Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889263600137.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C100, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600137
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 88K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 721K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748966258018

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C100
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 136 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Transformed 600 places.
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Transformed 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 600 places and 400 transitions and 1794 arcs in 226 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 130 out of 600 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 600/600 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 52 ms. Remains 600 /600 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 600 cols
[2025-06-03 15:57:39] [INFO ] Computed 300 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 565 ms returned [595, 597, 599]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 599 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 597/600 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 695 ms. Remains : 597/600 places, 400/400 transitions.
Support contains 130 out of 597 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 15:57:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 71 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:40] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 15:57:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
Support contains 122 out of 597 places (down from 130) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (190 resets) in 2603 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 0/73 properties
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 15:57:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 637 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1018 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:57:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 1042 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 148/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1949 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60139ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60149ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61192 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9484466506916029918.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:58:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16422224651359459900.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9484466506916029918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16422224651359459900.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.49062,51384,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5853641907012693522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5853641907012693522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5853641907012693522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5853641907012693522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5853641907012693522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7548415862076492524.gal : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13966876141514781364.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7548415862076492524.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13966876141514781364.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.02729,47812,8626,214,118588,1310,1207,139033,113,3712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i3.u61.p_28_2==0)||(i5.i1.u89.r_41_0==1)) * ((!((EF(((i4.u65.p_30_0==1)&&(i3.u60.p_29_1==1))) * (E(((i0.i0.u2.p_0_2==0)||(i10.i2.u18...589
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((i3.u61.p_28_2==0)||(i5.i1.u89.r_41_0==1)) * ((!((E(TRUE U ((i4.u65.p_30_0==1)&&(i3.u60.p_29_1==1)...756
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t28, t67, t99, t123, t148, t211, t251, t300, t307, t331, t332, t355, t380, i0.t12, i0.i0.t4, ...1231
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:59:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 729 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 15:59:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 777 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1508 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:59:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 1014 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 120/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1944 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60077ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61606 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11489717600810899750.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:00:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3759320660929382610.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11489717600810899750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3759320660929382610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.55208,51572,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12163835961094865503.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12163835961094865503.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12163835961094865503.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12163835961094865503.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12163835961094865503.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 71 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10179349737580572312.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14931955103962676885.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10179349737580572312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14931955103962676885.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.32664,52340,9330,236,119700,1476,1027,171683,113,4485,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(((AX(((i1.u22.p_9_1==0)||(i11.u191.p_83_1==1))) * ((i12.u220.r_94_1==0)||(i7.u124.r_53_0==1))) * ((i1.u28.r_11_2==0) * AF((i5.u92....410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((EY(Init) * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((i1.u22.p_9_1==0)||(i11.u191.p_83_1==1))))) * ((i12.u220.r_94_1==0)||(i7.u...880
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t44, t51, t83, t148, t172, t179, t204, t220, t267, t284, t323, t356, i0.t20, i0.t19, i0....1107
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:01:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 502 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:01:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 939 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1443 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:01:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 1042 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 148/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 481 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 164 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 278 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1946 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60091ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61551 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 80 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality197416920904276763.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:02:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11462910957649449322.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality197416920904276763.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11462910957649449322.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.61467,51200,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:03:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18161295458091792113.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18161295458091792113.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18161295458091792113.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18161295458091792113.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18161295458091792113.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 100 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality780096531338027556.gal : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5385992642666349924.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality780096531338027556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5385992642666349924.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.61994,53876,8746,184,129842,1187,1223,172585,114,3344,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((EG(((i0.u14.r_4_2==0)||(i5.i1.i1.u105.p_43_2==1))) * EF((i12.i1.i0.u212.p_89_0==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((EG(((i0.u14.r_4_2==0)||(i5.i1.i1.u105.p_43_2==1))) * E(TRUE U (i12.i1.i0.u212.p_89_0==0)))))] ...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t60, t76, t140, t188, t219, t236, t267, t308, t315, t332, t339, t371, i0.t20, i0.t19, i0.t12,...1193
