Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r184-tall-174889263600129.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C050, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600129
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 772K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 360K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748964919001

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 107 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Transformed 300 places.
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Transformed 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 300 places and 200 transitions and 894 arcs in 202 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 93 out of 300 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 300/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 300 cols
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 150 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 376 ms returned [295, 299]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 414 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 472 ms. Remains : 298/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 298 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 15:35:21] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-03 15:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 15:35:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 298 places (down from 93) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (378 resets) in 2150 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 1/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 290 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-03 15:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/21 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 15/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/41 variables, 10/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/61 variables, 10/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 20/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 20/81 variables, 10/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 16/97 variables, 8/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 16/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 15/112 variables, 8/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 15/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 12/124 variables, 6/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 12/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 12/136 variables, 6/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 9/145 variables, 5/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 9/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 6/151 variables, 3/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 6/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 6/157 variables, 3/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 6/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 6/163 variables, 3/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 6/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 3/166 variables, 2/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 2/168 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 2/170 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 2/172 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 2/174 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 56 (OVERLAPS) 2/178 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 58 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (OVERLAPS) 2/180 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 60 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 61 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 62 (OVERLAPS) 2/182 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 63 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 64 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 65 (OVERLAPS) 2/184 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 66 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 67 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 68 (OVERLAPS) 2/186 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 69 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 70 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 71 (OVERLAPS) 2/188 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 72 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 73 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 74 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 75 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 76 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 77 (OVERLAPS) 2/192 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 78 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 79 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 80 (OVERLAPS) 2/194 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 81 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 82 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 83 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 84 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 85 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 86 (OVERLAPS) 2/198 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 87 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 88 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 89 (OVERLAPS) 200/398 variables, 198/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 90 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 91 (OVERLAPS) 100/498 variables, 100/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 92 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 100/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 93 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 50/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 94 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 95 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 0/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 498/498 variables, and 744 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 736 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/21 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 15/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/41 variables, 10/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/61 variables, 10/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 20/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 20/81 variables, 10/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 16/97 variables, 8/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 16/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 15/112 variables, 8/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 15/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 12/124 variables, 6/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 12/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 12/136 variables, 6/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 9/145 variables, 5/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 9/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 6/151 variables, 3/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 6/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 6/157 variables, 3/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 6/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 6/163 variables, 3/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 6/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/163 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 3/166 variables, 2/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 2/168 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 2/170 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 2/172 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 