Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800466.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800466
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749115260965

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 67 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Transformed 213 places.
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Transformed 198 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 213 places and 198 transitions and 492 arcs in 156 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 126 out of 213 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 209 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 209 transition count 194
Applied a total of 8 rules in 25 ms. Remains 209 /213 variables (removed 4) and now considering 194/198 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 440 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 16/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 194/403 variables, 209/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/403 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/403 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 403/403 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 25233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/209 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 47/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 194/403 variables, 209/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 193/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 13/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 3/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 7/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 3/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 1/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 1/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 403/403 variables, and 510 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 55302ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55322ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/213 places, 194/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55806 ms. Remains : 209/213 places, 194/198 transitions.
Support contains 126 out of 209 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
Support contains 123 out of 209 places (down from 126) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2641 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 10/97 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 217 ms. (183 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-05 09:21:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 177/209 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 194/403 variables, 209/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/403 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 403/403 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved in 246 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 128/155 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp96 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 13/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 54/209 variables, 8/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 194/403 variables, 209/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 4/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 5/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 3/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/403 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/403 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 403/403 variables, and 267 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved in 1956 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/8 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 2215ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1487 ms.
Support contains 16 out of 209 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 209 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 173 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 169 transition count 153
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 169 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 155 transition count 139
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 141 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 141 transition count 125
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 141 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 135 transition count 119
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 88 transition count 72
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 81 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 81 transition count 75
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 81 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 80 transition count 74
Applied a total of 261 rules in 47 ms. Remains 80 /209 variables (removed 129) and now considering 74/194 (removed 120) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 80/209 places, 74/194 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 302 ms. (132 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 334071 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 334071 steps, saw 216009 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=111 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/59 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 55/114 variables, 59/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 9/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 11/125 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 17/142 variables, 8/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 3/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 9/154 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/154 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 167 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/59 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 7/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/114 variables, 59/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 9/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 11/125 variables, 4/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 17/142 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 9/154 variables, 8/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 154/154 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved in 900 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 9/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1082ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 64 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 74/74 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 80 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 76 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 75 transition count 69
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 75 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 73 transition count 67
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 68 transition count 62
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 67 transition count 62
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 67 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 66 transition count 61
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 66 /80 variables (removed 14) and now considering 61/74 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 66/80 places, 61/74 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 136 ms. (291 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1197199 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=398 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1197199 steps, saw 339052 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=398 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:10] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/32 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 35/67 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 19/86 variables, 10/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 4/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/89 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 22/111 variables, 12/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/114 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 13/127 variables, 10/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/32 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 35/67 variables, 32/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/86 variables, 10/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/87 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/89 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 22/111 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 4/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 2/114 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 13/127 variables, 10/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 263 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 368ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 33 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 66 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 66/66 places, 61/61 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 66/66 places, 61/61 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 66/66 places, 61/61 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [56]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 65/66 places, 61/61 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 65 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 60
