Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889264600674.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264600674
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 684K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 215K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749147384135

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 98 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Transformed 320 places.
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Transformed 220 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 320 places and 220 transitions and 2640 arcs in 189 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 166 out of 320 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 320/320 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 320 /320 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 320 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:25] [INFO ] Computed 210 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 422 ms returned [1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 45, 56, 67, 89, 100, 112, 123, 134, 156, 178, 200, 234, 245, 249, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 259, 260, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 276, 277, 279, 280, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 300, 301, 304, 305, 306, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 317]
Discarding 76 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 455 ms to find 76 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 244/320 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 241 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 241 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 241 transition count 214
Applied a total of 9 rules in 18 ms. Remains 241 /244 variables (removed 3) and now considering 214/220 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 241 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 241/320 places, 214/220 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 725 ms. Remains : 241/320 places, 214/220 transitions.
Support contains 166 out of 241 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 105 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 214 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 51 to 50
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1825 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 3/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 365 ms. (109 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 295 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 251 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-05 18:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 209/455 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 102/134 constraints, State Equation: 0/241 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/0 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 136ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-05 18:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 214 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 17 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:27] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 271 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 201 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 201 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 201 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 7 ms. Remains 201 /204 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 453 ms. Remains : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13222493695424083302.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4685006847297476165.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13222493695424083302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4685006847297476165.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11936326233519872814.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11936326233519872814.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11936326233519872814.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11936326233519872814.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11936326233519872814.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8279587224822740838.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5934701435025711177.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8279587224822740838.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5934701435025711177.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.073841,5568,204,9,712,224,417,111,21,128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(EX((u8.p129==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(EX((u8.p129==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.120606,5824,1,0,1186,224,1519,310,68,128,12519
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 239 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 239 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 239 transition count 210
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 239 /241 variables (removed 2) and now considering 210/214 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:58] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 248 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 201, 202, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 236, 238]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 250 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/241 places, 210/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 206 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 206 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 206 transition count 204
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 206 /209 variables (removed 3) and now considering 204/210 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Computed 104 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 206/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 440 ms. Remains : 206/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3041552041250072502.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 18:16:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability195804016221147160.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3041552041250072502.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability195804016221147160.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18030416015374228998.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18030416015374228998.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18030416015374228998.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18030416015374228998.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18030416015374228998.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 196 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9999055746437153262.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16995657653062377616.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9999055746437153262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16995657653062377616.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.109232,5800,209,13,680,229,430,121,25,141,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((AF((u27.p174==0)) + AX(((u99.p275==1)&&(u99.p65==1)))) + ((u40.p202==1)||((u88.p239==1)&&(u88.p29==1)))) + (((u43.p308==1)&&(u43.p9...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((u43.p308==1)&&(u43.p98==1))||(((u38.p299==1)&&(u38.p89==1))&&(u46.p317==1))))) * ...281
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,0.266766,6568,1,0,1575,229,3031,840,97,141,13811
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:17:29] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 236, 237]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 205 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 205 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 205 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 205 /208 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Computed 104 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 205/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 385 ms. Remains : 205/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2767914424384515870.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 18:17:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12326198638414592610.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2767914424384515870.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12326198638414592610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11430367260312623570.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11430367260312623570.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11430367260312623570.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11430367260312623570.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11430367260312623570.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1501815546128725426.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability675054126614255469.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1501815546128725426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability675054126614255469.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.133575,5640,205,10,714,226,425,114,28,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A((!(A((u54.p120==1) U (u56.p126==1))) * !(AX(((u44.p306==1)&&(u44.p96==1))))) U A(((u36.p182==1)||(((u99.p253==1)&&(u99.p43==1))&&(...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((u19.p246==1)&&(u19.p36==1)))) U (!(((u36.p182==1)||(((u99.p2...1368
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,0.356077,6920,1,0,1436,226,2504,600,111,132,14694
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:18:00] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 247 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 259 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 202 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 202 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 202 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 19 ms. Remains 202 /205 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 202 cols
