Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532700449.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532700449
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 176K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749111556913

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 56 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Transformed 143 places.
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Transformed 133 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 143 places and 133 transitions and 330 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 67 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 133/133 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 137 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 137 transition count 127
Applied a total of 12 rules in 20 ms. Remains 137 /143 variables (removed 6) and now considering 127/133 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 198 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 127/264 variables, 137/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 4/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/264 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 264/264 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 8322 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 26/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 127/264 variables, 137/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 126/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 13/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 4/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 3/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 264/264 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38385ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38395ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/143 places, 127/133 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38797 ms. Remains : 137/143 places, 127/133 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 137 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 137 places (down from 67) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 20974 steps (5 resets) in 403 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 0/43 properties
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
Computed a total of 34 stabilizing places and 34 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 136 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 109 transition count 99
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 109 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 92 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 92 transition count 82
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 92 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 86 transition count 76
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 50 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 50 transition count 39
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 49 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 47 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 45 transition count 36
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 45 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 44 transition count 35
Applied a total of 181 rules in 29 ms. Remains 44 /137 variables (removed 93) and now considering 35/127 (removed 92) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [30]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/137 places, 35/127 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 42 transition count 34
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 42 /43 variables (removed 1) and now considering 34/35 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/137 places, 34/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 42/137 places, 34/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 34 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14970051143660327961.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11148517844403297601.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14970051143660327961.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11148517844403297601.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3328e+06,0.028799,4928,2,111,5,5180,6,0,205,7293,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p32==0)||(p37==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p32==0)||(p37==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.046787,5184,1,0,10,7164,19,4,1007,7367,8
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 121 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Applied a total of 32 rules in 10 ms. Remains 121 /137 variables (removed 16) and now considering 111/127 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:19:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/232 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 5447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 110/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 16/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 5/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 232/232 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 35484ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35485ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35632 ms. Remains : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16471678009904535667.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:20:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1716369630422698820.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16471678009904535667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1716369630422698820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.50938e+11,0.630311,33384,2,1611,5,94098,6,0,597,202933,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p6==0)) * (EF((((p38==0)&&(p25==1))&&(p111==1))) + AX(((!(A(E((p85==1) U (p84==1)) U (p7==0))) * (p72==0)) * (p103==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((p6==0)))] = FALSE * (([((EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((p38==0)&&(p25==1))&&(p111==1)))))) * !(EG(!((p7...415
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t29, t31, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, ...324
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12687448485697621323.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12687448485697621323.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12687448485697621323.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12687448485697621323.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12687448485697621323.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8982152037440301620.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2425813570704865177.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8982152037440301620.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2425813570704865177.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.50938e+11,0.056822,6440,350,29,5288,193,304,7944,45,455,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((i4.i1.u2.p6==0)) * (EF((((i3.u10.p38==0)&&(i2.u8.p25==1))&&(i11.u38.p111==1))) + AX(((!(A(E((i9.u28.p85==1) U (i8.i1.u27.p84==1)) U ...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((i4.i1.u2.p6==0)))] = FALSE * (([((EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((i3.u10.p38==0)&&(i2.u8.p25==1))&&(i11....546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t84, t86, i0.t82, i0.u5.t89, i0.u9.t83, i1.u6.t88, i2.u1.t90, i2.u8.t85, i3.t75, i3.u10....499
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,1.27807,58408,1,0,99698,297,1764,207154,248,885,140000
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 123 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 123 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 122 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 112
Applied a total of 30 rules in 7 ms. Remains 122 /137 variables (removed 15) and now considering 112/127 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-05 08:21:04] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 112/234 variables, 122/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/234 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/234 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 234/234 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 8608 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 112/234 variables, 122/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 111/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 18/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 4/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 3/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/234 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 234/234 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 38621ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38621ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/137 places, 112/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38736 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 112/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3900068053923161491.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality797578147016589315.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3900068053923161491.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality797578147016589315.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.67882e+11,1.28446,54652,2,2080,5,150979,6,0,602,358472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((p7==0)||(((p64==0)&&(p85==1))&&((p30==0)&&(p32==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((p7==0)||(((p64==0)&&(p85==1))&&((p30==0)&&(p32==1)))))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 101/0/11
