About the Execution of ITS-Tools for QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 199426.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | FFFTTFFTFFFTFTFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r156-tall-174881254700788.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r156-tall-174881254700788
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 712K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 157K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 166K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749141217018
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 65 ms
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Transformed 270 places.
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Transformed 116 transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 270 places and 116 transitions and 659 arcs in 148 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 225 out of 270 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 270/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 252 transition count 116
Applied a total of 18 rules in 17 ms. Remains 252 /270 variables (removed 18) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 257 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:33:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:33:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 452 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:33:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/367 variables, 251/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/368 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/368 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 368/368 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 7680 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 138/138 constraints, State Equation: 252/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 138/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/367 variables, 251/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 108/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/368 variables, 1/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/368 variables, 0/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 368/368 variables, and 498 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 24457 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 138/138 constraints, State Equation: 252/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 32220ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 32238ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 252/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32734 ms. Remains : 252/270 places, 116/116 transitions.
Support contains 225 out of 252 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-05 16:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 31 to 26
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3931 resets) in 2534 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 22/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (69 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (63 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (68 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (67 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 102 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (72 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (70 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (71 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (71 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (65 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (35 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
[2025-06-05 16:34:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/222 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 108/330 variables, 222/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 38/368 variables, 30/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 6/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/368 variables, 0/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 368/368 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved in 1501 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 138/138 constraints, State Equation: 252/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/221 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/326 variables, 221/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 16/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 24/350 variables, 15/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 350/368 variables, and 384 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved in 5015 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/138 constraints, State Equation: 236/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6538ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 214 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 252 transition count 114
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 252 transition count 113
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 251 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 250 transition count 112
Applied a total of 5 rules in 25 ms. Remains 250 /252 variables (removed 2) and now considering 112/116 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 25 ms. Remains : 250/252 places, 112/116 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4505 resets) in 564 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 14/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (572 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (446 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (566 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (452 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (447 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (572 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (568 resets) in 61 ms. (645 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (449 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (567 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (569 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (567 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (572 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (450 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (452 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 250 cols
[2025-06-05 16:34:19] [INFO ] Computed 139 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/221 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/326 variables, 221/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 29/355 variables, 22/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 7/362 variables, 7/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 7/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/362 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 362/362 variables, and 389 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 1466 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 139/139 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 126/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/221 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/326 variables, 221/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 14/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 29/355 variables, 22/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 7/362 variables, 7/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 7/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/362 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 362/362 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 15551 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 139/139 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17046ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 53 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=26 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 14 properties in 195 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
Computed a total of 252 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 252 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(p1)&&p0) U G((X(X(G(p3)))||p2))))'
Support contains 72 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:34:37] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:34:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 371 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 392 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 612 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), true, (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1082 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(((!p0&&X(!p0)) U X(p0))))'
Support contains 8 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 241 transition count 111
Applied a total of 5 rules in 24 ms. Remains 241 /252 variables (removed 11) and now considering 111/116 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 111 rows 241 cols
[2025-06-05 16:34:38] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:34:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 267 ms returned [144, 145, 146, 147, 151, 156, 157, 194, 195, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 407 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 227/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 227 /227 variables (removed 0) and now considering 111/111 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 441 ms. Remains : 227/252 places, 111/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 8 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 finished in 544 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((G((X(p2)||p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 64 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:34:39] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:34:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 364 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 380 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9838 reset in 332 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9825 reset in 256 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 15 factoid took 118 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 143 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3929 resets) in 286 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (433 resets) in 296 ms. (134 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (436 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (707 resets) in 762 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (703 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 885149 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=294 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 885149 steps, saw 144854 distinct states, run finished after 3010 ms. (steps per millisecond=294 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2025-06-05 16:34:43] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 6 ms
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 77/141 variables, 64/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 161/302 variables, 133/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 78/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/350 variables, 42/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 18/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/361 variables, 6/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 545 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 77/141 variables, 64/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 161/302 variables, 133/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 78/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 48/350 variables, 42/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 18/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 11/361 variables, 6/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1737 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2307ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 56 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 4 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 15 factoid took 260 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 197 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 64 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:34:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:34:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:34:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 354 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:34:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6844 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 108/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 27370 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34233ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34234ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34600 ms. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3926 resets) in 304 ms. (131 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (430 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (433 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (698 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (716 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 826623 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=275 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 826623 steps, saw 136106 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=275 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-05 16:35:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 77/141 variables, 64/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 161/302 variables, 133/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 78/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/350 variables, 42/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 18/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/361 variables, 6/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 550 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 77/141 variables, 64/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 161/302 variables, 133/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 78/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 48/350 variables, 42/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 18/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/350 variables, 0/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 11/361 variables, 6/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1421 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1982ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 57 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=14 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 3 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G p2)), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p2))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 315 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 181 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9834 reset in 197 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9834 reset in 208 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8893009004854295486
[2025-06-05 16:35:28] [INFO ] Built C files in 13ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8893009004854295486
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8893009004854295486;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 384 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8893009004854295486;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 49 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin8893009004854295486;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4227751402767159213.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 2944 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 finished in 53019 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(F(p0))||(p1 U X(p1))))'