2/174 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (OVERLAPS) 2/176 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 56 (OVERLAPS) 2/178 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 57 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 58 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 59 (OVERLAPS) 2/180 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 60 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 61 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 62 (OVERLAPS) 2/182 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 63 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 64 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 65 (OVERLAPS) 2/184 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 66 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 67 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 68 (OVERLAPS) 2/186 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 69 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 70 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 71 (OVERLAPS) 2/188 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 72 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 73 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 74 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 75 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 76 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 77 (OVERLAPS) 2/192 variables, 1/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 78 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 79 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 80 (OVERLAPS) 2/194 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 81 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 82 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 83 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 84 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 85 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 86 (OVERLAPS) 2/198 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 87 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 88 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 89 (OVERLAPS) 200/398 variables, 198/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 90 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 91 (OVERLAPS) 100/498 variables, 100/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 92 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 100/694 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 93 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 50/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 94 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 1/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 95 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 96 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 498/498 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 543 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1316ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 67 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=22 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 8 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 252 transition count 154
Applied a total of 92 rules in 33 ms. Remains 252 /298 variables (removed 46) and now considering 154/200 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned [250]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 192 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 251 /251 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14534815796643038184.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9215871077555862269.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14534815796643038184.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9215871077555862269.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.50648e+25,0.786828,35556,2,33029,5,177634,6,0,1161,150662,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((r_21_2==0)&&(p_19_2==1))||((p_49_0==0)&&(p_0_1==1)))) + AG((((p_10_0==0)||(p_27_0==1))||((p_3_2==0)||(p_46_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((((r_21_2==0)&&(p_19_2==1))||((p_49_0==0)&&(p_0_1==1)))))))),TRUE) * !((((p_1...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t56, t99, t104, t129, t130, t133, t134, t151, t152, t153, Intersection with reachable a...225
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2473794728198022529.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2473794728198022529.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2473794728198022529.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2473794728198022529.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2473794728198022529.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6154775871735567404.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:35:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10142404331029764009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6154775871735567404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10142404331029764009.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.50648e+25,0.049618,6140,279,73,2303,364,622,1880,108,684,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((i4.u23.r_21_2==0)&&(i4.u22.p_19_2==1))||((i10.i1.u55.p_49_0==0)&&(i0.i0.u1.p_0_1==1)))) + AG((((i2.u11.p_10_0==0)||(i5.i1.u30.p...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((((i4.u23.r_21_2==0)&&(i4.u22.p_19_2==1))||((i10.i1.u55.p_49_0==0)&&(i0.i0.u1...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t130, t134, t151, i4.t129, i4.t47, i5.t133, i5.i1.t56, i10.t153, i10.t152, i10.i0.t99, i10.i1...266
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 241 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 256 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9221817356551392435.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7133199741024972770.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9221817356551392435.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7133199741024972770.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16087700579799179545.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16087700579799179545.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16087700579799179545.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16087700579799179545.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16087700579799179545.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1061377199907460133.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:36:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16633857334877153921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1061377199907460133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16633857334877153921.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.425735,25132,5105,164,53535,972,651,71155,88,2550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i4.u64.p_26_2==1) U EG(EX((i1.u23.r_8_2==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(EX((i1.u23.r_8_2==0))))))) * !(E(!(EG(EX((i1.u23.r_8_2==0)))) U (!((i4.u64.p_26_2==1)) * !(E...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t43, t44, t99, t116, t140, t155, i0.t12, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t36, i1.t35, i1.t28...632
