Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532400273.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400273
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749018727845

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 06:32:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Transformed 121 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 121 transitions and 362 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 59 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 121/121 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 121 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 121 transition count 119
Applied a total of 4 rules in 19 ms. Remains 121 /123 variables (removed 2) and now considering 119/121 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 5/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 119/240 variables, 121/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 14/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 15594 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 74/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 119/240 variables, 121/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 118/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 11/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 10/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 387 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 45661ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45669ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/123 places, 119/121 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46056 ms. Remains : 121/123 places, 119/121 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 121 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 8442 steps (24 resets) in 273 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 0/50 properties
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 31 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 107/119 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 17/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 13089 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 61/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 5/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 43122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43124ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43329 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15335299578431552622.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14378458539815311533.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15335299578431552622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14378458539815311533.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28127e+11,5.624,167824,2,12388,5,473718,6,0,545,1.14697e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((p39!=1) U A(AX(AX((p100==1))) U (p3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!((E(!((p3==0)) U (!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((p100==1)))))))) * !((p3==0)))) + EG(!((p3==0)))))) U (!((p...363
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16536639774774948587.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16536639774774948587.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16536639774774948587.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16536639774774948587.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16536639774774948587.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11640543284742034434.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13680081867775120111.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11640543284742034434.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13680081867775120111.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28127e+11,0.596788,25708,1024,45,39685,224,353,67046,48,730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((i1.i0.u14.p39!=1) U A(AX(AX((i6.i1.u33.p100==1))) U (i0.u1.p3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!((E(!((i0.u1.p3==0)) U (!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((i6.i1.u33.p100==1)))))))) * !((i0.u1.p3==0)))) + EG(...457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t39, t63, t65, t67, i0.u1.t71, i1.i0.u14.t57, i1.i0.u14.t58, i1.i1.u5.t70, i2.u6.t69, i3...622
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 113 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 113 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 112 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 112 transition count 110
Applied a total of 18 rules in 10 ms. Remains 112 /121 variables (removed 9) and now considering 110/119 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-04 06:34:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:34:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 220 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 109 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:34:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 9506 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 35/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 110/222 variables, 112/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 109/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 8/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 6/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 11/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 7/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 4/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 5/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39555ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 109 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39555ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/121 places, 110/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39787 ms. Remains : 112/121 places, 110/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9859383777169553638.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12273331303166203459.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9859383777169553638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12273331303166203459.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.62214e+11,5.6938,175788,2,13797,5,493625,6,0,560,1.20731e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!(AX(((p52==0)||(p62==1)))) + !((((p51==0) + EX(((p108==0)||(p105==1)))) * (p112==0)))) U E(A((p40!=1) U (((p118==1)||(p31==0))||(p12...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E((!(!(EX(!(((p52==0)||(p62==1)))))) + !((((p51==0) + EX(((p108==0)||(p105==1)))) * (p112==0)))) U E...390
(forward)formula 0,0,5.71551,175788,1,0,8,493625,9,2,565,1.20731e+06,1
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 24 rules in 18 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 107/119 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:35:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:35:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:35:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 9891 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 51/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 170 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 4/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 10/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 39938ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39938ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40099 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4058653828057413393.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8575018849624086284.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4058653828057413393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8575018849624086284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,4.7036,143664,2,21267,5,460200,6,0,545,875644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((p102!=0)&&(p122!=1))) * EF(((p79==0)&&(p106==1)))) * EF(AX(AF((p7==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * (E(TRUE U ((p102!=0)&&(p122!