Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532400289.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400289
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749022823181

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 61 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Transformed 183 places.
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Transformed 180 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 183 places and 180 transitions and 540 arcs in 151 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 96 out of 183 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 183/183 places, 180/180 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 176 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 176 transition count 173
Applied a total of 14 rules in 24 ms. Remains 176 /183 variables (removed 7) and now considering 173/180 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 176 cols
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:40:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 12/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 19/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 15/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 15/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 9/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 11/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 5/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 152/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 6/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 172/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 20/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 12/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 11/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 2/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 349/349 variables, and 580 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60099ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/183 places, 173/180 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60564 ms. Remains : 176/183 places, 173/180 transitions.
Support contains 96 out of 176 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 07:41:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:25] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 07:41:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 176 places (down from 96) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (88 resets) in 1354 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 3/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (14 resets) in 249 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (12 resets) in 263 ms. (151 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (12 resets) in 214 ms. (186 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 79/88 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 88/176 variables, 16/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 173/349 variables, 176/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/349 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 349/349 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 133 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 79/88 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 88/349 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 77 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 214ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 165 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 165 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 164 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 164 transition count 161
Applied a total of 24 rules in 20 ms. Remains 164 /176 variables (removed 12) and now considering 161/173 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 12/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 161/325 variables, 164/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 6/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 16/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 6/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 3/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 4/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 3/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/325 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 325/325 variables, and 287 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 92/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 161/325 variables, 164/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 160/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 3/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60047ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/176 places, 161/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60242 ms. Remains : 164/176 places, 161/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11071449063568903447.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15206153374344305498.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11071449063568903447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15206153374344305498.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:42:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18412205554849409848.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18412205554849409848.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18412205554849409848.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18412205554849409848.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18412205554849409848.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:42:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:42:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:42:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10473335575037519009.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7268456632348710754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10473335575037519009.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7268456632348710754.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 175 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 124 transition count 121
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 79 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 76 transition count 74
Applied a total of 195 rules in 37 ms. Remains 76 /176 variables (removed 100) and now considering 74/173 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [73]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 5/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 73/149 variables, 76/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 4854 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 16/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/149 variables, 76/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 71/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 3914 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8783ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8783ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/176 places, 73/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 9001 ms. Remains : 76/176 places, 73/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14488957755031068528.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:43:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10104531138778137354.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14488957755031068528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10104531138778137354.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17705e+11,2.37592,71500,2,4139,5,230756,6,0,379,497487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((p86==1)) + (p95==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p95==1))),!((p86==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 70/0/3
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6086490808170228236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6086490808170228236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6086490808170228236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6086490808170228236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6086490808170228236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 52 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2148318063916557651.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12701175468725434172.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2148318063916557651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12701175468725434172.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17705e+11,17.3511,238176,1365,30,244815,67,197,1.61885e+06,34,315,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((i2.u14.p86==1)) + (i3.i1.u15.p95==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i3.i1.u15.p95==1))),!((i2.u14.p86==1)))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 176 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 162 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 160 transition count 157
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 160 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 144 transition count 141
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 131 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 131 transition count 128
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 131 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 127 transition count 124
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 81 transition count 78
Applied a total of 190 rules in 21 ms. Remains 81 /176 variables (removed 95) and now considering 78/173 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [66]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/176 places, 78/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 80/176 places, 78/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10666987642493590562.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2915396409156909750.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10666987642493590562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2915396409156909750.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30847e+11,1.98338,68380,2,4437,5,213836,6,0,400,459513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((p65==0) U EF(AG((p124==1)))) U !(((p155==0)||(p47==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E((p65==0) U E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p124==1))))))) * !(((p155==0)||(p47==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...385
(forward)formula 0,0,2.99793,70680,1,0,218,366493,188,85,2915,459513,174
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 7 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 161 cols
