fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r161-tall-174881261200372
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 1800000.00 0.00 0.00 [undef] Time out reached

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r161-tall-174881261200372.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20, examination is QuasiLiveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r161-tall-174881261200372
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748859328062

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=QuasiLiveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
QuasiLiveness COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 10:15:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, QuasiLiveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-02 10:15:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 10:15:29] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 10:15:29] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 619 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Imported 48 HL places and 38 HL transitions for a total of 494 PT places and 11822.0 transition bindings in 22 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 494 places and 11780 transitions 111159 arcs in 189 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Unfolded 38 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Reduced 9285 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Reduced 780 identical enabling conditions.
[2025-06-02 10:15:30] [INFO ] Reduced 45 identical enabling conditions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 29 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 20 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 10110 transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 615 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 290 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality823486766374726284.gal : 117 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16777030118301702403.prop : 31 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality823486766374726284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16777030118301702403.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16777030118301702403.prop.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2235 resets) in 7509 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 9/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (415 resets) in 714 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (416 resets) in 554 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (415 resets) in 615 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,36 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 386
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (110 resets) in 4647 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 7/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (100 resets) in 419 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 4/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (417 resets) in 254 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-02 10:15:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1641 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1641 rows 474 cols
[2025-06-02 10:15:34] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 90 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 382/398 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 65/463 variables, 44/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/463 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 10/473 variables, 7/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 383 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/474 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,36 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :386 after 1023
SDD proceeding with computation,36 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :1023 after 1024
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1641/2115 variables, 474/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2115 variables, 1/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2115 variables, 0/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/2115 variables, 0/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2115/2115 variables, and 548 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 3332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 474/474 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 382/398 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/398 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 65/463 variables, 44/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Reachability property qltransition_35 is true.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/463 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 10/473 variables, 7/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Reachability property qltransition_32 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_31 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_27 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_21 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_20 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_19 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_18 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_17 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_16 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_15 is true.
Reachability property qltransition_6 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :1024 after 26361
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/474 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1641/2115 variables, 474/547 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2115 variables, 1/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2115 variables, 3/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2115 variables, 0/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/2115 variables, 0/551 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 2115/2115 variables, and 551 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 2196 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 474/474 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5715ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 82 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 474 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 474/474 places, 1650/1650 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 10 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 26 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 26 transitions
Performed 26 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 26
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 464 transition count 1624
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 438 transition count 1624
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 438 transition count 1599
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 413 transition count 1599
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 412 transition count 1598
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 412 transition count 1598
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 410 transition count 1596
Applied a total of 118 rules in 332 ms. Remains 410 /474 variables (removed 64) and now considering 1596/1650 (removed 54) transitions.
Running 1585 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:15:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1587 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1587 rows 410 cols
[2025-06-02 10:15:40] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 49 ms
[2025-06-02 10:15:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :26361 after 100425
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :100425 after 285389
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :285389 after 656716
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/1997 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved in 20086 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1585/584 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 382 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :656716 after 1.33202e+06
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/1997 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved in 20037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1001/584 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43542ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43553ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 43912 ms. Remains : 410/474 places, 1596/1650 transitions.
