Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889263600162.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600162
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 632K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 172K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748969716703

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R015C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 16:55:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 16:55:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Transformed 60 places.
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 60 places and 32 transitions and 150 arcs in 150 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 59 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 416 ms returned [59]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 449 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 473 ms. Remains : 59/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 59 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 53 to 43
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (583 resets) in 1649 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 6/43 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (130 resets) in 195 ms. (204 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (64 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 3/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (121 resets) in 163 ms. (243 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (99 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:19] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/23 variables, 10/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 10/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 16/40 variables, 24/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 18/58 variables, 12/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 12/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 6/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 16/74 variables, 12/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 12/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 6/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 6/80 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 6/86 variables, 4/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 4/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 2/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 5/91 variables, 3/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 3/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 205 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/4 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/8 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 6/20 variables, 4/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 6/26 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 6/32 variables, 4/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 6/38 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 6/44 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 6/50 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 6/56 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 4/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 6/62 variables, 4/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 4/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 6/68 variables, 4/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 6/74 variables, 4/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 4/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (OVERLAPS) 6/80 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 4/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 56 (OVERLAPS) 6/86 variables, 4/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 58 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 60 (OVERLAPS) 5/91 variables, 3/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 61 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 3/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 62 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 63 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 64 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 409ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 15 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=15 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 7 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-03 16:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 50, 52, 54, 56]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 80 ms. Remains : 45/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14907924631692208494.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15382064422437144098.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14907924631692208494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15382064422437144098.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,262144,0.020522,4108,2,114,5,2115,6,0,214,2387,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(AG((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1)))) + (p_1_0==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1)))))) + (p_1_0==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.038437,4748,1,0,77,6642,91,36,1415,4550,75
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [31, 33, 37, 45, 47, 49, 51, 55, 57]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 50/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15668135777162319670.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3761715802944135553.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15668135777162319670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3761715802944135553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012608,4340,2,131,5,2338,6,0,235,2610,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(EF(EG(((p_0_10==0)||(r_0_11==0))))) * EX(EG((((p_0_9==0)||(r_0_10==0))&&(((r_0_5==0)||(r_1_5==0))||(p_1_6==0)))))) * (EG(E(E(((((r_0...737
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG(((p_0_10==0)||(r_0_11==0))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EX(EG((((p_0_9==0)||(r_0_10==0...982
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.70052,186184,1,0,7498,1.09437e+06,136,3852,1710,1.38195e+06,8758
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 50, 52, 54, 56]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 47/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16129336454321172225.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13274623934807354738.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16129336454321172225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13274623934807354738.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,262144,0.011885,4288,2,119,5,2184,6,0,222,2458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(EF((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1))) U E((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_1_0==1))&&((p_1_1==1)&&(r_0_0==1))) U !((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_1_0==1))&&((p_1_1==1)&&(r_0_0==1))) U !((((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&...482
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.064098,6848,1,0,106,18142,99,60,1502,17855,118
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 46/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12712390124395118914.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11025364929230258758.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12712390124395118914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11025364929230258758.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012542,4280,2,119,5,2181,6,0,219,2446,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(AF((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!(EG(!((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.734257,39032,1,0,1521,207912,91,706,1418,283396,1742
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 57]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1836458241355223863.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17394127788770478218.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1836458241355223863.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17394127788770478218.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.013029,4312,2,124,5,2243,6,0,227,2509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p_1_0==1)) + A((EX(TRUE) + (!(((p_0_10==1)&&(r_0_11==1))) * ((((r_0_12==1)&&(r_1_12==1))&&(p_1_13==1)) + ((AX((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_1_0==...333
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (!(((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1)))))))) U (!(...598
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.387107,20768,1,0,404,105759,108,261,1632,115098,517
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 45, 49, 51, 55, 57]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17050743276322403803.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10085407763579080312.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17050743276322403803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10085407763579080312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012137,4308,2,125,5,2305,6,0,227,2580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF((((r_0_6==1)&&(r_1_6==1))&&(p_1_7==1)))) + EX(AG((((r_0_11==1)&&(r_1_11==1))&&((p_1_12==1)&&(((r_0_8==0)||(r_1_8==0))||(p_1_9==0))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((r_0_11==1)&&(r_1_11==1))&&((p_1_12==1)&&(((r_0_8==0)||(r_1_8==0))||(p_1_9==0...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.050367,6100,1,0,114,12551,88,58,1545,11854,126
