Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894532400266.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400266
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749018039249

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 47 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Transformed 53 places.
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Transformed 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 53 places and 51 transitions and 222 arcs in 152 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 53 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:20:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 280 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1874 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5260 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 7172ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7188ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7493 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 53 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 78 to 70
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (285 resets) in 1084 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 3/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (87 resets) in 350 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (72 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-04 06:20:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 34/53 variables, 18/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 34/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 63 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 20/30 variables, 10/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/53 variables, 9/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 23/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 104 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 176ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 38 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 53 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 53 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 52 transition count 50
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 51 transition count 49
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 49
Applied a total of 12 rules in 18 ms. Remains 51 /53 variables (removed 2) and now considering 49/51 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 51/53 places, 49/51 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (235 resets) in 644 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (84 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 730511 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 836 ms. (steps per millisecond=873 )
Probabilistic random walk after 730511 steps, saw 146558 distinct states, run finished after 839 ms. (steps per millisecond=870 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 52 transition count 50
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /53 variables (removed 1) and now considering 50/51 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 19/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/102 variables, 52/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 2085 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 52/52 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 19/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/102 variables, 52/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 49/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 2391 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 52/52 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4490ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4492ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/53 places, 50/51 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4614 ms. Remains : 52/53 places, 50/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3968074604326472880.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2030097608367370434.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3968074604326472880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2030097608367370434.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.26453e+07,0.256357,14632,2,1819,5,40926,6,0,260,70993,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EG(((p6==1)&&(p16==1))) * (((p13==0)||(p21==0))||(p27==0))) * (((p38==0)||(p48==0))||(p52==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p38==0)||(p48==0))||(p52==0))) * (((p13==0)||(p21==0))||(p27==0))),((p6==1)&&(p16==...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/5/6
(forward)formula 0,0,1.96126,75136,1,0,49,354368,21,5,1524,475081,46
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1483 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5072 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6564ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6565ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6663 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17458057425808224367.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6725648380455194858.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17458057425808224367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6725648380455194858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.274677,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((p33==0)||(p47==0)) + ((((EF(((p31==1)&&(p42==1))) * A(((p14==1)&&(p35==1)) U (p21==1))) * ((p38==1)&&(p48==1))) * ((p52==1)&&(((p2...567
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((p33==0)||(p47==0)) + ((((E(TRUE U ((p31==1)&&(p42==1))) * !((E(!((p21==1)) U (!(((p14==1)&&(p35==...817
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11469309305025057108.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11469309305025057108.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11469309305025057108.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11469309305025057108.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11469309305025057108.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:21:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:21:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:21:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17150638756446848193.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:21:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5440194879085210301.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17150638756446848193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5440194879085210301.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.39227,19020,347,29,30545,91,146,48699,32,389,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i6.u12.p33==0)||(i6.u17.p47==0)) + ((((EF(((i5.u11.p31==1)&&(i5.u15.p42==1))) * A(((i0.u6.p14==1)&&(i7.u13.p35==1)) U (i3.u8.p21==...845
