Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889264700706.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is SafeBus-COL-03, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264700706
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749150056879

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SafeBus-COL-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 515 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Detected 1 constant HL places corresponding to 3 PT places.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Imported 20 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 60 PT places and 214.0 transition bindings in 30 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 20 places and 14 transitions 68 arcs in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Skeletonized 6 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 10 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 5 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 135 steps (0 resets) in 16 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/9 properties
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [It(3), It(3)] of place AMC breaks symmetries in sort It
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 60 places and 97 transitions 556 arcs in 25 ms.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Reduced 3 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 6 transitions.
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 91/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 91/91 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 19:00:58] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 23 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 11/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 3445 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 16/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved in 3173 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/88 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6700ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 9 dead transitions in 6710ms
Found 9 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 9 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 9 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 6974 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/91 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 54 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 38 to 35
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1903 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 6/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 225 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 162 ms. (245 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/42 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/122 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 70 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 0/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 89ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16443856030131547146.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8993094855970273642.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16443856030131547146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8993094855970273642.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.063801,6444,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AG(((((((((Cpt2_0>=1)&&(cable_used_2>=1))&&((AMC_3>=1)&&(FMCb>=1)))||(((Cpt2_0>=1)&&(cable_used_1>=1))&&((AMC_6>=1)&&(FMCb>=1))))|...1755
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((Cpt2_0>=1)&&(cable_used_2>=1))&&((AMC_3>=1)&&(FMCb>=1)))|...1831
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.240799,12588,1,0,190,44511,181,79,2374,27659,171
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:07] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 46 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9712113029401685593.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14395645292413334729.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9712113029401685593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14395645292413334729.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.070344,6924,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG((EX((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_free<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_1<1)||(cable_free<1))||((AMC_4<1)||(FMCb<1))))&&((((Cpt2_2<...2238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((EX((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_free<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_1<1)||(cable_fre...2293
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.617285,30824,1,0,272,143140,198,118,2547,131922,265
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3116 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2588 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5733ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5734ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5844 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1364730131242195281.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18010539369340570125.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1364730131242195281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18010539369340570125.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.077577,7360,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EF(((((AG(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1)&&(FMC_2>=1)))||((cable_used_1>=1)&&(FMC_1>=1)))) + ((wait_ack_1>=1...2414
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((((!(E(TRUE U !(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1...2739
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.625495,28792,1,0,321,123910,202,138,2745,108277,338
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18393066153757081645.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3110152736304750400.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18393066153757081645.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3110152736304750400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.056232,6360,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EG(((((((wait_ack_5<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wait_ack_2<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1)))&&((((wait_ack_6<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wai...542
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((((wait_ack_1<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wait_ack_3<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1)))&&((((...592
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 24/30/55
(forward)formula 0,0,0.158381,10072,1,0,11,29615,22,4,1783,16883,11
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 51 /51 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17822875827782419783.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8534013057430773234.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17822875827782419783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8534013057430773234.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.075329,6924,2,1124,5,11611,6,0,289,11498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((((((((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(loop_em_1>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(loop_em_2>=1)))||(((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(loop_em_0>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(loop_em_0>=1)))...1138
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((((((((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(loop_em_1>=1))||((Cpt1_1>=1)&&(loop_em_2>=1)))||(((Cpt1_2>=1)&&(loop_em_0>=...1189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.788626,38100,1,0,358,175994,201,187,2458,187711,337
