Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532700433.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532700433
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 468K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749110894240

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPt-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Transformed 73 places.
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Transformed 68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 73 places and 68 transitions and 168 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 64 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 12/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/141 variables, 73/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 141/141 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 3014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 12/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/141 variables, 73/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 67/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 3/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/141 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 8268 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 11310ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11322ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11657 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 73 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 73 places (down from 64) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 65 to 64
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 748 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 1/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 233 ms. (170 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 34/141 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 23 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 67 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 67 /73 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:08:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 2043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 61/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 11/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 11770 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 13822ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13823ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/73 places, 62/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13911 ms. Remains : 67/73 places, 62/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18004724554376726305.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11043809256331884417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18004724554376726305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11043809256331884417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29321e+06,0.241691,15308,2,1232,5,34253,6,0,332,79927,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((p70==1)) * EG((((p20==1)||(p29==0))||((p43==1)||(p37==1))))) + (AX(AG(((EF(((p50==0)||(p13==1))) + (p7==0)) + (p42==1)))) * (EX(((A...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(EY((Init * !((!(EX(!((p70==1)))) * EG((((p20==1)||(p29==0))||((p43==1)||(p37==1)))))))),TRUE) * !((p42...561
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t11, t14, t18, t23, t27, t28, t29, t33, t34, t38, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, ...268
(forward)formula 0,1,11.7705,403220,1,0,1106,2.16706e+06,166,537,1900,3.35874e+06,1149
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 59
Applied a total of 18 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /73 variables (removed 9) and now considering 59/68 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-05 08:08:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1975 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 58/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 9/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 5537 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 7519ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7519ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/73 places, 59/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7612 ms. Remains : 64/73 places, 59/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15701803602402831440.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10666237256052646979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15701803602402831440.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10666237256052646979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75066e+06,0.105661,9568,2,815,5,18863,6,0,317,36622,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AG((p16==0)) + (p61==1)) + EG(((((AF(((p21==0)||(p35==1))) + AF((p2==1))) * AX((p49==1))) * (((p32==0)||(p30==1))&&(p9==0))) * ((((p...222
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p16==0)))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (p61==1))] != FALSE) + [FwdG(EY(Init),((((!(EG...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t9, t14, t18, t23, t27, t31, t37, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, t49, Inter...247
(forward)formula 0,0,5.48642,210132,1,0,1173,1.11136e+06,163,544,1822,1.74775e+06,1294
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 73 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 56 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 55 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 54 transition count 48
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 54 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 49 transition count 43
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 42 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 42 transition count 36
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 42 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 39 transition count 33
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 25 transition count 19
Applied a total of 97 rules in 25 ms. Remains 25 /73 variables (removed 48) and now considering 19/68 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [13, 14]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/73 places, 19/68 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 23 transition count 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 18
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /23 variables (removed 1) and now considering 18/19 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 18 rows 22 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [7]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 24 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 21/73 places, 18/68 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 17
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /21 variables (removed 1) and now considering 17/18 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 20/73 places, 17/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 20/73 places, 17/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 17 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14964635379408599658.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality651475494255070665.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14964635379408599658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality651475494255070665.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,578,0.006791,3920,2,60,5,1085,6,0,99,1211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p55==0)||(p4==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p55==0)||(p4==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 13/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.011385,4176,1,0,12,1559,19,3,508,1313,10
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 56 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 55 transition count 49
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 55 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 49 transition count 43
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 41 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 41 transition count 35
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 41 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 38 transition count 32
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 25 transition count 19
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 25 transition count 19
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 24 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 22 transition count 18
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 22 transition count 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 21 transition count 17
Applied a total of 101 rules in 11 ms. Remains 21 /73 variables (removed 52) and now considering 17/68 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 21 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/73 places, 17/68 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 19 /20 variables (removed 1) and now considering 16/17 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 19 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 53 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 19/73 places, 16/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 87 ms. Remains : 19/73 places, 16/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 16 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 169 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8120525015241220868.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11847475427261907707.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8120525015241220868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11847475427261907707.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 62 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 57
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 61 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 61 transition count 56
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 60 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 60 transition count 55
