Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532800465.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800465
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749115248939

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Transformed 213 places.
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Transformed 198 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 213 places and 198 transitions and 492 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 91 out of 213 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 198/198 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 197 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 197 transition count 182
Applied a total of 32 rules in 30 ms. Remains 197 /213 variables (removed 16) and now considering 182/198 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 197 cols
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 423 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 131 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 182/379 variables, 197/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/379 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/379 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 20699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/197 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 36/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 182/379 variables, 197/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 181/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 18/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 9/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 6/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 5/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 2/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 379/379 variables, and 491 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 50781ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50790ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 197/213 places, 182/198 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51261 ms. Remains : 197/213 places, 182/198 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 197 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 197 places (down from 91) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 969 ms. (41 steps per ms) remains 2/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 186 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 184/197 variables, 27/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 182/379 variables, 197/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/379 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/379 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 91 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 197/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 13/379 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 19 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/197 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 114ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
Computed a total of 51 stabilizing places and 51 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 196 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 140
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 125
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 140 transition count 125
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 129 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 129 transition count 114
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 129 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 122 transition count 107
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 73 transition count 58
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 73 transition count 57
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 72 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 70 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 68 transition count 54
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 68 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 67 transition count 53
Applied a total of 255 rules in 43 ms. Remains 67 /197 variables (removed 130) and now considering 53/182 (removed 129) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [53]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/197 places, 53/182 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 65 transition count 52
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /66 variables (removed 1) and now considering 52/53 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 65/197 places, 52/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 189 ms. Remains : 65/197 places, 52/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 194 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9202165727091523163.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4415620650403976277.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9202165727091523163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4415620650403976277.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Applied a total of 36 rules in 13 ms. Remains 179 /197 variables (removed 18) and now considering 164/182 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 16582 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 23/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 163/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 19/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 7/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 9/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 4/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 439 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 20/20 constraints]
After SMT, in 46610ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46610ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46779 ms. Remains : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5257118236128420020.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6717806408722474409.ctl : 18 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5257118236128420020.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6717806408722474409.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3246e+17,2.83069,100620,2,2472,5,294277,6,0,882,682649,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!(EX(((p92==0)||(p145==1)))) + (p160==0)) + ((p12==1)||(p180==1))) U (AG((AX(((p46==0)||(p75==1))) * (p15!=1))) + !(AX(((p51==1)||...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((p46==0)||(p75==1))))) * (p15!=1))))) + !(!(EX(!(((p51==1)||(p40==1))))...459
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14188735491407959997.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14188735491407959997.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14188735491407959997.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14188735491407959997.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14188735491407959997.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15078699016140817365.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:22:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17756882690853990866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15078699016140817365.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17756882690853990866.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3246e+17,0.297937,16896,487,37,25398,384,460,54196,54,918,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!(EX(((i7.i1.u29.p92==0)||(i12.i0.u47.p145==1)))) + (i13.i0.u52.p160==0)) + ((i1.i1.u5.p12==1)||(i11.u58.p180==1))) U (AG((AX(((i3...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((i3.u17.p46==0)||(i0.i0.u25.p75==1))))) * (i1.i1.u6.p15!=1))))) + !(!(E...628
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t81, t126, i0.i1.u32.t82, i1.t130, i1.t128, i1.i0.u1.t134, i1.i0.u9.t129, i1.i1.u6.t133,...700