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i6.u12.p33==0)||(i6.u17.p47==0)) + ((((E(TRUE U ((i5.u11.p31==1)&&(i5.u15.p42==1))) * !((E(!((i3....1163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t29, t30, t43, t47, i0.t38, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i1.u9.t5, i1.u9.t6, i3.t36, i3.u8.t3,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1567 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5056 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6650ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6650ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6851 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5865160120173236929.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8099210551907353020.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5865160120173236929.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8099210551907353020.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.257843,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(EG((AG(((p12==1)&&(p45==1))) + (((p36==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p52==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(EG((!(E(TRUE U !(((p12==1)&&(p45==1))))) + (((p36==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p52==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,18.8458,508728,1,0,627,2.14304e+06,137,378,2044,4.3992e+06,567
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1584 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5068 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6659ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6659ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6769 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4599282146636450040.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7342359014146153908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4599282146636450040.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7342359014146153908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.26259,15584,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(!(A(!(EX(((p29==1)&&(p44==1)))) U (p37!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!((E(!((p37!=1)) U (!(!(EX(((p29==1)&&(p44==1))))) * !((p37!=1)))) + EG(!((p37!=1)))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
(forward)formula 0,1,8.44685,276952,1,0,576,1.40993e+06,130,234,1956,2.08007e+06,606
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1526 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5125 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6658ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6659ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6756 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14919613039217036344.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7772160779117216813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14919613039217036344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7772160779117216813.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.276769,15708,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((((EG(EX((p21==1))) + E(A(((p3==1)&&(p24==1)) U (p39==1)) U AG(((p6==1)&&(p17==1))))) * ((p12==0)||(p45==0))) * ((p37==0)&&((((p37==...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(((((EG(EX((p21==1))) + E(!((E(!((p39==1)) U (!(((p3==1)&&(p24==1))) * !((p39==1)))) + EG(...468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5113703000751201471.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5113703000751201471.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5113703000751201471.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5113703000751201471.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5113703000751201471.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability880080443453588899.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18071414511618951708.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability880080443453588899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18071414511618951708.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.460879,22856,441,31,34848,93,146,87906,32,438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((((EG(EX((i3.u8.p21==1))) + E(A(((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u9.p24==1)) U (i6.u15.p39==1)) U AG(((i2.u2.p6==1)&&(i2.u6.p17==1))))) * ((i1.u5...436
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(((((EG(EX((i3.u8.p21==1))) + E(!((E(!((i6.u15.p39==1)) U (!(((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u9.p24==1...624
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t28, t31, t43, t47, i1.u9.t5, i1.u9.t6, i2.t38, i2.u6.t1, i2.u6.t2, i3.t36, i3.u8.t3,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1509 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4925 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6441ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6442ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6533 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9488160300525023450.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:23:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11278321399005092776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9488160300525023450.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11278321399005092776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.264468,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((E((((!(((p36==1)&&(p40==1))&&(p52==1)))||(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))&&((p3==1)&&(p24==1)))) * !(AF(((p31==1)&&(p42==1))))) U (AX((((p13==1)...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E((((!(((p36==1)&&(p40==1))&&(p52==1)))||(((p2==1)&&(p10==1))&&((p3==1)&&(p24==1)))) * !(!(EG(!(((p...323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10927063953481387722.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10927063953481387722.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10927063953481387722.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10927063953481387722.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10927063953481387722.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10254077690416010565.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9204430808618589291.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10254077690416010565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9204430808618589291.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.357042,15888,358,29,22706,121,164,36730,32,488,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((E((((!(((i5.u13.p36==1)&&(i4.u15.p40==1))&&(i5.u18.p52==1)))||(((i3.i1.u0.p2==1)&&(i3.i1.u4.p10==1))&&((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.i0.u9.p24=...415
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E((((!(((i5.u13.p36==1)&&(i4.u15.p40==1))&&(i5.u18.p52==1)))||(((i3.i1.u0.p2==1)&&(i3.i1.u4.p10==1)...470
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t32, t35, t43, t45, i1.t38, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.i0.u9....368