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 184 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13187138338297152594.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15840077553108959929.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13187138338297152594.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15840077553108959929.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6449300263710009703.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6449300263710009703.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6449300263710009703.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6449300263710009703.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6449300263710009703.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9120450119317754016.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:37:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12615375933067970121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9120450119317754016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12615375933067970121.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.443494,26432,4414,126,56684,775,680,79076,90,1929,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AX(EF(((i0.u1.p_0_1==0)||(i5.i0.i0.u38.p_19_1==1)))) * EF(((EF((i9.u90.r_41_0==1)) * (((i8.u84.p_37_2==0)||(i5.i1.i0.u52.p_23_2==1))|...366
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U ((i0.u1.p_0_1==0)||(i5.i0.i0.u38.p_19_1==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ...469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t28, t44, t59, t60, t76, t147, t163, t179, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t27, i1.t20, i1.t19, i1.u...626
(forward)formula 0,1,8.53975,306076,1,0,499222,2034,3939,2.18932e+06,590,9228,495385
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:38:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 15:38:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 295 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 459 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:38:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 298/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 148/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 20/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 13/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/498 variables, 298/817 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/817 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 0/817 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 498/498 variables, and 817 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 13824 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 298/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 148/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 73/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 200/498 variables, 298/817 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 150/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 1/968 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/968 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 498/498 variables, and 968 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43880ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43882ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44345 ms. Remains : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2594043723303440202.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:38:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17019872670266827197.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2594043723303440202.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17019872670266827197.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13041221051968047544.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13041221051968047544.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13041221051968047544.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13041221051968047544.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13041221051968047544.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15687945928728608944.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15670617424436529993.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15687945928728608944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15670617424436529993.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.312151,20540,4531,142,38247,831,667,56053,88,2211,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(!(((i0.u9.p_5_1==0)||(i0.u3.p_1_0==1))) U ((i7.u85.p_37_2==1)&&(i3.u49.r_20_2==1))) * AX(EX(AF(((i2.u41.r_17_2==0)&&(i9.u115.r_49_1...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(((i7.u85.p_37_2==1)&&(i3.u49.r_20_2==1))) U (!(!(((i0.u9.p_5_1==0)||(i0.u3.p_1_0==1)))) * !...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t20, t27, t51, t76, t115, t148, t164, i0.t19, i0.t12, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t43, i1.i0....612
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 174 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 178 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7940287719520093105.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:39:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14366038855329808215.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7940287719520093105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14366038855329808215.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3354563123743875331.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3354563123743875331.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3354563123743875331.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3354563123743875331.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3354563123743875331.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2685405681935373116.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8669743987123628902.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2685405681935373116.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8669743987123628902.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.279869,18488,4026,218,35174,998,642,45226,94,2463,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AF(EG(((i10.i1.i1.u113.p_49_2==0)||(i9.u91.r_41_1==1)))) U (AX(!(((i6.u60.p_28_0==0)||(i1.u10.r_5_2==1)))) * (AX((i1.u13.p_6_2!=0)) + ...511
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * !((E(!((!(EX(!(!(((i6.u60.p_28_0==0)||(i1.u10.r_5_2==1)))))) * (!(EX(!((i1.u13.p_6_2!=0)))) + (i1.u14...2204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t35, t52, t68, t84, t132, t139, t155, t156, t172, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t28, i1.t2...637
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 250 transition count 152
Applied a total of 96 rules in 25 ms. Remains 250 /298 variables (removed 48) and now considering 152/200 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 250 cols
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned [248]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 145 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 249/298 places, 152/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 249 /249 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 249/298 places, 152/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18036426215026769696.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:40:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14504253244215327556.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18036426215026769696.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14504253244215327556.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.83562e+25,0.108465,7936,2,4757,5,20422,6,0,1151,16632,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(AF((((r_15_1==0)||((r_21_1==0)&&(p_49_0==1)))||((p_31_2==0)&&(r_28_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((r_15_1==0)||((r_21_1==0)&&(p_49_0==1)))||((p_31_2==0)&&(r_28_2==1))))...171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t59, t100, t131, t132, t151, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...190
