Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532500306.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532500306
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 152K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749030490944

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Transformed 243 places.
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Transformed 239 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 243 places and 239 transitions and 718 arcs in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 117 out of 243 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 243/243 places, 239/239 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 232 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 232 transition count 228
Applied a total of 22 rules in 31 ms. Remains 232 /243 variables (removed 11) and now considering 228/239 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 240 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 446 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 10/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 12/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 228/460 variables, 232/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 12/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 14/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 128/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 7/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 14/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 20/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 8/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 10/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 228/460 variables, 232/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 227/686 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 14/700 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 713 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60106ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 232/243 places, 228/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60601 ms. Remains : 232/243 places, 228/239 transitions.
Support contains 117 out of 232 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 09:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (68 resets) in 1578 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 7/89 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 64 ms. (615 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (11 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (10 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 222/232 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 228/460 variables, 232/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 6/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 460/460 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved in 852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 75/81 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 151/232 variables, 27/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 9/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 228/460 variables, 232/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 4/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/460 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 460/460 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 690 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/4 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1556ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 47 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 232 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 212 transition count 208
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 212 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 191 transition count 187
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 176 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 176 transition count 172
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 176 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 167 transition count 163
Performed 63 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 104 transition count 100
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 26 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 26 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 104 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 103 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 284 place count 102 transition count 99
Applied a total of 284 rules in 74 ms. Remains 102 /232 variables (removed 130) and now considering 99/228 (removed 129) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 102/232 places, 99/228 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 371 ms. (107 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2052451 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=683 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2052451 steps, saw 397344 distinct states, run finished after 3007 ms. (steps per millisecond=682 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 09:49:18] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/34 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/88 variables, 24/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/91 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 62/153 variables, 34/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 10/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 33/187 variables, 19/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 10/201 variables, 8/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 0/201 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 201/201 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/34 variables, 11/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/88 variables, 24/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/91 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 62/153 variables, 34/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 10/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 33/187 variables, 19/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 4/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 10/201 variables, 8/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 0/201 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 201/201 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 298 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 529ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 11 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 99/99 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 99/99 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 99/99 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 7/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 99/201 variables, 102/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 6/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/201 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 201/201 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 35/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 99/201 variables, 102/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 97/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 201/201 variables, and 286 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38121ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38122ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 38307 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 99/99 transitions.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
Computed a total of 60 stabilizing places and 60 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 231 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 210 transition count 206
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 210 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 189 transition count 185
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 172 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 172 transition count 168
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 172 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 162 transition count 158
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 102 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 100 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 261 place count 99 transition count 96
Applied a total of 261 rules in 28 ms. Remains 99 /232 variables (removed 133) and now considering 96/228 (removed 132) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned [95]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 10/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/194 variables, 99/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 4704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 19/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 95/194 variables, 99/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 94/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 249 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 6273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10999ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11002ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/232 places, 95/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 11228 ms. Remains : 99/232 places, 95/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15855894318523214955.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3187624646478085168.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15855894318523214955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3187624646478085168.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.78411e+14,13.1603,372832,2,12687,5,1.13288e+06,6,0,494,2.92304e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p35!=1)) * EG((p155==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U (p35!=1))),(p155==0))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...445
