fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r184-tall-174889263700177
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ResAllocation-PT-R050C002

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 3112160.00 0.00 0.00 F?FFT?F????????? normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889263700177.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R050C002, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263700177
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 212K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748969984675

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R050C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 16:59:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 16:59:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 16:59:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 90 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Transformed 200 places.
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Transformed 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 200 places and 102 transitions and 500 arcs in 178 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 96 out of 200 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Computed 100 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 356 ms returned [105, 107, 111, 115, 117, 119, 125, 127, 129, 135, 137, 149, 155, 161, 163, 165, 167, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 183, 185, 187, 191, 193, 199]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 386 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/200 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 172/200 places, 102/102 transitions.
Support contains 96 out of 172 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 172 places (down from 96) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (58 resets) in 1704 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 17/65 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-03 16:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 40/66 variables, 25/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 40/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 11/77 variables, 7/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 11/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 68/145 variables, 77/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 85/230 variables, 63/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 63/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 23/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 23/253 variables, 17/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 17/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 7/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 12/265 variables, 8/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 8/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 4/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 9/274 variables, 7/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 7/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 3/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 274/274 variables, and 418 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 1599 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 172/172 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 72/72 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 40/66 variables, 25/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 40/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 11/77 variables, 7/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 11/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 68/145 variables, 77/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 85/230 variables, 63/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 63/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 23/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 16/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 23/253 variables, 17/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 17/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 7/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 2/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 12/265 variables, 8/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 8/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 4/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 9/274 variables, 7/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 7/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 3/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/274 variables, 0/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 0/274 variables, 0/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 274/274 variables, and 441 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 3871 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 172/172 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 72/72 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Fused 17 Parikh solutions to 12 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 15 properties in 6406 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 172 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 169 transition count 100
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 169 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 165 transition count 98
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 162 transition count 96
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 162 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 160 transition count 95
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 159 transition count 94
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 159 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 157 transition count 93
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 156 transition count 92
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 156 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 154 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 152 transition count 90
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 152 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 150 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 149 transition count 88
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 149 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 147 transition count 87
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 145 transition count 86
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 145 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 143 transition count 85
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 142 transition count 84
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 142 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 140 transition count 83
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 139 transition count 82
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 139 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 137 transition count 81
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 136 transition count 80
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 136 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 134 transition count 79
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 132 transition count 78
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 132 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 130 transition count 77
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 128 transition count 76
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 128 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 126 transition count 75
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 125 transition count 74
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 125 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 123 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 122 transition count 72
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 122 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 13 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 120 transition count 71
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 119 transition count 70
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 14 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 119 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 14 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 117 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 115 transition count 68