=1))) * E(TRUE U ((p79==0)&&(p106==1))))),TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((p7==...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t24, t27, t2...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5649693694736939663.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5649693694736939663.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5649693694736939663.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5649693694736939663.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5649693694736939663.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1674082906445961504.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:36:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16649325399158421930.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1674082906445961504.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16649325399158421930.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27785e+11,1.23919,44012,1200,35,68753,193,320,160450,44,644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((i5.i1.u34.p102!=0)&&(i8.u37.p122!=1))) * EF(((i5.i0.u27.p79==0)&&(i5.i1.u35.p106==1)))) * EF(AX(AF((i3.i2.u3.p7==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * (E(TRUE U ((i5.i1.u34.p102!=0)&&(i8.u37.p122!=1))) * E(TRUE U ((i5.i0.u27.p79==0)&&(i5.i1.u35.p10...220
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t42, t63, t65, i0.u1.t71, i1.u9.t66, i1.u11.t60, i1.u12.t1, i1.u12.t2, i1.u12.t3, i2.u10...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 120 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 112 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 111 transition count 109
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 111 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 100 transition count 98
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 90 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 90 transition count 88
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 90 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 87 transition count 85
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 61 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 60 transition count 58
Applied a total of 119 rules in 31 ms. Remains 60 /121 variables (removed 61) and now considering 58/119 (removed 61) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/121 places, 58/119 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 58/58 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 59/121 places, 58/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8956462741146428093.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6290009805547863916.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8956462741146428093.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6290009805547863916.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.04402e+07,0.400136,22132,2,2838,5,63695,6,0,294,123065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((p12==1)||(p28==0))||(p65==1)) U (((p3!=1) * AF(!(((p63==1)&&(p50==1))))) * EF((EG((p65==0)) + ((p29!=1) * EF((p15==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((p3!=1) * !(EG(!(!(((p63==1)&&(p50==1))))))) * E(TRUE U (EG((p65==0)) + ((p29!=1) * E(TRUE U ...457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t17, t18, t19, t24, t30, t36...335
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4079670739487581949.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4079670739487581949.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4079670739487581949.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4079670739487581949.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4079670739487581949.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 36 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18374341115036044025.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2339973578207241880.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18374341115036044025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2339973578207241880.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.04402e+07,0.279759,14912,517,23,19597,109,194,40403,36,340,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((i1.u1.p12==1)||(i3.u6.p28==0))||(i5.u14.p65==1)) U (((i0.u0.p3!=1) * AF(!(((i3.u12.p63==1)&&(i2.u11.p50==1))))) * EF((EG((i5.u14.p65...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i0.u0.p3!=1) * !(EG(!(!(((i3.u12.p63==1)&&(i2.u11.p50==1))))))) * E(TRUE U (EG((i5.u14.p65==...593
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t17, t18, t30, t37, t39, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t54, i0.u0.t19, i2.t38, i2.u10.t3, ...431
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,13.445,434292,1,0,755474,161,977,1.15441e+06,151,389,744681
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 107/119 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:37:49] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 412 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:37:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 490 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:37:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 17/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 13192 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 46/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 43215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43215ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43710 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:38:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3498133797758306293.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:38:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality396059596065645996.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3498133797758306293.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality396059596065645996.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44679e+11,4.94887,146672,2,19896,5,471878,6,0,545,905118,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((EX((p18==0)) * (p48==1))) * AG(EF(((p55==0)&&(p41==1))))) * AX((EF((p22==0)) + AG((((p3==0)||(p56==1)) * (AX((p1==1)) + (((p94==0)|...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX((p18==0)) * (p48==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p55==0)&&(p41==1)...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t2...347
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16163783103113233711.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16163783103113233711.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16163783103113233711.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16163783103113233711.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16163783103113233711.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6548385002669387144.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7673631727547995087.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6548385002669387144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7673631727547995087.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.44679e+11,0.791242,35284,1098,47,61758,158,354,103143,47,711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((EX((i1.i1.u7.p18==0)) * (i3.i0.u16.p48==1))) * AG(EF(((i4.u19.p55==0)&&(i1.i0.u14.p41==1))))) * AX((EF((i1.i1.u8.p22==0)) + AG((((i...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX((i1.i1.u7.p18==0)) * (i3.i0.u16.p48==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ...498
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t63, t65, i0.i0.u1.t71, i0.i0.u9.t66, i1.t67, i1.i0.u5.t70, i1.i1.u6.t69, i2.u11.t6...616
(forward)formula 0,0,2.44355,72660,1,0,128169,384,1767,244387,217,1185,178156