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5101925723539170462.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5101925723539170462.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5101925723539170462.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5101925723539170462.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5101925723539170462.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 59 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1377855639628064235.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 09:50:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12737926677682848542.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1377855639628064235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12737926677682848542.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 231 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 207
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 190 transition count 186
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 173 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 173 transition count 169
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 173 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 163 transition count 159
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 103 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 101 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 100 transition count 97
Applied a total of 259 rules in 32 ms. Remains 100 /232 variables (removed 132) and now considering 97/228 (removed 131) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned [96]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-04 09:51:09] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 11/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 96/196 variables, 100/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 4/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 4839 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 25/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 96/196 variables, 100/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 95/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 5981 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10833ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10834ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/232 places, 96/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 11091 ms. Remains : 100/232 places, 96/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 107 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6733558116676505375.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14170025330455798070.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6733558116676505375.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14170025330455798070.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 231 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 213 transition count 209
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 213 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 192 transition count 188
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 176 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 172
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 168 transition count 164
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 107 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 105 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 104 transition count 101
Applied a total of 251 rules in 27 ms. Remains 104 /232 variables (removed 128) and now considering 101/228 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [100]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 09:51:20] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 9/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/104 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 100/204 variables, 104/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 4/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 204/204 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 12106 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 22/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/104 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 100/204 variables, 104/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 97/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/204 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 204/204 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 15171 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 27304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27305ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/232 places, 100/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 104 /104 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 27509 ms. Remains : 104/232 places, 100/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15742843864555200241.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2223440942777333254.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15742843864555200241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2223440942777333254.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.17833e+14,17.7074,436396,2,62229,5,1.29362e+06,6,0,518,3.40823e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16354567252027691244.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16354567252027691244.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16354567252027691244.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16354567252027691244.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16354567252027691244.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 62 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6432142484970752819.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7673434788915660219.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6432142484970752819.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7673434788915660219.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 217 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 217 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 216 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 212
Applied a total of 32 rules in 13 ms. Remains 216 /232 variables (removed 16) and now considering 212/228 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 216 cols
[2025-06-04 09:52:48] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:52:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:52:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 13/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 212/428 variables, 216/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 5/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 7/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 3/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 7/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 1/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 2/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 428/428 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 111/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 212/428 variables, 216/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 211/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 10/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 428/428 variables, and 597 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 216/232 places, 212/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60334 ms. Remains : 216/232 places, 212/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 212 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10810953115682403107.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2478999512511356965.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10810953115682403107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2478999512511356965.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1719459625866718768.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1719459625866718768.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1719459625866718768.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1719459625866718768.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1719459625866718768.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12545147924181873140.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11043968869020411620.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12545147924181873140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11043968869020411620.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 216 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 215 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 215 transition count 211