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 60/61 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 63/66 places, 60/61 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 62 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 62 transition count 59
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 62 /63 variables (removed 1) and now considering 59/60 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 09:22:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 62/66 places, 59/61 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 62/66 places, 59/61 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (10 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1362501 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1362501 steps, saw 358700 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=454 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/28 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/61 variables, 28/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 19/80 variables, 10/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/83 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 22/105 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 13/121 variables, 10/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/28 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 33/61 variables, 28/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/80 variables, 10/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/81 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/83 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 22/105 variables, 12/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/108 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 13/121 variables, 10/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 32 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 59/59 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 59/59 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 59/59 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/62 variables, 9/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/121 variables, 62/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1212 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/62 variables, 9/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/121 variables, 62/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 56/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 3666ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3668ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3783 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 59/59 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (complete) has 156 edges and 62 vertex of which 61 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 61 transition count 59
Applied a total of 9 rules in 6 ms. Remains 61 /62 variables (removed 1) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] After 37ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 25 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using 8 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] After 21ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] After 88ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 144 ms.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
Support contains 113 out of 209 places (down from 114) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 59 stabilizing places and 59 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 182 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 181 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 181 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Applied a total of 58 rules in 11 ms. Remains 180 /209 variables (removed 29) and now considering 165/194 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 180 cols
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/345 variables, 180/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/345 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/345 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/345 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 345/345 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 19187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 23/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/345 variables, 180/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 164/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 16/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 5/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 8/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 7/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 345/345 variables, and 442 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 49208ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49209ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 180/209 places, 165/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49385 ms. Remains : 180/209 places, 165/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7481420209265763185.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14853751093778584750.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7481420209265763185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14853751093778584750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.9383e+17,4.07167,127624,2,2657,5,362422,6,0,887,893059,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((A(!(((p104==1)&&(p72==1))) U (E((p169==1) U (p4==1)) + E((p120==1) U (p126==1)))) + AF((p175==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!((E(!((E((p169==1) U (p4==1)) + E((p120==1) U (p126==1)))) U (!(!(((p104==1)&&(p72==1)))) ...313
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t32, t34, t35, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53,...421
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5527050337309822514.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5527050337309822514.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5527050337309822514.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5527050337309822514.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5527050337309822514.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15046555201671706884.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16631732097821125132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15046555201671706884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16631732097821125132.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.9383e+17,0.343726,17420,518,46,26417,531,455,55895,63,1112,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((A(!(((i8.u35.p104==1)&&(i4.u22.p72==1))) U (E((i13.u56.p169==1) U (i0.i1.u1.p4==1)) + E((i9.u36.p120==1) U (i5.u40.p126==1)))) + A...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!((E(!((E((i13.u56.p169==1) U (i0.i1.u1.p4==1)) + E((i9.u36.p120==1) U (i5.u40.p126==1)))) ...428
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t82, t127, t129, i0.i1.u1.t135, i0.i1.u9.t130, i1.t131, i1.i0.u6.t134, i1.i1.u7.t133, i1...745
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 184 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 184 transition count 169
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 183 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 182 transition count 167
Applied a total of 54 rules in 14 ms. Remains 182 /209 variables (removed 27) and now considering 167/194 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 182 cols