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 38 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:03:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 886 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:03:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1503 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2417 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:03:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 111 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 173 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 111 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 125 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 172 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 160 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 974 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30050 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 80/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 141 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 137 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 136 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1939 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60199ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60200ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62671 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6704074883184966060.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:04:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11723116002289644760.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6704074883184966060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11723116002289644760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.25657,51384,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-03 16:05:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:05:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10116417722757143459.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10116417722757143459.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10116417722757143459.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10116417722757143459.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10116417722757143459.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:05:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:05:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:05:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 87 ms
[2025-06-03 16:05:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:05:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11142814007087572546.gal : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 16:05:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15456689170964977259.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11142814007087572546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15456689170964977259.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.74953,51224,9845,80,114501,608,1125,175840,95,1652,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(!(((EX((i9.u139.p_59_2==1)) + (i0.u2.p_0_2==1)) + (i14.u224.r_97_0==1))))) U AG((!((E(((i13.i1.i1.u206.p_88_1==0)||(i12.u183.r_78_...392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(((EX((i9.u139.p_59_2==1)) + (i0.u2.p_0_2==1)) + (i14.u224.r_97_0==1)))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ...456
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t51, t76, t83, t100, t147, t220, t244, t268, t316, t323, t364, i0.t19, i0.t12, i0.t11, i...1193
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:05:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:05:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6060 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:05:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:05:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1511 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7594 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:05:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 153 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 147 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 148 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 326 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30170ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30171ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37777 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11987311023358200512.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:06:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14996784206030765012.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11987311023358200512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14996784206030765012.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.02967,51648,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5286807249139243289.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5286807249139243289.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5286807249139243289.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5286807249139243289.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5286807249139243289.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 86 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9575272872272445006.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6992785856756739684.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9575272872272445006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6992785856756739684.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.85045,70164,9509,70,171187,733,1282,241524,86,2402,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(AG(((i3.u51.r_23_0==1)&&(i8.u151.r_65_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u51.r_23_0==1)&&(i8.u151.r_65_2==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t83, t123, t124, t140, t187, t227, t292, i0.t12, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i0.u4.t11, i1.t43, i1....1272
(forward)formula 0,0,17.2376,609676,1,0,1.17765e+06,1114,8309,4.19816e+06,628,4734,774213
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Performed 99 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 99 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 198 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 498 transition count 301
Applied a total of 198 rules in 182 ms. Remains 498 /597 variables (removed 99) and now considering 301/400 (removed 99) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 498 cols
[2025-06-03 16:07:18] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 896 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:07:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1043 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1969 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:07:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 38 ms returned []
Running 201 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:07:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 498/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 297/795 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/795 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 301/799 variables, 498/1293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/799 variables, 0/1293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 799/799 variables, and 1293 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 30060 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 498/498 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 498/498 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 498/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 297/795 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/795 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 301/799 variables, 498/1293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/799 variables, 201/1494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/799 variables, 1/1495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 799/799 variables, and 1495 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 498/498 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 498/498 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 201 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 498/597 places, 301/400 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62351 ms. Remains : 498/597 places, 301/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10860663749742609235.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12775009511680825886.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10860663749742609235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12775009511680825886.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.33805e+51,0.770731,8752,2,5047,5,20407,6,0,2296,16197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((r_58_1==0)||(r_34_0==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((r_58_1==0)||(r_34_0==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 293/0/8
(forward)formula 0,1,6.65143,138028,1,0,9,836064,19,4,12697,192515,8