SDD proceeding with computation,24 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :1.33202e+06 after 2.48828e+06
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (289633 resets) in 81779 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (38589 resets) in 12791 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 8875071 steps, run timeout after 72001 ms. (steps per millisecond=123 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 8875071 steps, saw 1550274 distinct states, run finished after 72006 ms. (steps per millisecond=123 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 10:18:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1587 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:18:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:18:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1587/1996 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1996 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1996 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1997 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1997 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1997 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1997/1997 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 667 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1587/1996 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1996 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1996 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1997 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1997 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1997 variables, 0/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/1997 variables, 0/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1997/1997 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 929 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1614ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 41 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 410 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1596/1596 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 50 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1596/1596 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1596/1596 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1596/1596 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 72 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1596/1596 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:18:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1587 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:18:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:18:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 850 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 10:18:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1587 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:18:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:18:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:18:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3087 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3949 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:18:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 91 ms returned []
Running 1585 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:18:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1587 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:18:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:18:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1585 unsolved
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD374 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD378 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD379 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD380 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD382 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD383 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD384 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD387 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD388 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD391 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD392 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD393 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD394 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD395 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD396 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD397 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD398 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD399 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD400 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD401 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD402 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD403 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD404 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD407 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD408 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD411 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD412 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD414 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD417 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD420 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD422 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD423 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD424 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD425 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD426 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD427 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD428 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD429 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD430 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD431 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD432 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD433 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD434 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD435 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD436 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD437 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD438 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD439 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD442 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD443 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD447 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD448 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD449 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD452 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD455 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD456 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD457 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD458 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD459 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD462 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD465 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD469 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD470 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD471 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD472 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD473 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD474 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD475 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD476 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD477 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD478 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD479 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD480 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD481 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD482 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD483 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD484 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD485 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD486 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD487 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD488 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD489 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD490 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD491 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD492 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD493 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD494 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD495 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD498 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD499 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD502 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD503 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD504 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD505 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD508 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD511 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD512 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD513 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD514 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD515 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD518 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD521 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD525 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD526 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD527 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD528 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD529 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD530 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD533 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD536 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD540 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD545 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD546 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD547 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD548 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD549 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD550 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD551 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD552 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD553 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD554 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD555 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD556 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD557 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD558 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD559 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD560 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD561 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD562 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD563 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD564 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD565 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD566 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD567 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD568 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD569 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD570 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD571 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD572 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD573 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD574 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD575 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD576 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD577 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD578 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD579 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD582 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD583 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD586 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD587 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD588 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD589 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD592 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD595 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD596 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD597 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD598 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD599 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD602 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD605 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD609 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD610 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD611 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD612 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD613 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD614 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD617 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD620 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD624 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD629 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD630 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD631 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD632 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD633 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD634 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD635 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD638 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD641 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD645 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD650 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD656 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD657 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD658 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD659 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD660 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD661 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD662 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD663 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD664 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD665 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD666 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD667 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD668 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD669 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD670 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD671 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD672 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD673 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD674 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD675 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD676 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD677 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD678 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD679 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD680 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD681 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD682 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD683 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD684 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD685 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD686 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD687 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD688 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD689 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD690 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD691 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD692 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD693 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD694 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD695 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD696 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD697 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD698 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD699 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD702 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD703 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD706 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD707 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD708 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD709 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD712 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD715 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD716 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD717 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD718 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD719 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD722 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD725 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD729 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD730 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD731 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD732 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD733 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD734 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD737 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD740 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD744 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD749 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD750 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD751 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD752 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD753 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD754 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD755 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD758 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD761 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD765 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD770 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD776 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD777 