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 38 rules in 10 ms. Remains 178 /197 variables (removed 19) and now considering 163/182 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-05 09:23:29] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:23:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:23:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60242 ms. Remains : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17597504462669365515.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:24:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality490793163678521454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17597504462669365515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality490793163678521454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.88635,99576,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EX(((p4!=0)&&(p106!=1))) + (p145!=1)) + ((p25==1)||(p39==0))) + (((p186==1) + EF(((p190==0)||(p106==1)))) + AF(((p108==0)||(p16==1)...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((EX(((p4!=0)&&(p106!=1))) + (p145!=1)) + ((p25==1)||(p39==0))) + (((p186==1) + E(TRUE U ((p190==0)|...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6730934415650337279.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6730934415650337279.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6730934415650337279.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6730934415650337279.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6730934415650337279.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13191262896042496060.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12060933755738816667.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13191262896042496060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12060933755738816667.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,0.597831,25960,545,29,37821,289,416,121706,47,707,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EX(((i2.i1.u1.p4!=0)&&(i6.u32.p106!=1))) + (i10.i1.u44.p145!=1)) + ((i2.i1.u8.p25==1)||(i3.u11.p39==0))) + (((i13.u58.p186==1) + EF...242
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((EX(((i2.i1.u1.p4!=0)&&(i6.u32.p106!=1))) + (i10.i1.u44.p145!=1)) + ((i2.i1.u8.p25==1)||(i3.u11.p39...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t85, t129, i0.i1.t110, i0.i1.t114, i1.u6.t131, i2.t127, i2.i0.t125, i2.i0.u5.t132, i2.i0...687
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 38 rules in 14 ms. Remains 178 /197 variables (removed 19) and now considering 163/182 (removed 19) transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:25:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:25:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:25:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60253 ms. Remains : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9922103633710881163.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7354338677958002534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9922103633710881163.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7354338677958002534.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.91878,101280,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,2.94728,101280,1,0,6,292868,7,1,1446,675011,1
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 184 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 184 transition count 169
Applied a total of 26 rules in 3 ms. Remains 184 /197 variables (removed 13) and now considering 169/182 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-05 09:26:33] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:26:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 168 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:26:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/353 variables, 184/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 3/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/353 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 353/353 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 19998 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/184 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 26/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/353 variables, 184/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 168/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 7/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 3/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 7/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 11/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/353 variables, and 460 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 168/168 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 50032ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 168 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/197 places, 169/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50220 ms. Remains : 184/197 places, 169/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 169 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5825914456383646096.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1881097070858138008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5825914456383646096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1881097070858138008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07687e+17,3.99104,124692,2,2991,5,348799,6,0,907,868180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EG((((AF((p0==1)) + EX(!(((p204==0)||(p158==1))))) + ((p167==0)||(p183==1))) + ((p170==1)&&(p92==1)))) U EG(((p56==0)||(p44==1)))) * (...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(EG((((!(EG(!((p0==1)))) + EX(!(((p204==0)||(p158==1))))) + ((p167==0)||(p183==1))) + ((p170==1)&&(...422
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t12, t17, t22, t26, t30, t33, t36, t39, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t52, t56,...434
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12658810528586048074.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12658810528586048074.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12658810528586048074.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12658810528586048074.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12658810528586048074.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14292796682988192709.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:27:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16204552651115861521.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14292796682988192709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16204552651115861521.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.07687e+17,0.494942,22568,677,29,30282,285,461,109140,52,644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(EG((((AF((i10.i0.u0.p0==1)) + EX(!(((i15.u67.p204==0)||(i12.i0.u51.p158==1))))) + ((i11.i0.u53.p167==0)||(i12.i1.u60.p183==1))) + ((i1...476
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(EG((((!(EG(!((i10.i0.u0.p0==1)))) + EX(!(((i15.u67.p204==0)||(i12.i0.u51.p158==1))))) + ((i11.i0.u...588
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t89, t135, i0.t133, i0.i0.u1.t139, i0.i0.u9.t134, i0.i1.t131, i0.i1.u6.t138, i0.i1.u10.t...764
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 33 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 33 transitions
Performed 33 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 33
Iterating post reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 196 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 163 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 161 transition count 146
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 161 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 144 transition count 129
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 134 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 134 transition count 119
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 134 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 127 transition count 112
Performed 42 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 42 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 84 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 85 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 85 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 84 transition count 68