Applied a total of 34 rules in 14 ms. Remains 215 /232 variables (removed 17) and now considering 211/228 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-04 09:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:54:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 331 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 210 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:54:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 171 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 283 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 12/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 6/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 4/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 7/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 13/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 4/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 7/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 105/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 210/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 14/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 164 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 13/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 11/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 426/426 variables, and 610 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60414 ms. Remains : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 211 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1425913287365820438.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3149820254508049366.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1425913287365820438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3149820254508049366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14421731151341623018.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14421731151341623018.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14421731151341623018.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14421731151341623018.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14421731151341623018.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15097636707021522468.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5067572596667303534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15097636707021522468.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5067572596667303534.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 231 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 214 transition count 210
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 214 transition count 190
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 194 transition count 190
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 179 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 179 transition count 175
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 179 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 172 transition count 168
Performed 53 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 53 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 119 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 225 place count 118 transition count 114
Applied a total of 225 rules in 24 ms. Remains 118 /232 variables (removed 114) and now considering 114/228 (removed 114) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-04 09:56:49] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 243 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 41 ms returned [113]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 34/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 19/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 113/231 variables, 118/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 9/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 231/231 variables, and 220 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 18952 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 34/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 56/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 113/231 variables, 118/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 111/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 4/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 3/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/231 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 48974ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48975ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/232 places, 113/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49293 ms. Remains : 118/232 places, 113/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2765493511025136611.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:57:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5987622503108390863.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2765493511025136611.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5987622503108390863.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7172424010194324555.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7172424010194324555.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7172424010194324555.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7172424010194324555.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7172424010194324555.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability264735486996904615.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13228589237973211143.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability264735486996904615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13228589237973211143.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 221 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 221 transition count 217
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 221 /232 variables (removed 11) and now considering 217/228 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 221 cols
[2025-06-04 09:58:39] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 09:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 216 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 16/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 14/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 217/438 variables, 221/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 13/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 14/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 9/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 3/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 8/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 0.0)
(t1 0.0)
(t2 0.0)
(t3 0.0)
(t4 0.0)
(t5 0.0)
(t6 0.0)
(t7 0.0)
(t8 0.0)
(t9 0.0)
(t10 0.0)
(t11 0.0)
(t12 0.0)
(t13 0.0)
(t14 0.0)
(t15 0.0)
(t16 0.0)
(t17 0.0)
(t18 1.0)
(t19 0.0)
(t20 0.0)
(t21 0.0)
(t22 1.0)
(t23 0.0)
(t24 1.0)
(t25 0.0)
(t26 1.0)
(t27 0.0)
(t28 0.0)
(t29 0.0)
(t30 0.0)
(t31 1.0)
(t32 0.0)
(t33 0.0)
(t34 0.0)
(t35 1.0)
(t36 0.0)
(t37 0.0)
(t38 1.0)
(t39 1.0)
(t40 0.0)
(t41 0.0)
(t42 1.0)
(t43 1.0)
(t44 1.0)
(t45 1.0)
(t46 1.0)
(t47 1.0)
(t48 0.0)
(t49 0.0)
(t50 1.0)
(t51 1.0)
(t52 2.0)
(t53 2.0)
(t54 1.0)
(t55 1.0)
(t56 1.0)
(t57 1.0)
(t58 1.0)
(t59 1.0)
(t60 1.0)
(t61 1.0)
(t62 0.0)
(t63 1.0)
(t64 1.0)
(t65 1.0)
(t66 0.0)
(t67 0.0)
(t68 0.0)
(t69 1.0)
(t70 1.0)
(t71 1.0)
(t72 1.0)
(t73 1.0)
(t74 1.0)
(t75 1.0)
(t76 0.0)
(t77 1.0)
(t78 1.0)
(t79 1.0)
(t80 1.0)
(t81 1.0)
(t82 1.0)
(t83 1.0)
(t84 1.0)
(t85 1.0)
(t86 1.0)
(t87 1.0)
(t88 0.0)
(t89 1.0)
(t90 0.0)
(t91 1.0)
(t92 1.0)
(t93 0.0)
(t94 0.0)
(t95 1.0)
(t96 1.0)
(t97 1.0)
(t98 1.0)
(t99 1.0)
(t100 0.0)
(t101 1.0)
(t102 1.0)
(t103 1.0)
(t104 1.0)
(t105 1.0)
(t106 1.0)
(t107 0.0)
(t108 1.0)
(t109 1.0)
(t110 0.0)
(t111 0.0)
(t112 1.0)
(t113 0.0)
(t114 1.0)
(t115 0.0)
(t116 0.0)
(t117 0.0)
(t118 0.0)
(t119 0.0)
(t120 1.0)
(t121 1.0)
(t122 1.0)
(t123 1.0)
(t124 1.0)
(t125 0.0)
(t126 0.0)
(t127 0.0)
(t128 1.0)
(t129 1.0)
(t130 1.0)
(t131 1.0)
(t132 1.0)
(t133 0.0)
(t134 1.0)
(t135 1.0)
(t136 0.0)
(t137 0.0)
(t138 0.0)
(t139 0.0)
(t140 0.0)
(t141 0.0)
(t142 0.0)
(t143 0.0)
(t144 0.0)
(t145 0.0)
(t146 0.0)
(t147 1.0)
(t148 1.0)
(t149 0.0)
(t150 1.0)
(t151 0.0)
(t152 0.0)
(t153 0.0)
(t154 0.0)
(t155 1.0)
(t156 1.0)
(t157 0.0)
(t158 0.0)
(t159 0.0)
(t160 0.0)
(t161 0.0)
(t162 0.0)
(t163 0.0)
(t164 1.0)
(t165 0.0)
(t166 1.0)
(t167 0.0)
(t168 0.0)
(t169 0.0)
(t170 0.0)
(t171 0.0)
(t172 1.0)
(t173 0.0)
(t174 0.0)
(t175 1.0)
(t176 1.0)
(t177 1.0)
(t178 1.0)
(t179 0.0)
(t180 0.0)
(t181 0.0)
(t182 0.0)
(t183 0.0)
(t184 0.0)
(t185 1.0)
(t186 0.0)
(t187 0.0)
(t188 0.0)
(t189 0.0)
(t190 0.0)
(t191 0.0)
(t192 0.0)
(t193 0.0)
(t194 0.0)
(t195 0.0)
(t196 0.0)
(t197 0.0)
(t198 0.0)
(t199 0.0)
(t200 1.0)
(t201 0.0)
(t202 0.0)
(t203 timeout
0.0)
(t204 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 438/438 variables, and 381 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 221/221 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 216/216 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 122/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 10/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 217/438 variables, 221/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 216/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 20/630 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 20/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60061ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 216 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 221/232 places, 217/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60306 ms. Remains : 221/232 places, 217/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 217 transitions.