[2025-06-04 07:44:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:44:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:44:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 7/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 8/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 4/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/319 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 161/161 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 73/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 157/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 10/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 9/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 6/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60037ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60235 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15240991117038656505.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:45:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2870975652750228241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15240991117038656505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2870975652750228241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2342028759192503326.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2342028759192503326.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2342028759192503326.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2342028759192503326.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2342028759192503326.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11364471412694402581.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15324423410078491796.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11364471412694402581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15324423410078491796.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 175 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 162 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 161 transition count 158
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 161 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 130 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 130 transition count 127
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 130 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 127 transition count 124
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 84 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 82 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 81 transition count 79
Applied a total of 185 rules in 30 ms. Remains 81 /176 variables (removed 95) and now considering 79/173 (removed 94) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [78]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 13/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 8/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 78/159 variables, 81/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 7/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 159/159 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 8857 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 10/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/81 variables, 13/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 17/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/159 variables, 81/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 74/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 159/159 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 11127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 19995ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19996ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 81/176 places, 78/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 20176 ms. Remains : 81/176 places, 78/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4394668558656439746.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15818142299498968439.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4394668558656439746.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15818142299498968439.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.23882e+11,4.25178,137764,2,9714,5,437522,6,0,403,971686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(!(((((p62==0)||(p67==1))||((p17==0)||(p80==1)))||((p81==0)&&(p143==1)))) U AF((p104==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EG(!((p104==1)))))) * !(!(((((p62==0)||(p67==1))||((p17==0)||(p80==1)))||((p81=...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...390
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10530407722262990965.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10530407722262990965.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10530407722262990965.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10530407722262990965.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10530407722262990965.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 49 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2176477438112344874.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8119230560150785756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2176477438112344874.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8119230560150785756.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.23882e+11,14.0194,183436,1505,30,203351,97,274,989537,35,384,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(!(((((i1.i1.u10.p62==0)||(i4.i1.u11.p67==1))||((i0.i1.u2.p17==0)||(i2.i0.u14.p80==1)))||((i2.i0.u15.p81==0)&&(i6.u26.p143==1)))) U...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EG(!((i2.i1.u20.p104==1)))))) * !(!(((((i1.i1.u10.p62==0)||(i4.i1.u11.p67==1))|...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t30, t39, t45, t51, t57, t60, t62, t74, t76, i0.t31, i0.i0.u6.t0, i0.i0.u6.t1, i0.i1.t22...570
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 164 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 164 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 163 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 160
Applied a total of 26 rules in 15 ms. Remains 163 /176 variables (removed 13) and now considering 160/173 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 163 cols
[2025-06-04 07:48:00] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:48:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:48:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 7/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 160/323 variables, 163/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 3/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 5/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 6/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 8/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 7/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 9/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 6/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 3/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 323/323 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/163 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 102/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 3/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/323 variables, 163/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 159/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 17/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 9/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 5/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 9/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 323/323 variables, and 496 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 163/163 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 163/176 places, 160/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60243 ms. Remains : 163/176 places, 160/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17371536755023374674.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11185842121287196991.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17371536755023374674.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11185842121287196991.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4968562006834848718.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4968562006834848718.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4968562006834848718.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4968562006834848718.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4968562006834848718.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17348318158945533347.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:49:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15725196402678955985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17348318158945533347.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15725196402678955985.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 175 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 161 transition count 158
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 161 transition count 146
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 149 transition count 146
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 139 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 139 transition count 136
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 139 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 138 transition count 135
Performed 40 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 40 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 40 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 98 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 96 transition count 93
Applied a total of 156 rules in 27 ms. Remains 96 /176 variables (removed 80) and now considering 93/173 (removed 80) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 96 cols
[2025-06-04 07:50:00] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:50:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/96 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/189 variables, 96/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 6886 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/96 variables, 19/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 11/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/189 variables, 96/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 89/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 36906ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36906ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/176 places, 93/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37091 ms. Remains : 96/176 places, 93/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8498142194614631357.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:50:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10050091610352487930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8498142194614631357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10050091610352487930.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.92213e+12,4.30705,129380,2,6743,5,379718,6,0,477,943010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((!((EG((p3==1)) + E(((p78==0)||(p59==1)) U (p111==1)))) * (p175==1))) * E(!(EG((p21==0))) U A(A(((p144==0)||(p22==1)) U (p104==0)) ...313
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((!((!((EG((p3==1)) + E(((p78==0)||(p59==1)) U (p111==1)))) * (p175==1))) * E(!(EG((p21==0))) U !((E...748
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...390
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16988222519286360824.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16988222519286360824.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16988222519286360824.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16988222519286360824.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16988222519286360824.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10218310231018054005.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17455034797584573511.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10218310231018054005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17455034797584573511.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.92213e+12,3.81543,90924,1059,51,134180,288,331,306014,63,1599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((!((EG((i1.u0.p3==1)) + E(((i4.i0.u14.p78==0)||(i2.u11.p59==1)) U (i3.u23.p111==1)))) * (i8.i1.u33.p175==1))) * E(!(EG((i0.i1.u3.p2...469
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((!((!((EG((i1.u0.p3==1)) + E(((i4.i0.u14.p78==0)||(i2.u11.p59==1)) U (i3.u23.p111==1)))) * (i8.i1.u...1050