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15999426870924986504.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15999426870924986504.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15999426870924986504.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15999426870924986504.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15999426870924986504.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15433338103546136425.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15061204433817242262.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15433338103546136425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15061204433817242262.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.83562e+25,0.046135,6116,248,72,2025,366,546,1663,97,659,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(AF((((i4.i0.u16.r_15_1==0)||((i5.i0.u23.r_21_1==0)&&(i11.u55.p_49_0==1)))||((i7.u35.p_31_2==0)&&(i6.u32.r_28_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((i4.i0.u16.r_15_1==0)||((i5.i0.u23.r_21_1==0)&&(i11.u55.p_49_0==1)))||...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t132, i6.t131, i6.t59, i11.t151, i11.u55.t100, Intersection with reachable at each step enab...208
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 253 transition count 155
Applied a total of 90 rules in 11 ms. Remains 253 /298 variables (removed 45) and now considering 155/200 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 253 cols
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned [251]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 154 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 252/298 places, 155/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 155/155 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 170 ms. Remains : 252/298 places, 155/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9253557473345983875.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality560723138268021365.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9253557473345983875.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality560723138268021365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.16795e+25,0.132707,8740,2,6153,5,25310,6,0,1166,20472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((p_45_0==0) + EF(((p_8_1==0)&&(r_21_1==1)))) + EF(((r_48_1==0)||(p_44_2==1))))) * (AF(((p_27_0==0)||(r_9_2==1))) + (r_29_0==0)))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((p_45_0==0) + E(TRUE U ((p_8_1==0)&&(r_21_1==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((r_48_1==0)||(p_44_2==...254
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 149/6/6
(forward)formula 0,0,2.77181,114792,1,0,11,722100,22,5,6432,138036,9
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 183 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality952719829956453654.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10011220161056667984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality952719829956453654.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10011220161056667984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15768683768177501756.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15768683768177501756.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15768683768177501756.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15768683768177501756.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15768683768177501756.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12051834311756087421.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1778336876160905039.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12051834311756087421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1778336876160905039.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.375204,23172,4551,144,46715,748,657,68109,90,2183,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(!(E((i1.u17.p_9_1==1) U ((i7.u95.p_44_2==0)||(i3.u32.p_17_0==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E((i1.u17.p_9_1==1) U ((i7.u95.p_44_2==0)||(i3.u32.p_17_0==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t84, t139, t140, t171, t187, i0.t20, i0.t19, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i0.u7.t12, i1.t51,...645
(forward)formula 0,1,3.52515,172804,1,0,309985,1847,3712,1.17943e+06,580,6837,280210
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 172 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14591496745636699661.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4982120859685845479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14591496745636699661.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4982120859685845479.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9333015662805320046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9333015662805320046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9333015662805320046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9333015662805320046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9333015662805320046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10038542032190279571.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:42:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17343919624884242678.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10038542032190279571.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17343919624884242678.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.353952,23160,4204,78,46605,487,651,67221,62,1284,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((AF(EX((i4.u50.p_19_0==1))) + (i3.u44.p_17_1!=0))) * EG((AF((((((i6.u75.p_30_0==0)||(i3.u44.p_17_1==0))||(i6.u77.p_31_1==1)) * EX(((i...284
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * EG((!(EG(!(EX((i4.u50.p_19_0==1))))) + (i3.u44.p_17_1!=0)))),(!(EG(!((((((i6.u75.p_30_0==0)||(i3.u...345
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t35, t51, t91, t116, t123, t139, t163, i0.t19, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t28, i1.t27, ...613
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:43:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 161 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 164 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12360486169573773452.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11252120019865583562.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12360486169573773452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11252120019865583562.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2252298265011102013.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2252298265011102013.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2252298265011102013.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2252298265011102013.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2252298265011102013.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11350052020238869314.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:43:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7344201633879859021.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11350052020238869314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7344201633879859021.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.327999,18908,3009,73,37786,440,744,48963,64,1246,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX(((((((i1.i1.u20.r_8_2==0)||(i6.i0.u63.r_28_0==0))||(i9.u107.r_45_2==1))&&((i6.i0.u63.r_28_0==0)||(i4.i1.u50.r_21_2==1)))||(i8.i3....355
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(((((((i1.i1.u20.r_8_2==0)||(i6.i0.u63.r_28_0==0))||(i9.u107.r_45_2==1))&&((i6.i0.u63.r_28_0==0...477
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t36, t67, t68, t83, t123, t155, t156, t180, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i0.u7.t12, i1.i0.t2...661
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 44 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 44 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 254 transition count 156
