Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r147-tall-174876819600234.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-2, examination is Liveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r147-tall-174876819600234
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 620K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME Liveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748809859966

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=Liveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=ParamProductionCell-PT-2
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
Liveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, Liveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 89 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions and 846 arcs in 181 ms.
Built sparse matrix representations for Structural reductions in 6 ms.20831KB memory used
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 30 ms. Remains 231 /231 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 231 /231 variables (removed 0) and now considering 202/202 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 231 cols
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 291 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 20:31:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 528 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 20:31:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 20:31:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 227/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 32/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 22/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 6/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/230 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 9/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 202/433 variables, 231/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 68/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 433/433 variables, and 645 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 231/231 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 227/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 32/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 22/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 51/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/230 variables, 3/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 202/433 variables, 231/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 68/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 200/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 433/433 variables, and 845 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 231/231 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 231/231 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60113ms
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 60680 ms. Remains : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Random walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 1743 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=717 )
Random directed walk for 1250001 steps, including 0 resets, run took 1350 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=925 )
[2025-06-01 20:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 180 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 1679 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 1915 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:09] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 32 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 157 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 2773 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 68 Read/Feed constraints in 206 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 20:32:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 32 trap constraints in 5250 ms
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 231 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 217 transition count 188
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 199 transition count 170
Applied a total of 64 rules in 26 ms. Remains 199 /231 variables (removed 32) and now considering 170/202 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 199 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:17] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 450 ms returned [15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 51, 54, 55, 61, 64, 65, 77, 78, 80, 93, 94, 96, 98, 99, 137, 138, 140, 142, 143, 168, 169, 172, 173, 178, 179, 181, 190]
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [80, 78, 77, 35, 40, 54, 64, 93, 94, 96, 137, 138, 140, 172, 173, 181, 17, 18, 22, 28, 36, 41, 55, 65, 178, 179, 190, 98, 99, 142, 143, 168, 169]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 453 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 166/231 places, 170/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 166 transition count 151
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 147 transition count 151
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 147 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 143 transition count 147
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 94 transition count 98
Applied a total of 144 rules in 14 ms. Remains 94 /166 variables (removed 72) and now considering 98/170 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned [15, 16, 23, 24, 33, 38]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 138 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 2 : 88/231 places, 98/202 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 84 transition count 94
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 84 /88 variables (removed 4) and now considering 94/98 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 3 : 84/231 places, 94/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 3 iterations and 913 ms. Remains : 84/231 places, 94/202 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
RANDOM walk for 15394 steps (3 resets) in 430 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 0/92 properties
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14525051471131240255.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8423087501218724166.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14525051471131240255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8423087501218724166.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 94 properties.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 231 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 217 transition count 188
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 199 transition count 170
Applied a total of 64 rules in 14 ms. Remains 199 /231 variables (removed 32) and now considering 170/202 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 199 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:18] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 426 ms returned [15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 51, 54, 55, 61, 64, 65, 77, 78, 80, 93, 94, 96, 98, 99, 137, 138, 140, 142, 143, 168, 169, 172, 173, 178, 179, 181, 190]
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [80, 78, 77, 35, 40, 54, 64, 93, 94, 96, 137, 138, 140, 172, 173, 181, 17, 18, 22, 28, 36, 41, 55, 65, 178, 179, 190, 98, 99, 142, 143, 168, 169]
Discarding 33 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 428 ms to find 33 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 166/231 places, 170/202 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 166 transition count 151
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 147 transition count 151
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 147 transition count 147
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 143 transition count 147
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 94 transition count 98
Applied a total of 144 rules in 9 ms. Remains 94 /166 variables (removed 72) and now considering 98/170 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [15, 16, 23, 24, 33, 38]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 2 : 88/231 places, 98/202 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 84 transition count 94
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 84 /88 variables (removed 4) and now considering 94/98 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 3 : 84/231 places, 94/202 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 3 iterations and 833 ms. Remains : 84/231 places, 94/202 transitions.
Net is quasi-live, checking if it is reversible to establish liveness.
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11509253793396020371.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 20:32:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15158694398737733089.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11509253793396020371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15158694398737733089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8382,0.05285,5724,2,1538,5,8152,6,0,433,6601,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((((((((ch_DC_full==1)&&(ch_DC_free==0))&&((ch_CF_free==0)&&(ch_CF_full==1)))&&(((ch_A1P_free==1)&&(ch_TA1_full==0))&&((ch_A2D_full...1917
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((((((ch_DC_full==1)&&(ch_DC_free==0))&&((ch_CF_free==0)&&(ch_CF_full==1)))&&((...1977
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions deposit_belt_lock_input_area.deposit_belt_lock_output_area.DB_trans_Pstart, feed_belt_lock_in...1645
(forward)formula 0,1,0.502582,25464,1,0,260,112123,209,142,2811,75531,312
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Able to resolve query Liveness after proving 1 properties.
FORMULA Liveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL QUASI_LIVE_REVERSIBLE INITIAL_STATE
Total runtime 79105 ms.

BK_STOP 1748809940258

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ Liveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="Liveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-2, examination is Liveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r147-tall-174876819600234"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-2.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-2 execution
cd execution
if [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "Liveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "Liveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' Liveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME Liveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;