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:24:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1569 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5079 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6654ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6655ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6776 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9600139183151868277.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14495275685892106852.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9600139183151868277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14495275685892106852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.267289,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((AF((AF(((p30==1)&&(p43==1))) * (p15!=1))) + ((((AF(((((p4==1)&&(p19==1))&&((p36==1)&&(p40==1)))&&(p52==1))) * (p38==1)) * ((p46==1)&...512
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p30==1)&&(p43==1))))) * !((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p27==1)))) * ((p6==1)&...831
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3150658873645560595.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3150658873645560595.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3150658873645560595.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3150658873645560595.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3150658873645560595.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6817165626101985246.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4861739360907312507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6817165626101985246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4861739360907312507.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.425948,20432,407,31,31700,90,147,63680,32,376,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((AF((AF(((i5.u11.p30==1)&&(i4.u16.p43==1))) * (i2.u6.p15!=1))) + ((((AF(((((i3.u1.p4==1)&&(i3.u7.p19==1))&&((i7.u13.p36==1)&&(i5.u15....757
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i5.u11.p30==1)&&(i4.u16.p43==1))))) * !((((i1.u4.p11==1)&&(i2.u6.p15==1)...1164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t29, t30, t43, t47, i0.t36, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.u9.t5, i1.u9.t6, i2.t38, i2.u6.t1,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1441 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5078 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6527ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6529ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6632 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1606310341824850814.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2277194609282539621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1606310341824850814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2277194609282539621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.269879,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AG(((((p13==0)||(p21==0))||((p25==0)||(p14==0)))||(p35==0)))) + A(EX(((p33==1)&&(p48==1))) U (EX(EG((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p26==1...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!((EX(EG((((p11==1)&&(p15==1))&&(p26==1)))) + ((p29==1)&&(p44==1)))) U (!(EX(((p33==1)&&(p4...407
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7626964478411903540.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7626964478411903540.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7626964478411903540.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7626964478411903540.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7626964478411903540.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8539481842418299478.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4000281777731241011.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8539481842418299478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4000281777731241011.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.418267,19148,361,29,29822,90,145,54559,32,363,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AG(((((i0.u5.p13==0)||(i0.u8.p21==0))||((i1.u9.p25==0)||(i2.u6.p14==0)))||(i7.u13.p35==0)))) + A(EX(((i5.u12.p33==1)&&(i5.u17.p48=...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!((EX(EG((((i1.u4.p11==1)&&(i2.u6.p15==1))&&(i1.u9.p26==1)))) + ((i4.u10.p29==1)&&(i4.u16.p...548
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t28, t31, t43, t47, i0.t36, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i1.u9.t5, i1.u9.t6, i2.t38, i2.u6.t1,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,11.1305,349564,1,0,615736,177,702,1.17245e+06,135,414,529708
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:26:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1461 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5032 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6506ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6624 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8112912283588435095.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17396783586853629721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8112912283588435095.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17396783586853629721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.276915,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((((((p11==1)&&(p17==1))&&(p26==1)) + (((E((((p13==1)&&(p23==1))&&(p27==1)) U ((p31==1)&&(p42==1))) * EF(((p33==1)&&(p48==1)))) * (((...508
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((p12==1)&&(p45==1))&&((p8==1)&&(p22==1)))||(((p4==1)&&(p19==1))&&((p3...950
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9991766727477539630.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9991766727477539630.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9991766727477539630.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9991766727477539630.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9991766727477539630.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3679657582588121655.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17797236116928574126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3679657582588121655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17797236116928574126.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.56255,20812,368,30,28112,114,144,62031,32,441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((((((i3.u4.p11==1)&&(i1.u6.p17==1))&&(i3.u9.p26==1)) + (((E((((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u8.p23==1))&&(i3.u9.p27==1)) U ((i4.u11.p31==1)&&(...752
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((i2.u5.p12==1)&&(i7.u17.p45==1))&&((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u8.p22==1)))||(...1330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t32, t35, t43, t45, i1.t38, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.u9.t5,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,29.0211,699156,1,0,1.11444e+06,198,952,2.21767e+06,139,511,994384
