Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532400274.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400274
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749019071259

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Transformed 121 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 121 transitions and 362 arcs in 157 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 81 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 121/121 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 119 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 119 transition count 117
Applied a total of 8 rules in 19 ms. Remains 119 /123 variables (removed 4) and now considering 117/121 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 347 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 7/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 6/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 117/236 variables, 119/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 14562 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 68/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/236 variables, 119/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 116/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 5/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 361 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 44633ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44642ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/123 places, 117/121 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45025 ms. Remains : 119/123 places, 117/121 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 119 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 06:38:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (116 resets) in 1139 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 1/76 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (16 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 117/119 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 117/236 variables, 119/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 149 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/236 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 52 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 218ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
Computed a total of 30 stabilizing places and 30 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 111 transition count 109
Applied a total of 16 rules in 8 ms. Remains 111 /119 variables (removed 8) and now considering 109/117 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-04 06:38:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:38:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:38:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 5/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 6/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 10/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 16729 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 64/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 108/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 7/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 5/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 46757ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46758ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/119 places, 109/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47041 ms. Remains : 111/119 places, 109/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4884243377415302146.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11527611428333330302.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4884243377415302146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11527611428333330302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57761e+11,5.76158,163628,2,14256,5,459475,6,0,555,1.10719e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((AF((((p28==1)&&(p47==1))&&(p58==1))) * !((AF((p3==1)) * (((p57==1)&&(p92==1)) + AG((p117==1))))))) U EF((((p21==1)&&(p50==1)) + (((...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((p21==1)&&(p50==1)) + (((EX((p93==1)) * (p98!=1)) * ((p25==1)&&(p33==1))) * (p60==1)...521
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t2...362
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3519110481772401954.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3519110481772401954.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3519110481772401954.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3519110481772401954.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3519110481772401954.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17419030357137520161.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6135394709602578643.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17419030357137520161.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6135394709602578643.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57761e+11,1.72256,59372,1353,71,97402,343,365,175213,59,1994,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((AF((((i3.u11.p28==1)&&(i3.u17.p47==1))&&(i4.u20.p58==1))) * !((AF((i0.u1.p3==1)) * (((i4.u20.p57==1)&&(i7.u31.p92==1)) + AG((i9.u38...323
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((i1.i2.u9.p21==1)&&(i3.u18.p50==1)) + (((EX((i7.u31.p93==1)) * (i5.u33.p98!=1)) * ((...740
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t44, t65, t67, i0.u1.t73, i1.t69, i1.i0.u6.t72, i1.i2.u7.t71, i2.i0.u12.t62, i2.i1.u10.t...653
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 18 rules in 8 ms. Remains 110 /119 variables (removed 9) and now considering 108/117 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:40:26] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:40:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:40:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 18/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 10/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 8907 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 33/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38940ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38941ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39107 ms. Remains : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13932003795840653389.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3837097740570675286.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13932003795840653389.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3837097740570675286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28106e+11,5.37285,151324,2,13634,5,433754,6,0,550,1.02877e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((!(EX((p99==1))) + ((A((p12==1) U (((p25==1)&&(p36==1))&&(p61==1))) * (p18==1)) * (p76==1))) U (A((p12==1) U (((p87==1)&&(p106==1))&...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!((E(!((((p87==1)&&(p106==1))&&(p120==1))) U (!((p12==1)) * !((((p87==1)&&(p106==1))&&(p120==...789
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...357
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6323684607422847541.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6323684607422847541.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6323684607422847541.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6323684607422847541.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6323684607422847541.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16482744639590081144.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8802671391809483286.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16482744639590081144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8802671391809483286.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28106e+11,0.750517,31644,1341,38,52202,219,352,108927,48,818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((!(EX((i5.i1.u32.p99==1))) + ((A((i2.i2.u4.p12==1) U (((i1.i0.u9.p25==1)&&(i1.i1.u13.p36==1))&&(i4.u20.p61==1))) * (i2.i0.u8.p18==1)...286