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-03 16:08:27] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 928 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:08:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1592 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2551 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:08:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 143 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 178 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 208 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 157 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 167 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 125 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 217 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 192 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 974 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30053 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 80/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 150 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 192 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 114 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 126 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 160 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 146 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 1)
(s2 0)
(s3 1)
(s4 1)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 1)
(s8 0)
(s9 1)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 1)
(s14 0)
(s15 1)
(s16 1)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 1)
(s20 0)
(s21 1)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 1)
(s26 0)
(s27 1)
(s28 1)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 1)
(s32 0)
(s33 1)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 1)
(s38 0)
(s39 1)
(s40 1)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 1)
(s44 0)
(s45 1)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 1)
(s50 0)
(s51 1)
(s52 1)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 1)
(s56 0)
(s57 1)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 1)
(s62 0)
(s63 1)
(s64 1)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 1)
(s68 0)
(s69 1)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 0)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 1)
(s80 0)
(s81 1)
(s82 0)
(s83 1)
(s84 0)
(s85 1)
(s86 0)
(s87 1)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 1)
(s94 1)
(s95 0)
(s96 1)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 1)
(s100 0)
(s101 1)
(s102 0)
(s103 1)
(s104 0)
(s105 1)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 1)
(s110 0)
(s111 1)
(s112 1)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 1)
(s116 0)
(s117 1)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 1)
(s122 0)
(s123 1)
(s124 1)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 1)
(s128 0)
(s129 1)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 1)
(s134 0)
(s135 1)
(s136 1)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 1)
(s140 0)
(s141 1)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 1)
(s146 0)
(s147 1)
(s148 1)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 1)
(s152 0)
(s153 1)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 1)
(s158 0)
(s159 1)
(s160 1)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 1)
(s164 0)
(s165 1)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 1)
(s170 0)
(s171 1)
(s172 1)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 1)
(s176 0)
(s177 1)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 1)
(s182 0)
(s183 1)
(s184 1)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 1)
(s188 0)
(s189 1)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 1)
(s194 0)
(s195 1)
(s196 1)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 1)
(s200 0)
(s201 1)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 1)
(s206 0)
(s207 1)
(s208 1)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 1)
(s212 0)
(s213 1)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 1)
(s218 0)
(s219 1)
(s220 1)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 1)
(s224 0)
(s225 1)
(s226 0)
(s227 0)
(s228 0)
(s229 1)
(s230 0)
(s231 1)
(s232 1)
(s233 0)
(s234 0)
(s235 1)
(s236 0)
(s237 1)
(s238 0)
(s239 0)
(s240 0)
(s241 1)
(s242 0)
(s243 1)
(s244 1)
(s245 0)
(s246 0)
(s247 1)
(s248 0)
(s249 1)
(s250 0)
(s251 0)
(s252 0)
(s253 1)
(s254 0)
(s255 1)
(s256 1)
(s257 0)
(s258 0)
(s259 1)
(s260 0)
(s261 1)
(s262 0)
(s263 0)
(s264 0)
(s265 1)
(s266 0)
(s267 1)
(s268 1)
(s269 0)
(s270 0)
(s271 1)
(s272 0)
(s273 1)
(s274 0)
(s275 0)
(s276 0)
(s277 1)
(s278 0)
(s279 1)
(s280 1)
(s281 0)
(s282 0)
(s283 1)
(s284 0)
(s285 1)
(s286 0)
(s287 0)
(s288 0)
(s289 1)
(s290 0)
(s291 1)
(s292 1)
(s293 0)
(s294 0)
(s295 1)
(s296 0)
(s297 1)
(s298 0)
(s299 0)
(s300 0)
(s301 1)
(s302 0)
(s303 1)
(s304 1)
(s305 0)
(s306 0)
(s307 1)
(s308 0)
(s309 1)
(s310 0)
(s311 0)
(s312 0)
(s313 1)
(s314 0)
(s315 1)
(s316 1)
(s317 0)
(s318 0)
(s319 1)
(s320 0)
(s321 1)
(s322 0)
(s323 0)
(s324 0)
(s325 1)
(s326 0)
(s327 1)
(s328 1)
(s329 0)
(s330 0)
(s331 1)
(s332 0)
(s333 1)
(s334 0)
(s335 0)
(s336 0)
(s337 1)
(s338 0)
(s339 1)
(s340 1)
(s341 0)
(s342 0)
(s343 1)
(s344 0)
(s345 1)
(s346 0)
(s347 0)
(s348 0)
(s349 1)
(s350 0)
(s351 1)
(s352 1)
(s353 0)
(s354 0)
(s355 1)
(s356 0)
(s357 1)
(s358 0)
(s359 0)
(s360 0)
(s361 1)
(s362 0)
(s363 1)
(s364 1)
(s365 0)
(s366 0)
(s367 1)
(s368 0)
(s369 1)
(s370 0)
(s371 0)
(s372 0)
(s373 1)
(s374 0)
(s375 1)
(s376 1)
(s377 0)
(s378 0)
(s379 1)
(s380 0)
(s381 1)
(s382 0)
(s383 0)
(s384 0)
(s385 1)
(s386 0)
(s387 1)
(s388 1)
(s389 0)
(s390 0)
(s391 1)
(s392 0)
(s393 1)
(s394 0)
(s395 0)
(s396 0)
(s397 1)
(s398 0)
(s399 1)
(s400 1)
(s401 0)
(s402 0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 597/997 variables, and 1042 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62695 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7382245633255946547.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8597558861976048174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7382245633255946547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8597558861976048174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.2789,51420,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:10:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11972707938898331235.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11972707938898331235.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11972707938898331235.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11972707938898331235.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11972707938898331235.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:10:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:10:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:10:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:10:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 112 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:10:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3820232440712757732.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8932903718969873028.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3820232440712757732.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8932903718969873028.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.50528,45236,9682,180,105456,1129,1202,133215,113,2811,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E(AX(E(EX((i11.u219.p_95_1==1)) U A((i0.i0.i2.u9.r_3_0==0) U ((i3.u68.r_30_2==0)||(i3.u65.p_29_2==1))))) U ((i4.i1.i1.u93.p_42_2==1) +...265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(!(EX(!(E(EX((i11.u219.p_95_1==1)) U !((E(!(((i3.u68.r_30_2==0)||(i3.u65.p_29_2==1))) U (!((i0.i0....437
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t35, t68, t99, t100, t139, t179, t212, t244, t308, t315, t355, t380, i0.t27, i0.i0.i0.t4, i0....1206
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:10:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 971 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:10:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1592 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2586 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 140 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 127 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 154 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 193 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 143 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 303 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 137 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30111ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30111ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32705 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9289315389702812718.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10937578729302102015.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9289315389702812718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10937578729302102015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.9739,51432,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2865234472800278127.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2865234472800278127.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2865234472800278127.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2865234472800278127.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2865234472800278127.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4247803447724824130.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 16:11:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17941910420690809503.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4247803447724824130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17941910420690809503.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.4388,45304,8409,242,108717,1549,1332,133038,116,4175,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX((AF((i9.u183.r_75_2==1)) * EG((i6.u129.r_52_2==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((!(EG(!((i9.u183.r_75_2==1)))) * EG((i6.u129.r_52_2==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t84, t131, t164, t203, t228, t252, t292, t331, t371, i0.t20, i0.t19, i0.t12, i0.t11, i0....1243