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 84 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 82 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 80 transition count 66
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 80 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 79 transition count 65
Applied a total of 232 rules in 27 ms. Remains 79 /197 variables (removed 118) and now considering 65/182 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/197 places, 65/182 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 83 ms. Remains : 78/197 places, 65/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14591038070353979063.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3846224985959300278.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14591038070353979063.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3846224985959300278.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33368e+10,0.179633,12800,2,491,5,34772,6,0,377,61654,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(E(((p13==0)||(p57==1)) U (p201==1))) + ((A((p199==1) U ((p192==0)||(p20==1))) * EG(!(E(((p155==0)||(p42==1)) U (p56==1))))) * (((p4...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(((p13==0)||(p57==1)) U (p201==1))) + ((!((E(!(((p192==0)||(p20==1))) U (!((p199==1)) * !(((p192=...324
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t5, t6, t9, t10, t12, t22, t23, t25, t27, t29, t32, t34, t38, t41, t44, t46, t47, t54...260
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9049591049437253651.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9049591049437253651.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9049591049437253651.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9049591049437253651.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9049591049437253651.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality88934177846509.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17336940529539352363.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality88934177846509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17336940529539352363.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...258
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33368e+10,0.063008,6768,111,28,5928,168,233,10366,60,500,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(E(((i3.u2.p13==0)||(i2.u9.p57==1)) U (i9.u23.p201==1))) + ((A((i9.u24.p199==1) U ((i9.u24.p192==0)||(i0.u3.p20==1))) * EG(!(E(((i7....301
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(((i3.u2.p13==0)||(i2.u9.p57==1)) U (i9.u23.p201==1))) + ((!((E(!(((i9.u24.p192==0)||(i0.u3.p20==...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t47, t54, i0.u4.t0, i0.u7.t22, i0.u7.t25, i1.u6.t38, i2.u0.t12, i2.u8.t27, i3.t9, i3.u10...368
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 38 rules in 14 ms. Remains 178 /197 variables (removed 19) and now considering 163/182 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-05 09:29:24] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:29:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:29:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60031ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60212 ms. Remains : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8861292121300271739.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality943775554991648305.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8861292121300271739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality943775554991648305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.74233,99820,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF(!(A(((p202==0)||(p71==1)) U ((p64==0)||(p130==1))))) * AX(AG((((p84==0)||(p59==0))||(p2==1))))) * ((p127==0)||(p177==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p127==0)||(p177==1))) * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(((p64==0)||(p130==1))) U (!(((p202==0)||(p71==1)...295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2019614834086180541.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2019614834086180541.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2019614834086180541.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2019614834086180541.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2019614834086180541.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15089422356713927492.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:30:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1038691517379907399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15089422356713927492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1038691517379907399.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,0.270217,15352,488,29,21638,295,428,53607,45,645,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF(!(A(((i13.i1.u64.p202==0)||(i1.u20.p71==1)) U ((i1.u21.p64==0)||(i9.i1.u41.p130==1))))) * AX(AG((((i6.i0.u27.p84==0)||(i4.u19.p59...231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i9.i1.u41.p127==0)||(i14.i1.u56.p177==1))) * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(((i1.u21.p64==0)||(i9.i1.u4...412
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t81, t129, i0.t127, i0.i0.u1.t133, i0.i0.u8.t128, i0.i1.t125, i0.i1.u5.t132, i0.i1....694
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 41 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 41 transitions
Performed 41 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 41
Iterating post reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 196 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 140
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 155 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 139 transition count 124
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 128 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 128 transition count 113
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 128 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 120 transition count 105
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 71 transition count 56
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 71 transition count 55
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 70 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 68 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 66 transition count 52
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 66 transition count 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 65 transition count 51
Applied a total of 259 rules in 21 ms. Remains 65 /197 variables (removed 132) and now considering 51/182 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/197 places, 51/182 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 50
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 63 /64 variables (removed 1) and now considering 50/51 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 63/197 places, 50/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 63/197 places, 50/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2624081583948165644.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11463704747246312117.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2624081583948165644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11463704747246312117.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.53496e+09,0.047022,5768,2,192,5,8982,6,0,305,12197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p85==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p85==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.077717,6280,1,0,10,13079,20,4,1508,12197,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Applied a total of 36 rules in 5 ms. Remains 179 /197 variables (removed 18) and now considering 164/182 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-05 09:31:25] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:31:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 18/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 21550 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 26/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 163/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 12/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 7/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 438 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 51573ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51573ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51733 ms. Remains : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality251219841449240664.