(forward)formula 0,1,1.55292,54652,1,0,51,150979,19,3,2815,358472,49
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 120 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 120 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 119 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 119 transition count 109
Applied a total of 36 rules in 12 ms. Remains 119 /137 variables (removed 18) and now considering 109/127 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-05 08:21:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/228 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 5867 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 12/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 108/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 13/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 7/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/228 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 35885ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35885ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36016 ms. Remains : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14355930771209337769.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18321715410703386906.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14355930771209337769.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18321715410703386906.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33119e+11,0.581408,31192,2,1479,5,87709,6,0,587,186199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AG(AF((p92==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p92==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t32, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t42, t43, t47, t51, t56, t60, ...314
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13527048284979942191.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13527048284979942191.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13527048284979942191.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13527048284979942191.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13527048284979942191.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2853594946693446502.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18194127797778570792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2853594946693446502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18194127797778570792.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33119e+11,0.059081,5908,271,29,3813,210,314,5663,47,476,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AG(AF((i9.u31.p92==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((i9.u31.p92==1)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t40, t80, t82, i0.u10.t81, i1.t84, i1.i0.u6.t87, i1.i1.u7.t86, i2.i1.u1.t88, i2.i1.u9.t8...467
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,1.9823,95636,1,0,178724,404,1753,354996,247,1127,201845
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 120 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 120 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 119 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 119 transition count 109
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 119 /137 variables (removed 18) and now considering 109/127 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:22:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:22:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:22:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/228 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 12/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 108/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 13/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 7/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/228 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 36063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36064ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36193 ms. Remains : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8310583845433526379.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10021043822308915800.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8310583845433526379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10021043822308915800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33119e+11,0.647969,30984,2,1479,5,87709,6,0,587,186199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EX(((p87==0)&&(p90==1)))) * EX(((p124==0)||(p55==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * E(TRUE U EX(((p87==0)&&(p90==1)))))) * ((p124==0)||(p55==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t32, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t42, t43, t47, t51, t56, t60, ...314
(forward)formula 0,1,2.70604,94968,1,0,269,428712,240,131,3367,607554,272
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 123 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 123 transition count 113
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 123 /137 variables (removed 14) and now considering 113/127 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-05 08:23:32] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:23:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:23:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 113/236 variables, 123/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 7616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 17/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 113/236 variables, 123/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 112/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 11/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 6/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 37637ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37638ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/137 places, 113/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37762 ms. Remains : 123/137 places, 113/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9417255227477818783.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10742168902458561450.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9417255227477818783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10742168902458561450.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.79774e+11,0.894312,40592,2,2028,5,112963,6,0,607,253468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(E((((p27==0)||(p104==1))||((p1==1)&&((p21==0)||(p77==1)))) U ((p50!=1) + AF(((p61==0)||(p62==1)))))) + ((p100==1) * (AX(((((p55==0...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(E((((p27==0)||(p104==1))||((p1==1)&&((p21==0)||(p77==1)))) U ((p50!=1) + !(EG(!(((p61==0)||(...408
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t19, t21, t24, t28, t33, t36, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, t59, ...334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4084598775446569313.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4084598775446569313.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4084598775446569313.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4084598775446569313.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4084598775446569313.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15589885708271054366.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13620713122062175454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15589885708271054366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13620713122062175454.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.79774e+11,0.080978,7756,407,29,8140,193,327,12247,47,478,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(E((((i2.u9.p27==0)||(i10.u34.p104==1))||((i1.i1.u0.p1==1)&&((i3.u7.p21==0)||(i1.i1.u26.p77==1)))) U ((i5.u16.p50!=1) + AF(((i6.u20...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(E((((i2.u9.p27==0)||(i10.u34.p104==1))||((i1.i1.u0.p1==1)&&((i3.u7.p21==0)||(i1.i1.u26.p77==...572
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t86, t88, i0.u1.t92, i0.u8.t87, i2.t84, i2.u5.t91, i2.u9.t85, i3.u6.t90, i4.t77, i4.u11....526
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,7.59131,278992,1,0,473210,333,1904,890530,245,954,525504
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 25 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 25 transitions
Performed 25 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 25
Iterating post reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 136 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 111 transition count 101