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:27:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:27:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:27:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:27:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1492 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6515ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6515ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6621 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability354625451783212353.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8162600407339307637.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability354625451783212353.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8162600407339307637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.25271,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((!(EX((!(EF((p0==1))) * (!(((p6==1)&&(p17==1))) + EF(((p31==1)&&(p41==1))))))) * (p38==1)) * ((p46==1)&&(p50==1))) * ((AG(((((p36==1)...366
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))))) U (!((((!(EX((!(E(TRUE U...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7787463785995104445.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7787463785995104445.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7787463785995104445.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7787463785995104445.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7787463785995104445.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9852723185743626871.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:28:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14274274595574866674.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9852723185743626871.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14274274595574866674.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.525878,22092,353,31,34137,92,144,66788,32,426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((!(EX((!(EF((i0.u7.p0==1))) * (!(((i1.u2.p6==1)&&(i1.u6.p17==1))) + EF(((i5.u11.p31==1)&&(i5.u15.p41==1))))))) * (i4.u14.p38==1)) * (...536
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i3.u3.p9==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i3.u3.p9==1)))))) ...729
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t28, t30, t43, t47, i1.t38, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.u9.t5, i2.u9.t6, i3.t36, i3.u8.t3,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:29:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1446 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5033 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6484ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6485ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6591 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7470802033714880207.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14107195383222480386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7470802033714880207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14107195383222480386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.252913,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((!(A(((AX(((p14==1)&&(p35==1))) + AG((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p52==1)))) + (((p3==1)&&(p24==1))||((p2==1)&&(p10==1)))) U ((AF((p16==1))...324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!(((!(EG(!((p16==1)))) + EX((p50==1))) + ((p25==1)||(((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p52==1))...1495
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18008054308202675653.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18008054308202675653.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18008054308202675653.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18008054308202675653.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18008054308202675653.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4014469060455062022.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15753213450118396872.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4014469060455062022.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15753213450118396872.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.256291,14020,341,30,19389,120,146,35158,32,450,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((!(A(((AX(((i1.u6.p14==1)&&(i6.u13.p35==1))) + AG((((i7.u14.p38==1)&&(i7.u17.p48==1))&&(i6.u18.p52==1)))) + (((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.u9.p2...472
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!(((!(EG(!((i1.u6.p16==1)))) + EX((i6.u18.p50==1))) + ((i3.u9.p25==1)||(((i7.u14.p38...2079
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t29, t32, t43, t45, i1.t38, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.u9.t5,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,20.5103,617408,1,0,1.05377e+06,203,866,1.88192e+06,139,516,816343
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:30:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1502 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4904 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6415ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6416ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6502 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9084421141207032059.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6737957190796711571.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9084421141207032059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6737957190796711571.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.282148,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(EX(((((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p50==1))||(((p38==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p52==1)))&&(p13==1))&&((p23==1)&&(p25==1))))) U (A(EX((p50==1)) U E...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,!(EX(((((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p50==1))||(((p38==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p52==1)))&&(p13==1))&&((p23==1)&...489
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6627859520711779429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6627859520711779429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6627859520711779429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6627859520711779429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6627859520711779429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11291460467217741281.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9881068933849592888.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11291460467217741281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9881068933849592888.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.362768,16332,355,29,23006,121,145,40111,32,510,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(EX(((((((i5.u14.p38==1)&&(i7.u17.p48==1))&&(i5.u18.p50==1))||(((i5.u14.p38==1)&&(i7.u17.p46==1))&&(i5.u18.p52==1)))&&(i2.u5.p13==1)...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,!(EX(((((((i5.u14.p38==1)&&(i7.u17.p48==1))&&(i5.u18.p50==1))||(((i5.u14.p38==1)&&(i7.u17.p46==1))...681
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t33, t35, t43, t45, i0.t38, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.u9.t5,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1902,268748,1,0,454836,174,711,769460,130,510,435690