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17050053611456676367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality251219841449240664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17050053611456676367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61785e+17,3.34485,115276,2,2784,5,334450,6,0,882,800430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((A(((p192==0)||(p111==1)) U (p133==1)) + EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((p133==1)) U (!(((p192==0)||(p111==1))) * !((p133==1)))) + EG(!((p133==1))))) ...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t21, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58,...410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12792208077698835088.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12792208077698835088.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12792208077698835088.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12792208077698835088.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12792208077698835088.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 33 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7088576315148044313.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality454462266945349536.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7088576315148044313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality454462266945349536.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61785e+17,0.392996,18696,574,29,27512,344,407,62492,47,861,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((A(((i10.u61.p192==0)||(i8.u38.p111==1)) U (i9.u42.p133==1)) + EX(TRUE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!((i9.u42.p133==1)) U (!(((i10.u61.p192==0)||(i8.u38.p111==1))) * !((i9.u42.p133...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t82, t128, t130, i0.t102, i0.u19.t106, i1.t115, i1.t111, i1.u6.t132, i2.u1.t134, i2.u8.t...646
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 183 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 183 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 182 transition count 167
Applied a total of 30 rules in 14 ms. Remains 182 /197 variables (removed 15) and now considering 167/182 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 182 cols
[2025-06-05 09:33:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:33:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 3/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 19884 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 32/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 166/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 9/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 6/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 7/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 349/349 variables, and 454 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 49909ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49910ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 182/197 places, 167/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50079 ms. Remains : 182/197 places, 167/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 167 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8575023439822517557.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10629281356303232485.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8575023439822517557.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10629281356303232485.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90843e+17,5.18191,166144,2,3478,5,468155,6,0,897,1.17376e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((EF((p47==0)) + (p180==0)) + ((p39==0)||(p123==1))) + (((A((p193==1) U ((p112==0)||(p38==1))) * EG(((p118==0)||(p6==1)))) * EX((p...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((E(TRUE U (p47==0)) + (p180==0)) + ((p39==0)||(p123==1))) + (((!((E(!(((p112==0)||(p38...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t20, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t58,...426
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16207259984918045848.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16207259984918045848.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16207259984918045848.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16207259984918045848.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16207259984918045848.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2163899163050560559.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14113117473499760087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2163899163050560559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14113117473499760087.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.90843e+17,0.548085,22660,597,43,33046,463,454,82484,56,871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((EF((i0.u16.p47==0)) + (i13.u58.p180==0)) + ((i3.u11.p39==0)||(i9.u43.p123==1))) + (((A((i14.u65.p193==1) U ((i8.u37.p112==0)||(i...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((E(TRUE U (i0.u16.p47==0)) + (i13.u58.p180==0)) + ((i3.u11.p39==0)||(i9.u43.p123==1)))...473
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t84, t129, i0.t117, i0.t113, i1.i1.u10.t130, i1.i2.t99, i1.i2.u22.t95, i2.t133, i2.i0.u7...736
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 197 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 159 transition count 144
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 159 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 144 transition count 129
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 137 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 137 transition count 122
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 137 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 132 transition count 117
Performed 52 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 80 transition count 65
Applied a total of 234 rules in 23 ms. Remains 80 /197 variables (removed 117) and now considering 65/182 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [64]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/197 places, 65/182 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 65/65 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 79/197 places, 65/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9832605205589682912.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17061277068592425195.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9832605205589682912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17061277068592425195.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29004e+11,0.099312,8844,2,773,5,20890,6,0,383,31110,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p1==0) * EG((((((p2==0)&&(p182==1))&&(p172==0)) + EG(((p129==0)&&(p157==1)))) + !(E((p203==1) U (p143==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p1==0)),(((((p2==0)&&(p182==1))&&(p172==0)) + EG(((p129==0)&&(p157==1)))) + !(E((p203=...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t8, t9, t16, t19, t22, t24, t29, t34, t37, t39, t47, t49, t56, t60, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,9.18173,346508,1,0,1194,1.91736e+06,163,489,2413,2.87384e+06,1388
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 178 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 178 transition count 163