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 111 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 102 transition count 92
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 92 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 92 transition count 82
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 92 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 84 transition count 74
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 53 transition count 43
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 53 transition count 42
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 52 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 50 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 48 transition count 39
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 48 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 47 transition count 38
Applied a total of 175 rules in 13 ms. Remains 47 /137 variables (removed 90) and now considering 38/127 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [32]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/137 places, 38/127 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 45 transition count 37
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /46 variables (removed 1) and now considering 37/38 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/137 places, 37/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 133 ms. Remains : 45/137 places, 37/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17485831238186162549.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17173745213159052553.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17485831238186162549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17173745213159052553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.90976e+06,0.025455,5028,2,184,5,5783,6,0,219,7746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(((p44==0)||(p82==1))) U EG((AG(A((p24==0) U (p125==0))) * (p83==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,EG(((p44==0)||(p82==1)))),(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p125==0)) U (!((p24==0)) * !((p125==0)))) + EG(!...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t13, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,25.9744,839864,1,0,1088,4.03628e+06,120,600,1332,7.16027e+06,1283
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 121 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 120 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 120 transition count 110
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 120 /137 variables (removed 17) and now considering 110/127 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-05 08:25:14] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:25:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 109 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:25:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 110/230 variables, 120/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 5561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 110/230 variables, 120/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 109/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 13/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 35586ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35586ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/137 places, 110/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35703 ms. Remains : 120/137 places, 110/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5577670565595758159.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:25:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17368955989754515588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5577670565595758159.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17368955989754515588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.09266e+11,0.906531,38716,2,1730,5,109221,6,0,592,238006,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(EX(((p96==0)||(p24==1)))) * (AF(((p97==0)&&(p123==1))) + EX(((p116==0)||(p18==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(EX(((p96==0)||(p24==1)))))) * (!(EG(!(((p97==0)&&(p123==1))))) + EX(((p116==0)||(p18==1))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, t57, ...319
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4179874877474971738.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4179874877474971738.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4179874877474971738.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4179874877474971738.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4179874877474971738.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16068547865163792671.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality221795518119200357.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16068547865163792671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality221795518119200357.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.09266e+11,0.054386,6200,307,29,4255,235,328,8247,47,488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(EX(((i0.i1.u32.p96==0)||(i1.i0.u9.p24==1)))) * (AF(((i0.i1.u32.p97==0)&&(i12.u43.p123==1))) + EX(((i11.u38.p116==0)||(i2.u8.p18==1...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(EX(((i0.i1.u32.p96==0)||(i1.i0.u9.p24==1)))))) * (!(EG(!(((i0.i1.u32.p97==0)&&(i12.u43.p123==...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t81, t85, i0.i1.u32.t38, i1.t83, i1.i0.u1.t89, i1.i0.u9.t84, i1.i1.u6.t88, i2.u7.t8...483
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,1,27.834,761112,1,0,1.313e+06,392,1748,2.90883e+06,244,1049,1353402
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 122 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 121 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Applied a total of 32 rules in 7 ms. Remains 121 /137 variables (removed 16) and now considering 111/127 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/232 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 5833 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 110/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 16/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 7/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 232/232 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 35852ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35853ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35986 ms. Remains : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1705626063706500969.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14089009850247364763.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1705626063706500969.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14089009850247364763.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.86702e+11,0.760142,35004,2,1921,5,98911,6,0,597,212026,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(!(AX((p24==1))) U AG(((p128==0)||(p134==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((p24==1))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p128==0)||(p134==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t11, t15, t20, t22, t25, t29, t34, t35, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, ...324
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10644041160337851251.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10644041160337851251.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10644041160337851251.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10644041160337851251.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10644041160337851251.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9009899751874627913.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15258426811852493366.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9009899751874627913.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15258426811852493366.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.86702e+11,0.290738,16216,395,29,21701,223,328,63177,48,542,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(!(AX((i2.i0.u8.p24==1))) U AG(((i10.u40.p128==0)||(i11.u43.p134==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((i2.i0.u8.p24==1))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((i10.u40.p128==0)||(i11.u43.p134==1))))))))] != ...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t86, i0.u6.t88, i1.t75, i1.u10.t79, i2.t82, i2.i0.t84, i2.i0.u5.t89, i2.i0.u8.t85, i2.i1...518
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 136 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 109 transition count 99
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 109 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 100 transition count 90
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 90 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 90 transition count 80
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 90 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 82 transition count 72
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 49 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 49 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 48 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 46 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 44 transition count 35