[2025-06-05 09:24:08] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 243 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 16653 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 25/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 166/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 186 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 20/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 4/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 8/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 6/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 349/349 variables, and 450 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 46692ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46693ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 182/209 places, 167/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47001 ms. Remains : 182/209 places, 167/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 167 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2435851966869601863.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1696824782618061443.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2435851966869601863.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1696824782618061443.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.45853e+17,4.3669,146520,2,2939,5,414726,6,0,897,1.03704e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((AX((p52==0)) + EF((AG((p127==0)) + (p112==1)))) + ((p192==1)||(p107==1))) + (p82==1))) * ((AX(((p105==0)||((p139==0)&&(((p85==0)||...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((((!(EX(!((p52==0)))) + E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((p127==0)))) + (p112==1)))) + ((p192==1)||(p107==1...389
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t21, t26, t31, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59,...426
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:25:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:25:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph606119601973829370.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph606119601973829370.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph606119601973829370.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph606119601973829370.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph606119601973829370.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10671536679167422736.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17196368431884460406.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10671536679167422736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17196368431884460406.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.45853e+17,0.580584,25876,571,29,38105,232,462,119216,49,535,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((AX((i3.u17.p52==0)) + EF((AG((i8.u40.p127==0)) + (i7.u35.p112==1)))) + ((i13.u61.p192==1)||(i6.u33.p107==1))) + (i5.i1.u26.p82==1)...341
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((((!(EX(!((i3.u17.p52==0)))) + E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((i8.u40.p127==0)))) + (i7.u35.p112==1)))) +...519
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t85, t133, i0.t131, i0.i0.u1.t137, i0.i0.u8.t132, i0.i1.t129, i0.i1.u5.t136, i0.i1.u9.t1...756
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 181 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 181 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 179 transition count 164
Applied a total of 60 rules in 10 ms. Remains 179 /209 variables (removed 30) and now considering 164/194 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-05 09:25:56] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 333 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 440 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 274 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 3/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 12740 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 163/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 17/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 4/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 4/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 9/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 42765ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42765ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/209 places, 164/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43225 ms. Remains : 179/209 places, 164/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16852888955857039030.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5645035369542964447.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16852888955857039030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5645035369542964447.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60341e+17,3.52319,119188,2,3098,5,354142,6,0,882,821799,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((p13==1)) + ((A(((E((p203==1) U (p174==1)) * E((p42==1) U (p144==1))) * !(((p17==1)&&(p45==1)))) U EF(EX((p139==1)))) * (p16==1)) ...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((p13==1)))))] != FALSE + [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p49==1)) * (p16==1)) * !(EG(!(E(TRU...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t11, t13, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58,...410
(forward)formula 0,1,4.57663,119316,1,0,348,372631,345,168,4760,821799,335
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 183 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 182 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 181 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 181 transition count 166
Applied a total of 56 rules in 29 ms. Remains 181 /209 variables (removed 28) and now considering 166/194 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 181 cols
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 244 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/347 variables, 181/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 3/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 2/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/347 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 347/347 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 14337 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 22/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/347 variables, 181/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 165/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 15/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 8/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 4/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 6/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 9/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 347/347 variables, and 439 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 44373ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44373ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/209 places, 166/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44649 ms. Remains : 181/209 places, 166/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14805728026841100730.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8977238648523816912.ctl : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14805728026841100730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8977238648523816912.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.00491e+17,3.9955,125740,2,2689,5,353783,6,0,892,881500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF(EX((((p164==1)&&(p177==1))&&(p211==1)))) * EX((EF((((p164!=1)||(p177!=1))||(p211!=1))) * (p6!=1))))) + E(!((EG((p9==1)) * !(((p18...302
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(!((EG((p9==1)) * !(((p18==1)||(!((p204==1)||(p116==1))))))) U !(E(TRUE U (E((p208==1) U (p131=...368
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t12, t16, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t59,...415
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2750737238452077661.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2750737238452077661.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2750737238452077661.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2750737238452077661.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2750737238452077661.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3910166355146762625.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7499042611700524244.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3910166355146762625.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7499042611700524244.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.00491e+17,0.527525,24168,580,29,39573,362,435,93420,47,901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((AF(EX((((i14.u53.p164==1)&&(i11.i1.u56.p177==1))&&(i15.u68.p211==1)))) * EX((EF((((i14.u53.p164!=1)||(i11.i1.u56.p177!=1))||(i15.u68...467
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(!((EG((i1.i0.u3.p9==1)) * !(((i2.i1.u7.p18==1)||(!((i15.u68.p204==1)||(i9.u38.p116==1))))))) U...533
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t88, t128, i0.i0.u1.t136, i1.i0.u10.t129, i1.i1.t104, i1.i1.u19.t108, i2.t132, i2.i0.t13...713