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 15 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 115 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 15 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 113 transition count 67
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 111 transition count 66
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 16 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 111 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 16 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 109 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 108 transition count 64
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 17 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 108 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 17 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 106 transition count 63
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 105 transition count 62
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 18 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 105 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 18 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 103 transition count 61
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 19 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 103 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 19 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 102 transition count 60
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 20 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 102 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 20 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 99 transition count 59
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 21 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 98 transition count 58
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 21 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 98 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 21 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 95 transition count 57
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 22 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 94 transition count 56
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 22 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 94 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 22 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 92 transition count 55
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 23 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 92 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 23 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 91 transition count 54
Applied a total of 129 rules in 175 ms. Remains 91 /172 variables (removed 81) and now considering 54/102 (removed 48) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 91/172 places, 54/102 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (227 resets) in 264 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (36 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1440063 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=479 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1440063 steps, saw 263114 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=479 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-03 17:00:02] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/24 variables, 12/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/56 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 18/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 6/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/58 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 30/89 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 22/111 variables, 14/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 14/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 6/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 19/130 variables, 13/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 13/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 5/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 11/141 variables, 7/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 3/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 4/145 variables, 4/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 4/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 297 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 91/91 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/12 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/24 variables, 12/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/56 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 18/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 6/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/58 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 30/89 variables, 20/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 20/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 22/111 variables, 14/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 14/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 6/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 19/130 variables, 13/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 13/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 5/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 11/141 variables, 7/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 4/145 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 4/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 299 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 91/91 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 627ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 68 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 91 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 91/91 places, 54/54 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 91 /91 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 91/91 places, 54/54 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 91/91 places, 54/54 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 91 /91 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:00:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned [54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 65, 67, 70, 72, 83, 85, 90]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 201 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 79/91 places, 54/54 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 79/91 places, 54/54 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (227 resets) in 136 ms. (291 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (36 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (36 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1326712 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=442 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1326712 steps, saw 243612 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=442 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-03 17:00:06] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/10 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/22 variables, 10/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/52 variables, 16/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 16/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 28/82 variables, 18/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 18/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 6/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 12/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 18/120 variables, 12/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 12/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 10/130 variables, 6/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 6/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 3/133 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 227 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 79/79 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/10 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 12/22 variables, 10/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/52 variables, 16/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 16/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 28/82 variables, 18/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 18/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 6/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 20/102 variables, 12/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 18/120 variables, 12/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 12/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 10/130 variables, 