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 44 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 43 transition count 34
Applied a total of 183 rules in 23 ms. Remains 43 /137 variables (removed 94) and now considering 34/127 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [29]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/137 places, 34/127 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 33
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /42 variables (removed 1) and now considering 33/34 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/137 places, 33/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 41/137 places, 33/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 38 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10403428356406150790.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9171440274712253119.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10403428356406150790.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9171440274712253119.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 136 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 110 transition count 100
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 110 transition count 91
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 101 transition count 91
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 91 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 91 transition count 81
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 91 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 83 transition count 73
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 49 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 49 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 48 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 46 transition count 35
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 44 transition count 35
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 44 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 43 transition count 34
Applied a total of 183 rules in 16 ms. Remains 43 /137 variables (removed 94) and now considering 34/127 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [28]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/137 places, 34/127 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 33
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /42 variables (removed 1) and now considering 33/34 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/137 places, 33/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 41/137 places, 33/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 33 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13334514335333750623.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14410710642297682831.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13334514335333750623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14410710642297682831.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86624e+06,0.03027,5108,2,120,5,5777,6,0,200,8404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((p134!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((p134!=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 31/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.121358,9076,1,0,10,30140,23,6,981,28541,9
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 122 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 121 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 121 /137 variables (removed 16) and now considering 111/127 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 13/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 232/232 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 4516 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 14/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 111/232 variables, 121/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 110/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 17/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 5/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 6/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/232 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 232/232 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 34540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34541ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34666 ms. Remains : 121/137 places, 111/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3535968486259083589.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:28:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6932287666414582529.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3535968486259083589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6932287666414582529.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77693e+11,0.763241,35468,2,1542,5,99510,6,0,597,217266,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(EG((((p131==1)||(p79==0))||(p99==1)))) + AX(E((p100==1) U ((p79==1)||(p139==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U EG((((p131==1)||(p79==0))||(p99==1)))) + !(EX(!(E((p100==1) U ((p79==1)||(p139==0))))))))] ...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t31, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49, t53, ...324
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3698193273408203375.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3698193273408203375.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3698193273408203375.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3698193273408203375.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3698193273408203375.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14391555961197735398.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1648613375172801488.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14391555961197735398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1648613375172801488.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77693e+11,0.148237,11068,313,28,14256,280,326,34121,47,630,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(EG((((i11.u41.p131==1)||(i8.u32.p79==0))||(i9.u36.p99==1)))) + AX(E((i9.u33.p100==1) U ((i8.u32.p79==1)||(i12.u44.p139==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U EG((((i11.u41.p131==1)||(i8.u32.p79==0))||(i9.u36.p99==1)))) + !(EX(!(E((i9.u33.p100==1) U ...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t82, t84, i0.t86, i0.i0.u6.t89, i0.i1.u7.t88, i1.i1.u1.t90, i1.i1.u9.t85, i2.t75, i2.u11...512
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,20.5719,562436,1,0,722889,486,2193,2.38942e+06,260,1372,556192
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 120 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 120 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 119 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 119 transition count 109
Applied a total of 36 rules in 4 ms. Remains 119 /137 variables (removed 18) and now considering 109/127 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-05 08:29:50] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:29:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:29:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/228 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 5890 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 12/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 109/228 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 108/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 13/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 7/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/228 variables, and 288 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 35911ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35912ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36029 ms. Remains : 119/137 places, 109/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4666066449056287211.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8843835982838508620.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4666066449056287211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8843835982838508620.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33119e+11,0.628238,31080,2,1479,5,87709,6,0,587,186199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX((((p95==0)&&(p50==1))&&((p29==0)&&(p97==1)))) + AF((p116==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((p95==0)&&(p50==1))&&((p29==0)&&(p97==1)))))),!((p116==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t32, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t42, t43, t47, t51, t56, t60, ...314
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 107/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,1.06914,33104,1,0,278,133815,245,117,3413,186199,271
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 123 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 123 transition count 113
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 123 /137 variables (removed 14) and now considering 113/127 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 123 cols