Applied a total of 26 rules in 10 ms. Remains 60 /73 variables (removed 13) and now considering 55/68 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/115 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1685 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/115 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 54/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 6/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 4186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 5878ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5879ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/73 places, 55/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6002 ms. Remains : 60/73 places, 55/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13382688682232350805.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16333846423027206312.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13382688682232350805.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16333846423027206312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.2467e+06,0.075081,7880,2,540,5,13903,6,0,297,25628,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF((p11==1)) * ((p11==0)||(p12==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * ((p11==0)||(p12==1))) * !(EG(!((p11==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t13, t17, t22, t26, t31, t32, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t41, t42, t43, Intersection w...238
(forward)formula 0,0,2.71136,111044,1,0,746,571161,134,389,1635,931136,845
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 62 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 57
Applied a total of 22 rules in 12 ms. Remains 62 /73 variables (removed 11) and now considering 57/68 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/119 variables, 62/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 57/119 variables, 62/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 56/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 4120 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 6200ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6200ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/73 places, 57/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6284 ms. Remains : 62/73 places, 57/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3456010127293827807.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7487374359542501483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3456010127293827807.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7487374359542501483.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41359e+06,0.102174,9048,2,562,5,17368,6,0,307,34190,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AF(AG(((EF(((p62==0)||(p34==1))) * (p20==0)) * (p4==1)))) + (p29==0)) + ((p6==1) + ((p60==0) * EX(TRUE)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p6==1) + ((p60==0) * EX(TRUE))))) * !((p29==0))),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((p62==...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t14, t19, t23, t27, t33, t34, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t45, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,1,0.181596,10456,1,0,156,26626,144,71,1752,38003,159
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 67 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 67 transition count 62
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 67 /73 variables (removed 6) and now considering 62/68 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 1766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 62/129 variables, 67/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 61/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 5291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 7062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/73 places, 62/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7149 ms. Remains : 67/73 places, 62/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13749521286196463844.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14980455420679850666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13749521286196463844.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14980455420679850666.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.32652e+06,0.233136,15868,2,1323,5,35283,6,0,332,82705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AF(((((p30==0)||(p22==1))||(p25==1))&&(!((p21==0)||(p68==1))))) U AG(EF(((p20==0)||(p12==1))))) + (E(AF(!(((p11==0)||(p71==1)))) U EF(...357
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((((p30==0)||(p22==1))||(p25==1))&&(!((p21==0)||(p68==1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p2...511
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t9, t11, t14, t15, t19, t21, t24, t28, t29, t30, t34, t38, t40, t42, t43, t44, t45, t...272
(forward)formula 0,1,23.6446,801492,1,0,2076,4.33183e+06,179,1083,1994,6.59032e+06,2498
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 58 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 55 transition count 50
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 55 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 50 transition count 45
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 47 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 47 transition count 42
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 47 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 46 transition count 41
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 30 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 29 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 28 transition count 24
Applied a total of 86 rules in 15 ms. Remains 28 /73 variables (removed 45) and now considering 24/68 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 28 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 28 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 24/52 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 52/52 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 198 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 24/52 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 23/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 52/52 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 216 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 415ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 415ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/73 places, 24/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 489 ms. Remains : 28/73 places, 24/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 24 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14840529972836017462.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7478589258348300954.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14840529972836017462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7478589258348300954.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12752,0.027425,5080,2,113,5,6214,6,0,139,8546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF((p68==1)) * !(E(((p42==0)||(p53==1)) U ((p51==0)||(p32==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U (p68==1))) * !(E(((p42==0)||(p53==1)) U ((p51==0)||(p32==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t9, t12, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...172
(forward)formula 0,1,0.042904,5464,1,0,64,7401,74,32,802,8546,76
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 55 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 54 transition count 48
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 54 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 49 transition count 43
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 43 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 43 transition count 37
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 43 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 41 transition count 35
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 27 transition count 21
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 27 transition count 21
Applied a total of 94 rules in 8 ms. Remains 27 /73 variables (removed 46) and now considering 21/68 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 27 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned [14, 15]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 27 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/73 places, 21/68 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 25 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 24 transition count 20
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 20/21 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 24 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned [8]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 28 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/73 places, 20/68 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 22 transition count 19
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 22 /23 variables (removed 1) and now considering 19/20 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 22 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 22/73 places, 19/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 22/73 places, 19/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14286972183488123423.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17513148977053763662.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14286972183488123423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17513148977053763662.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1201,0.011309,4088,2,65,5,1391,6,0,109,1924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((!(E((p0==0) U (p70==0))) + AF((p41==1))) + EG((p12==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((p0==0) U (p70==0))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((p41==1)))))] != FALSE) +...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total...167
(forward)formula 0,1,0.048665,6264,1,0,207,13061,66,111,649,16436,288