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3177 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2599 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5808ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5809ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5902 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4267325218133004711.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability525375783774469479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4267325218133004711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability525375783774469479.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.076136,7364,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((AF(((((((Cpt1_2<1)||(listen_2<1))&&((Cpt1_1<1)||(listen_1<1)))&&(((Cpt1_1<1)||(listen_2<1))&&((Cpt1_2<1)||(listen_0<1))))&&((((C...2186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(((((((Cpt1_2<1)||(listen_2<1))&&((Cpt1_1<1)||(listen_1<1)))&&((...3439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
(forward)formula 0,1,0.435768,23232,1,0,244,91223,200,109,2682,74958,244
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2531 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5660ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5662ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5777 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4543544900675080051.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17817991528741938085.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4543544900675080051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17817991528741938085.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.077774,7360,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG(!((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_free<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_1<1)||(cable_free<1))||((AMC_4<1)||(FMCb<1))))&&((((Cpt2_2<1)...952
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(!(((((((wait_cable_0>=1)&&(RMC_0>=1))||((wait_cable_1>=1)&&(RMC_1>=...1898
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 34/0/48
(forward)formula 0,1,0.576659,27260,1,0,237,106119,205,102,2784,91213,241
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8337030587758157663.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2603621751483666246.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8337030587758157663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2603621751483666246.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.059072,6412,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AF((((((((wait_ack_5<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wait_ack_2<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1)))&&((((wait_ack_6<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wai...1501
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EG(!((((((((wait_ack_5<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1))&&(((wait_ack_2<1)||(ACK<1))||(FMCb<1)))...1561
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.299637,15628,1,0,241,62878,195,107,2413,41400,244
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [28, 29, 30]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 51 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 79
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 48 /51 variables (removed 3) and now considering 79/82 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 48/54 places, 79/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5269821328552592737.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1883329811772128645.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5269821328552592737.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1883329811772128645.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3048,0.059172,6356,2,1049,5,9633,6,0,274,9349,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(AF(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1)&&(FMC_2>=1)))||((cable_used_1>=1)&&(FMC_1>=1)))) U !((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cabl...644
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(((((cable_used_0>=1)&&(FMC_0>=1))||((cable_used_2>=1)&&(FMC_2>=1)))||((cable_used_1>=1)&&(FMC...692
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t61, t62, t63, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.299799,16724,1,0,262,63737,184,110,2412,54779,263
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3093 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2613 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5719ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5721ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5811 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3112065111971411912.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9789950679522597332.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3112065111971411912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9789950679522597332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.081499,7356,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((((EF(((A(!(((((MSG_2<1)||(wait_msg_2<1))&&((MSG_0<1)||(wait_msg_0<1)))&&((MSG_1<1)||(wait_msg_1<1)))) U !(((((MSG_2<1)||(wait_msg_2<...8791
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(((((E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(!(((((MSG_2<1)||(wait_msg_2<1))&&((MSG_0<1)||(wait_msg_0<1)))&&((MSG_1<1)...10125
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 4/263/78
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,1.331,53408,1,0,381,222903,220,168,2940,231675,423
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2603 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5750ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5751ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5887 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1018588108205385015.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4715684275940518599.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1018588108205385015.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4715684275940518599.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.088406,7360,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(EF((EX(((((wait_cable_0<1)||(RMC_0<1))&&((wait_cable_1<1)||(RMC_1<1)))&&((wait_cable_2<1)||(RMC_2<1)))) * ((((MSG_1>=1)&&(R_tout>=1...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),TRUE) * ((((MSG_1>=1)&&(R_tout>=1))||((MSG_2>=1)&&(R_tout>=1)))||((MSG_0>=1)&&(R_...276
(forward)formula 0,1,0.108247,7616,1,0,10,12525,10,2,704,11920,6
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 82/82 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 14 similar events)
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 3141 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 79/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 2574 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5730ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5730ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5811 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 82/82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17751652262818952248.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6650342628195707062.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17751652262818952248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6650342628195707062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4650,0.084688,7368,2,1426,5,12525,6,0,301,11920,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_2<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_1<1))||((AMC_6<1)||(FMCb<1))))&&((((Cpt2_2<1)...2126
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U ((((((((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_2<1))||((AMC_3<1)||(FMCb<1)))&&(((Cpt2_0<1)||(cable_used_1...2187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t25, t26, t27, t37, t38, t39, t64, t65, t66, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74,...289
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.692943,32700,1,0,237,144583,200,111,2759,112419,223
FORMULA SafeBus-COL-03-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 19:01:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 19:01:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 52016 ms.

BK_STOP 1749150110105

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SafeBus-COL-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SafeBus-COL-03, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264700706"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SafeBus-COL-03.tgz
mv SafeBus-COL-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;