[2025-06-05 08:30:27] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:30:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:30:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 113/236 variables, 123/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 5159 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 113/236 variables, 123/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 112/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 17/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 123/123 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 35176ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35177ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/137 places, 113/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35294 ms. Remains : 123/137 places, 113/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15009267649153105170.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11063131353936757554.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15009267649153105170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11063131353936757554.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.79999e+11,1.30125,54600,2,2482,5,156427,6,0,607,351081,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p114==0)||(p136==1)) U (EX(((p140==0)||(p127==1))) * E(!(A(((p99==0)||(p116==1)) U ((p37==0)||(p65==1)))) U EG((p69==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(((p140==0)||(p127==1))) * E(!(!((E(!(((p37==0)||(p65==1))) U (!(((p99==0)||(p116==1))) * !(...627
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t10, t12, t15, t19, t24, t28, t32, t34, t35, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t44, t45, t49,...345
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3579696842924999024.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3579696842924999024.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3579696842924999024.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3579696842924999024.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3579696842924999024.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14183223781576284393.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:31:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1247209098287008397.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14183223781576284393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1247209098287008397.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.79999e+11,0.110299,8988,443,32,10296,280,317,18453,52,640,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i11.u36.p114==0)||(i13.u43.p136==1)) U (EX(((i13.u44.p140==0)||(i12.u41.p127==1))) * E(!(A(((i9.u34.p99==0)||(i11.u37.p116==1)) U ((i...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(((i13.u44.p140==0)||(i12.u41.p127==1))) * E(!(!((E(!(((i3.u12.p37==0)||(i6.u22.p65==1))) U ...883
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t86, t88, i1.t84, i1.u5.t91, i1.u9.t85, i2.u6.t90, i3.t76, i3.u11.t81, i3.u12.t77, i3.u1...550
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 127/127 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 123 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 123 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 122 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 112
Applied a total of 30 rules in 2 ms. Remains 122 /137 variables (removed 15) and now considering 112/127 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-05 08:32:02] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:32:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:32:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 12/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 112/234 variables, 122/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/234 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 234/234 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 4796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 112/234 variables, 122/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 111/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 15/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 4/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/234 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 234/234 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 34814ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34814ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/137 places, 112/127 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34933 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 112/127 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6388570996783054711.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:32:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16712065841230205523.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6388570996783054711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16712065841230205523.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.87711e+11,0.991273,43636,2,1632,5,123015,6,0,602,274748,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(((!((EF((p116==0)) + (p46!=1))) * (p27!=0)) * AF((p78==0)))) * (EG(EF((((p36==0)||(p106==1))||(p99==0)))) + AX((p24==1)))) U AF(EG(...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(EG(E(((p42==0)||(p30==1)) U (p47==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(EG(E(((p42==0)||(p30==1)) U...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t31, t33, t34, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t48, t52, ...334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6750228836290057924.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6750228836290057924.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6750228836290057924.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6750228836290057924.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6750228836290057924.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6015914964583090517.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11807570732494778387.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6015914964583090517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11807570732494778387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.87711e+11,0.077302,6804,359,32,5614,304,330,9188,52,583,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(((!((EF((i11.u35.p116==0)) + (i5.u15.p46!=1))) * (i3.u9.p27!=0)) * AF((i0.i1.u24.p78==0)))) * (EG(EF((((i4.u12.p36==0)||(i10.u32.p1...273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(EG(E(((i5.u13.p42==0)||(i4.u12.p30==1)) U (i5.u15.p47==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(EG(E((...518
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t85, t87, i1.u1.t91, i1.u8.t86, i2.u6.t89, i3.t83, i3.u5.t90, i3.u9.t84, i4.t75, i4.u11....519
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13547606545476962854.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13547606545476962854.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13547606545476962854.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13547606545476962854.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13547606545476962854.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7331477943637295137.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:33:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8000812003293575387.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7331477943637295137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8000812003293575387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.24787e+12,0.20201,12516,903,33,15125,192,372,34729,49,484,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(!(AX((i0.i0.u9.p24==1))) U AG(((i11.u48.p128==0)||(i12.u53.p134==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((i0.i0.u9.p24==1))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((i11.u48.p128==0)||(i12.u53.p134==1))))))))] != ...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t98, t102, i0.t100, i0.i0.u1.t106, i0.i0.u9.t101, i0.i1.u6.t105, i1.i1.u10.t99, i2.u7.t1...761
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17825340152353888202.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:58:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7394552550976951573.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17825340152353888202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7394552550976951573.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.24787e+12,3.9804,149732,2993,285,269957,737,218,1.04461e+06,104,5552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(!(AX((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u14.p24==1))) U AG(((i1.i0.u35.p128==0)||(i1.u36.p134==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u14.p24==1))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((i1.i0.u35.p128==0)||(i1.u36.p13...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t106, i0.i1.u19.t56, i0.i1.u19.t57, i0.i1.u19.t61, i0.i1.u19.t63, i0.i1.u19.t64, i0.i1....1245

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532700449"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;