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD778 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD779 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD780 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD781 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD782 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD783 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD786 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD789 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD793 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD798 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD804 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD811 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD812 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD813 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD814 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD815 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD816 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD817 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD818 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD819 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD820 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD821 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD822 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD823 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD824 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD825 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD826 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD827 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD828 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD829 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD830 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD831 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD832 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD833 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD834 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD835 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD836 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD837 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD838 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD839 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD840 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD841 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD842 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD843 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD844 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD845 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD846 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD847 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD848 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD849 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD850 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD851 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD852 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD853 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD854 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD855 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD856 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD857 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD858 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD859 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD860 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD861 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD862 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD863 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD864 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD867 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD868 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD871 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD872 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD873 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD874 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD877 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD880 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD881 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD882 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD883 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD884 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD887 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD890 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD894 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD895 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD896 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD897 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD898 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD899 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD902 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD905 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD909 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD914 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD915 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD916 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD917 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD918 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD919 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD920 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD923 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD926 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD930 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD935 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD941 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD942 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD943 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD944 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD945 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD946 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD947 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD948 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD951 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD954 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD958 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD963 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD969 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD976 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD977 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD978 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD979 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD980 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD981 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD982 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD983 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD984 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD987 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD990 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD994 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD999 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1005 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1012 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1020 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1021 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1022 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1023 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1024 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1025 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1026 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1027 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1028 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1029 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1030 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1031 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1032 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1033 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1034 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1035 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1036 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1037 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1038 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1039 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1040 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1041 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1042 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1043 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1044 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1045 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1046 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1047 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1048 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1049 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1050 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1051 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1052 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1053 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1054 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1055 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1056 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1057 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1058 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1059 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1060 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1061 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1062 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1063 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1064 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1065 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1066 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1067 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1068 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1069 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1070 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1071 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1072 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1073 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1074 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1075 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1076 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1077 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1078 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1079 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1080 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1081 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1082 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1083 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1084 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1087 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1088 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1091 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1092 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1093 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1094 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1097 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1270 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1277 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1294 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1295 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1296 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1297 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1298 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1299 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1300 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1301 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1302 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1303 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1307 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1310 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1314 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1319 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1325 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1359 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/409 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 409/1997 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1585/584 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 298 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/409 variables, 9/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 409/1997 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 443/584 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 62759ms problems are : Problem set: 558 solved, 1027 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 558 dead transitions in 62764ms
Found 558 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 558 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 558 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 410/410 places, 1038/1596 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 28 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:19:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 66 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 67006 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1596 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (290327 resets) in 65117 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (38771 resets) in 11148 ms. (358 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 11006274 steps, run timeout after 60001 ms. (steps per millisecond=183 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 11006274 steps, saw 1925190 distinct states, run finished after 60001 ms. (steps per millisecond=183 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 10:20:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1029 rows 410 cols
[2025-06-02 10:20:29] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 17 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1439 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1439/1439 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 283 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 385 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 329 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 269 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 274 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 268 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 285 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 270 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 457 ms of which 222 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 559 ms of which 329 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1101 ms of which 865 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 408 ms of which 174 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 351 ms of which 120 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 380 ms of which 150 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 398 ms of which 189 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 591 ms of which 373 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1186 ms of which 962 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 503 ms of which 277 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 672 ms of which 455 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 515 ms of which 291 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 339 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 824 ms of which 598 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 611 ms of which 391 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 436 ms of which 209 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 573 ms of which 360 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 585 ms of which 332 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 478 ms of which 246 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 421 ms of which 168 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 531 ms of which 303 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 516 ms of which 288 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 760 ms of which 544 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 454 ms of which 219 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 439 ms of which 208 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1182 ms of which 961 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 708 ms of which 474 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1075 ms of which 845 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 408 ms of which 167 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 449 ms of which 202 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 273 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 596 ms of which 360 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 452 ms of which 212 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 512 ms of which 268 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 595 ms of which 366 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 526 ms of which 290 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 614 ms of which 378 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 529 ms of which 288 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 367 ms of which 129 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 861 ms of which 615 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 470 ms of which 234 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1723 ms of which 1485 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 636 ms of which 400 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 521 ms of which 292 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 575 ms of which 326 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 696 ms of which 443 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 336 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 390 ms of which 174 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 333 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 371 ms of which 129 