Applied a total of 38 rules in 11 ms. Remains 178 /197 variables (removed 19) and now considering 163/182 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-05 09:35:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:35:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:35:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 19/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/341 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 341/341 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/178 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 24/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 163/341 variables, 178/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 162/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 15/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 3/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 341/341 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 178/178 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 60026ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60026ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60221 ms. Remains : 178/197 places, 163/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5421416308852151369.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10844220218444932994.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5421416308852151369.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10844220218444932994.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,2.81721,100392,2,2450,5,292868,6,0,877,675011,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AX(((p195==1)&&((p86==0)||(p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((p195==1)&&((p86==0)||(p7==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...405
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12432777263896483785.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12432777263896483785.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12432777263896483785.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12432777263896483785.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12432777263896483785.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16431858148632494945.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6960755855499598968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16431858148632494945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6960755855499598968.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29062e+17,0.241281,14452,464,43,20372,380,447,46680,56,910,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AX(((i14.u62.p195==1)&&((i5.i0.u27.p86==0)||(i1.i0.u2.p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i14.u62.p195==1)&&((i5.i0.u27.p86==0)||(i1.i0.u2.p7==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t81, t127, t129, i0.u1.t133, i0.u9.t128, i1.i1.t125, i1.i1.u6.t132, i1.i1.u10.t126,...697
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 180 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 180 transition count 165
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 179 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 179 transition count 164
Applied a total of 36 rules in 4 ms. Remains 179 /197 variables (removed 18) and now considering 164/182 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-05 09:37:16] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 163 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:37:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 2/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 5/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/343 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 343/343 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 12137 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/179 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 25/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 164/343 variables, 179/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 163/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 11/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 7/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 5/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 1/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 3/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 12 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 6/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/343 variables, 3/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 343/343 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 42164ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 163 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42165ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42339 ms. Remains : 179/197 places, 164/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11947047760238656391.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:37:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4906993471889988229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11947047760238656391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4906993471889988229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.58867e+17,3.13921,110160,2,2608,5,316186,6,0,882,746419,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EX(EX((p53==1)))) U EF(!(AX((p46==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p46==0)))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p46==0))))))) U (!(!(EX(EX((p53=...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, t61,...411
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2667844103045534419.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2667844103045534419.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2667844103045534419.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2667844103045534419.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2667844103045534419.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14554934693234133640.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6116525691526663023.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14554934693234133640.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6116525691526663023.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.58867e+17,0.270156,15300,591,29,23491,271,436,41814,49,602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EX(EX((i4.i1.u20.p53==1)))) U EF(!(AX((i2.i2.u15.p46==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((i2.i2.u15.p46==0)))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((i2.i2.u15.p46==0))))))...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t85, t126, t128, i0.u1.t134, i0.u9.t129, i2.t130, i2.i0.u7.t132, i2.i1.u6.t133, i2.i2.t1...703
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 185 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 185 transition count 170
Applied a total of 24 rules in 9 ms. Remains 185 /197 variables (removed 12) and now considering 170/182 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-05 09:38:59] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:38:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:38:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:38:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/185 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 170/355 variables, 185/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 4/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 6/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/355 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 355/355 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 14491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/185 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 26/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 170/355 variables, 185/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 169/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 7/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 7/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 7/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 5/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 1/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 355/355 variables, and 459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 44510ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44510ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/197 places, 170/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44679 ms. Remains : 185/197 places, 170/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9675573228707418678.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8900662409798442007.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9675573228707418678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8900662409798442007.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.38801e+17,6.08794,189820,2,3775,5,504497,6,0,912,1.36498e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG((p19==0)) * EG((((p152==0)||(p208==1))||(((p195==0)&&(p16==1))&&((p98==0)||(p162==1)))))) * ((E(AX((p172==0)) U !((((p72==0)||(p1...342