Applied a total of 88 rules in 15 ms. Remains 254 /298 variables (removed 44) and now considering 156/200 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 254 cols
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [252]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 157 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 253/298 places, 156/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 253 /253 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 253/298 places, 156/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15248418796787742822.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8178896025134929107.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15248418796787742822.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8178896025134929107.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.9251e+25,0.73501,30128,2,26511,5,144743,6,0,1171,121742,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((r_8_2==0) + AF(EG(((r_26_2==0)&&(r_30_0==1))))) * A((A((p_15_1==0) U (r_36_2==1)) + (p_23_2!=1)) U A((((p_5_1==0)||(p_36_0==1))||(...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG((((r_8_2==0) + !(EG(!(EG(((r_26_2==0)&&(r_30_0==1))))))) * !((E(!(!((E(!((r_21_2!=0)) U (!((...612
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t49, t59, t68, t83, t109, t119, t120, t132, t133, t135, t136, t139, t140, t143, t144, t1...265
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18327426330656428643.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18327426330656428643.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18327426330656428643.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18327426330656428643.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18327426330656428643.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9859735710832772471.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 15:44:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10612756130997666238.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9859735710832772471.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10612756130997666238.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.9251e+25,0.048564,6160,282,76,2315,364,601,1890,110,667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((((i1.i1.u11.r_8_2==0) + AF(EG(((i6.u31.r_26_2==0)&&(i7.i1.u35.r_30_0==1))))) * A((A((i3.u17.p_15_1==0) U (i8.i1.u44.r_36_2==1)) + (i...299
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG((((i1.i1.u11.r_8_2==0) + !(EG(!(EG(((i6.u31.r_26_2==0)&&(i7.i1.u35.r_30_0==1))))))) * !((E(!...845
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t120, t132, t135, t136, t140, t144, i1.t119, i1.i1.t19, i5.t133, i5.t49, i6.t59, i7.t139, i7....323
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 164 ms returned [296]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 165 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16847107900950608931.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11100679182176456060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16847107900950608931.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11100679182176456060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9220752642715704022.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9220752642715704022.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9220752642715704022.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9220752642715704022.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9220752642715704022.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8271949563600523196.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 15:45:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16210099805991892121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8271949563600523196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16210099805991892121.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.346906,20852,3057,169,40928,1128,745,58059,92,3501,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AF((AF(((i8.i1.u84.p_37_2==0)||(i2.i1.u23.p_11_0==1))) + EX(TRUE))) + ((i9.u94.r_43_0==0)&&(i8.i2.u87.p_39_1==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!((!(EG(!(((i8.i1.u84.p_37_2==0)||(i2.i1.u23.p_11_0==1))))) + EX(TRUE))))) + ((i9.u9...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t28, t35, t51, t60, t100, t123, t179, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t27, i1.u10.t19, i1.u1...687
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2524519579532812855.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2524519579532812855.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2524519579532812855.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2524519579532812855.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2524519579532812855.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality391191344536004979.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 15:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14447061728983282804.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality391191344536004979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14447061728983282804.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.423078,24932,4126,68,54110,447,716,71639,60,1070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((i4.u55.r_21_2==0)&&(i4.u51.p_19_2==1))||((i9.u118.p_49_0==0)&&(i0.u1.p_0_1==1)))) + AG((((i2.u26.p_10_0==0)||(i5.u67.p_27_0==1)...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((((i4.u55.r_21_2==0)&&(i4.u51.p_19_2==1))||((i9.u118.p_49_0==0)&&(i0.u1.p_0_1...271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t19, t35, t36, t116, t155, t187, i0.t12, i0.t11, i0.t4, i0.u2.t3, i1.t28, i1.t27, i1.t20, i2....644
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,1387.01,4628100,1,0,4.70874e+06,1139,2604,3.70152e+07,175,5044,597603
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 144 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15637352990443469036.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 16:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17334774131230165189.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15637352990443469036.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17334774131230165189.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,58.0017,2062064,1.16004e+06,12,5.56072e+06,531,665,3.39272e+06,21,398,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 16:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 139 ms
[2025-06-03 16:33:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-06-03 16:33:56] [INFO ] Transformed 298 places.
[2025-06-03 16:33:56] [INFO ] Transformed 200 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-03 16:33:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16522068039970344830.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 16:33:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16494536309425928427.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16522068039970344830.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16494536309425928427.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.87175e+28,0.079621,6124,2,2561,5,8471,6,0,1395,6132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p_26_2==1) U EG(EX((r_8_2==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(EX((r_8_2==0))))))) * !(E(!(EG(EX((r_8_2==0)))) U (!((p_26_2==1)) * !(EG(EX((r_8_2==0)))))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t11, t12, t19, t20, t27, t28, t35, t36, t43, t44, t51, t52, t59, t60, t67, t68, t75, ...435
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C050, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r184-tall-174889263600129"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C050.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C050 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;