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 628 ms of which 393 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 447 ms of which 214 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 450 ms of which 219 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 506 ms of which 287 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 441 ms of which 215 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 487 ms of which 250 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 914 ms of which 675 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 258 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 257 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 265 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 267 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 266 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 266 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 265 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 269 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 287 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 275 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 272 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 269 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 249 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 257 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 266 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 278 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 275 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 273 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 264 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 249 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 262 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 268 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 258 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 263 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 256 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 249 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 272 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 265 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 257 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 265 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 236 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 236 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 235 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 258 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 257 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 259 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 257 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 258 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 260 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 450 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/652 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 274 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 274 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 274 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 275 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 276 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 277 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 273 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 271 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 75807ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 1 out of 410 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 24 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 523 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:21:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2753 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 1027 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:21:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:21:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:21:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 185 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 177 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 180 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 181 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 178 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 178 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 177 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 181 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 190 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 171 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 166 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 174 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 175 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 174 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 175 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 (/ 2.0 3.0))
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 (/ 1.0 3.0))
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 (/ 1.0 3.0))
(s90 0.0)
(s91 (/ 2.0 3.0))
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 4.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 9.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 1.0)
(s359 0.0)
(s360 timeout
0.0)
(s361 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/1439 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1027/585 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 27/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 157 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 155 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 159 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 157 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 172 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 226 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 339 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 302 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 304 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 280 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 292 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 279 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 258 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 269 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 261 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 288 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 259 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 262 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 260 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 174 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 176 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 181 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 194 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 173 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 302 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 304 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 392 ms of which 124 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 331 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 321 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 966 ms of which 697 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 353 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 342 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 349 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 313 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 319 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 317 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 294 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 311 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 315 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 295 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 290 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 293 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 300 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 293 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 292 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 322 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 290 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 516 ms of which 252 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 318 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 318 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 317 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 315 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 304 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 61588ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61592ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 64389 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 400000 steps (29124 resets) in 6577 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] After 268ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] After 15ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] After 69ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] After 431ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:22:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:22:52] [INFO ] After 255ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:22:52] [INFO ] After 88ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-02 10:22:52] [INFO ] After 147ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:22:52] [INFO ] After 502ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (290387 resets) in 49040 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (38886 resets) in 8667 ms. (461 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 7477104 steps, run timeout after 42001 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 7477104 steps, saw 1302862 distinct states, run finished after 42001 ms. (steps per millisecond=178 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 10:23:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:23:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:23:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1439 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1439/1439 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 478 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 388 ms of which 137 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 490 ms of which 261 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 553 ms of which 327 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 409 ms of which 180 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 752 ms of which 526 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 462 ms of which 239 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 476 ms of which 243 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 610 ms of which 385 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 395 ms of which 166 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 431 ms of which 202 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 299 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 932 ms of which 710 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 474 ms of which 253 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 349 ms of which 130 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 368 ms of which 145 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 954 ms of which 726 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 627 ms of which 402 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 422 ms of which 194 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 866 ms of which 640 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 842 ms of which 617 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 465 ms of which 239 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 353 ms of which 131 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1016 ms of which 789 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 331 ms of which 105 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 396 ms of which 176 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 444 ms of which 223 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 829 ms of which 603 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 648 ms of which 413 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 630 ms of which 396 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 416 ms of which 191 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 390 ms of which 171 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 404 ms of which 185 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1556 ms of which 1333 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 310 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 515 ms of which 293 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 585 ms of which 362 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 385 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 481 ms of which 259 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 442 ms of which 221 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 394 ms of which 173 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 656 ms of which 429 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 420 ms of which 196 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 388 ms of which 164 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 506 ms of which 280 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 687 ms of which 464 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 371 ms of which 153 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 698 ms of which 473 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 422 ms of which 198 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 368 ms of which 140 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 928 ms of which 697 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 274 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 280 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 569 ms of which 342 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 288 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 267 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 3251 ms of which 3025 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 266 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 270 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 269 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 292 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 270 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 273 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1136 ms of which 908 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1219 ms of which 993 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 264 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 275 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 272 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 750 ms of which 523 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 295 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 265 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 573 ms of which 353 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 536 ms of which 312 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 277 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1802 ms of which 1585 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 276 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 280 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 301 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1447 ms of which 1222 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 268 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 269 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 675 ms of which 451 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 275 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 271 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1634 ms of which 1395 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 331 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 314 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 736 ms of which 515 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1095 ms of which 720 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 291 ms of which 83 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 278 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 764 ms of which 325 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 276 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 267 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 307 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 302 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 299 ms of which 93 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 278 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 295 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 292 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 328 ms of which 122 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 712 ms of which 487 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 336 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 325 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 301 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 655 ms of which 422 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 822 ms of which 414 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 411 ms of which 182 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 271 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 280 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 269 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 377 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 667 ms of which 424 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 549 ms of which 305 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 317 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 298 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 1015 ms of which 791 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 605 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 311 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 458 ms of which 219 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 476 ms of which 241 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 277 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 290 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 903 ms of which 645 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 599 ms of which 390 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 261 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 314 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 263 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 261 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 330 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 284 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 266 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 278 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 343 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 429 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 318 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 375 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 382 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 347 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 351 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 501 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 264 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 276 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 267 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 291 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 282 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 301 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 2069 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 91050ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 1 out of 410 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 500 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 505 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 365 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:25:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:25:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1390 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 10:25:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:25:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:25:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 6813 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 8215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 1027 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:25:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:25:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:25:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