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 208 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 159 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 158 transition count 142
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 158 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 145 transition count 129
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 126 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 126 transition count 110
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 126 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 116 transition count 100
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 73 transition count 57
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 73 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 71 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 70 transition count 55
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 70 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 69 transition count 54
Applied a total of 277 rules in 51 ms. Remains 69 /209 variables (removed 140) and now considering 54/194 (removed 140) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-05 09:28:28] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned [52]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/209 places, 54/194 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 67 transition count 53
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 67 /68 variables (removed 1) and now considering 53/54 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/209 places, 53/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 311 ms. Remains : 67/209 places, 53/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8452790838245060168.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14165960089395225507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8452790838245060168.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14165960089395225507.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45119e+10,0.047198,5836,2,198,5,9109,6,0,324,12129,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p87==1) U EG(!((AG((p181==1)) * (p166==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(p87==1)),!((!(E(TRUE U !((p181==1)))) * (p166==1))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 51/0/2
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.095153,7244,1,0,10,17029,27,5,1680,16088,14
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 184 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 184 transition count 169
Applied a total of 50 rules in 8 ms. Remains 184 /209 variables (removed 25) and now considering 169/194 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/353 variables, 184/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/353 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 353/353 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 12160 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/353 variables, 184/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 168/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 20/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 7/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 3/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/353 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 42182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42183ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/209 places, 169/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42379 ms. Remains : 184/209 places, 169/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3999001183802832298.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12669275486102294665.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3999001183802832298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12669275486102294665.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.6404e+17,4.04282,132836,2,3294,5,382578,6,0,907,927300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(A((p12==1) U ((EX((p171==1)) + (p19==1)) + (p191==1)))) * (p107==1)) * (p200==1))) * EF((p4==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!(((EX((p171==1)) + (p19==1)) + (p191==1))) U (!((p12==1)) * !(((EX((p171==1)) ...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t16, t22, t23, t26, t30, t34, t38, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57,...426
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15165774297610065881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15165774297610065881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15165774297610065881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15165774297610065881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15165774297610065881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15827506712219393045.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5093326149418126647.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15827506712219393045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5093326149418126647.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.6404e+17,0.522566,22572,672,43,35199,688,456,94428,58,1600,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(A((i1.i3.u5.p12==1) U ((EX((i10.u55.p171==1)) + (i2.i0.u8.p19==1)) + (i11.u64.p191==1)))) * (i7.u34.p107==1)) * (i11.u65.p200==1)...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!(((EX((i10.u55.p171==1)) + (i2.i0.u8.p19==1)) + (i11.u64.p191==1))) U (!((i1.i...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t91, t135, i0.t107, i0.u20.t111, i1.t131, i1.i0.u1.t139, i1.i2.u10.t132, i1.i3.t133, i1....764
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 183 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 182 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 181 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 181 transition count 166
Applied a total of 56 rules in 7 ms. Remains 181 /209 variables (removed 28) and now considering 166/194 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 166 rows 181 cols
[2025-06-05 09:30:11] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 165 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/347 variables, 181/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 4/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/347 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 347/347 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 12390 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/181 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 22/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 166/347 variables, 181/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 165/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 17/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 4/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 5/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 2/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 1/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 6/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 6/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 347/347 variables, and 439 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 42414ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 165 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42414ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 181/209 places, 166/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42669 ms. Remains : 181/209 places, 166/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 166 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13073992686831201051.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13378941682616932961.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13073992686831201051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13378941682616932961.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61529e+17,4.02011,123540,2,2528,5,352413,6,0,892,846479,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((((p20==1)&&(p39==1))||(p107==0))||(p185==0))) * (((!(E(AF(((p20==1)&&(p39==1))) U EX((p188==1)))) + A((p57==1) U (p28==1))) + ((...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((p20==1)&&(p39==1))||(p107==0))||(p185==0))))] = FALSE * [(EY(FwdU((((FwdU(Init,TRUE...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t25, t30, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58, t62,...416
