Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876813000620.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-5, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876813000620
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 4.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 406K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 380K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 257K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 168K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 196K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 784K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 206K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 945K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 535K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748945889395

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-PT-5
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 111 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Transformed 834 places.
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Transformed 1242 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 10:18:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 834 places and 1242 transitions and 3828 arcs in 201 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 681 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 30 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1122 rows 834 cols
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 28 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 458 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 871 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:18:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 828/828 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 7/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 2/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 828/1956 variables, and 844 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 828/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1236/1236 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 828/828 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 7/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 2/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 7/844 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 1/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 828/1956 variables, and 845 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 828/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1236 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60375ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60391ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61317 ms. Remains : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Support contains 681 out of 834 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 10:19:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 119 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 79 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1242 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 35 to 29
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1460 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 9/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 299 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 398 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 194 ms. (205 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-06-03 10:19:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:19:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:19:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 734/797 variables, 9/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 734/807 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 1/808 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 206 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 1/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 0/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/800 variables, 3/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 3/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/804 variables, 4/819 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 4/823 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 238 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 199 places in 118 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 147 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 159 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 4/827 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 0/827 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1122/1926 variables, 804/1631 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1926 variables, 205/1836 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1926/1956 variables, and 1836 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 804/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 804/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/8 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 734/797 variables, 9/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 734/807 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 1/808 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 1/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/797 variables, 0/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 3/800 variables, 3/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 3/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/800 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/804 variables, 4/819 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 4/823 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 4/827 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 179 places in 176 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 159 places in 201 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 2/829 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 179 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 219 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 2/831 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/804 variables, 0/831 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1122/1926 variables, 804/1635 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1926 variables, 205/1840 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1926 variables, 8/1848 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1926/1956 variables, and 1848 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 5009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 804/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 804/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/8 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 63 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 343 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 343 transitions
Performed 343 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 343
Iterating post reduction 0 with 343 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 834 transition count 899
Reduce places removed 343 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 344 rules applied. Total rules applied 687 place count 491 transition count 898
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 490 transition count 898
Performed 160 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 160 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 688 place count 490 transition count 738
Deduced a syphon composed of 160 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 160 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 320 rules applied. Total rules applied 1008 place count 330 transition count 738
Applied a total of 1008 rules in 97 ms. Remains 330 /834 variables (removed 504) and now considering 738/1242 (removed 504) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 330/834 places, 738/1242 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 309 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 257 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 94 ms. (421 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 637763 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=212 ) properties seen :0 out of 9
Probabilistic random walk after 637763 steps, saw 93792 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=211 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 10:19:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 618 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 618 rows 330 cols
[2025-06-03 10:19:27] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/293 variables, 8/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 230/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/297 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/300 variables, 3/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 6/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 618/918 variables, 300/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/918 variables, 205/829 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/918 variables, 0/829 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 30/948 variables, 30/859 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 30/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 5/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 0/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/948 variables, 0/894 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 948/948 variables, and 894 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 2293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 330/330 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 330/330 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/8 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 230/293 variables, 8/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 230/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/297 variables, 4/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 4/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/300 variables, 3/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 6/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 618/918 variables, 300/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/918 variables, 205/833 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/918 variables, 8/841 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/918 variables, 0/841 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 30/948 variables, 30/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 30/901 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 5/906 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 20/926 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 20/946 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 20/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 8/974 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 5/979 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 0/979 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/948 variables, 3/982 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 2/984 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 0/984 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/948 variables, 3/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/948 variables, 0/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/948 variables, 0/987 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 948/948 variables, and 987 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 32132 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 330/330 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 330/330 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/8 constraints, Known Traps: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34441ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 8 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 304 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 330 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 330/330 places, 738/738 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 330 transition count 733
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 325 transition count 733
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 325 transition count 708
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 300 transition count 708
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 272 transition count 680
Applied a total of 116 rules in 41 ms. Remains 272 /330 variables (removed 58) and now considering 680/738 (removed 58) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 272/330 places, 680/738 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 793653 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=264 ) properties seen :0 out of 5
Probabilistic random walk after 793653 steps, saw 116866 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=264 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 10:20:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 560 rows 272 cols