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!((E(!((((i8.u29.p87==1)&&(i8.u34.p106==1))&&(i9.u38.p120==1))) U (!((i2.i2.u4.p12==1)) * !((...1148
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t42, t64, t66, i0.u1.t72, i1.i0.u9.t67, i1.i0.u12.t1, i1.i0.u12.t2, i1.i0.u12.t3, i...645
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 108 transition count 106
Applied a total of 22 rules in 11 ms. Remains 108 /119 variables (removed 11) and now considering 106/117 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 108 cols
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 106/214 variables, 108/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 10688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 39/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 106/214 variables, 108/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 105/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 8/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 5/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 40713ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40714ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/119 places, 106/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40845 ms. Remains : 108/119 places, 106/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16027666876332157636.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2603252234978083584.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16027666876332157636.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2603252234978083584.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,4.95614,144080,2,21275,5,460145,6,0,540,882909,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((AX((p77==0)) + (p25==0)) + ((p36==0)||(p61==0)))) * (EX(((p73==0) * AG((p77==0)))) + A(AF(((p21==1)&&(p50==1))) U EX(((p78==1)&&...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!((p77==0)))) + (p25==0)) + ((p36==0)||(p61==0)))))) * (EX(((p73==0) * !(E(TRU...327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...342
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3282168182773064605.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3282168182773064605.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3282168182773064605.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3282168182773064605.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3282168182773064605.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2973651497122082945.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1519302045800314324.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2973651497122082945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1519302045800314324.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,0.608317,27976,1242,42,44971,147,346,90639,44,602,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((AX((i8.i0.u26.p77==0)) + (i2.i0.u9.p25==0)) + ((i2.i1.u13.p36==0)||(i4.u20.p61==0)))) * (EX(((i7.u24.p73==0) * AG((i8.i0.u26.p77...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!((i8.i0.u26.p77==0)))) + (i2.i0.u9.p25==0)) + ((i2.i1.u13.p36==0)||(i4.u20.p6...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t39, t62, t64, i0.u1.t70, i1.t66, i1.i0.u5.t69, i1.i1.u6.t68, i2.i0.u9.t65, i2.i0.u12.t1...619
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 18/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 11/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 16276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 8/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 46303ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46303ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46442 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability813419039807936004.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1705808247933781864.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability813419039807936004.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1705808247933781864.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,5.63372,143196,2,9889,5,418078,6,0,545,970511,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((EG(((p103==1)||((p4==1)&&(p23==1)))) + (p112!=1))) U !(EX(AG((p92!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p92!=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p92!=1))))))) U (!(!((EG(((p103=...247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t29, t3...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15195687589696838757.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15195687589696838757.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15195687589696838757.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15195687589696838757.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15195687589696838757.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability120660828481295912.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1613379876867233904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability120660828481295912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1613379876867233904.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,1.326,42816,1152,35,75263,170,322,139880,44,587,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((EG(((i6.i1.u34.p103==1)||((i0.u1.p4==1)&&(i2.u9.p23==1)))) + (i8.u37.p112!=1))) U !(EX(AG((i7.u31.p92!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u31.p92!=1)))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u31.p92!=1))))))) U (!...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t63, t65, i0.u1.t71, i1.t67, i1.i1.u5.t70, i1.i2.u6.t69, i2.u9.t66, i2.u11.t60, i2....606
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 10 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 242 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 391 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 14024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 48/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 11/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 44069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44471 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1308684403847922487.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6644765368597394945.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1308684403847922487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6644765368597394945.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27924e+11,5.42781,144560,2,21510,5,462069,6,0,545,885679,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((p60==1) * AX(AX((((p84==1)&&(p95==1))&&(p119==1))))) U AG(((AF(((p21==1)&&(p49==1))) + (p85==1)) + ((p38==1)||(!((p79==1)&&(p81==1)...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(((p21==1)&&(p49==1))))) + (p85==1)) + ((p38==1)||(!((p79==1)&&(...470
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5254369181182779303.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5254369181182779303.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5254369181182779303.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5254369181182779303.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5254369181182779303.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10518558787816744027.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4103542129743414869.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10518558787816744027.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4103542129743414869.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27924e+11,0.946379,35120,1061,44,56984,158,348,98708,44,643,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((i4.u20.p60==1) * AX(AX((((i6.u29.p84==1)&&(i6.u32.p95==1))&&(i9.u38.p119==1))))) U AG(((AF(((i1.i2.u8.p21==1)&&(i3.i0.u17.p49==1)))...240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(((i1.i2.u8.p21==1)&&(i3.i0.u17.p49==1))))) + (i7.u30.p85==1)) +...648