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8937647658830371810.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8937647658830371810.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8937647658830371810.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8937647658830371810.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8937647658830371810.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12916319561355909178.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5184638484726757997.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12916319561355909178.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5184638484726757997.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61529e+17,0.234015,14100,454,38,21298,494,440,38003,59,1211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((((i2.i1.u8.p20==1)&&(i4.u12.p39==1))||(i9.u35.p107==0))||(i12.u58.p185==0))) * (((!(E(AF(((i2.i1.u8.p20==1)&&(i4.u12.p39==1))) U...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((i2.i1.u8.p20==1)&&(i4.u12.p39==1))||(i9.u35.p107==0))||(i12.u58.p185==0))))] = FALS...472
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t83, t87, t128, t130, i0.i1.u1.t136, i0.i1.u9.t131, i1.t100, i1.u23.t95, i2.t132, i2.i0....730
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 62 rules in 7 ms. Remains 178 /209 variables (removed 31) and now considering 163/194 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-05 09:31:54] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:31:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:31:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60029ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60030ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60217 ms. Remains : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3758483190568353500.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17837720790153457675.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3758483190568353500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17837720790153457675.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.75659,101132,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(EF((p69==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),TRUE) * (p69==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,2.79595,101132,1,0,8,292868,9,1,1682,675011,4
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 62 rules in 6 ms. Remains 178 /209 variables (removed 31) and now considering 163/194 (removed 31) transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:32:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60236 ms. Remains : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability851428692873394717.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11602747867183483300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability851428692873394717.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11602747867183483300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.78184,99512,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(AX(A((p36!=1) U ((p127==1)&&(p139==1)))) U A(((AF((p0==1)) + AG((p6==1))) + (p30!=1)) U ((p105==1) + EX(((p27==1)&&(p125==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EX(!(!((E(!(((p127==1)&&(p139==1))) U (!((p36!=1)) * !(((p127==1)&&(p139==1))))) + EG(!(((p12...406
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17549150250466096817.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17549150250466096817.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17549150250466096817.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17549150250466096817.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17549150250466096817.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11232051497427475061.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13096388953268044538.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11232051497427475061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13096388953268044538.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,0.406881,18348,463,29,28199,291,444,63668,47,715,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(AX(A((i2.u12.p36!=1) U ((i5.i2.u40.p127==1)&&(i7.i1.u44.p139==1)))) U A(((AF((i0.i1.u0.p0==1)) + AG((i0.i1.u2.p6==1))) + (i2.u11.p30...232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EX(!(!((E(!(((i5.i2.u40.p127==1)&&(i7.i1.u44.p139==1))) U (!((i2.u12.p36!=1)) * !(((i5.i2.u40...579
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t81, t85, t129, i0.t127, i0.i0.u1.t133, i0.i0.u9.t128, i0.i2.t125, i0.i2.u6.t132, i0.i2....692
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 50 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 50 transitions
Performed 50 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 50
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 208 transition count 143
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 158 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 157 transition count 141
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 157 transition count 128
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 144 transition count 128
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 126 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 126 transition count 110
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 126 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 116 transition count 100
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 72 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 70 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 68 transition count 54
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 68 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 67 transition count 53
Applied a total of 279 rules in 18 ms. Remains 67 /209 variables (removed 142) and now considering 53/194 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/209 places, 53/194 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /66 variables (removed 1) and now considering 52/53 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 65/209 places, 52/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 200 ms. Remains : 65/209 places, 52/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5945205908163978295.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8623281401775518071.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5945205908163978295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8623281401775518071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.53496e+09,0.037365,5544,2,255,5,7948,6,0,314,10648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p212==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p212==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 50/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.055186,5800,1,0,10,8395,20,3,1546,10648,10
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 62 rules in 5 ms. Remains 178 /209 variables (removed 31) and now considering 163/194 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60030ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60224 ms. Remains : 178/209 places, 163/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13106604940266055880.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1193148640023645153.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13106604940266055880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1193148640023645153.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.81859,101036,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AG(((p14==1)&&(p68==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((p14==1)&&(p68==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
(forward)formula 0,0,6.43733,167096,1,0,404,617039,352,169,5184,1.01857e+06,401
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 182 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 181 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 181 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 180 transition count 165
Applied a total of 58 rules in 11 ms. Remains 180 /209 variables (removed 29) and now considering 165/194 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 180 cols