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 66 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 66 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 66 /73 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/68 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2116 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 12/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/127 variables, 66/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 60/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 6/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 3485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 5608ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5608ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/73 places, 61/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5713 ms. Remains : 66/73 places, 61/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality81234130803848208.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:09:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9343380009150486493.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality81234130803848208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9343380009150486493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.74922e+06,0.145412,11632,2,1020,5,25171,6,0,327,51304,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(AG(((p48==0)||(p60==1)))) U AG((!((((((p17==0)||(p53==1))&&((p44==0)||(p25==1)))||(p32!=1))||(!(((p22==0)||(p13==1))||(p46==1))))) * ...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!((((((p17==0)||(p53==1))&&((p44==0)||(p25==1)))||(p32!=1))||(!(((p22==0)||(p13==...755
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t8, t14, t19, t21, t22, t26, t30, t31, t34, t38, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t48, t49, ...258
(forward)formula 0,0,2.06171,81564,1,0,343,404028,154,166,1885,493840,381
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 64 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 64 transition count 59
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 62 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 57
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 62 /73 variables (removed 11) and now considering 57/68 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/119 variables, 62/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1725 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 57/119 variables, 62/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 56/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4217ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4217ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/73 places, 57/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4295 ms. Remains : 62/73 places, 57/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10244179169227281256.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4553736235930649106.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10244179169227281256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4553736235930649106.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.60986e+06,0.132671,10988,2,847,5,23500,6,0,307,48360,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(((EX(((p29==0)||(p25==1))) + (p6==0)) + (p25==1))) + ((p70==0)&&(p23==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(((p70==0)&&(p23==1)))) * !(EG(((EX(((p29==0)||(p25==1))) + (p6==0)) + (p25==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t11, t14, t18, t23, t27, t31, t33, t34, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t43, t44, t45, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,1.89679,77156,1,0,312,372701,140,146,1748,455560,338
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 63 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 63 transition count 58
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 62 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 62 transition count 57
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 61 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 61 transition count 56
Applied a total of 24 rules in 8 ms. Remains 61 /73 variables (removed 12) and now considering 56/68 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/117 variables, 61/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/117 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 1489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/117 variables, 61/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 55/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/117 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 3992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 5484ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5485ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/73 places, 56/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5581 ms. Remains : 61/73 places, 56/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6068377052056454178.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13918172624787280888.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6068377052056454178.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13918172624787280888.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42189e+06,0.107654,9428,2,735,5,18741,6,0,302,36772,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(AX(((p22==1)&&(p70==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!(EX(!(((p22==1)&&(p70==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t9, t11, t14, t18, t23, t27, t32, t33, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t42, t43, t44, Intersect...243
(forward)formula 0,0,0.198745,11092,1,0,150,29743,135,63,1666,42187,145
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 73 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 60 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 57 transition count 51
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 57 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 53 transition count 47
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 50 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 44
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 49 transition count 43
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 37 transition count 31
Applied a total of 73 rules in 12 ms. Remains 37 /73 variables (removed 36) and now considering 31/68 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 31/68 variables, 37/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 68/68 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 31/68 variables, 37/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 30/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 68/68 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 1243 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1680ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1681ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/73 places, 31/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1769 ms. Remains : 37/73 places, 31/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality249407341076572437.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15443997674792769094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality249407341076572437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15443997674792769094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,34679,0.053016,6456,2,328,5,8738,6,0,179,17117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF(((p8==0)||(p2==1))) + AG(((!(A(((p14==0)||(p36==1)) U ((p19==0)||(p51==1)))) + (p35==0)) + (p1==0)))) + ((AF(EG((p67==1))) * ((p5...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!(((p8==0)||(p2==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((!(!((E(!(((p19==0)||(p51==1))) U (!(((p14==0)||(p36==...409
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t10, t17, t21, t23, t26, Intersection with reachable at each step en...209
(forward)formula 0,1,1.40868,64096,1,0,1001,284771,122,485,1122,470702,1174
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 68/68 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 58 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 56 transition count 51
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 56 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 52 transition count 47
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 46 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 46 transition count 41
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 46 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 43 transition count 38
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 35 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 34 transition count 29
Applied a total of 75 rules in 13 ms. Remains 34 /73 variables (removed 39) and now considering 29/68 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 34 cols
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 7/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 63/63 variables, and 48 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 7/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 29/63 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 28/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/63 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 63/63 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 780 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1272ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1272ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/73 places, 29/68 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1364 ms. Remains : 34/73 places, 29/68 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 29 transitions.
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3534162097472771115.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality236881723761551219.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3534162097472771115.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality236881723761551219.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,27652,0.029954,5296,2,191,5,5601,6,0,167,9392,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((!(A(((p28==0)||(p8==1)) U ((p25==0)||(p12==1)))) + !(E(((p33==0)||(p16==1)) U (p43==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (!(!((E(!(((p25==0)||(p12==1))) U (!(((p28==0)||(p8==1))) * !(((p25==0)||(p12==1))))) + EG(!...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t23, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled....202
(forward)formula 0,1,0.370387,22820,1,0,483,95943,97,213,1055,158092,570
FORMULA ShieldIIPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-05 08:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 08:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 123671 ms.

BK_STOP 1749111019140

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPt-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532700433"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPt-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPt-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;