6/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 6/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 3/133 variables, 3/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 231 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 79/79 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 467ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 97 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 54/54 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 54/54 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 54/54 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 54/54 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 79/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 27/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/133 variables, 79/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2257 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 79/79 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 79/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 27/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 26/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 54/133 variables, 79/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 52/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1930 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 79/79 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4203ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4204ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4364 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 54/54 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 79 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 77 transition count 52
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 77 /79 variables (removed 2) and now considering 52/54 (removed 2) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 27 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] After 29ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] After 101ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] After 170ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 27 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] After 26ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] After 44ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] After 114ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 297 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 475 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 117, 124, 128, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168]
Discarding 17 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 482 ms to find 17 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 155/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 155 /155 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 485 ms. Remains : 155/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8934221528536976245.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality215068144355251050.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8934221528536976245.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality215068144355251050.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.132705,8616,2,411,5,22729,6,0,725,27203,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p_0_30==1) U (AF((EG(((p_1_4==0)||(r_1_15==1))) + AX((p_1_16==1)))) + AX((r_1_48==0)))) * (!(A(AF(!(((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_42==1)))) U (r...344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E((p_0_30==1) U (!(EG(!((EG(((p_1_4==0)||(r_1_15==1))) + !(EX(!((p_1_16==1)))))))) + !(EX(...1030
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:00:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:00:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10130901496305600226.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10130901496305600226.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10130901496305600226.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10130901496305600226.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10130901496305600226.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:00:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:00:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:00:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9675191814887851229.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:00:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1669249268096708397.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9675191814887851229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1669249268096708397.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.09514,8212,106,11,10775,43,221,12602,21,71,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((i5.i2.u30.p_0_30==1) U (AF((EG(((i0.i1.u4.p_1_4==0)||(i2.u51.r_1_15==1))) + AX((i3.i0.u16.p_1_16==1)))) + AX((i9.i1.u54.r_1_48==0))))...527
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E((i5.i2.u30.p_0_30==1) U (!(EG(!((EG(((i0.i1.u4.p_1_4==0)||(i2.u51.r_1_15==1))) + !(EX(!(...1465
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [101, 103, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 170]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality942941847868752813.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7639835204840501899.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality942941847868752813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7639835204840501899.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.136611,8624,2,402,5,22287,6,0,713,26690,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((p_0_35==0)||(p_1_15==1)) + ((!((((p_0_32!=0) + EF((r_0_0==0))) * !(((p_1_43==1)||(p_0_26==1))))) * !(AX((p_0_48==0)))) + (AX(!((((p_...380
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((p_0_35==0)||(p_1_15==1)) + ((!((((p_0_32!=0) + E(TRUE U (r_0_0==0))) * !(((p_1_43==1)||(p_0_26==1...569
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13338065415308832765.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13338065415308832765.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13338065415308832765.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13338065415308832765.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13338065415308832765.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13462327391648888298.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15210530353435258227.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13462327391648888298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15210530353435258227.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.101251,7364,83,11,9139,42,193,9190,21,68,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i6.i2.u35.p_0_35==0)||(i3.i0.u15.p_1_15==1)) + ((!((((i6.i1.u32.p_0_32!=0) + EF((i0.i0.u0.r_0_0==0))) * !(((i8.i1.u43.p_1_43==1)||(i...586
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((i6.i2.u35.p_0_35==0)||(i3.i0.u15.p_1_15==1)) + ((!((((i6.i1.u32.p_0_32!=0) + E(TRUE U (i0.i0.u0.r...833
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 240 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 243 ms. Remains : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10785900518435350997.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12603013955261516832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10785900518435350997.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12603013955261516832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.114816,8596,2,396,5,21922,6,0,705,26276,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
(forward)formula 0,0,0.221398,11796,1,0,218,59586,219,107,4538,26276,210
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 170]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 120 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 123 ms. Remains : 154/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10753303854716175534.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3306003261111806002.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10753303854716175534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3306003261111806002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.107387,8772,2,408,5,22854,6,0,721,27344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((EX((p_0_7==0)) + (r_0_3==1)) + (r_1_25==0)) * (!(A((p_1_40==1) U (r_1_44==1))) + A(AF(((p_0_26==0)||(r_1_44==1))) U !(((p_1_14==...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((((((EX((p_0_7==0)) + (r_0_3==1)) + (r_1_25==0)) * (!(!((E(!((r_1_44==1)) U (!((p_1_...476