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1491 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4970 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6470ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6470ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6577 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7250130807339180192.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1673416096040060108.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7250130807339180192.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1673416096040060108.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.26774,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF((((p11==0)||(p15==0))||(p27==0))) * AF(EX(((p31==0)||(p41==0))))) * ((EG(((p1==0)||(p20==0))) + ((p5==1)&&(p18==1))) + (((p25==1)...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((EY(Init) * (!(EG(!((((p11==0)||(p15==0))||(p27==0))))) * !(EG(!(EX(((p31==0)||(p41==0)))))))),((p1==0)|...467
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/8
(forward)formula 0,0,2.76986,106620,1,0,440,605011,142,168,2083,723246,478
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 52 transition count 50
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 52 /53 variables (removed 1) and now considering 50/51 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 19/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/102 variables, 52/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 1974 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 52/52 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 19/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 6/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 50/102 variables, 52/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 49/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 2393 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 52/52 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4373ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4373ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/53 places, 50/51 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4496 ms. Remains : 52/53 places, 50/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7584197037682948297.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17169995899557053386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7584197037682948297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17169995899557053386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.26453e+07,0.240478,14688,2,1819,5,40926,6,0,260,70993,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG((((p38==0)||(p46==0))||(p52==0))) * (p13==1)) * ((p21==1)&&(p27==1))) * (EG(((p32==0)||(p34==0))) + ((p7==1)&&(p9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG((((p38==0)||(p46==0))||(p52==0))) * (p13==1)) * ((p21==1)&&(p27==1)))),((p32==0)|...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t18, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32, t37, t38...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1230182973881805914.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1230182973881805914.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1230182973881805914.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1230182973881805914.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1230182973881805914.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability971632745990987470.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17890258279323895518.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability971632745990987470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17890258279323895518.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.26453e+07,0.250446,13448,340,29,18327,122,166,29705,34,489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG((((i7.u14.p38==0)||(i7.u17.p46==0))||(i6.u18.p52==0))) * (i3.i1.u5.p13==1)) * ((i2.u8.p21==1)&&(i3.i1.u9.p27==1))) * (EG(((i5.u1...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EG((((i7.u14.p38==0)||(i7.u17.p46==0))||(i6.u18.p52==0))) * (i3.i1.u5.p13==1)) * ((i...424
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t27, t29, t41, t44, i1.t32, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t30, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.i1.u9....356
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,9.14832,250888,1,0,450933,179,777,702225,141,489,373999
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 51 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 06:31:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:31:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1498 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 5094 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6597ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6597ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6710 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2634550119563394392.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:31:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12769218663951183852.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2634550119563394392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12769218663951183852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.266138,15716,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((p36==0)||(p42==0))||(p52==0))) * EF(((EX((AG(((p8==1)&&(p22==1))) * ((A(((p31==1)&&(p42==1)) U (((p36==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p52==1))) +...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(((FwdU((Init * EG((((p36==0)||(p42==0))||(p52==0)))),TRUE) * (p24==1)) * (p3==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p8=...668
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9372261838610452623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9372261838610452623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9372261838610452623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9372261838610452623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9372261838610452623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13966509129475430469.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6952473418821624502.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13966509129475430469.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6952473418821624502.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.481468,20804,350,29,31726,134,144,66169,32,518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((i6.u13.p36==0)||(i7.u15.p42==0))||(i6.u18.p52==0))) * EF(((EX((AG(((i1.u3.p8==1)&&(i1.u8.p22==1))) * ((A(((i7.u11.p31==1)&&(i7.u15...332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(((FwdU((Init * EG((((i6.u13.p36==0)||(i7.u15.p42==0))||(i6.u18.p52==0)))),TRUE) * (i2.u9.p24==1)) * (i3...906
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t28, t33, t43, t47, i0.t38, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i1.t36, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.u9.t5,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,20.449,523840,1,0,807360,175,668,2.04226e+06,131,518,712969