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Computed 101 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 445 ms. Remains : 202/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13669952232585618770.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2255242046634785851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13669952232585618770.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2255242046634785851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7948647893064130101.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7948647893064130101.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7948647893064130101.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7948647893064130101.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7948647893064130101.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6470296579735555302.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8853370236412900968.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6470296579735555302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8853370236412900968.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.12019,5508,205,10,715,229,422,114,25,138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((((u83.p184==0)||(u39.p180==1))||((u45.p298==1)&&(u45.p88==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((u83.p184==0)||(u39.p180==1))||((u45.p298==1)&&(u45.p88==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.176782,5764,1,0,1065,229,1539,309,84,138,12063
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 220 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 201 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 201 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 201 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 9 ms. Remains 201 /204 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:18:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 380 ms. Remains : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9676561753615520490.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability377035227707155095.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9676561753615520490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability377035227707155095.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7984133031053244046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7984133031053244046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7984133031053244046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7984133031053244046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7984133031053244046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2935549827866333294.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18033359952005190808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2935549827866333294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18033359952005190808.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.135636,5584,204,9,660,224,417,111,21,128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(((u77.p165==1)&&(u58.p125==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((u77.p165==1)&&(u58.p125==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.17471,5840,1,0,1147,224,1029,257,33,128,2668
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 239 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 239 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 239 transition count 210
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 239 /241 variables (removed 2) and now considering 210/214 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned [1, 2, 4, 13, 24, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 225, 226, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 238]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 192 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 211/241 places, 210/214 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 209 transition count 208
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 209 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 209 transition count 206
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 209 /211 variables (removed 2) and now considering 206/210 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 206 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Computed 106 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 209/241 places, 206/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 426 ms. Remains : 209/241 places, 206/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 206 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8648898606727083509.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8656179613008920738.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8648898606727083509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8656179613008920738.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12490962399194443007.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12490962399194443007.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12490962399194443007.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12490962399194443007.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12490962399194443007.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 396 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16837056882183046359.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4982669666070999443.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16837056882183046359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4982669666070999443.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.167543,5768,260,13,829,331,437,125,28,243,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((!(A(AF(((u67.p148==1)||((u100.p217==1)&&(u100.p7==1)))) U (u15.p145==1))) * (((((((((u0.p106==1)&&(u49.p212==1))&&((u1.p213==1)&&(u2....2028
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!((u15.p145==1)) U (!(!(EG(!(((u67.p148==1)||((u100.p217==1)&&(u100.p7==1))))))) * !((u15....2657
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
(forward)formula 0,1,0.447453,8840,1,0,3225,331,5502,1874,114,243,24645
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 14 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 229 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 201 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 201 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 201 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /204 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:19:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 400 ms. Remains : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8211063998534321822.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:19:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4674533543344939859.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8211063998534321822.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4674533543344939859.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7426341819881849093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7426341819881849093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7426341819881849093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7426341819881849093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7426341819881849093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10477305339292840335.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12689288119848861221.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10477305339292840335.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12689288119848861221.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.073828,5592,204,9,712,224,417,111,21,128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((u58.p135==1)||(u62.p140==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((u58.p135==1)||(u62.p140==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.134505,5848,1,0,958,224,1937,224,72,128,12291
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 4 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 228, 230, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 30 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 217 ms to find 30 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 205 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 205 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 205 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 7 ms. Remains 205 /208 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Computed 104 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 205/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 398 ms. Remains : 205/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16810962861296136396.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3641099281345242023.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16810962861296136396.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3641099281345242023.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9654099118020816163.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9654099118020816163.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9654099118020816163.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9654099118020816163.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9654099118020816163.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12748109665544652900.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14579750990080424451.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12748109665544652900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14579750990080424451.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.072476,5640,205,10,714,226,425,114,28,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EX((((AF((u1.p113==1)) * (u30.p284==1)) * (u30.p74==1)) + (u89.p194==1))) * !(A(!(E(((u98.p282==1)&&(u98.p72==1)) U ((u97.p243==1)&&(u...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EX((((!(EG(!((u1.p113==1)))) * (u30.p284==1)) * (u30.p74==1)) + (u89.p194==1))) * !(!((E(!(EX(!(EX(...421