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 24 rules in 8 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 107/119 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:39:05] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 405 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:39:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 501 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 17/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 7/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 9/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 13138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 61/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 5/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 43178ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43178ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43688 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1245051120844125204.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17463528044137747333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1245051120844125204.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17463528044137747333.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28127e+11,5.4576,168120,2,12388,5,473718,6,0,545,1.14697e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(!(A(((p40==1) * EF((p8==1))) U !(EX(TRUE))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(!((E(!(!(EX(TRUE))) U (!(((p40==1) * E(TRUE U (p8==1)))) * !(!(EX(TRUE))))) + EG(!(!(EX(TRUE...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6309224097882538116.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6309224097882538116.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6309224097882538116.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6309224097882538116.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6309224097882538116.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2796775391243065432.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14151022947947771847.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2796775391243065432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14151022947947771847.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28127e+11,1.28949,49124,1224,41,81596,229,349,170133,48,1113,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(!(A(((i0.i0.u14.p40==1) * EF((i0.i0.u3.p8==1))) U !(EX(TRUE))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(!(!((E(!(!(EX(TRUE))) U (!(((i0.i0.u14.p40==1) * E(TRUE U (i0.i0.u3.p8==1)))) * !(!(EX(TRUE)))...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t41, t63, t65, t67, i0.i0.u14.t57, i0.i0.u14.t58, i0.i1.u5.t70, i1.i0.u6.t69, i1.i1.u11....649
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 22 rules in 11 ms. Remains 110 /121 variables (removed 11) and now considering 108/119 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 291 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 371 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:40:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 18/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 4/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 12201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 41/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 42242ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42243ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42626 ms. Remains : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6237265698132576552.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4554138485381752206.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6237265698132576552.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4554138485381752206.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57432e+11,4.84381,143456,2,19997,5,467427,6,0,550,867611,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E((EX((p23!=1)) * EX((((p91==0)||(p57==1))&&(p6==1)))) U EF((p78==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(EX((p23!=1)) * EX((((p91==0)||(p57==1))&&(p6==1))))),TRUE) * (p78==1))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t2...352
(forward)formula 0,0,13.8505,333908,1,0,264,1.84884e+06,239,117,3544,1.70881e+06,235
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 111 /121 variables (removed 10) and now considering 109/119 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-04 06:41:46] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:41:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 251 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:41:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 5/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 17088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 58/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 108/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 5/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 8/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 6/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 47126ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47126ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/121 places, 109/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47492 ms. Remains : 111/121 places, 109/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8845190029726749663.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:42:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9257560316025073604.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8845190029726749663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9257560316025073604.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,5.10208,155088,2,34876,5,487182,6,0,555,984078,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(!(A(!(((p16==0)||(p113==1))) U (p85!=0))))) * AX(((EF(((p42==0)||(p108==1))) + E((p12==1) U ((p80==0)||(p7==1)))) + AF((EF((p13==0...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p85!=0)) U (!(!(((p16==0)||(p113==1)))) * !((p85!=0)))) + EG(!((p85!=0))))))))...306
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t24, t27, t2...357
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17918328608791099758.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17918328608791099758.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17918328608791099758.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17918328608791099758.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17918328608791099758.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6799457508907468944.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9192136323487074808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6799457508907468944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9192136323487074808.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,1.08586,39580,1384,45,64244,189,334,102829,44,689,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(!(A(!(((i0.u7.p16==0)||(i9.i1.u41.p113==1))) U (i8.u31.p85!=0))))) * AX(((EF(((i2.i1.u15.p42==0)||(i8.u37.p108==1))) + E((i2.i1.u5...257
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i8.u31.p85!=0)) U (!(!(((i0.u7.p16==0)||(i9.i1.u41.p113==1)))) * !((i8.u31.p85...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t41, t64, t66, t68, i0.u7.t70, i1.u10.t67, i1.u12.t61, i1.u13.t1, i1.u13.t2, i1.u13.t3, ...621
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 112 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 112 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 111 /121 variables (removed 10) and now considering 109/119 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-04 06:43:33] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:43:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:43:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6812 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 28/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 109/220 variables, 111/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 108/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 13/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 36884ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36884ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/121 places, 109/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37118 ms. Remains : 111/121 places, 109/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11143635045438849485.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5001651020581582369.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11143635045438849485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5001651020581582369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58916e+11,5.27024,159036,2,20707,5,516056,6,0,555,980954,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AF(((((p57==0)||(p46==1))&&(p87==1))&&(p38!=0))) * (p24==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (p24==1)) * !(EG(!(((((p57==0)||(p46==1))&&(p87==1))&&(p38!=0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t2...357