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !((p19==0)))) * EG((((p152==0)||(p208==1))||(((p195==0)&&(p16==1))&&((p98==0)||(p162==...417
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t32, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54, t59, t63,...433
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7236293070583862682.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7236293070583862682.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7236293070583862682.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7236293070583862682.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7236293070583862682.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5140794630671083935.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10694372834113365692.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5140794630671083935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10694372834113365692.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.38801e+17,0.805079,34596,640,29,50990,299,465,175782,55,747,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG((i2.i0.u7.p19==0)) * EG((((i10.i1.u51.p152==0)||(i10.i2.u68.p208==1))||(((i13.u65.p195==0)&&(i0.i1.u5.p16==1))&&((i5.i1.u31.p98==...541
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !((i2.i0.u7.p19==0)))) * EG((((i10.i1.u51.p152==0)||(i10.i2.u68.p208==1))||(((i13.u65....616
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t90, t136, i0.i0.u1.t140, i0.i1.t132, i0.i1.t134, i0.i1.u5.t139, i0.i1.u8.t135, i0.i1.u9...766
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 197/197 places, 182/182 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 182 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 182 transition count 167
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 182 /197 variables (removed 15) and now considering 167/182 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 167 rows 182 cols
[2025-06-05 09:40:44] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 09:40:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 166 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:40:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 21477 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 28/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 167/349 variables, 182/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 166/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 20/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 9/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 349/349 variables, and 450 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 182/182 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 51500ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 166 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51501ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 182/197 places, 167/182 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51665 ms. Remains : 182/197 places, 167/182 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 167 transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9819010576181644476.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 09:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16993485032587609063.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9819010576181644476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16993485032587609063.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.51317e+17,4.74371,152936,2,3827,5,440165,6,0,897,1.06923e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EF(AX(FALSE)) + AX(((p66==0)&&(p168==1)))) + (EF(((p5==0)||((((p122==1)||(p108==0))||(p146==1))&&((p210==0)||(p24==1))))) + (p103==...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p160==0)||(p57==1)))) * !((E(TRUE U ((p5==0)||((((p122==1)||(p108==0))||(p146==1))...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t11, t13, t16, t20, t25, t29, t32, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t50, t54,...431
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3710256598045533466.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3710256598045533466.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3710256598045533466.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3710256598045533466.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3710256598045533466.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15205938858667104589.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14327148650477320454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15205938858667104589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14327148650477320454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.51317e+17,0.379547,19084,640,29,32247,305,470,53541,49,732,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EF(AX(FALSE)) + AX(((i4.u23.p66==0)&&(i13.u56.p168==1)))) + (EF(((i0.i0.u1.p5==0)||((((i5.u43.p122==1)||(i7.u34.p108==0))||(i10.i0....276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i12.u53.p160==0)||(i1.i1.u20.p57==1)))) * !((E(TRUE U ((i0.i0.u1.p5==0)||((((i5.u4...357
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t88, t129, t131, i0.i0.u1.t137, i0.i0.u9.t132, i1.i0.u10.t130, i1.i1.t105, i1.i1.u20.t10...746
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3163041482191406139.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3163041482191406139.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3163041482191406139.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3163041482191406139.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3163041482191406139.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10168197203886602357.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 09:42:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality58258399331704412.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10168197203886602357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality58258399331704412.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.51272e+18,0.950569,34400,1024,30,51933,270,491,121081,52,674,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!(EX(((i6.i1.u31.p92==0)||(i14.i0.u51.p145==1)))) + (i12.u57.p160==0)) + ((i0.i2.u5.p12==1)||(i14.i1.u67.p180==1))) U (AG((AX(((i1...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((i1.i1.u16.p46==0)||(i5.i0.u26.p75==1))))) * (i0.i2.u6.p15!=1))))) + !(...646
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t94, t148, i0.t144, i0.i0.u1.t152, i0.i1.u10.t145, i0.i2.t146, i0.i2.u6.t151, i0.i2.u9.t...1012
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11623040126158626850.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 10:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15194720109418428343.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11623040126158626850.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15194720109418428343.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.51272e+18,42.2326,1466952,2538,331,2.62023e+06,937,303,1.20627e+07,123,8851,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!(EX(((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u31.p92==0)||(i1.u56.p145==1)))) + (i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u48.p160==0)) + ((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0....377
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u18.p46==0)||(i0.i1.u75.p75==1))))) * (i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i...869
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u3.t152, i0.i0.i1.u20.t105, i0.i0.i1.u20.t106, i0.i0.i1.u20.t110, i0.i0.i1.u20.t112, i0...1754

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532800465"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;