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.196784,6920,1,0,2320,226,2709,1654,116,132,15802
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 239 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 239 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 239 transition count 210
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 239 /241 variables (removed 2) and now considering 210/214 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 242 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/241 places, 210/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 202 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 202 transition count 207
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 202 transition count 204
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 202 /205 variables (removed 3) and now considering 204/210 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 202 cols
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 398 ms. Remains : 202/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11279019046912373712.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:20:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability246333805927378320.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11279019046912373712.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability246333805927378320.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13226310785087554157.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13226310785087554157.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13226310785087554157.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13226310785087554157.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13226310785087554157.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 196 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability486474884631178166.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10220039496844674982.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability486474884631178166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10220039496844674982.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.124806,5780,213,12,687,227,425,118,21,136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((u47.p315==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((u47.p315==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,1,0.289195,6420,1,0,1437,227,3066,430,73,136,13737
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 4 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 190, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 31 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 209 ms to find 31 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 204 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 204 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 204 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /207 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Computed 103 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 204/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 401 ms. Remains : 204/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11024056273683881550.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6509836767514496457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11024056273683881550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6509836767514496457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8244639436895692862.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8244639436895692862.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8244639436895692862.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8244639436895692862.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8244639436895692862.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1351616528049418144.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1064077303945763387.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1351616528049418144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1064077303945763387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.086064,5624,205,10,668,226,425,114,28,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AX(EX((u95.p206==1))) * ((EG(((u74.p237==0)||(u74.p27==0))) + AF((u3.p117==0))) + (((u0.p213==0)||(u0.p3==0))&&((u99.p283==0)||(u99.p...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EX((u95.p206==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(((EY(Init) * !((((u0.p213==0)||(u0.p3==0))&&((u99.p283=...243
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
(forward)formula 0,0,0.236315,6648,1,0,2190,226,2433,1314,100,132,14505
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 241 vertex of which 136 / 241 are part of one of the 68 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 68 places
Ensure Unique test removed 68 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 68 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 27 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 27 transitions
Performed 27 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 27
Iterating post reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 173 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 119 transition count 119
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 116 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 116 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 116 transition count 113
Applied a total of 91 rules in 69 ms. Remains 116 /241 variables (removed 125) and now considering 113/214 (removed 101) transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 19 transitions (discarded 94 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Computed 107 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 87, 115]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/241 places, 113/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 108 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 108 transition count 107
Applied a total of 9 rules in 9 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 107/113 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 94 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 108 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Computed 102 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 94 similar events)
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 108/241 places, 107/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 108/241 places, 107/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12041637209846475757.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18120668377230517913.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12041637209846475757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18120668377230517913.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,33,0.043862,4684,2,264,5,864,6,0,447,503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p139==0)) * EF((AF(!(A(((p240==1)&&(p30==1)) U (p198==1)))) * AG((EF((p148==1)) + EG(((p290==1)&&(p80==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((p139==0)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(!((E(!((p198==1)) U (!(((p240==1)&&(p30==1)))...279
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 105/0/2
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.374217,6220,1,0,12,2492,49,5,3202,2444,18
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 7 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 419 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 34 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 420 ms to find 34 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 201 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 201 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 201 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 201 /204 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-05 18:21:37] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 583 ms. Remains : 201/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11598187016277926277.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:21:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7351839947385211057.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11598187016277926277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7351839947385211057.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3909080544249972018.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3909080544249972018.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3909080544249972018.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3909080544249972018.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3909080544249972018.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9424410512559759284.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12724484420894712282.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9424410512559759284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12724484420894712282.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.071725,5588,204,9,663,224,417,111,21,128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG((u75.p165==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((u75.p165==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.131222,5844,1,0,890,224,1937,217,73,128,12073
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 241 vertex of which 136 / 241 are part of one of the 68 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 68 places
Ensure Unique test removed 68 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 68 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 173 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 171 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 104 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 104 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 275 rules applied. Total rules applied 314 place count 2 transition count 4
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 2 transition count 3
Applied a total of 315 rules in 11 ms. Remains 2 /241 variables (removed 239) and now considering 3/214 (removed 211) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 2 cols