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1164175530389335530.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1164175530389335530.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1164175530389335530.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1164175530389335530.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1164175530389335530.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14666499610787871891.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:44:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4773010287306863568.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14666499610787871891.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4773010287306863568.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58916e+11,2.01977,64884,1460,52,108702,378,362,211751,55,1534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AF(((((u19.p57==0)||(i3.i1.u16.p46==1))&&(i8.u30.p87==1))&&(i2.u13.p38!=0))) * (i2.u9.p24==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (i2.u9.p24==1)) * !(EG(!(((((u19.p57==0)||(i3.i1.u16.p46==1))&&(i8.u30.p87==1))&&(i2.u1...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t41, t43, t65, t67, u19.t8, u19.t9, u19.t10, u19.t11, i0.t69, i0.i1.u5.t72, i0.i2.u6.t71...615
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 22 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /121 variables (removed 11) and now considering 108/119 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:45:11] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:45:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:45:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 10999 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 43/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41030ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41030ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41215 ms. Remains : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15685599925358840899.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18436290406692941730.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15685599925358840899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18436290406692941730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,4.91188,148392,2,29788,5,454390,6,0,550,937626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p89==1) U E((p49==0) U !(AG(EX(((p53==0)||(p24==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((p49==0) U !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p53==0)||(p24==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(E((p49==0) U !(!(E(TRUE U...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8622828972275306282.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8622828972275306282.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8622828972275306282.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8622828972275306282.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8622828972275306282.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality108479970770179657.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4811549303691711336.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality108479970770179657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4811549303691711336.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,0.781544,31580,1555,42,50984,206,356,95349,44,682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i6.u32.p89==1) U E((i2.i0.u16.p49==0) U !(AG(EX(((i3.u18.p53==0)||(i1.i0.u9.p24==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((i2.i0.u16.p49==0) U !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i3.u18.p53==0)||(i1.i0.u9.p24==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!...365
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t63, t65, i0.t67, i0.i1.u5.t70, i0.i2.u6.t69, i1.i0.u9.t66, i1.i0.u12.t1, i1.i0.u12...642
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /121 variables (removed 11) and now considering 108/119 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 10879 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 43/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 40910ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40910ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41102 ms. Remains : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10380652214200821648.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:47:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3586935008405333293.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10380652214200821648.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3586935008405333293.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,4.82964,148428,2,29788,5,454390,6,0,550,937626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AX((p78==1)) * (EG(((p89==0)&&(p120==1))) + ((p1==0)&&(p66==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((p78==1)))) * (EG(((p89==0)&&(p120==1))) + ((p1==0)&&(p66==1))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6744029259671722996.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6744029259671722996.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6744029259671722996.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6744029259671722996.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6744029259671722996.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13787911610475278221.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5711084979081849698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13787911610475278221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5711084979081849698.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29617e+11,1.27022,41776,1800,44,72551,237,346,134506,44,917,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AX((i6.u28.p78==1)) * (EG(((i7.u34.p89==0)&&(i9.u41.p120==1))) + ((i0.i1.u0.p1==0)&&(i8.i1.u23.p66==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((i6.u28.p78==1)))) * (EG(((i7.u34.p89==0)&&(i9.u41.p120==1))) + ((i0.i1...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t40, t42, t63, t65, i0.i0.u1.t71, i0.i0.u10.t66, i1.t67, i1.u6.t70, i1.u7.t69, i2.u12.t6...613
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 107/119 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 06:48:33] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:48:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 2/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/216 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 216/216 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 12684 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 44/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/216 variables, 109/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 106/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 14/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 3/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 216/216 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 42705ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42706ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42823 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 107/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6985384614872909094.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6269557663826882317.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6985384614872909094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6269557663826882317.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,6.38542,158724,2,31644,5,512093,6,0,545,993132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(EF(((p108==0)&&(p88==1)))) + AF((p16==1))) + ((p12==0)||((p80==0)&&(p26==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p12==0)||((p80==0)&&(p26==1))))) * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((p108==0)&&(p88==1)))))),!((p16=...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t28, t3...352