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t39, t41, t63, t65, i0.u1.t71, i1.t67, i1.i1.u6.t70, i1.i2.u7.t69, i2.i0.u10.t66, i2.i0....616
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 118 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 109 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 108 transition count 106
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 108 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 97 transition count 95
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 89 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 89 transition count 87
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 89 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 86 transition count 84
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 62 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 60 transition count 58
Applied a total of 114 rules in 30 ms. Remains 60 /119 variables (removed 59) and now considering 58/117 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/60 variables, 13/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 58/118 variables, 60/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1437 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/60 variables, 13/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 58/118 variables, 60/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 56/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 11353 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 12800ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12800ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/119 places, 58/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12948 ms. Remains : 60/119 places, 58/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5385083416966538410.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15520273565485062002.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5385083416966538410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15520273565485062002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.21687e+07,0.527328,22272,2,2859,5,64716,6,0,297,125172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((!((A((p14==1) U (p94==1)) * (p47==1))) + AF((EG((p70==1)) + ((p119==1)&&(p105==1))))) U EF((!(((p24==1)||((p19==1)&&(p36==1)))) + E...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U (!(((p24==1)||((p19==1)&&(p36==1)))) + E((p43==1) U (p103==1)))))) * !((!((!...490
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t24, t36...325
(forward)formula 0,1,1.48797,42608,1,0,233,211870,149,80,2110,240139,203
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /119 variables (removed 9) and now considering 108/117 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:47:32] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 19183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 68/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 49215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49215ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49391 ms. Remains : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18398900002430309098.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10442414987982866624.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18398900002430309098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10442414987982866624.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43469e+11,5.03199,149552,2,10713,5,426472,6,0,550,1.00708e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((!(EF((p30==1))) + (EX(!(((p24==1)&&(p47==1)))) * AF((p24==1)))) U AG(((A((p11==1) U (p116==1)) * EF((p29==1))) * EG(EF((((p84==1)&&(...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((p116==1)) U (!((p11==1)) * !((p116==1)))) + EG(!((p116==1)))...1525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t2...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11302298622366029844.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11302298622366029844.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11302298622366029844.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11302298622366029844.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11302298622366029844.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17605726185510020857.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7439948805072847065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17605726185510020857.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7439948805072847065.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43469e+11,1.23662,46532,1128,43,80836,224,350,149609,52,736,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((!(EF((i2.u14.p30==1))) + (EX(!(((i2.u10.p24==1)&&(i3.i0.u17.p47==1)))) * AF((i2.u10.p24==1)))) U AG(((A((i1.i1.u5.p11==1) U (i8.u39....256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((i8.u39.p116==1)) U (!((i1.i1.u5.p11==1)) * !((i8.u39.p116==1...1997
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t64, t66, i0.u1.t72, i1.t68, i1.i1.u6.t71, i1.i2.u7.t70, i2.t61, i2.u10.t67, i2.u13...631
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 15257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 50/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 45295ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45295ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45424 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9929158198192714080.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1504656977600653460.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9929158198192714080.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1504656977600653460.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43331e+11,4.52322,143220,2,10274,5,416887,6,0,545,972414,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF(EX(EG((p35==1)))) U ((p4==1)&&(p23==1))) + ((EX(((p74==0)||(p101==0))) * AF(((AF(((p72==1)&&(p114==1))) * EF((p70==1))) + AF(EX((((...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !(!((E(!(((p4==1)&&(p23==1))) U (!(E(TRUE U EX(EG((p35==1))))) * !(((p4==1)&&(p23==1))))) + EG(!(((p...699
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t2...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12116736767296001560.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12116736767296001560.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12116736767296001560.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12116736767296001560.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12116736767296001560.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8766917681250928041.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8433773889674623458.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8766917681250928041.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8433773889674623458.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43331e+11,1.69303,51836,1219,45,82653,195,356,177618,52,661,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EF(EX(EG((i1.u12.p35==1)))) U ((i4.u1.p4==1)&&(i1.u9.p23==1))) + ((EX(((i6.u25.p74==0)||(i6.u33.p101==0))) * AF(((AF(((i6.u25.p72==1)&...353
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !(!((E(!(((i4.u1.p4==1)&&(i1.u9.p23==1))) U (!(E(TRUE U EX(EG((i1.u12.p35==1))))) * !(((i4.u1.p4==1)...914