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:12:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 807 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:12:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1458 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:12:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 182 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 260 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 160 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 152 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 199 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 143 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 149 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30174ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30181ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32485 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10524197936131692299.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 16:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13942934883372655174.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10524197936131692299.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13942934883372655174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.09498,51448,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10352700924877395473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10352700924877395473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10352700924877395473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10352700924877395473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10352700924877395473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4659574420378353303.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2639886827846101210.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4659574420378353303.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2639886827846101210.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,0.86231,38028,9314,296,84103,1527,1099,108442,142,4438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(AF(EX(TRUE)))) + EG((A(!(((i1.u27.p_16_0==0)||(i7.u119.p_53_2==1))) U (AX((i3.u54.p_28_1==1)) * ((i13.u193.p_88_1==0)||(i6.u98.r_4...191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG((!((E(!((!(EX(!((i3.u54.p_28_1==1)))) * ((i13.u193.p_88_1==0)||(i6.u98.r_43_2==1)))) U (!(!(...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t75, t92, t116, t147, t164, t203, t204, t260, t283, t307, t331, t348, t380, i0.t35, i0.t...1093
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:13:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 877 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:13:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1413 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2317 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:13:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 213 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 181 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 974 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30086 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 80/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 179 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 158 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 117 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 215 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 143 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 132 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 188 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 129 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60213ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60214ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62536 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1134983117945998595.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:14:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality474782437974720231.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1134983117945998595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality474782437974720231.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.06056,51136,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12053208241183836041.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12053208241183836041.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12053208241183836041.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12053208241183836041.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12053208241183836041.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11683510681245170156.gal : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1690676891458742589.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11683510681245170156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1690676891458742589.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.70379,41608,10510,190,97116,1131,1057,115728,113,2901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((E(!(AF((i2.u61.p_26_2==1))) U (i6.u106.r_46_0==0)) + AX((i10.u180.r_78_2==1))) + EX(!(A(((i2.u49.r_20_0==1)||(i7.u124.p_55_0==1)) U ...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!((E(!((((i0.u4.p_1_1==0)||(i8.i1.i0.u153.r_65_1==1))||((i8.i1.i0.u144.r_63_0==0)||(i10...542
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t43, t60, t107, t132, t164, t171, t203, t236, t276, t292, t348, t355, t379, i0.t11, i0.t...1135
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:15:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 910 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:15:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1488 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2416 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:15:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 124 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 140 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 111 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 160 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 232 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 212 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 155 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 134 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 120 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 268 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 994 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30093 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 100/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 167 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 108 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 122 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 163 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 130 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 168 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 121 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1639 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30057 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60212ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60213ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62641 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15698935855000096925.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6329812925159868632.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15698935855000096925.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6329812925159868632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.99048,51580,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1373411105094321880.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1373411105094321880.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1373411105094321880.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1373411105094321880.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1373411105094321880.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15990148194318818603.gal : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14521469102096487487.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15990148194318818603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14521469102096487487.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.80103,37960,9211,134,88501,795,1042,100191,104,1999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(AG((((((i3.u56.p_23_2==0)&&(i6.u135.p_59_1==1))||(i5.i0.i2.u105.r_46_1==0))&&(((i9.u174.p_75_2==0)&&(i2.u35.p_15_2==1))||((i2.u38.r_1...400
