fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r184-tall-174889264800772
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for SafeBus-PT-06

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 1982767.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFFFFFTTFFFFT normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889264800772.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is SafeBus-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264800772
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.0M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 203K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 166K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 791K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 303K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749182037873

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SafeBus-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 91 ms
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Transformed 144 places.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Transformed 451 transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 144 places and 451 transitions and 2968 arcs in 181 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 138 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 451/451 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 451/451 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 209 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 27 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 209 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 411 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 209 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:53:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 213 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 12/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 177 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 167 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30433ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 36 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 36 dead transitions in 30449ms
Found 36 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 36 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 36 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/138 places, 415/451 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 30897 ms. Remains : 138/138 places, 415/451 transitions.
Support contains 138 out of 138 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 03:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 77 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 415 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 33 to 28
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1625 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 1/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 213 ms. (186 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-06 03:54:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 03:54:31] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 23/380 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/15 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 44 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 33 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:54:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:54:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 577 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 581 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 132 transition count 409
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 126 transition count 409
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -114
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 120 transition count 523
Applied a total of 24 rules in 51 ms. Remains 120 /132 variables (removed 12) and now considering 523/415 (removed -108) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:54:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 350 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 350 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-06 03:54:32] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 314 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:54:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 350 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 450 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 767 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/138 places, 523/415 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1433 ms. Remains : 120/138 places, 523/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 757 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 241 steps with 0 reset with depth 242 and stack size 242 in 2 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 finished in 2399 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X((X(!p0)||G(!p1))))) U G((p2&&F(p0)))))'
Support contains 56 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:54:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 03:54:34] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 652 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 701 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 409 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:54:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:54:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/380 variables, 138/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 43/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 409/409 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 43/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 8/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/380 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/409 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60286ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60290ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61660 ms. Remains : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 659 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND p0 p1), (NOT p0), (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p0 p1), (AND p0 p1), p0, (AND p1 p0), true, (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), p1, (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), (AND (NOT p2) p0), (NOT p2), (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 512 steps with 16 reset in 9 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 finished in 62361 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G((X(X(X(p2)))||p1))&&X(p3)&&p0)))'
Support contains 57 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:55:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:55:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 699 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:55:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:55:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:55:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 764 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1465 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 409 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:55:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:55:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:55:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/380 variables, 138/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 43/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 409/409 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 43/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 8/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/380 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/409 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60222ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60224ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61698 ms. Remains : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 322 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p3), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 241 steps with 2 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 finished in 62047 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 12 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:56:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:56:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 903 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 904 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 950 ms. Remains : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5591 reset in 247 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5548 reset in 277 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 55 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 89 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 26 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 24 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-06-06 03:56:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-06 03:56:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 38 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 124 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 827 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:41] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 333 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 263 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 43 Read/Feed constraints in 26 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 93 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 66/348/66 causal constraints (skipped 170 transitions) in 19 ms.