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t42, t63, t65, i0.t67, i0.i1.u5.t70, i0.i2.u6.t69, i1.u9.t66, i1.u11.t60, i1.u12.t1, i1....622
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 2 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:51:07] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:51:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 8211 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 34/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 38234ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38235ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38419 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9774206310810706960.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6600924432450555599.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9774206310810706960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6600924432450555599.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28106e+11,5.82685,149868,2,13454,5,430574,6,0,545,1.01855e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((p98==1)) + (p87==0)) + ((p109==0)||(p117==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p109==0)||(p117==0)))) * !((p87==0))) * !(EX((p98==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
(forward)formula 0,0,9.50615,162504,1,0,260,777661,234,116,3272,1.01855e+06,223
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:51:55] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:51:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 12806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 44/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 14/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 42828ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42828ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42961 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5547682213455043089.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12858258313171610742.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5547682213455043089.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12858258313171610742.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,5.96605,158740,2,31644,5,512093,6,0,545,993132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AG((AF((p49==1)) + AG((p88==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p49==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((p88==1)))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13835773269751834703.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13835773269751834703.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13835773269751834703.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13835773269751834703.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13835773269751834703.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7322603392510292629.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4159269355141868622.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7322603392510292629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4159269355141868622.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,1.23888,44556,1537,42,74246,174,357,117589,42,604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AG((AF((i2.i1.u16.p49==1)) + AG((i6.u30.p88==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((i2.i1.u16.p49==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !((i6.u30.p88==1)))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t62, t64, i0.t66, i0.i0.u5.t69, i0.i1.u6.t68, i1.i0.u9.t65, i1.i0.u12.t1, i1.i0.u12...633
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 22 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:53:38] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:53:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 7994 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 34/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 38021ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38022ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38178 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14591678232410606392.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4410419958730786515.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14591678232410606392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4410419958730786515.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28106e+11,6.23697,149788,2,13454,5,430574,6,0,545,1.01855e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AX(((p60==0)||(p99==0))) * EG((((p4==0)||(p23==0))||(p96==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(((p60==0)||(p99==0))))) * EG((((p4==0)||(p23==0))||(p96==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7892669683277469365.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7892669683277469365.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7892669683277469365.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7892669683277469365.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7892669683277469365.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2150507111751585251.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:54:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1175067211565588756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2150507111751585251.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1175067211565588756.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28106e+11,1.35819,46440,1272,46,72032,300,375,143126,48,1695,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AX(((i4.u20.p60==0)||(i5.u34.p99==0))) * EG((((i0.i0.u1.p4==0)||(i2.i0.u10.p23==0))||(i6.i2.u33.p96==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(((i4.u20.p60==0)||(i5.u34.p99==0))))) * EG((((i0.i0.u1.p4==0)||(i2.i0.u10.p23==0...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t42, t63, t65, i0.i0.u1.t71, i1.t67, i1.i1.u6.t70, i1.i2.u7.t69, i2.i0.u10.t66, i2.i0.u1...650
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 118 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 111 transition count 109
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 111 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 100 transition count 98
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 92 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 92 transition count 90
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 92 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 89 transition count 87
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 65 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 64 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 63 transition count 62
Applied a total of 108 rules in 21 ms. Remains 63 /119 variables (removed 56) and now considering 62/117 (removed 55) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned [61]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/63 variables, 14/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 9/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 61/124 variables, 63/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 2873 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/63 variables, 14/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 16/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/124 variables, 63/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 57/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 12536 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 15434ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15434ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/119 places, 61/117 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 15568 ms. Remains : 63/119 places, 61/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17969153849496161104.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9366050909321944688.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17969153849496161104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9366050909321944688.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15306e+08,0.547008,27132,2,4422,5,83054,6,0,314,159493,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((((p2==0)||(p45==0))&&((p75==0)||(p100==0)))||(p12==0))) + (EG((((p28==0)||(p47==0))||(p61==0))) * ((AF((p38==0)) + (p78==0)) + (...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((((p2==0)||(p45==0))&&((p75==0)||(p100==0)))||(p12==0))) + (EG((((p28==0)||(p47==0))||(p61==0)))...239