[2025-06-05 09:36:05] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:36:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 164 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 165/345 variables, 180/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 3/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/345 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 345/345 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 16244 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/180 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 30/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 165/345 variables, 180/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 164/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 9/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 13/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 1/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 345/345 variables, and 445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 180/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 46264ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 164 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46265ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 180/209 places, 165/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46473 ms. Remains : 180/209 places, 165/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 165 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3390496408055929635.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9100958198315273482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3390496408055929635.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9100958198315273482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.94817e+17,3.17674,111744,2,3150,5,320480,6,0,887,760130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!((EF(((p154==1)&&(p187==1))) + (!(EX((p33==1))) * !(((p196!=1)&&(p198!=1)))))) U (p46==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!((p46==1))) * !((p46==1))),TRUE) * ((p154==1)&&(p187==1)))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU(Init,!((p46...272
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 163/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,4.44035,111744,1,0,11,320480,17,3,1789,760130,7
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 183 transition count 168
Applied a total of 52 rules in 11 ms. Remains 183 /209 variables (removed 26) and now considering 168/194 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 183 cols
[2025-06-05 09:36:56] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 168/351 variables, 183/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 3/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 4/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/351 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 351/351 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 17111 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 28/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 168/351 variables, 183/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 167/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 13/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 6/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 5/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 6/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 6/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 351/351 variables, and 449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 47134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/209 places, 168/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47302 ms. Remains : 183/209 places, 168/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15295546523304340914.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1992521702011928945.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15295546523304340914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1992521702011928945.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.75255e+17,5.87467,158320,2,3319,5,430613,6,0,902,1.13676e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((p58==1) + (AF(((p89==1)&&(p108==1))) * ((A(((p172==1)&&(p184==1)) U AX((p124==1))) + EF((p36==1))) + (AX(EF((p151==1))) + (EG((p101=...177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * (p58==1))] != FALSE + (([(((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((p89==1)&&(p108==1)))))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((p124==1))...525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t11, t16, t20, t25, t29, t33, t37, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t46, t47, t51, t55, t60,...427
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5266988665260430522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5266988665260430522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5266988665260430522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5266988665260430522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5266988665260430522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10269257319365089398.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2936015459956493131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10269257319365089398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2936015459956493131.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.75255e+17,0.715846,31396,548,29,48736,268,435,143802,47,767,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((i0.u19.p58==1) + (AF(((i6.i1.u30.p89==1)&&(i7.u36.p108==1))) * ((A(((i12.u59.p172==1)&&(i13.u62.p184==1)) U AX((i5.u43.p124==1))) + ...257
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * (i0.u19.p58==1))] != FALSE + (([(((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((i6.i1.u30.p89==1)&&(i7.u36.p108==1)))))) * ...670
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t86, t134, i0.t106, i0.u19.t110, i1.t123, i1.u12.t127, i2.t130, i2.i1.u10.t131, i2.i2.t1...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 43 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 43 transitions
Performed 43 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 43
Iterating post reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 208 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 165 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 164 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 160 transition count 144
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 160 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 147 transition count 131
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 131 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 131 transition count 115
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 131 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 123 transition count 107
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 80 transition count 64
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 80 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 78 transition count 62
Applied a total of 260 rules in 25 ms. Remains 78 /209 variables (removed 131) and now considering 62/194 (removed 132) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 78 cols
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [65]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/209 places, 62/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 62/62 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 77/209 places, 62/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17596113292540863312.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17493630844698901918.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17596113292540863312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17493630844698901918.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.06379e+10,0.061752,6640,2,359,5,12292,6,0,370,16489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(((!(E((p176==1) U (p190==1))) * AG(((p159==1)&&(p161==1)))) * ((p62==1) * ((p190==1) + AF((p36==1)))))) U !(AG(!((AG(((p27==1)&&(p12...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((!(E((p176==1) U (p190==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p159==1)&&(p161==1)))))) * ((p62=...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t5, t6, t14, t16, t17, t22, t24, t26, t28, t31, t33, t37, t39, t45, t48, Int...249
(forward)formula 0,0,0.125793,8560,1,0,151,28882,153,63,2250,20165,136
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 190 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 190 transition count 175
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 189 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 189 transition count 174
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 188 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 188 transition count 173
Applied a total of 42 rules in 11 ms. Remains 188 /209 variables (removed 21) and now considering 173/194 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 188 cols