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/5 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 4/5 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 44 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 102ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 103ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 2/241 places, 3/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 2/241 places, 3/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 3 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3851935125732655803.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12506354848765769262.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3851935125732655803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12506354848765769262.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2,0.001618,3660,2,4,5,12,5,0,12,6,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p168==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p168==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.002358,3916,1,0,6,19,17,1,46,11,10
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 229 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 96, 127, 148, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237]
Discarding 32 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 231 ms to find 32 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 206/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 203 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 203 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 203 transition count 202
Applied a total of 9 rules in 4 ms. Remains 203 /206 variables (removed 3) and now considering 202/208 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 203 cols
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Computed 102 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:22:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 203/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 407 ms. Remains : 203/241 places, 202/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 202 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4172315895233871673.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17024679481683984424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4172315895233871673.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17024679481683984424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7849135512223302700.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7849135512223302700.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7849135512223302700.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7849135512223302700.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7849135512223302700.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5769536298565533960.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8440740312834457222.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5769536298565533960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8440740312834457222.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.117139,5616,205,10,663,226,422,114,25,132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((u98.p244==0)||(u98.p34==0))) + AG(!(E((u29.p168!=1) U AX(((u99.p290==1)&&(u99.p80==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!(((u98.p244==0)||(u98.p34==0))))))),TRUE),(u29.p168!=1)) * !(EX(!(((u99.p290==1)&&(u...179
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.194688,6384,1,0,1354,226,2204,621,95,132,14058
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 241/241 places, 214/214 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 238 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 238 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 238 transition count 208
Applied a total of 9 rules in 3 ms. Remains 238 /241 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/214 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Computed 134 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [3, 4, 13, 24, 65, 169, 190, 201, 202, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 227, 230, 231, 233, 234, 235, 236]
Discarding 23 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 121 ms to find 23 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 215/241 places, 208/214 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 213 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 213 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 213 transition count 204
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 213 /215 variables (removed 2) and now considering 204/208 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 204 rows 213 cols
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 229 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 213/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 356 ms. Remains : 213/241 places, 204/214 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 204 transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12629657209587358550.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-05 18:22:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6992826613448211344.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12629657209587358550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6992826613448211344.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9158224598273261484.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9158224598273261484.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9158224598273261484.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9158224598273261484.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9158224598273261484.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 198 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-05 18:23:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-05 18:23:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-05 18:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11707955749846212679.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-05 18:23:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5838231440336411809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11707955749846212679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5838231440336411809.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26765e+30,0.11604,5832,226,11,759,332,431,118,28,242,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG((AG((u44.p189==0)) + EX(!(E(((u40.p284==1)&&(u40.p74==1)) U (u27.p160==1)))))) + AX(((((((((u11.p23==0)||(u11.p233==0))&&((u98.p256=...2277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY((Init * !((!(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U !((u44.p189==0)))) + EX(!(E(((u40.p284==1)&&(u40.p74==1)) U (u27...4791
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 50
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 51
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 52
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 53
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 54
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 55
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 56
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 57
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 58
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 59
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 60
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 61
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 62
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 63
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 64
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 65
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 66
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 67
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 68
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 69
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 70
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 72
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 73
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 74
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 75
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 76
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 77
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 78
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 79
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 80
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 81
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 82
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 83
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 84
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 85
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 86
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 87
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 88
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 89
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 90
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 91
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 92
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 93
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 94
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 95
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 96
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 97
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 98
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 99
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 100
(forward)formula 0,1,0.36155,8776,1,0,3797,332,5117,2560,118,242,22024
FORMULA RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-05 18:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-05 18:23:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Total runtime 405101 ms.

BK_STOP 1749147790526

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889264600674"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010.tgz
mv RwMutex-PT-r0100w0010 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;