t158, i0.u22.t163, i0.u25.t159, i0.u25.t166, i1.t169, i1.u...1343
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16051912584124554834.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 11:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1637217204374879833.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16051912584124554834.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1637217204374879833.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16708e+24,206.861,6335680,3371,409,1.08783e+07,1183,365,5.41067e+07,142,13521,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(!(AG((AG((i0.i1.i0.i0.u77.p148==1)) * !(((i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.p70==0)||(i1.i0.i0.u70.p259==1)))))) U E(AF((((i1.i0.u71.p261==0)||(i0.i0....477
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!(E(!(EG(!((((i1.i0.u71.p261==0)||(i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.p67==1))||(i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u19.p44==...1072
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.u4.t205, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t158, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t159, i0.i0.i0.i1.u21.t163, i0.i0.i0....2423
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800481"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;