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Added : 32 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 231 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 12 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:56:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 783 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:56:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:56:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:56:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 676 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1461 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 32 ms returned []
Running 409 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:56:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:56:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:56:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 10/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 18/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 17/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/374 variables, 132/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 43/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 7/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 375 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 132/132 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 409/409 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 10/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 13/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 45/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/374 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 132/132 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 0/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/409 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60255ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60256ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61781 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 415/415 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 88 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 63 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-06-06 03:57:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:57:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 675 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:46] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 334 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 488 ms returned sat
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 43 Read/Feed constraints in 51 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 97 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 66/348/66 causal constraints (skipped 170 transitions) in 19 ms.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Added : 10 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 149 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 52 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5579 reset in 199 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5582 reset in 214 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9592103861124396243
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 13 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 03:57:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 97ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9592103861124396243
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9592103861124396243;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1093 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9592103861124396243;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 55 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9592103861124396243;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11148309261422948985.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 944 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-03 finished in 71185 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(G(p0))&&(G(p1) U X(G(p2))))))'
Support contains 81 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 256 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (AND (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-04 finished in 441 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(!p0)&&X(X(X(p1)))))'
Support contains 73 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:57:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 306 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 603 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 409 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:57:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:57:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:57:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/380 variables, 138/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 43/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/380 variables, and 391 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 409/409 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 43/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 8/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/380 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 138/138 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/409 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60229ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 409 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60232ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60842 ms. Remains : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 238 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), p0, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 finished in 61099 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X((F(p1)&&(!p1 U (G(!p1)||p2))))&&p0)))'
Support contains 24 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 600 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 602 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 610 ms. Remains : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 181 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-07 finished in 816 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F((X(F(p2))&&p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 811 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 119]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 812 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 133 /133 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 820 ms. Remains : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 460 reset in 227 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 561 steps with 1 reset with depth 128 and stack size 128 in 2 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1268 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)||X(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 814 ms returned [114, 116, 117, 118]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 816 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 134 /134 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 823 ms. Remains : 134/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 158 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 155 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-09 finished in 1318 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F((G(!p1)||(!p1&&G(F(!p2))))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 887 ms returned [114, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 890 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 133 transition count 411
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 129 transition count 411
Applied a total of 8 rules in 16 ms. Remains 129 /133 variables (removed 4) and now considering 411/415 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 129 cols
[2025-06-06 03:58:55] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 866 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:58:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:58:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 837 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1704 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 129/138 places, 411/415 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2627 ms. Remains : 129/138 places, 411/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1, (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 237 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 249 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 84 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 174 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1, (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 248 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 1/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-06 03:58:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:58:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 29/33 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 29/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/101 variables, 10/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 68/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 22/123 variables, 7/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 22/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/127 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 237/364 variables, 127/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 42/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/367 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/367 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 130 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 129/129 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 29/33 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 29/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/367 variables, and 45 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 39 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 33/129 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 174ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 219 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Support contains 4 out of 129 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 411/411 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 129 /129 variables (removed 0) and now considering 411/411 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:58:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:58:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 721 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 821 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1546 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 405 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 03:59:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 129/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 10/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 14/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 20/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 20/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 8/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 238/367 variables, 129/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 43/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 129/129 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 405/405 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 129/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 10/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 14/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 55/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/367 variables, and 212 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 129/129 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/405 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60219ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 405 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60221ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61805 ms. Remains : 129/129 places, 411/411 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 96 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