[2025-06-02 10:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 150 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
[2025-06-02 10:25:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 106 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6681141789482653267.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6681141789482653267.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6681141789482653267.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6681141789482653267.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6681141789482653267.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 5624 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 341 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 267 labels/synchronizations in 64 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6012278256217679071.gal : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10330545367609310569.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6012278256217679071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10330545367609310569.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10330545367609310569.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 30
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 218 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 182 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 179 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 179 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 175 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 177 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 186 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 165 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 175 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 162 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 160 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/1439 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1027/585 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 27/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 157 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 174 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 209 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 307 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 272 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 282 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 259 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 263 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 255 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 256 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 262 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 260 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 289 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 260 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 256 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 257 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 170 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 163 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 279 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 266 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 372 ms of which 123 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 310 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 300 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 932 ms of which 685 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 327 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 312 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 333 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 300 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 303 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 312 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 277 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 280 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 275 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 276 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 276 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 270 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 273 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 273 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 272 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 274 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 268 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 489 ms of which 253 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 289 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 298 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 299 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 299 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 292 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 303 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 312 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 305 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/1439 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 442/585 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 64351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 64379ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 73019 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 400001 steps (29197 resets) in 4935 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 263ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 12ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 427ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 254ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 88ms SMT Verify possible using 1 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 144ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:26:35] [INFO ] After 497ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2894 resets) in 565 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (396 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 517228 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 517228 steps, saw 84093 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=172 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 10:26:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:26:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:26:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1439 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1439/1439 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 254 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 228 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 231 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 249 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1438/1439 variables, and 489 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 5005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 409/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5485ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 1 out of 410 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 1027 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:26:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 167 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 160 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 187 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 160 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 156 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 166 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 149 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 185 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 223 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 186 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 183 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 197 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/1439 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 20030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1027/585 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 21/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 229 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 330 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 272 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 278 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 267 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 275 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 273 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 274 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 280 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 281 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 207 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 181 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 181 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 179 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 174 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 176 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 167 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 18/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 278 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 268 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 267 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 273 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 278 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 274 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/1439 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 20021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 442/585 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41415ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41419ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 41446 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2873 resets) in 533 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (377 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 521794 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=173 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 521794 steps, saw 84853 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=173 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 10:27:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:27:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:27:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 0/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/1439 variables, 1/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1439 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1439/1439 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 441 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 410/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/9 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 77/86 variables, 2/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 313/399 variables, 52/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/400 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 8/408 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/409 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/409 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1029/1438 variables, 409/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 229 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 232 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 253 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 231 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 250 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 228 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 228 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 228 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 236 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 225 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 249 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 251 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 271 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 231 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 233 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 238 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 231 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 235 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 234 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 226 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 237 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 230 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/552 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 237 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 237 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 236 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 236 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 237 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 237 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 255 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 235 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 252 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 240 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 248 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1438 variables, 20/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 247 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 243 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 241 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 239 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 244 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 238 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 245 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 242 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 45531ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 1 out of 410 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 410 /410 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1038/1038 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 551 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 10:28:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 10:28:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2252 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2806 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 1027 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:28:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1029 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2025-06-02 10:28:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 10:28:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 162 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 173 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 158 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 161 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 159 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 156 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 157 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 159 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 170 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 180 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 155 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 186 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 187 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 185 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 169 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 188 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 151 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 166 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 174 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 180 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 179 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 176 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 164 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 182 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 400/1439 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1027/585 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 6/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 27/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 