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2855316047217457826.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2855316047217457826.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2855316047217457826.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2855316047217457826.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2855316047217457826.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12836243965080334269.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2658049401971818849.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12836243965080334269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2658049401971818849.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.08845,8080,100,11,10600,42,209,12471,21,69,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((EX((i1.i1.u7.p_0_7==0)) + (i0.i1.u3.r_0_3==1)) + (i4.i1.u51.r_1_25==0)) * (!(A((i8.i0.u40.p_1_40==1) U (i8.i1.u52.r_1_44==1))) +...418
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((((((EX((i1.i1.u7.p_0_7==0)) + (i0.i1.u3.r_0_3==1)) + (i4.i1.u51.r_1_25==0)) * (!(!(...684
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1867713505757572282.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17418409990255783299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1867713505757572282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17418409990255783299.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.108556,8604,2,399,5,22131,6,0,709,26511,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((r_0_32!=1) U A(((p_0_3==1)||((r_1_29==1)&&(r_0_40==1))) U E(EG((((r_0_15==0)||(r_0_7==1))&&((p_0_49==0)||(p_1_0==1)))) U ((!((r_0_4==1...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(EG((((r_0_15==0)||(r_0_7==1))&&((p_0_49==0)||(p_1_0==1)))) U ((!((r_0_4==1)&&((p_1_20=...1831
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph905765431455374483.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph905765431455374483.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph905765431455374483.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph905765431455374483.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph905765431455374483.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5686480053059888756.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3950120927466245985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5686480053059888756.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3950120927466245985.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.079553,7504,74,11,9234,41,195,9276,21,67,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i5.i1.u32.r_0_32!=1) U A(((i0.i1.u3.p_0_3==1)||((i5.i0.u50.r_1_29==1)&&(i7.i1.u40.r_0_40==1))) U E(EG((((i2.i1.u15.r_0_15==0)||(i1.i0....392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(EG((((i2.i1.u15.r_0_15==0)||(i1.i0.u7.r_0_7==1))&&((i9.i1.u49.p_0_49==0)||(i0.i0.u0.p_...2882
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15321792982198128869.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2906631061388317831.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15321792982198128869.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2906631061388317831.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.108243,8744,2,402,5,22328,6,0,713,26778,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX(((p_0_15==0)&&(((r_1_22==0)||(r_0_22==0))||(p_1_12==1))))) + AF(EX((r_1_40==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p_0_15==0)&&(((r_1_22==0)||(r_0_22==0))||(p_1_12==1))))))))))),!(EX((r_1_40==0))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2499552770580301912.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2499552770580301912.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2499552770580301912.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2499552770580301912.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2499552770580301912.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10269356945947945090.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:04:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10336760089098168953.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10269356945947945090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10336760089098168953.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.087067,7776,78,11,9629,41,204,10608,21,67,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX(((i3.i0.u15.p_0_15==0)&&(((i4.i1.u50.r_1_22==0)||(i4.i1.u22.r_0_22==0))||(i2.i0.u12.p_1_12==1))))) + AF(EX((i8.i0.u51.r_1_40==0)))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((i3.i0.u15.p_0_15==0)&&(((i4.i1.u50.r_1_22==0)||(i4.i1.u22.r_0_22==0))||(i2.i0.u1...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [101, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 112 ms. Remains : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13120152976065304359.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18236344091448209567.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13120152976065304359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18236344091448209567.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.116212,8608,2,399,5,21935,6,0,709,26287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(FALSE) + (AX((r_0_12==0)) * (AX(((p_0_35==0)&&(p_0_40==1))) + AF((r_1_1==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + (!(EX(!((r_0_12==0)))) * (!(EX(!(((p_0_35==0)&&(p_0_40==1))))) + !(EG(!((r_1_1==...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13418187619179261463.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13418187619179261463.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13418187619179261463.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13418187619179261463.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13418187619179261463.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality765740655324504643.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:05:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8050906469184350307.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality765740655324504643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8050906469184350307.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.085481,7556,67,11,9484,41,185,9608,21,67,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(FALSE) + (AX((i2.u12.r_0_12==0)) * (AX(((i6.i1.u35.p_0_35==0)&&(i7.i1.u40.p_0_40==1))) + AF((i0.i0.u50.r_1_1==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + (!(EX(!((i2.u12.r_0_12==0)))) * (!(EX(!(((i6.i1.u35.p_0_35==0)&&(i7.i1.u40.p_0_4...211
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 183 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 185 ms. Remains : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12582992404893503897.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5589274063570005600.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12582992404893503897.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5589274063570005600.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.208219,8604,2,399,5,22005,6,0,709,26367,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((AX(!(AF((p_1_30==1)))) + EX(((r_1_11==0)||(r_0_36==1)))) U (r_0_34==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(EX(!(!(!(EG(!((p_1_30==1)))))))) + EX(((r_1_11==0)||(r_0_36==1)))) U (r_0_34==1))))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16010461241450581205.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16010461241450581205.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16010461241450581205.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16010461241450581205.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16010461241450581205.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13727673752186935025.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:06:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9665445805276642338.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13727673752186935025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9665445805276642338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.096203,7476,68,11,8979,39,173,9205,21,66,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((AX(!(AF((i5.i1.u30.p_1_30==1)))) + EX(((i2.i0.u50.r_1_11==0)||(i6.i1.u36.r_0_36==1)))) U (i6.i0.u34.r_0_34==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(EX(!(!(!(EG(!((i5.i1.u30.p_1_30==1)))))))) + EX(((i2.i0.u50.r_1_11==0)||(i6.i1.u36.r_...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i8.i2.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 130, 132, 134, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 138 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 152/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18307308213698906467.