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11005890952834597191.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 09:59:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13242885979723773439.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11005890952834597191.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13242885979723773439.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18352542068003639462.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18352542068003639462.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18352542068003639462.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18352542068003639462.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18352542068003639462.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9569630983694566348.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15266437128370256670.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9569630983694566348.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15266437128370256670.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 216 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 215 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 215 transition count 211
Applied a total of 34 rules in 9 ms. Remains 215 /232 variables (removed 17) and now considering 211/228 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-04 10:00:40] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:00:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 229 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 210 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:00:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 7/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 12/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 4/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/426 variables, 6/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 95/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 5/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 210/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 20/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 20/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 14/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 426/426 variables, and 622 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60302 ms. Remains : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 211 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13200278395774879332.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:01:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability398857888949350343.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13200278395774879332.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability398857888949350343.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12053995689291623816.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12053995689291623816.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12053995689291623816.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12053995689291623816.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12053995689291623816.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11629240475722561428.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability313789575208214075.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11629240475722561428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability313789575208214075.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 231 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 213 transition count 209
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 213 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 192 transition count 188
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 176 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 172
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 176 transition count 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 168 transition count 164
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 108 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 106 transition count 102
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 105 transition count 102
Applied a total of 249 rules in 20 ms. Remains 105 /232 variables (removed 127) and now considering 102/228 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 41 ms returned [101]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-04 10:02:40] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/105 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 7/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 101/206 variables, 105/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 6/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/206 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 7874 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/105 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 12/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 101/206 variables, 105/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 97/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/206 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 206/206 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 37897ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37899ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/232 places, 101/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38137 ms. Remains : 105/232 places, 101/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12747960204195194429.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4577748075505960209.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12747960204195194429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4577748075505960209.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.79848e+14,18.8254,410580,2,29301,5,1.2234e+06,6,0,523,3.2183e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18061027063584159430.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18061027063584159430.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18061027063584159430.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18061027063584159430.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18061027063584159430.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 68 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2686609570760392766.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:03:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5084831171479169649.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2686609570760392766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5084831171479169649.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 219 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 219 transition count 215
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 218 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 218 transition count 214
Applied a total of 28 rules in 6 ms. Remains 218 /232 variables (removed 14) and now considering 214/228 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 218 cols
[2025-06-04 10:04:18] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 213 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:04:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 214/432 variables, 218/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 12/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 3/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 6/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 6/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 5/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 5/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 432/432 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 213/213 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 90/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 214/432 variables, 218/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 213/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 20/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 4/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 6/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/432 variables, 7/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60048ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 213 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/232 places, 214/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60297 ms. Remains : 218/232 places, 214/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 214 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11629085228363121364.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4265283826762812604.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11629085228363121364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4265283826762812604.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12909196732724325075.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12909196732724325075.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12909196732724325075.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12909196732724325075.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12909196732724325075.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1187900011178194574.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:05:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17919485156059017240.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1187900011178194574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17919485156059017240.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 231 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 212 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 207
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 190 transition count 186
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 174 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 174 transition count 170
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 174 transition count 161
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 165 transition count 161
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 105 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 103 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 102 transition count 99
Applied a total of 255 rules in 32 ms. Remains 102 /232 variables (removed 130) and now considering 99/228 (removed 129) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 31 ms returned [98]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 11/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/200 variables, 102/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 200/200 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 6385 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 23/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 98/200 variables, 102/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 96/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 4/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 3/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/200 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 200/200 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 27231 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 33629ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33629ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/232 places, 98/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 33945 ms. Remains : 102/232 places, 98/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8286904857450391519.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:06:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5799510489958541962.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8286904857450391519.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5799510489958541962.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.66599e+14,13.504,380492,2,12691,5,1.14499e+06,6,0,508,2.98001e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((AF((p29==0)) + AF((((p140==0)||(p142==0))||(p54==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(EG(!((p29==0)))) + !(EG(!((((p140==0)||(p142==0))||(p54==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5596978110610431823.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5596978110610431823.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5596978110610431823.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5596978110610431823.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5596978110610431823.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16475164067015773475.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11554158288692942520.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16475164067015773475.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11554158288692942520.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 231 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 210 transition count 206
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 210 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 189 transition count 185
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 172 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 172 transition count 168
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 172 transition count 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 162 transition count 158
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 104 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 102 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 101 transition count 98