RANDOM walk for 3889 steps (0 resets) in 27 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 137 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (NOT p0), p1]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1056 reset in 237 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1087 reset in 251 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4192275384617694045
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 411 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 411 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 411 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 6 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:02] [INFO ] Built C files in 56ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4192275384617694045
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4192275384617694045;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 954 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4192275384617694045;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4192275384617694045;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased8458426338553570734.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 129 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 411/411 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 128 transition count 430
Applied a total of 2 rules in 22 ms. Remains 128 /129 variables (removed 1) and now considering 430/411 (removed -19) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 257 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-06 04:00:17] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 668 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 257 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 786 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1455 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 424 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 257 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 04:00:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-06 04:00:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 43 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 128/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 10/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 14/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 20/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 6/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 5/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 257/385 variables, 128/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30223ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 424 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30224ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/129 places, 430/411 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31723 ms. Remains : 128/129 places, 430/411 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16623068929230722097
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 430 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 430 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 430 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:00:49] [INFO ] Built C files in 62ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16623068929230722097
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16623068929230722097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1023 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16623068929230722097;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 39 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16623068929230722097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased2620566708126041050.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-06 04:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL17781690437345992695.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5395981382403339270.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL17781690437345992695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut4282835706165995446.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL5395981382403339270.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL5395981382403339270.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut4282835706165995446.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14483893040462898478.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL16721151784880260280.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14483893040462898478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL16721151784880260280.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((MSG_4==0)||(wait_msg_4==0))||((RMC_2==0)||(wait_cable_2==0)))"))&&(F((G("((MSG_4==0)||(wait_msg_4==0))"))||(("((MSG_4==0)|...219
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((MSG_4==0)||(wait_msg_4==0))||((RMC_2==0)||(wait_cable_2==0)))" | G(F!"((MSG_4==0)||(wait_msg_4==0))" & (!"((MSG_4==0)||(wait...205
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5131818761359644008.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5131818761359644008.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5131818761359644008.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5131818761359644008.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5131818761359644008.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:01:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 333 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 166 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 243 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL15231007635318515018.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5100678326928546094.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL15231007635318515018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL5100678326928546094.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((i0.u1.MSG_4==0)||(u3.wait_msg_4==0))||((u3.RMC_2==0)||(i0.u8.wait_cable_2==0)))"))&&(F((G("((i0.u1.MSG_4==0)||(u3.wait_msg...267
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((i0.u1.MSG_4==0)||(u3.wait_msg_4==0))||((u3.RMC_2==0)||(i0.u8.wait_cable_2==0)))" | G(F!"((i0.u1.MSG_4==0)||(u3.wait_msg_4==0...253
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 finished in 175127 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G((G(p0) U p1)) U X(p1)) U X(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 04:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 870 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 871 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 133 /133 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 876 ms. Remains : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-11 finished in 995 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||F((p1||X(p2)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 04:01:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 722 ms returned [114, 115, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 723 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 133 /133 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 726 ms. Remains : 133/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1133 reset in 244 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 836 steps with 9 reset with depth 260 and stack size 260 in 2 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 finished in 1082 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G(p0))||(F(p1)&&X(p2))))'
Support contains 7 out of 138 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 138 /138 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 173 similar events)
[2025-06-06 04:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 818 ms returned [114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 819 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 415/415 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 822 ms. Remains : 132/138 places, 415/415 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 215 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1576 reset in 242 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2609 steps with 31 reset with depth 179 and stack size 179 in 6 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 finished in 1306 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F((G(!p1)||(!p1&&G(F(!p2))))))))'
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15761494737342924850
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 415 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Built C files in 45ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15761494737342924850
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15761494737342924850;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4232821501154541064.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4232821501154541064.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4232821501154541064.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4232821501154541064.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4232821501154541064.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 838 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 196 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability5045715086405048277.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability14812818273476013210.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability5045715086405048277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability14812818273476013210.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((i2.u0.MSG_4==0)||(i3.u8.wait_msg_4==0))||((i0.u5.RMC_2==0)||(i2.u0.wait_cable_2==0)))"))&&(F((G(!("((i2.u0.MSG_4==1)&&(i3....288
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((i2.u0.MSG_4==0)||(i3.u8.wait_msg_4==0))||((i0.u5.RMC_2==0)||(i2.u0.wait_cable_2==0)))" | G(F"((i2.u0.MSG_4==1)&&(i3.u8.wait_...262
Compilation finished in 1009 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15761494737342924850;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15761494737342924850;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp0==true))&&<>(([](!(LTLAPp1==true))||(!(LTLAPp1==true)&&[](<>(!(LTLAPp2==true))))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t253, t325, t327, t328, t331, t333, t334, t337, t339, t34...810
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1117 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 101 ms
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 157 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability15964575128035395825.gal : 15 ms
[2025-06-06 04:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability2958390612806718973.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability15964575128035395825.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability2958390612806718973.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((u8.MSG_4==0)||(u4.wait_msg_4==0))||((u6.RMC_2==0)||(u21.wait_cable_2==0)))"))&&(F((G(!("((u8.MSG_4==1)&&(u4.wait_msg_4==1)...259
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((u8.MSG_4==0)||(u4.wait_msg_4==0))||((u6.RMC_2==0)||(u21.wait_cable_2==0)))" | G(F"((u8.MSG_4==1)&&(u4.wait_msg_4==1))" & ("(...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t9, t11, t20, t21, t26, t211, t212, t213, t214, t215, t216, t255, t256, t328, t330, t331,...484
LTSmin run took 1505670 ms.
FORMULA SafeBus-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1981501 ms.

BK_STOP 1749184020640

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SafeBus-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SafeBus-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264800772"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SafeBus-PT-06.tgz
mv SafeBus-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;