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 51/51 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1486 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 19/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 51/104 variables, 53/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 50/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4893 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 53/53 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6385ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6385ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6470 ms. Remains : 53/53 places, 51/51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 51 transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18100817786228736363.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:32:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7488853068280203278.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18100817786228736363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7488853068280203278.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.266706,15712,2,1980,5,45382,6,0,265,77189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((E((p16!=1) U (EX((((p38==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p50==1))) * !((((p38==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p52==1))))) + EF((((!(((p11==1)&&(p17==1))&&(p27==1)...562
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((p33==1)&&(p47==1)))))) * !(E(!(((p33==1)&&(p47==1))) U (!((E((p16!=1) U (EX((((p38==1)&&(p46...1067
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t16, t21, t23, t28, t29, t32, t33...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13085460600579998481.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13085460600579998481.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13085460600579998481.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13085460600579998481.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13085460600579998481.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3865612209513273888.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14485653979015991420.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3865612209513273888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14485653979015991420.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.179391,10968,328,30,14409,91,145,26866,32,386,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A((E((i0.u6.p16!=1) U (EX((((i7.u14.p38==1)&&(i5.u17.p46==1))&&(i7.u18.p50==1))) * !((((i7.u14.p38==1)&&(i5.u17.p48==1))&&(i7.u18.p52=...825
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((i5.u12.p33==1)&&(i5.u17.p47==1)))))) * !(E(!(((i5.u12.p33==1)&&(i5.u17.p47==1))) U (!((E((i0...1478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t28, t30, t43, t45, i0.t38, i0.u6.t1, i0.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.u9.t5,...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 06:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 06:33:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1933198239793255669.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1933198239793255669.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1933198239793255669.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1933198239793255669.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1933198239793255669.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7368002407886335813.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 06:33:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17934707248483736229.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7368002407886335813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17934707248483736229.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.39603e+07,0.354716,16372,414,30,23068,88,155,52895,32,419,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i5.i0.u12.p33==0)||(i6.u17.p47==0)) + ((((EF(((i5.i0.u11.p31==1)&&(i4.u15.p42==1))) * A(((i1.u6.p14==1)&&(i4.u13.p35==1)) U (i2.u8...872
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i5.i0.u12.p33==0)||(i6.u17.p47==0)) + ((((E(TRUE U ((i5.i0.u11.p31==1)&&(i4.u15.p42==1))) * !((E(...1208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t21, t23, t29, t43, t45, i1.t38, i1.u6.t1, i1.u6.t2, i2.t36, i2.u8.t3, i2.u8.t4, i3.u9.t5...365
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,34.9765,862516,1,0,1.35955e+06,177,886,2.6884e+06,136,476,1111422
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AX(((((EG(EX((i2.u8.p21==1))) + E(A(((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.u9.p24==1)) U (i4.u15.p39==1)) U AG(((i1.u2.p6==1)&&(i1.u6.p17==1))))) * ((i2.u5...436
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EX(!(((((EG(EX((i2.u8.p21==1))) + E(!((E(!((i4.u15.p39==1)) U (!(((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.u9.p24==1...624
(forward)formula 1,1,64.2637,1512536,1,0,2.26693e+06,178,974,4.46618e+06,139,479,1791154
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(((E((((!(((i4.u13.p36==1)&&(i4.u15.p40==1))&&(i4.u18.p52==1)))||(((i3.u0.p2==1)&&(i3.u4.p10==1))&&((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.u9.p24==1)))) * ...391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E((((!(((i4.u13.p36==1)&&(i4.u15.p40==1))&&(i4.u18.p52==1)))||(((i3.u0.p2==1)&&(i3.u4.p10==1))&&((i...446
(forward)formula 2,1,112.056,2207856,1,0,3.26286e+06,179,291,6.53598e+06,73,481,284221
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(((AF((AF(((i5.i0.u12.p30==1)&&(i5.i1.u16.p43==1))) * (i1.u6.p15!=1))) + ((((AF(((((i0.u1.p4==1)&&(i0.u7.p19==1))&&((i4.u13.p36==1)&&(i...772
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i5.i0.u12.p30==1)&&(i5.i1.u16.p43==1))))) * !((((i3.u4.p11==1)&&(i1.u6.p...1191
(forward)formula 3,0,157.491,2207856,1,0,3.26286e+06,179,594,6.53598e+06,91,481,1705291
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((((!(EX((!(EF((i0.u7.p0==1))) * (!(((i1.u2.p6==1)&&(i1.u6.p17==1))) + EF(((i5.i0.u11.p31==1)&&(i4.u15.p41==1))))))) * (i6.u14.p38==1)) ...542
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.u3.p9==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!(((i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.u3.p9==1)))))) ...735
(forward)formula 4,0,194.054,2207856,1,0,3.26286e+06,179,650,6.58723e+06,91,481,2500801
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (!(A((E((i1.u6.p16!=1) U (EX((((i6.u14.p38==1)&&(i6.u17.p46==1))&&(i4.u18.p50==1))) * !((((i6.u14.p38==1)&&(i6.u17.p48==1))&&(i4.u18.p52=...837
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((i5.i0.u12.p33==1)&&(i6.u17.p47==1)))))) * !(E(!(((i5.i0.u12.p33==1)&&(i6.u17.p47==1))) U (!(...1502
(forward)formula 5,1,233.962,2435060,1,0,3.44773e+06,179,546,7.23517e+06,85,481,610869
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 1022031 ms.

BK_STOP 1749019062585

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894532400266"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;