Applied a total of 257 rules in 27 ms. Remains 101 /232 variables (removed 131) and now considering 98/228 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned [97]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 10:07:53] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 97/198 variables, 101/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 7117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 32/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 97/198 variables, 101/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 95/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 37152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37153ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/232 places, 97/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 37416 ms. Remains : 101/232 places, 97/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4634991755650905649.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17600104729988875855.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4634991755650905649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17600104729988875855.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.78411e+14,13.7613,391524,2,13339,5,1.15901e+06,6,0,503,3.01792e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph881510352544285899.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph881510352544285899.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph881510352544285899.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph881510352544285899.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph881510352544285899.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 59 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 56 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17002487681846349999.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6312769482108321092.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17002487681846349999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6312769482108321092.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 231 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 207
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 186
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 190 transition count 186
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 173 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 173 transition count 169
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 173 transition count 160
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 164 transition count 160
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 104 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 102 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 101 transition count 98
Applied a total of 257 rules in 38 ms. Remains 101 /232 variables (removed 131) and now considering 98/228 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned [97]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 12/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/198 variables, 101/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 4609 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 18/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/198 variables, 101/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 95/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 6/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 27256 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31885ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31885ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/232 places, 97/228 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32161 ms. Remains : 101/232 places, 97/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15186211677938878787.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11322373462683630466.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15186211677938878787.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11322373462683630466.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.70671e+14,13.5231,388948,2,13601,5,1.18782e+06,6,0,504,3.0142e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF(((AF((p19==0)) * (p145==1)) * ((p156==1)&&(p180==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!((p19==0)))) * (p145==1)) * ((p156==1)&&(p180==1))))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t2...446
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4279675837564170972.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4279675837564170972.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4279675837564170972.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4279675837564170972.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4279675837564170972.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 61 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5883052813556739184.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:10:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2979680872509706569.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5883052813556739184.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2979680872509706569.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 216 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 212
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 215 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 215 transition count 211
Applied a total of 34 rules in 9 ms. Remains 215 /232 variables (removed 17) and now considering 211/228 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-04 10:11:03] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 210 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 7/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 15/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 4/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 12/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 5/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 426/426 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 101/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 3/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 211/426 variables, 215/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 210/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 18/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 7/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 426/426 variables, and 606 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 215/215 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60307 ms. Remains : 215/232 places, 211/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 211 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8817948590884521603.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14256192318823730705.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8817948590884521603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14256192318823730705.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9168892241939520229.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9168892241939520229.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168892241939520229.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9168892241939520229.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9168892241939520229.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11487888733090502381.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5427209824526008462.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11487888733090502381.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5427209824526008462.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 217 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 217 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 216 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 216 transition count 212
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 216 /232 variables (removed 16) and now considering 212/228 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 216 cols
[2025-06-04 10:13:04] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:13:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 235 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:13:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 15/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/428 variables, 216/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 11/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 7/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 8/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 428/428 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 117/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 212/428 variables, 216/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 211/593 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 10/603 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 12/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 428/428 variables, and 626 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 216/232 places, 212/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60301 ms. Remains : 216/232 places, 212/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 212 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5890493512952273914.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3851829056549418922.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5890493512952273914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3851829056549418922.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17690380140981907339.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17690380140981907339.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17690380140981907339.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17690380140981907339.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17690380140981907339.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2365484348242464602.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9574147607605494457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2365484348242464602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9574147607605494457.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 219 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 219 transition count 215
Applied a total of 26 rules in 9 ms. Remains 219 /232 variables (removed 13) and now considering 215/228 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-04 10:15:04] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 10:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 214 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 16/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 9/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 215/434 variables, 219/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 15/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 18/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 11/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 6/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 10/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 3/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 15/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 434/434 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/219 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 138/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 11/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 215/434 variables, 219/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 214/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 20/653 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 19/672 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 434/434 variables, and 672 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 202/202 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/232 places, 215/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60283 ms. Remains : 219/232 places, 215/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6756483684982227408.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17408191252067580305.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6756483684982227408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17408191252067580305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5982498815884070253.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5982498815884070253.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5982498815884070253.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5982498815884070253.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5982498815884070253.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability122953257815570669.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15002872196399966509.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability122953257815570669.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15002872196399966509.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11328853645225100287.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11328853645225100287.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11328853645225100287.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11328853645225100287.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11328853645225100287.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16870030753531132090.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14046791609943253504.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16870030753531132090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14046791609943253504.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03745e+22,778.195,3333772,34409,85,3.41685e+06,1663,565,2.01616e+07,59,12910,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((i2.u13.p35!=1)) * EG((i6.i1.i0.u52.p155==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U (i2.u13.p35!=1))),(i6.i1.i0.u52.p155==0))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t66, t95, t122, t124, t126, t149, t151, t153, i0.u2.t157, i0.u6.t156, i1.t140, i1.u7.t155, i1...1291
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 64 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 80 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5877418902079104682.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 10:46:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17972286130285635780.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5877418902079104682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17972286130285635780.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532500306"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;