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((((i3.u56.p_23_2==0)&&(i6.u135.p_59_1==1))||(i5.i0.i2.u105.r_46_1==0))&&(((i9...481
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t28, t59, t60, t92, t132, t163, t204, t243, t244, t260, t299, t340, t364, t371, i0.t27, i0.t2...1083
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Performed 96 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 96
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 96 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 192 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 501 transition count 304
Applied a total of 192 rules in 46 ms. Remains 501 /597 variables (removed 96) and now considering 304/400 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 304 rows 501 cols
[2025-06-03 16:17:44] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 383 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 552 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 949 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 501/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 297/798 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 3/801 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 0/801 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 304/805 variables, 501/1302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/805 variables, 0/1302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/805 variables, 0/1302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 805/805 variables, and 1302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 501/501 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 501/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 501/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 297/798 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 3/801 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/501 variables, 0/801 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 304/805 variables, 501/1302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/805 variables, 204/1506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/805 variables, 5/1511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 805/805 variables, and 1511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 501/501 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 501/501 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 501/597 places, 304/400 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61085 ms. Remains : 501/597 places, 304/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 304 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1127522125390734579.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3433917046783335198.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1127522125390734579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3433917046783335198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.96874e+51,0.261837,10728,2,7786,5,32187,6,0,2311,25855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((EF((r_16_0==1)) * EF((p_13_2==1)))) + (AG((((p_52_1==0)&&(p_87_0==0))&&((r_3_1==1)&&(r_61_1==1)))) * ((r_58_2==0)||(r_83_2==1))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((E(TRUE U (r_16_0==1)) * E(TRUE U (p_13_2==1)))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((((p_52_1==0)&&(p_87_0==0))&&((r...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t34, t121, t175, t180, t224, t225, t264, t265, t289, t290, t291, t292, Intersection with rea...233
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3052984523670964712.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3052984523670964712.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3052984523670964712.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3052984523670964712.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3052984523670964712.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4827469607916129918.gal : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11519621220612308913.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4827469607916129918.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11519621220612308913.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.96874e+51,0.185412,8296,452,77,3893,409,907,2854,112,756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((EF((i3.u20.r_16_0==1)) * EF((i2.u16.p_13_2==1)))) + (AG((((i8.u59.p_52_1==0)&&(i14.i1.u99.p_87_0==0))&&((i0.i1.u5.r_3_1==1)&&(i9....228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((E(TRUE U (i3.u20.r_16_0==1)) * E(TRUE U (i2.u16.p_13_2==1)))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((((i8.u59.p_52_1==...295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t224, t292, i3.t225, i3.t34, i9.t265, i9.i0.t121, i9.i0.t264, i14.t291, i14.t290, i14.i0.t175...283
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Performed 95 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 190 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 502 transition count 305
Applied a total of 190 rules in 80 ms. Remains 502 /597 variables (removed 95) and now considering 305/400 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 305 rows 502 cols
[2025-06-03 16:19:46] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 6051 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:19:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1464 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 7543 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 205 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:19:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 502/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 297/799 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 0/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 305/807 variables, 502/1306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 807/807 variables, and 1306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved in 30037 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 502/502 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 502/502 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 502/502 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 297/799 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 0/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 305/807 variables, 502/1306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/807 variables, 205/1511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/807 variables, 2/1513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 807/807 variables, and 1513 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 502/502 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 502/502 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 205 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60114ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 502/597 places, 305/400 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 67776 ms. Remains : 502/597 places, 305/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 305 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5038219455978925556.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 16:20:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12370373268723015265.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5038219455978925556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12370373268723015265.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.214e+51,0.670538,25724,2,23229,5,116216,6,0,2316,95207,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4258791639142039456.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4258791639142039456.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4258791639142039456.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4258791639142039456.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4258791639142039456.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15031651372721168204.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10738280487998752197.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15031651372721168204.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10738280487998752197.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.214e+51,0.105888,8324,498,95,4502,436,944,3527,134,828,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((((i14.i1.u96.r_89_2!=1) * AG(((i8.u49.p_45_2==0)||(i3.i1.u22.r_20_0==1)))) * ((i9.i0.u53.p_49_0==0)||(i11.i1.u75.p_69_1==1)))) U AG...328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (((i14.i1.u96.r_89_2!=1) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i8.u49.p_45_2==0)||(i3.i1.u22.r_20_0==1)))))) * (...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t230, t256, i3.t229, i3.i1.t43, i3.i1.t44, i9.i0.t102, i9.i0.t257, i14.t296, i14.i1.t189, i14...301
(forward)formula 0,0,0.30638,18436,1,0,35608,895,5147,50631,1086,2124,45333
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C100-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 400 rows 597 cols