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11039711172352384257.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18307308213698906467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11039711172352384257.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.107171,8616,2,402,5,22228,6,0,713,26618,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((E((AF((p_0_31==1)) * ((r_1_23==0)||(p_1_11==1))) U (AF(((r_0_42==0)||(p_0_15==1))) * E(((r_1_19==0)||(p_1_47==1)) U (r_0_9==1)))) ...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((E((!(EG(!((p_0_31==1)))) * ((r_1_23==0)||(p_1_11==1))) U (!(EG(!(((r_0_42==0)||(p_0_15==1))))...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3698573817427568424.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3698573817427568424.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3698573817427568424.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3698573817427568424.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3698573817427568424.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6444735457813457955.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:07:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16138664224933552810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6444735457813457955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16138664224933552810.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.089672,7880,88,11,9994,42,205,11191,21,69,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((E((AF((i6.i1.u31.p_0_31==1)) * ((i4.i1.u51.r_1_23==0)||(i2.i1.u11.p_1_11==1))) U (AF(((i8.i1.u42.r_0_42==0)||(i3.i1.u15.p_0_15==1)...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((E((!(EG(!((i6.i1.u31.p_0_31==1)))) * ((i4.i1.u51.r_1_23==0)||(i2.i1.u11.p_1_11==1))) U (!(EG(...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i9.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 143 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14267153017231058538.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9588124513040894549.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14267153017231058538.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9588124513040894549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.115202,8600,2,399,5,22096,6,0,709,26503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF(EG((r_1_28==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(EG((r_1_28==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17477237120568249108.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17477237120568249108.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17477237120568249108.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17477237120568249108.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17477237120568249108.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15095515879178640376.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:08:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14919025391466564493.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15095515879178640376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14919025391466564493.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.094374,7864,75,11,10111,43,205,10534,21,68,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF(EG((i6.i0.u50.r_1_28==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(EG((i6.i0.u50.r_1_28==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i10.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/r...191
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned [103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 151 /151 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 151/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1644123791792274840.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9510894898276713865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1644123791792274840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9510894898276713865.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.126952,8608,2,398,5,21929,6,0,709,26280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E((EX(AF(((r_0_46==0)||(p_1_27==1)))) + AX(!(EF((p_0_20==1))))) U (!(EG((r_1_0==1))) + ((EG(((p_1_44==0)||(r_0_38==1))) * (p_0_6==0)) ...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E((EX(!(EG(!(((r_0_46==0)||(p_1_27==1)))))) + !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U (p_0_20==1))))))) U (!(EG((r_1_0=...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12073914921298405227.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12073914921298405227.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12073914921298405227.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12073914921298405227.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12073914921298405227.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12898185958731947924.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:09:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17836245587554391152.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12898185958731947924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17836245587554391152.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.081233,7644,67,10,9695,42,193,9526,20,66,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E((EX(AF(((i10.i0.u46.r_0_46==0)||(i6.i0.u27.p_1_27==1)))) + AX(!(EF((i4.i1.u20.p_0_20==1))))) U (!(EG((i0.i0.u50.r_1_0==1))) + ((EG((...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E((EX(!(EG(!(((i10.i0.u46.r_0_46==0)||(i6.i0.u27.p_1_27==1)))))) + !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U (i4.i1.u20.p...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.t51, i10.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...188
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:10:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 115, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 144, 146, 157, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 18 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 18 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 111 ms. Remains : 154/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3466718369589647977.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7105638941804296075.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3466718369589647977.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7105638941804296075.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.109812,8768,2,408,5,22487,6,0,721,26952,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(E((r_0_35==0) U (EX(((p_1_28==0)||(p_0_33==0))) + !(AF((r_1_26==1))))) U ((EG((((p_1_11==0)||(p_1_43==1))&&(p_0_1!=0))) * !(((r_0_40==...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG((((p_1_11==0)||(p_1_43==1))&&(p_0_1!=0))) * !(((r_0_40==0)||(r_1_6==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(...660
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7974905010272286087.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7974905010272286087.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7974905010272286087.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7974905010272286087.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7974905010272286087.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17233275079840795166.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:10:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5358769712180205802.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17233275079840795166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5358769712180205802.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.106418,8464,97,11,11647,39,206,13488,21,67,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(E((i6.i1.u35.r_0_35==0) U (EX(((i5.i0.u28.p_1_28==0)||(i6.i0.u33.p_0_33==0))) + !(AF((i4.i1.u52.r_1_26==1))))) U ((EG((((i2.i0.u51.p_1...399
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(((EG((((i2.i0.u51.p_1_11==0)||(i7.i1.u43.p_1_43==1))&&(i0.i0.u1.p_0_1!=0))) * !(((i7.i0.u40.r_...957
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i8.i1.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 169 transition count 100
Applied a total of 5 rules in 8 ms. Remains 169 /172 variables (removed 3) and now considering 100/102 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 169 cols