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t18, t20, t21, t22, t23...320
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14739818703729943350.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14739818703729943350.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14739818703729943350.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14739818703729943350.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14739818703729943350.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18043993931184558242.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13646935399803212417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18043993931184558242.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13646935399803212417.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15306e+08,0.591592,25400,702,56,36683,170,225,83969,50,1408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((((i3.u0.p2==0)||(i3.u10.p45==0))&&((i4.i0.u13.p75==0)||(i4.i1.u20.p100==0)))||(i0.u1.p12==0))) + (EG((((i1.u6.p28==0)||(i3.u10.p...286
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((((i3.u0.p2==0)||(i3.u10.p45==0))&&((i4.i0.u13.p75==0)||(i4.i1.u20.p100==0)))||(i0.u1.p12==0))) ...335
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t45, t46, t48, t50, t51, t56, t58, t59, i0.t22, i1.u11.t6, i1.u11.t7, i1.u12.t18, i2...451
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /119 variables (removed 9) and now considering 108/117 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 17568 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 70/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 5/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 6/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 47588ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47588ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47717 ms. Remains : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1371398823567044147.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11864781984310474094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1371398823567044147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11864781984310474094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,4.82098,143944,2,21232,5,460171,6,0,550,878497,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((EX((p117==1)) * E((p113!=1) U ((p13==1)&&(p55==1))))) * EG(((AG((p76==0)) + (p25==0)) + ((p33==0)||(p60==0))))) * EF(((EG(EX((p54==...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((Init * (E(TRUE U (EX((p117==1)) * E((p113!=1) U ((p13==1)&&(p55==1))))) * EG(((!(E(TRUE U !((p76==...454
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t24, t27, t2...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3082559654273653651.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3082559654273653651.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3082559654273653651.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3082559654273653651.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3082559654273653651.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4002173667639778863.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:57:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17858297354176935695.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4002173667639778863.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17858297354176935695.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,1.39097,49956,1115,35,87375,203,328,146849,44,625,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((EX((i9.u36.p117==1)) * E((i9.u37.p113!=1) U ((i1.i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i5.u20.p55==1))))) * EG(((AG((i6.i1.u25.p76==0)) + (i3.u9.p25==0))...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((Init * (E(TRUE U (EX((i9.u36.p117==1)) * E((i9.u37.p113!=1) U ((i1.i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i5.u20.p55==1))...606
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t64, t66, t68, i0.u1.t72, i1.i1.u5.t71, i2.u6.t70, i3.u9.t67, i3.u11.t61, i3.u12.t1...590
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 20 rules in 4 ms. Remains 109 /119 variables (removed 10) and now considering 107/117 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 12746 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 44/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 14/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 42776ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42777ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42918 ms. Remains : 109/119 places, 107/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9356369372499561220.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6733098605206735444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9356369372499561220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6733098605206735444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,5.22834,158792,2,31644,5,512093,6,0,545,993132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((!(A((p76==1) U (((p84==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p119==1)))) + !(A((p110==1) U (p90==1)))) + EG((p96==0))) * (AX((p90==0)) + (p68==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((!(!((E(!((((p84==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p119==1))) U (!((p76==1)) * !((((p84==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p119==1...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17296478481857273441.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17296478481857273441.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17296478481857273441.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17296478481857273441.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17296478481857273441.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13891189864316215989.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9202379247693430787.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13891189864316215989.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9202379247693430787.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,1.19723,48924,1894,37,86803,157,348,158724,42,536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((!(A((i6.u27.p76==1) U (((i8.i0.u30.p84==1)&&(i7.u33.p92==1))&&(i10.u40.p119==1)))) + !(A((i9.i1.u38.p110==1) U (i7.u33.p90==1)))...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((!(!((E(!((((i8.i0.u30.p84==1)&&(i7.u33.p92==1))&&(i10.u40.p119==1))) U (!((i6.u27.p76==1)) * !...480
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t62, t64, t66, i0.u1.t70, i1.i1.u6.t69, i2.u7.t68, i3.i0.u10.t65, i3.i0.u13.t1, i3....623
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 108 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 108 transition count 106
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /119 variables (removed 11) and now considering 106/117 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 108 cols