[2025-06-03 16:21:24] [INFO ] Computed 297 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 7518 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:21:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 734 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 8262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:21:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 136 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 206 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 194 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 104 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 994 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30047 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 100/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 268 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 128 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 107 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 203 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 98 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1939 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30080 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60156ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60157ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 68430 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7452010122194627007.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:22:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15761376675404643413.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7452010122194627007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15761376675404643413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,2.08141,51376,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15757404237344947211.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15757404237344947211.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15757404237344947211.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15757404237344947211.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15757404237344947211.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14340291689777689731.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14784910071420580433.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14340291689777689731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14784910071420580433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.00104,48716,10056,254,117127,1625,1232,146189,125,4967,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX((AG(EX(TRUE)) * AX((EG((i7.i1.i2.u125.r_55_0==1)) * E((i7.i0.i0.u114.p_51_0==0) U ((i9.u167.p_72_2==0)||(i1.u14.r_5_2==1))))))) * A(...543
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * (EX((!(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))) * !(EX(!((EG((i7.i1.i2.u125.r_55_0==1)) * E((i7.i0.i0.u114.p...1787
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t83, t107, t164, t228, t291, t332, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t43, i1.t36, i1.t35, i1.t...1249
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 597 /597 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:23:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 731 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 16:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 732 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1466 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/914 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/934 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/954 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/994 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1014 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 20/1034 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 1.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 1.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 1.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 1.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 1.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 1.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 1.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 1.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 1.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 1.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 1.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 1.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 1.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 1.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 1.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 1.0)
(s206 timeout
0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 8/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 597/997 variables, and 1042 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 0/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 597/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 297/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 148/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/597 variables, 0/1042 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 400/997 variables, 597/1639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/997 variables, 300/1939 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 997/997 variables, and 1950 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 597/597 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 297/297 constraints, State Equation: 597/597 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61540 ms. Remains : 597/597 places, 400/400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3042852305829220003.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14039964875392594953.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3042852305829220003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14039964875392594953.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,1.45107,51528,2,68750,5,242653,6,0,2791,183712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12530912001862763038.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12530912001862763038.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12530912001862763038.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12530912001862763038.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12530912001862763038.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9504882682593105701.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1223086640529131896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9504882682593105701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1223086640529131896.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,0.791582,42980,10443,346,92917,1829,1039,137679,132,6020,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(AG(AX((((i5.u77.p_35_1==0)||(i12.u174.r_77_1==1))||(i9.i1.i0.u139.p_62_1==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((((i5.u77.p_35_1==0)||(i12.u174.r_77_1==1))||(i9.i1.i0.u139.p_62_1==0)))))...170
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t60, t91, t156, t228, t260, t276, t283, t307, t308, t331, t348, t379, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0....1126
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14523517141584197707.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14523517141584197707.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14523517141584197707.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14523517141584197707.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14523517141584197707.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15186775127584886095.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 16:25:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16160603500437980909.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15186775127584886095.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16160603500437980909.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41951e+57,0.919454,44328,8936,149,106220,1068,1152,123646,117,3536,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i3.u62.p_28_2==0)||(i5.u94.r_41_0==1)) * ((!((EF(((i4.u69.p_30_0==1)&&(i3.u67.p_29_1==1))) * (E(((i0.u2.p_0_2==0)||(i10.i1.i0.u175.p...565
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((i3.u62.p_28_2==0)||(i5.u94.r_41_0==1)) * ((!((E(TRUE U ((i4.u69.p_30_0==1)&&(i3.u67.p_29_1==1))) ...738
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t43, t76, t123, t147, t148, t172, t268, t300, t347, t372, i0.t35, i0.t28, i0.t27, i0.t20...1201
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 142 ms
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 294 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 197 ms
[2025-06-03 16:54:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4833465272989866059.gal : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 16:54:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10960655502291103723.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4833465272989866059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10960655502291103723.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C100"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C100, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600137"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C100.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C100 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;