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t13, t62, t65, t67, t69, t73, t74, t75, t77, t78, i0.i1.t51, i1.u0.t35, i1.u5.t33, i1.u8.t0, ...590
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 11 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 161 cols
[2025-06-04 07:51:38] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:51:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:51:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 7/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 8/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 4/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/319 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 161/161 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 73/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 157/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 10/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 9/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 6/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60023ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60023ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60333 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1584853942407850174.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6633195221007331528.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1584853942407850174.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6633195221007331528.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14301962955389488086.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14301962955389488086.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14301962955389488086.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14301962955389488086.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14301962955389488086.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7654983567866536877.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12691542238624684403.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7654983567866536877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12691542238624684403.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 164 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 164 transition count 161
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 164 /176 variables (removed 12) and now considering 161/173 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-04 07:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 17/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 14/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 5/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 161/325 variables, 164/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 9/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 8/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/325 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/325 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 325/325 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/164 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 109/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 11/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 161/325 variables, 164/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 160/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 7/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 5/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 20/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/325 variables, 6/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60032ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/176 places, 161/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60249 ms. Remains : 164/176 places, 161/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1586729877739741581.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10374712486620827873.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1586729877739741581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10374712486620827873.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11430512390871509292.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11430512390871509292.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11430512390871509292.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11430512390871509292.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11430512390871509292.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13303850755235915085.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14881940939395674432.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13303850755235915085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14881940939395674432.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.72916e+16,22.282,417356,7345,45,543753,321,444,2.33175e+06,44,1419,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 166 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 166 transition count 163
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 166 /176 variables (removed 10) and now considering 163/173 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 166 cols
[2025-06-04 07:55:39] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:55:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:55:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 11/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 10/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 4/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 163/329 variables, 166/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 13/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 13/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 15/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 6/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 3/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 329/329 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 111/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 5/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 163/329 variables, 166/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 162/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 12/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 5/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 7/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 4/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 2/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60037ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/176 places, 163/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60333 ms. Remains : 166/176 places, 163/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 163 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17328182527027055404.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:56:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9437947061682835346.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17328182527027055404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9437947061682835346.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4254994132785486379.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4254994132785486379.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4254994132785486379.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4254994132785486379.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4254994132785486379.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4245428605782117809.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11323788875877757662.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4245428605782117809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11323788875877757662.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 157
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 124 transition count 121
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 78 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 76 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 75 transition count 73
Applied a total of 197 rules in 21 ms. Remains 75 /176 variables (removed 101) and now considering 73/173 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [72]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-04 07:57:39] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 5/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 72/147 variables, 75/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 4/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 147/147 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 3404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 15/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/147 variables, 75/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 70/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 147/147 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2794 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6227ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6227ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/176 places, 72/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 75 /75 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6448 ms. Remains : 75/176 places, 72/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18405088219762688177.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:57:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11681863841770442895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18405088219762688177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11681863841770442895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85935e+10,1.89126,68440,2,4598,5,226630,6,0,374,471170,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p76!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p76!=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...375
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14699546491700467575.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14699546491700467575.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14699546491700467575.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14699546491700467575.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14699546491700467575.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 54 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9064677504187017278.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17269329629101562534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9064677504187017278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17269329629101562534.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85935e+10,7.32326,171828,1061,29,237720,71,180,759708,32,332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((i3.u12.p76!=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (i3.u12.p76!=1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t13, t29, t45, t51, t55, t69, i1.t40, i1.i0.t43, i1.i0.u8.t3, i1.i0.u8.t4, i1.i1.u9.t5, i...511
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 157
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 160 transition count 141
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 144 transition count 141
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 131 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 131 transition count 128
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 131 transition count 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 127 transition count 124
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 79 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 76 transition count 74