[2025-06-05 09:38:44] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:38:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 8/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 173/361 variables, 188/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 3/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 15357 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 34/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 173/361 variables, 188/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 172/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 11/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 6/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 2/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 3/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 17/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 188/188 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 45384ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45384ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/209 places, 173/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45557 ms. Remains : 188/209 places, 173/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8533870548391903224.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12364437532805022726.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8533870548391903224.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12364437532805022726.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.39531e+17,9.51877,275732,2,4884,5,746693,6,0,927,1.99918e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((AX(((p196==1)&&(p60==1))) * AG(((p110==1)&&(p116==1)))) * ((A((p35==1) U (p111==1)) + (p190==1)) + (!(((p175==1)&&(p19==1))) * AX(...533
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(!(((!(EX(!(((p196==1)&&(p60==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p110==1)&&(p116==1)))))) * ((!((E(!((p111==1)...935
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t11, t13, t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t27, t33, t37, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, ...486
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11092935283529667060.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11092935283529667060.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11092935283529667060.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11092935283529667060.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11092935283529667060.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5508407072244726540.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12271987032420884104.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5508407072244726540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12271987032420884104.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.39531e+17,0.472801,20680,826,30,32653,266,463,63802,52,734,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(((AX(((i16.u62.p196==1)&&(i6.u20.p60==1))) * AG(((i8.u36.p110==1)&&(i9.i1.u39.p116==1)))) * ((A((i3.u12.p35==1) U (i9.i1.u37.p111==1...829
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(!(((!(EX(!(((i16.u62.p196==1)&&(i6.u20.p60==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i8.u36.p110==1)&&(i9.i1.u39.p1...1391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t91, t137, t139, i0.u55.t42, i1.u6.t141, i2.i0.u1.t143, i2.i0.u8.t138, i3.t133, i3.u11.t...878
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 209/209 places, 194/194 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 183 transition count 168
Applied a total of 52 rules in 9 ms. Remains 183 /209 variables (removed 26) and now considering 168/194 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 183 cols
[2025-06-05 09:40:29] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:40:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 167 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:40:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 168/351 variables, 183/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/351 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 351/351 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 15477 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/351 variables, 183/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 167/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 20/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 3/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 4/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 12/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 3/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 351/351 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 183/183 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 167/167 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 19/19 constraints]
After SMT, in 45500ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 167 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45500ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 183/209 places, 168/194 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45707 ms. Remains : 183/209 places, 168/194 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10357919499794297793.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2989795043185938578.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10357919499794297793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2989795043185938578.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7247e+17,3.10484,105380,2,2625,5,304416,6,0,902,714075,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AG(((p145==0)||((p180==0)&&(((p95==0)||(p108==0))||(p142==0))))) + !(E(AF((p178==1)) U A((p104==1) U (p178==1))))) + (EG((AX((p40==0...188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !(((p145==0)||((p180==0)&&(((p95==0)||(p108==0))||(p142==0))))))) + !(E(!(EG(!((p178==1)...314
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t38, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t46, t47, t51, t55, t60, t64,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2095824753922274016.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2095824753922274016.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2095824753922274016.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2095824753922274016.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2095824753922274016.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14797292496301348302.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6058406326885883544.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14797292496301348302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6058406326885883544.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7247e+17,0.292539,15016,439,29,20625,309,458,46156,50,756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AG(((i4.i1.u48.p145==0)||((i14.u64.p180==0)&&(((i6.i1.u33.p95==0)||(i7.u36.p108==0))||(i9.u46.p142==0))))) + !(E(AF((i13.u60.p178==1...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i1.u48.p145==0)||((i14.u64.p180==0)&&(((i6.i1.u33.p95==0)||(i7.u36.p108==0))||(i9...419
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t84, t130, t132, i0.i1.u10.t131, i0.i2.t99, i0.i2.u24.t95, i1.t134, i1.i0.u6.t137, i1.i1...698
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4875102761412795242.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4875102761412795242.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875102761412795242.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4875102761412795242.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875102761412795242.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9369706459817187288.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18306552108441847050.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9369706459817187288.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18306552108441847050.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46562e+18,2.17942,69024,1478,36,110892,266,484,267407,51,745,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((A(!(((i8.u37.p104==1)&&(i6.u26.p72==1))) U (E((i14.u65.p169==1) U (i0.i0.u1.p4==1)) + E((i9.u44.p120==1) U (i10.u46.p126==1)))) + ...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!((E(!((E((i14.u65.p169==1) U (i0.i0.u1.p4==1)) + E((i9.u44.p120==1) U (i10.u46.p126==1))))...431
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t102, t160, i0.t158, i0.t156, i0.i0.u1.t164, i0.i0.u9.t159, i0.i1.u10.t157, i0.i2.u6.t163, i1...1048
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3775465070873317595.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18078463856997066290.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3775465070873317595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18078463856997066290.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46562e+18,89.0214,2800844,3663,305,4.86958e+06,821,268,2.34197e+07,114,7756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((A(!(((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.u34.p104==1)&&(i0.i0.i1.u20.p72==1))) U (E((i1.i0.i0.i0.u51.p169==1) U (i0.i0.u3.p4==1)) + E((i0.i1.i0.i0.u35...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!((E(!((E((i1.i0.i0.i0.u51.p169==1) U (i0.i0.u3.p4==1)) + E((i0.i1.i0.i0.u35.p120==1) U (i0...523
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u3.t164, i0.i0.i1.u20.t114, i0.i0.i1.u20.t115, i0.i0.i1.u20.t119, i0.i0.i1.u20.t121, i0...1835

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800466"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;