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 15/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 106/214 variables, 108/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 10811 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 39/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 106/214 variables, 108/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 105/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 8/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 3/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 5/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 108/108 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 40827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40828ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/119 places, 106/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40959 ms. Remains : 108/119 places, 106/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8659845270163504367.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:00:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17480820665986764114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8659845270163504367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17480820665986764114.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,4.74449,144004,2,21275,5,460145,6,0,540,882909,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AF((((p28==1)&&(p50==1))&&(p61==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((((p28==1)&&(p50==1))&&(p61==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...342
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7251945687840010453.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7251945687840010453.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7251945687840010453.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7251945687840010453.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7251945687840010453.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17512048769605326958.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7369186767800861108.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17512048769605326958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7369186767800861108.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,0.62772,28400,1333,38,44696,209,322,98736,44,686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AF((((i4.u10.p28==1)&&(i4.u16.p50==1))&&(i5.u20.p61==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!((((i4.u10.p28==1)&&(i4.u16.p50==1))&&(i5.u20.p61==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t39, t62, t64, u19.t7, u19.t8, u19.t9, i0.u1.t70, i1.t66, i1.i0.u5.t69, i1.i1.u6.t68, i3...571
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 117/117 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 18 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /119 variables (removed 9) and now considering 108/117 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 07:01:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 07:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 10/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 8635 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 54/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 6/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 6/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 38659ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38660ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38803 ms. Remains : 110/119 places, 108/117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16911702006394970759.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3981495003089372472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16911702006394970759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3981495003089372472.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,5.95697,145828,2,10098,5,420593,6,0,550,982768,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EX(((p21==1)&&(p49==1))) + AF(AG((p63==1)))) + (EF(((p52==0)&&(p70==0))) + (p62==1))) + ((p51==1)&&(p69==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p51==1)&&(p69==1)))) * !((E(TRUE U ((p52==0)&&(p70==0))) + (p62==1)))) * !(EX(((p...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
(forward)formula 0,1,19.9816,428112,1,0,470,1.80185e+06,244,122,3476,2.96676e+06,447
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5510462251240676567.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5510462251240676567.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5510462251240676567.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5510462251240676567.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5510462251240676567.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5766561116922237792.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9077735006241359370.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5766561116922237792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9077735006241359370.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00921e+11,1.98916,59000,2026,62,100923,302,378,197447,56,1252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((AF((((i3.u10.p28==1)&&(i3.u17.p47==1))&&(i4.u18.p58==1))) * !((AF((i0.u1.p3==1)) * (((i4.u18.p57==1)&&(i7.u32.p92==1)) + AG((i9.u39...319
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((i1.i0.u7.p21==1)&&(i3.u16.p50==1)) + (((EX((i7.u32.p93==1)) * (i5.i0.u34.p98!=1)) *...728
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t46, t48, t72, t74, i0.u1.t80, i1.t76, i1.i0.u6.t78, i1.i1.u5.t79, i2.t69, i2.u9.t75, i2...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11726225744065810412.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 07:04:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7689409425961867717.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11726225744065810412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7689409425961867717.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00921e+11,18.0648,587816,12286,265,1.06681e+06,1119,212,4.37633e+06,96,12727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((AF((((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u15.p28==1)&&(i0.i1.i0.u18.p47==1))&&(i0.i1.u19.p58==1))) * !((AF((i0.u2.p3==1)) * (((i0.i1.u19.p57==1)&&(i...429
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u13.p21==1)&&(i0.i1.i0.u18.p50==1)) + (((EX((i1.i0.i0.i0...986
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t80, i0.i1.u19.t7, i0.i1.u19.t8, i0.i1.u19.t9, i0.i1.u19.t10, i0.i1.u19.t56, i0.i1.u19....1174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Transformed 119 places.
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Transformed 117 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10924375931834170736.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 07:32:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7963650296454550282.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10924375931834170736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7963650296454550282.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00921e+11,4.24331,136624,2,44606,5,445682,6,0,595,837569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG((AF((((p28==1)&&(p47==1))&&(p58==1))) * !((AF((p3==1)) * (((p57==1)&&(p92==1)) + AG((p117==1))))))) U EF((((p21==1)&&(p50==1)) + (((...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (((p21==1)&&(p50==1)) + (((EX((p93==1)) * (p98!=1)) * ((p25==1)&&(p33==1))) * (p60==1)...521
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t2...407

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400274"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;