Applied a total of 195 rules in 29 ms. Remains 76 /176 variables (removed 100) and now considering 74/173 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned [73]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/149 variables, 76/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 2927 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 14/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/149 variables, 76/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 72/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 3108 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6041ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/176 places, 73/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6251 ms. Remains : 76/176 places, 73/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15652068113698716058.gal : 1 ms
RANDOM walk for 131 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16954083042041097625.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15652068113698716058.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16954083042041097625.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 163 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 163 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 162 /176 variables (removed 14) and now considering 159/173 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 162 cols
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 7/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 5/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 159/321 variables, 162/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 8/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 10/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 10/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 3/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/321 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 23720 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 162/162 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 83/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 159/321 variables, 162/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 158/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 8/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 9/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 8/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 4/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 9/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 2/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 321/321 variables, and 481 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 162/162 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 53745ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53745ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 162/176 places, 159/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53955 ms. Remains : 162/176 places, 159/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 159 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16984058301291989439.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9348290433920711689.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16984058301291989439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9348290433920711689.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16950305297335091635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16950305297335091635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16950305297335091635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16950305297335091635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16950305297335091635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4143876163017592711.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17565576295213084460.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4143876163017592711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17565576295213084460.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 175 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 160 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 159 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 143 transition count 140
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 129 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 126
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 129 transition count 121
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 124 transition count 121
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 77 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 75 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 74 transition count 72
Applied a total of 199 rules in 19 ms. Remains 74 /176 variables (removed 102) and now considering 72/173 (removed 101) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 08:00:46] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 08:00:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [71]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 3268 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 14/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 71/145 variables, 74/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 70/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 2115 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5389ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5389ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/176 places, 71/173 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 71/71 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5579 ms. Remains : 74/176 places, 71/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4882076427945148943.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3803430915754985103.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4882076427945148943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3803430915754985103.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,2.43359,67724,2,3936,5,220878,6,0,370,468435,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(A(AF((p134==1)) U (p139==0)) U EF((p101==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!((E(!((p139==0)) U (!(!(EG(!((p134==1))))) * !((p139==0)))) + EG(!((p139==0))))) U E(TRUE U (p10...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t25...370
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5577650214713218214.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5577650214713218214.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5577650214713218214.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5577650214713218214.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5577650214713218214.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13409111384911952024.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2587119966186887740.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13409111384911952024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2587119966186887740.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.85913e+10,8.05134,131236,1204,29,154661,69,169,677802,32,324,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(A(AF((i5.i0.u19.p134==1)) U (i6.u20.p139==0)) U EF((i3.u16.p101==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!((E(!((i6.u20.p139==0)) U (!(!(EG(!((i5.i0.u19.p134==1))))) * !((i6.u20.p139==0)))) + EG(!((i6.u...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t25, t47, t53, t62, i0.t42, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.i0.t40, i1.i0.t46, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1...509
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 173/173 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 162 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 162 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 161 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 161 transition count 158
Applied a total of 30 rules in 11 ms. Remains 161 /176 variables (removed 15) and now considering 158/173 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 161 cols
[2025-06-04 08:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 08:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 7/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 8/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 4/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/319 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 161/161 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 28/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 73/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 158/319 variables, 161/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 157/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 10/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 9/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 6/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60025ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60026ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60225 ms. Remains : 161/176 places, 158/173 transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12018250735566051226.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 08:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13461391073557594672.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12018250735566051226.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13461391073557594672.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10848180503621199732.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10848180503621199732.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10848180503621199732.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10848180503621199732.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10848180503621199732.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8128546526123310127.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14017477432414222903.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8128546526123310127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14017477432414222903.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5681725065217633246.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5681725065217633246.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5681725065217633246.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5681725065217633246.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5681725065217633246.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 69 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14728234207657361561.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 08:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6921323141335001220.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14728234207657361561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6921323141335001220.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.45991e+16,76.4596,1074792,13331,81,1.36524e+06,1181,521,4.46217e+06,55,13926,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(A(((i7.i0.u46.p133==0)||(i1.i1.u17.p46==1)) U (i8.u53.p151==1))) * AX(((i3.i2.u28.p78==0)||(i7.i0.u55.p160==1)))) + A(AF((i5.i1.u...275
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * E(TRUE U ((!(!((E(!((i8.u53.p151==1)) U (!(((i7.i0.u46.p133==0)||(i1.i1.u17.p46==1))) * !((i8.u5...474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t58, t60, t84, t86, t111, t113, t115, i0.i0.u15.t105, i0.i0.u15.t106, i0.i1.u6.t118, i0....1127
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5472561455106294436.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 08:31:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12785956139848422828.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5472561455106294436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12785956139848422828.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400289"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;