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Computed 71 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [100, 104, 107, 112, 114, 119, 121, 125, 127, 129, 131, 133, 136, 138, 141, 143, 154, 156, 161, 165, 167]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/172 places, 100/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 148/172 places, 100/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17338893955995991109.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12005116710800048280.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17338893955995991109.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12005116710800048280.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (59 resets) in 214 ms. (186 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties

BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12005116710800048280.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 4
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :4 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :8 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :32 after 448
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :448 after 14336
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :14336 after 1.67772e+07
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1.67772e+07 after 7.03687e+13
Invariant property ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12 does not hold.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 257 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,2.81475e+15,0.082692,4832,2,573,14,3302,6,0,695,2040,0
Total reachable state count : 2814749767106458

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Invariant property ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12 does not hold.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-12,1.40737e+14,0.08318,5088,2,196,14,3302,7,0,698,2040,0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1693650 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=564 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1693650 steps, saw 381885 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=564 ) properties seen :0
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 144 ms. Remains : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality219836293979451248.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7745355536696441949.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality219836293979451248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7745355536696441949.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.11961,8592,2,396,5,21922,6,0,705,26276,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AX(AG((p_0_29==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p_0_29==0)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4639509639296324066.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4639509639296324066.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4639509639296324066.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4639509639296324066.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4639509639296324066.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18274277419819519870.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3572780094704380386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18274277419819519870.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3572780094704380386.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.110532,7408,53,11,9057,38,173,9200,21,65,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(AX(AG((i4.i1.u29.p_0_29==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i4.i1.u29.p_0_29==0)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u0.t51, i8.i2.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 172/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:12:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [101, 103, 107, 110, 115, 117, 122, 124, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 139, 141, 144, 146, 157, 159, 164, 168, 170]
Discarding 22 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 22 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 150 /150 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 136 ms. Remains : 150/172 places, 102/102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12673740207628015300.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9201981740382797898.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12673740207628015300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9201981740382797898.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.10848,8592,2,396,5,21922,6,0,705,26276,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
(forward)formula 0,0,0.219404,11792,1,0,218,59586,219,107,4538,26276,210
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9388590637992393600.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9388590637992393600.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9388590637992393600.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9388590637992393600.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9388590637992393600.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11658446307526277902.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:12:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8581065858258291856.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11658446307526277902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8581065858258291856.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.153718,10144,239,11,14869,57,271,21603,20,91,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((i5.i1.u30.p_0_30==1) U (AF((EG(((i1.i0.u52.p_1_4==0)||(i3.i0.u56.r_1_15==1))) + AX((i3.i0.u57.p_1_16==1)))) + AX((i9.u71.r_1_48==0)))...526
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E((i5.i1.u30.p_0_30==1) U (!(EG(!((EG(((i1.i0.u52.p_1_4==0)||(i3.i0.u56.r_1_15==1))) + !(E...1466
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t51, i9.u49.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/int...181
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4297657678739285054.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:26:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11163257134081314784.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4297657678739285054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11163257134081314784.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.152959,12104,275,13,20601,205,360,19729,20,168,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((u20.p_0_30==1) U (AF((EG(((u46.p_1_4==0)||(u66.r_1_15==1))) + AX((u34.p_1_16==1)))) + AX((u99.r_1_48==0)))) * (!(A(AF(!(((u38.p_0_12=...418
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E((u20.p_0_30==1) U (!(EG(!((EG(((u46.p_1_4==0)||(u66.r_1_15==1))) + !(EX(!((u34.p_1_16==1...1208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, u1.t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/...174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 71
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Transformed 172 places.
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Transformed 102 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7368864755196098136.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 17:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2942770637302890546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7368864755196098136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2942770637302890546.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92734e+16,0.153609,9844,2,631,5,26983,6,0,793,33028,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((p_0_30==1) U (AF((EG(((p_1_4==0)||(r_1_15==1))) + AX((p_1_16==1)))) + AX((r_1_48==0)))) * (!(A(AF(!(((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_42==1)))) U (r...344
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU((Init * E((p_0_30==1) U (!(EG(!((EG(((p_1_4==0)||(r_1_15==1))) + !(EX(!((p_1_16==1)))))))) + !(EX(...1030
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...171
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 100/0/2
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1115.96,7002696,1,0,23902,3.56896e+07,17,12106,2663,5.41673e+07,5738
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R050C002-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3110967 ms.

BK_STOP 1748973096835

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R050C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R050C002, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263700177"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R050C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R050C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;