Support contains 15 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:32] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 254 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 413 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 195 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 201 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1099 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F((p0&&(p1 U G(p2))))&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 78 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 243 transition count 113
Applied a total of 3 rules in 16 ms. Remains 243 /252 variables (removed 9) and now considering 113/116 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 243 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 247 ms returned [196, 197, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/252 places, 113/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 394 ms. Remains : 236/252 places, 113/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 225 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 8 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-05 finished in 635 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(G(p0)) U ((G(p0) U p2)&&p1)))))'
Support contains 64 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 258 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 385 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 394 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 260 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 finished in 683 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(!p0)&&(p1 U p2)) U X((p1 U p3))))'
Support contains 24 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 247 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 396 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 401 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 297 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p3)), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 174 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 168 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p2 (NOT p3)) (AND p1 (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))))), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p3)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 27 factoid took 22 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 14 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1155 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 8 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 181 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 71 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 71 places :
Also discarding 15 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 15 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 180 transition count 86
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 179 transition count 85
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 179 transition count 85
Applied a total of 18 rules in 20 ms. Remains 179 /252 variables (removed 73) and now considering 85/116 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:35] [INFO ] Computed 96 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 88, 93, 94, 127, 128, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 165/252 places, 85/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 165 /165 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 323 ms. Remains : 165/252 places, 85/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 8 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 finished in 370 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((X(X(p0))||(p1&&F(G(p2))))))'
Support contains 11 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 154 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 266 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 429 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 finished in 697 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X((F((p1&&G(p2)))||p0)))))'
Support contains 12 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 151 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 265 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 419 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 425 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 274 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 109 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 124 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 294 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3936 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (713 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (712 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (695 resets) in 34 ms. (1142 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (433 resets) in 35 ms. (1111 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 245 cols
[2025-06-05 16:35:38] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 66/85 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/232 variables, 97/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 85/317 variables, 83/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 85/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 43/360 variables, 43/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 43/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 297 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 66/85 variables, 19/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/232 variables, 97/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 85/317 variables, 83/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 85/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 43/360 variables, 43/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 43/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 380 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 774 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1083ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 43 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=43 )
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 14 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p1) (OR p0 p2)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 345 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 303 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 286 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 12 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:35:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:35:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:35:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 256 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 391 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:35:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6782 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 108/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 26999 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 33810ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33811ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34208 ms. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 144 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 279 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 5 to 4
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3935 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (714 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (708 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (432 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-05 16:36:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 61/78 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 112/190 variables, 63/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/271 variables, 66/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 81/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 52/323 variables, 48/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 52/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 33/356 variables, 29/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 12/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/361 variables, 3/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 61/78 variables, 17/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 112/190 variables, 63/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 81/271 variables, 66/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 81/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 52/323 variables, 48/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 52/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 33/356 variables, 29/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 12/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 5/361 variables, 3/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 417 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 708ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 45 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=45 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 11 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 285 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 255 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 270 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 242 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 107 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 110 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, false, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 237 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 12 out of 245 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:36:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6864 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 116/360 variables, 244/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 108/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 0/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/361 variables, 1/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 27274 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 132/132 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34154ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34154ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34184 ms. Remains : 245/245 places, 116/116 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8096973028884714874
[2025-06-05 16:36:51] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8096973028884714874
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8096973028884714874;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 263 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8096973028884714874;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin8096973028884714874;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9752646222075712047.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 60 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-11 finished in 75365 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((!(X((p0 U p1))&&X(F(p0))) U X(p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 284 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 445 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 459 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 187 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, p1, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 finished in 663 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X((G(!p1)||(!p1&&F(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:36:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 244 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 375 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 383 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 208 ms :[true, p2, (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND p2 p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 108 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 111 ms.
Computed a total of 245 stabilizing places and 116 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 245 transition count 116
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p2))), (F (G p0)), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 finished in 907 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(F(p0)) U !p1)))'
Support contains 3 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 733 edges and 252 vertex of which 244 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 242 transition count 112
Applied a total of 3 rules in 18 ms. Remains 242 /252 variables (removed 10) and now considering 112/116 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 242 cols
[2025-06-05 16:36:53] [INFO ] Computed 132 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:36:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned [145, 146, 147, 148, 152, 157, 158, 195, 196, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224]
Discarding 14 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 14 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 228/252 places, 112/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 228 /228 variables (removed 0) and now considering 112/112 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 451 ms. Remains : 228/252 places, 112/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[p1, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10243 reset in 211 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10257 reset in 205 ms.
Computed a total of 228 stabilizing places and 112 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 228 transition count 112
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 10 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[p1, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), p1]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4095 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (481 resets) in 21 ms. (1818 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (394 resets) in 21 ms. (1818 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (494 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 81216 steps, run visited all 3 properties in 183 ms. (steps per millisecond=443 )
Probabilistic random walk after 81216 steps, saw 14549 distinct states, run finished after 186 ms. (steps per millisecond=436 ) properties seen :3
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0)]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 192 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1911 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 252 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 252/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 252 /252 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 252 cols
[2025-06-05 16:36:55] [INFO ] Computed 138 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-06-05 16:36:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-05 16:36:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 268 ms returned [147, 148, 149, 150, 154, 159, 160]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 245 /245 variables (removed 0) and now considering 116/116 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 430 ms. Remains : 245/252 places, 116/116 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06-LTLFireability-15 finished in 536 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 197833 ms.
BK_STOP 1749141416444
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r156-tall-174881254700788"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06.tgz
mv QuasiCertifProtocol-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;