161 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 161 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 164 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 208 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 321 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 275 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 281 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 262 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 265 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 263 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 267 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 265 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 261 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 290 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 261 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 264 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 261 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 169 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 162 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 167 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 165 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 277 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 277 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 368 ms of which 121 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 313 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 295 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 940 ms of which 686 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 322 ms of which 87 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 322 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 332 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 299 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 304 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 303 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 285 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 277 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 281 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 282 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 288 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 284 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 284 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 278 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 277 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 275 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 278 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 493 ms of which 252 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 305 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 308 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 304 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 303 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 298 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 311 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 317 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 312 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 20/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 400/1439 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 46/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/410 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 442/585 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 61379ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1027 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 61382ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 64230 ms. Remains : 410/410 places, 1038/1038 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 410 transition count 1029
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 410 transition count 1028
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 409 transition count 1028
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 409 transition count 1027
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 408 transition count 1027
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 9 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 408 transition count 1018
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 399 transition count 1018
Applied a total of 31 rules in 149 ms. Remains 399 /410 variables (removed 11) and now considering 1018/1038 (removed 20) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 1018 rows 399 cols
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] After 84ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 55 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 10:29:19] [INFO ] After 249ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 270 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 269 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 254 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 244 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 247 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 240 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 236 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 239 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 242 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 237 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure interrupted after too many repetitions 3223 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:22] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 3223 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 242 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 238 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 239 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 239 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 239 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 240 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 236 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 233 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure interrupted after too many repetitions 3040 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 3040 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 232 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 234 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 227 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 237 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 230 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 235 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 256 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 272 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 239 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure interrupted after too many repetitions 3061 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 3062 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 3
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 240 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 241 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 240 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 266 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 146 places in 241 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 1437 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 4
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] After 11203ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] After 11323ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18117311577261767239.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1187887947188542203.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18117311577261767239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1187887947188542203.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1187887947188542203.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 225
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :225 after 2435
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :2435 after 27486
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :27486 after 28214
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :28214 after 179911
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :179911 after 354540
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :354540 after 1.77081e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:29:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15634639712784045036.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15634639712784045036.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15634639712784045036.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15634639712784045036.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15634639712784045036.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 484 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 130 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3881394643041206277.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 10:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10758917894481241383.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3881394643041206277.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10758917894481241383.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10758917894481241383.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 71
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :71 after 256
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :256 after 80562
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 42288 ms.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 10:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability13900581778675681604.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability6478305427323259170.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability13900581778675681604.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability6478305427323259170.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability6478305427323259170.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :8 after 128
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9326318590832551398.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9326318590832551398.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9326318590832551398.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9326318590832551398.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9326318590832551398.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 656 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 93 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 266 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability9825853225154194760.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability13066156966516518373.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability9825853225154194760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability13066156966516518373.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability13066156966516518373.prop.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:30:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability2112049539717421956.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability14710277489994895691.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability2112049539717421956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability14710277489994895691.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability14710277489994895691.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :8 after 128
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :128 after 1024
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :1024 after 2050
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :2050 after 2053
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :2053 after 2058
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2058 after 2068
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :2068 after 2088
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2088 after 27137
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2104309695704043278.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2104309695704043278.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2104309695704043278.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2104309695704043278.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2104309695704043278.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3000 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 263 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability10768347427895789532.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 10:30:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability7429737261861255650.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability10768347427895789532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability7429737261861255650.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability7429737261861255650.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2048
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-02 10:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-02 10:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability13199110269604926399.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 10:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability11981343379942360519.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability13199110269604926399.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability11981343379942360519.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability11981343379942360519.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :8 after 128
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :128 after 1024
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :1024 after 2050
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :2050 after 2053
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :2053 after 2058
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2058 after 2068
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :2068 after 2088
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2088 after 27137
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :27137 after 179493
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :179493 after 509217
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :509217 after 1.36558e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :1.36558e+06 after 3.38867e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1785858540391499492.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1785858540391499492.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1785858540391499492.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1785858540391499492.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1785858540391499492.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 656 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 276 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability8807277004024983392.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 10:36:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability6051625390077336353.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability8807277004024983392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability6051625390077336353.prop' '--nowitness'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...307
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability6051625390077336353.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2069
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2069 after 2108
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :2108 after 2110
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :2110 after 2117
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :2117 after 2131
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :2131 after 2158
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2158 after 2214
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :2214 after 2312
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2312 after 2499
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :2499 after 2978
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :2978 after 2.06595e+07
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 10:41:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-02 10:41:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-02 10:41:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability13224482417206471736.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 10:41:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityFireability1615264780327346773.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability13224482417206471736.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityFireability1615264780327346773.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityFireability1615264780327346773.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :8 after 128
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :128 after 1024
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :1024 after 2050
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :2050 after 2053
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :2053 after 2058
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2058 after 2068
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :2068 after 2088
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2088 after 27137
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :27137 after 179493
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :179493 after 509217
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :509217 after 1.36558e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :1.36558e+06 after 3.38867e+06

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ QuasiLiveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination QuasiLiveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20"
export BK_EXAMINATION="QuasiLiveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20, examination is QuasiLiveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r161-tall-174881261200372"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20.tgz
mv PolyORBNT-COL-S10J20 execution
cd execution
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "QuasiLiveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "QuasiLiveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' QuasiLiveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "QuasiLiveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "QuasiLiveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME QuasiLiveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;