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [31, 35, 39, 41, 45, 47, 49, 53, 57]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 50/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13516291770762940398.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12817780695237140806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13516291770762940398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12817780695237140806.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.013236,4348,2,131,5,2363,6,0,235,2642,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((((r_0_12==0)||(r_1_12==0)) + ((p_1_13==0) + ((!(E((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1)) U ((p_0_5==1)&&(r_0_6==1)))) * EX((((r_0_...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((r_0_12==0)||(r_1_12==0)) + ((p_1_13==0) + ((!(E((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.03969,5500,1,0,94,9771,88,46,1511,8257,87
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 49, 51, 55, 57]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3522997873248798996.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12452229171230683331.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3522997873248798996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12452229171230683331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012514,4296,2,122,5,2257,6,0,223,2529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(AG(EX((((r_0_11==0)||(r_1_11==0))||(p_1_12==0))))) + (((r_0_8==1)&&(r_1_8==1))&&(p_1_9==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((((r_0_11==0)||(r_1_11==0))||(p_1_12==0)))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * (((r_0...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.036934,5576,1,0,86,8724,86,41,1501,6994,83
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [31, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3898947731458749773.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability478659557704205363.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3898947731458749773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability478659557704205363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012256,4296,2,122,5,2194,6,0,223,2457,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((((r_0_9==1)&&(r_1_9==1))&&(p_1_10==1))) + EX(EX(!(A(((p_0_11==1)&&(r_0_12==1)) U (((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1))&&(p_1_2==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EX(!(!((E(!((((r_0_1==1)&&(r_1_1==1))&&(p_1_2==1))) U (!(((p_0_11==1)&&(r_0_12==1))) *...319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.68339,35816,1,0,1168,197638,97,545,1514,240401,1324
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [30, 32, 34, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56]
Discarding 13 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 13 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 45/59 places, 31/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4417271462687273398.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16726010526149100561.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4417271462687273398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16726010526149100561.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,262144,0.012862,4172,2,114,5,2073,6,0,214,2339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((EF(((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1))||(r_0_0==1))) + ((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1)))) * EF(((p_0_7==1)&&(r_0_8==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p_0_6==1)&&(r_0_7==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U ((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4==1))||(r_0_0=...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t14, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.061882,6732,1,0,117,15036,86,62,1391,16472,126
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [33, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12107053715431879903.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17336796459341492480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12107053715431879903.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17336796459341492480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.014237,4308,2,124,5,2194,6,0,227,2453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((EF((((p_0_12==1)&&(r_0_13==1))||(((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1)))) + ((((r_0_0==1)&&(r_1_0==1))&&((p_1_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1)))&&(...341
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),(E(TRUE U (((p_0_12==1)&&(r_0_13==1))||(((r_0_7==1)&&(r_1_7==1))&&(p_1_8==1)))) + ((((r_0_...394
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/7/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.194054,14036,1,0,333,55550,103,281,1625,85671,453
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 55]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 62 ms. Remains : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14871263158656210761.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1402082027752985374.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14871263158656210761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1402082027752985374.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.018438,4296,2,122,5,2292,6,0,223,2569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF(AX(A((((r_0_11==1)&&(r_1_11==1))&&(p_1_12==1)) U (((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!((E(!((((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1))) U (!((((r_0_11==1)&&(...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.968216,46300,1,0,2085,251020,96,1005,1512,339993,2381
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 12 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 12 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 47/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2529718038054388535.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14555634774648405524.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2529718038054388535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14555634774648405524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012017,4300,2,122,5,2191,6,0,223,2457,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF((((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_13==0))&&(((p_0_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1))||((p_0_10==1)&&(r_0_11==1))))) + (!(A((EX((((r_0_3==1)&&(r_1_3==1))&&(p_1_4...370
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!((((p_0_12==0)||(r_0_13==0))&&(((p_0_1==1)&&(r_0_2==1))||((p_0_10==1)&&(r_0_11==1))))))) + (!(...676
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.813752,42264,1,0,1313,230033,103,631,1491,300768,1550
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 45/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11539844424966516484.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2901414210688909341.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11539844424966516484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2901414210688909341.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.011338,4268,2,116,5,2112,6,0,215,2371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG(EX(((p_0_4==0)||(r_0_5==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p_0_4==0)||(r_0_5==0))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
(forward)formula 0,0,0.03846,5548,1,0,88,10423,85,43,1442,9392,84
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [33, 35, 43, 45, 53, 55, 57]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 52 /52 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 52/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9587801908221679546.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3083619018543510816.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9587801908221679546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3083619018543510816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.013859,4280,2,136,5,2428,6,0,243,2705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EX((((r_0_5==0)||(r_1_5==0))||(p_1_6==0)))) + (!(E(!(A(EG((((r_0_10==1)&&(r_1_10==1))&&(p_1_11==1))) U ((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p...654
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !(EG(EX((((r_0_5==0)||(r_1_5==0))||(p_1_6==0)))))),!(!((E(!(((((r_0_4==1)&&(r_1_4==1))&&(p_1_5==...965
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.59312,97188,1,0,2546,557549,115,1306,1703,654592,3205
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51, 53]
Discarding 11 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 11 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 48/59 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3804084084541460202.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4857596344116681479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3804084084541460202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4857596344116681479.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,278528,0.012876,4304,2,125,5,2347,6,0,227,2636,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(((EX((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) + (((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1))) + ((p_0_4==1)&&(r_0_5==1)))) * (((r_0_12...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(((EX((((r_0_7==0)||(r_1_7==0))||(p_1_8==0))) + (((r_0_13==1)&&(r_1_13==1))&&(p_1_14==1))) + ((p...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t15, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tot...169
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.32611,55724,1,0,464,324957,95,354,1537,326491,602
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-03 16:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 16361 ms.

BK_STOP 1748969734257

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R015C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600162"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R015C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R015C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;