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10426655404170403211.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10426655404170403211.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10426655404170403211.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10426655404170403211.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10426655404170403211.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9137153919792419485.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:49:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1362195667018682552.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9137153919792419485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1362195667018682552.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28701e+11,1.42353,53312,1716,38,90897,201,333,184899,42,957,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(EF(((i6.i1.u37.p108==0)&&(i7.u32.p88==1)))) + AF((i1.i1.u7.p16==1))) + ((i1.i0.u5.p12==0)||((i6.i0.u29.p80==0)&&(i3.i0.u11.p26==1...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i1.i0.u5.p12==0)||((i6.i0.u29.p80==0)&&(i3.i0.u11.p26==1))))) * !(EX(E(TRUE U ((i6...224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t41, t62, t64, i0.u1.t70, i1.t66, i1.i1.u7.t68, i1.i2.u6.t69, i2.u10.t65, i2.u12.t59, i2...631
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 119/119 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 110 /121 variables (removed 11) and now considering 108/119 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-04 06:50:16] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:50:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 18/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 5/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 10754 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 46/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/218 variables, 110/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 107/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 11/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 40771ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40772ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40909 ms. Remains : 110/121 places, 108/119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15779663695909491079.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:50:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9743912567152470564.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15779663695909491079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9743912567152470564.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43827e+11,4.74613,147536,2,10170,5,429810,6,0,550,996625,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p91!=1) U EX((AF(AX((p79==0))) * !(((p55==0)||(p103==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(p91!=1))) * !(((p55==0)||(p103==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((p79==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t3...352
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18355479025970458318.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18355479025970458318.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18355479025970458318.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18355479025970458318.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18355479025970458318.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15393998202753632026.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6499316351555712189.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15393998202753632026.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6499316351555712189.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43827e+11,0.977699,39788,1104,42,66982,180,363,111531,47,735,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((i7.u31.p91!=1) U EX((AF(AX((i6.i2.u27.p79==0))) * !(((i4.u20.p55==0)||(i5.i1.u34.p103==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(i7.u31.p91!=1))) * !(((i4.u20.p55==0)||(i5.i1.u34.p103==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i6.i2.u27.p79==0...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t39, t41, t66, t68, i0.u1.t72, i1.t64, i1.i1.u6.t71, i1.i2.u11.t65, i2.i0.u10.t67, i2.i0.u13....649
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:51:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4629866683451650142.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4629866683451650142.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4629866683451650142.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4629866683451650142.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4629866683451650142.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16548117388915414814.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:51:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4871809631775501878.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16548117388915414814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4871809631775501878.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29159e+11,1.86689,60568,2058,67,96137,292,386,196881,56,1265,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((i1.i0.u14.p39!=1) U A(AX(AX((i5.i1.u34.p100==1))) U (i0.u1.p3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!((E(!((i0.u1.p3==0)) U (!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((i5.i1.u34.p100==1)))))))) * !((i0.u1.p3==0)))) + EG(...457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t47, t49, t74, t76, i0.u1.t82, i1.t78, i1.i0.u14.t67, i1.i0.u14.t68, i1.i1.u5.t81, i1.i2...766
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16907130838455719098.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:53:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3961638429423350193.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16907130838455719098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3961638429423350193.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29159e+11,23.8485,729200,12833,269,1.30139e+06,1193,212,5.48509e+06,96,13608,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((i0.i1.i0.i0.u17.p39!=1) U A(AX(AX((i1.i0.i0.u34.p100==1))) U (i0.u2.p3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!((E(!((i0.u2.p3==0)) U (!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((i1.i0.i0.u34.p100==1)))))))) * !((i0.u2.p3==0)))) + ...472
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t82, i0.i1.u19.t8, i0.i1.u19.t9, i0.i1.u19.t10, i0.i1.u19.t11, i0.i1.u19.t57, i0.i1.u19...1198
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Transformed 121 places.
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Transformed 119 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17822820798959639864.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:55:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18193263926529635908.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17822820798959639864.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18193263926529635908.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29159e+11,10.2677,247764,2,41941,5,775832,6,0,605,1.67475e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((p39!=1) U A(AX(AX((p100==1))) U (p3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!((E(!((p3==0)) U (!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((p100==1)))))))) * !((p3==0)))) + EG(!((p3==0)))))) U (!((p...363
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t2...412
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3004214 ms.

BK_STOP 1749021733293

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400273"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;