[2025-06-03 10:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 188/198 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 188/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/201 variables, 3/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/205 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 4/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 37/242 variables, 2/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 37/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 560/802 variables, 242/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 205/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 30/832 variables, 30/739 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 30/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 5/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 0/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/832 variables, 0/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 832/832 variables, and 774 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 966 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 272/272 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 188/198 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 188/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/201 variables, 3/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/205 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 4/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 37/242 variables, 2/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 37/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 560/802 variables, 242/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 205/709 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 5/714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/802 variables, 0/714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 30/832 variables, 30/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 30/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 5/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 20/799 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 20/819 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 12/831 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 6/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 6/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 2/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 2/847 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 0/847 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/832 variables, 6/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/832 variables, 0/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/832 variables, 0/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 832/832 variables, and 853 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 14518 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 272/272 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15498ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 999 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 272 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 680/680 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 272 /272 variables (removed 0) and now considering 680/680 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 272/272 places, 680/680 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 272/272 places, 680/680 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 272 /272 variables (removed 0) and now considering 680/680 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:20:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:20:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 262 ms returned [236, 248, 250, 251]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 265 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 268/272 places, 680/680 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 268 /268 variables (removed 0) and now considering 680/680 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 268/272 places, 680/680 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 45 ms. (869 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 815269 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=271 ) properties seen :0 out of 5
Probabilistic random walk after 815269 steps, saw 119991 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=271 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 10:20:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 560 rows 268 cols
[2025-06-03 10:20:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 11 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 225/235 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 225/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/238 variables, 3/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 560/798 variables, 238/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 205/697 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 0/697 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 30/828 variables, 30/727 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 30/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 5/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 0/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/828 variables, 0/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 828/828 variables, and 762 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 817 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 268/268 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 225/235 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 225/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/238 variables, 3/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 560/798 variables, 238/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 205/697 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 5/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/798 variables, 0/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 30/828 variables, 30/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 30/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 5/767 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 20/787 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 11/798 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 2/800 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 5/805 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 4/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 0/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/828 variables, 3/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 0/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/828 variables, 0/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 828/828 variables, and 812 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 9585 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 268/268 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 268/268 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10422ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 873 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 268 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 680/680 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 268 /268 variables (removed 0) and now considering 680/680 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 268/268 places, 680/680 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 680/680 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 268 /268 variables (removed 0) and now considering 680/680 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:20:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:20:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 725 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 952 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 33 ms returned []
Running 674 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 560 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:20:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 266/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 13/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 15/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/828 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/268 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/268 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 674/674 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 266/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 13/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 59/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/268 variables, 4/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 20/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 268/828 variables, and 444 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 268/268 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/268 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/674 constraints, Known Traps: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60117ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 674 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60118ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61119 ms. Remains : 268/268 places, 680/680 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(G(p0))&&(X((X((p3 U p4))||p2))||p1))))'
Support contains 330 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:21:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1122 rows 834 cols
[2025-06-03 10:21:38] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 600 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 603 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 628 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 350 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4)), (NOT p4), true]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1056 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(X(X(p1)))&&(X(G(p3))||p2))))'
Support contains 396 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:21:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:21:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 284 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 286 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 304 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 216 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-02 finished in 544 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&X(X(X((F(p1) U X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 396 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:21:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:21:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 303 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 304 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 325 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 256 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 326 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 190 steps with 0 reset with depth 191 and stack size 191 in 2 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-04 finished in 936 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(!p0)||G((G(p2)||p1))) U X(p3)))'
Support contains 126 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:21:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 597 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:21:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3568 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:21:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:21:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 828/828 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 7/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 2/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 828/1956 variables, and 845 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 828/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1236/1236 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 828/828 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 7/835 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 2/837 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/828 variables, 8/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 828/1956 variables, and 845 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 828/834 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/834 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1236 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60223ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1236 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60225ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 64411 ms. Remains : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 297 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND p0 (NOT p3)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), p0, (AND p0 (NOT p2)), (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4891 reset in 1029 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2290 steps with 117 reset with depth 22 and stack size 22 in 27 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-05 finished in 65789 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((X(p1)&&p0)))))'
Support contains 54 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:22:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1023 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1025 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1053 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 439 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 677 steps with 0 reset with depth 678 and stack size 678 in 3 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-06 finished in 1659 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G((X(X(p0)) U ((!p1&&X(X(p0)))||X(X(G(p0))))))||(F(G(!p0))&&(X(X(p0)) U ((!p1&&X(X(p0)))||X(X(G(p0))))))))))'
Support contains 60 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 360 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 360 transitions
Performed 360 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 360
Iterating post reduction 0 with 360 rules applied. Total rules applied 360 place count 834 transition count 882
Reduce places removed 360 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 360 rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 474 transition count 882
Performed 174 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 174 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 720 place count 474 transition count 708
Deduced a syphon composed of 174 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 174 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 348 rules applied. Total rules applied 1068 place count 300 transition count 708
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 1128 place count 270 transition count 678
Applied a total of 1128 rules in 42 ms. Remains 270 /834 variables (removed 564) and now considering 678/1242 (removed 564) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 558 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 558 rows 270 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:48] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned [229, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 162 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/834 places, 678/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 264 /264 variables (removed 0) and now considering 678/678 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 264/834 places, 678/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 28 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 1186 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 7 steps with 0 reset with depth 8 and stack size 8 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1469 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((X(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1122 rows 834 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:49] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1028 ms returned [785, 805, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1032 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 829/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 829 /829 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1059 ms. Remains : 829/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 176 reset in 172 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 50 steps with 0 reset with depth 51 and stack size 51 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1369 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((((p0 U p1) U X(G(p2))) U X(p3)))'
Support contains 6 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:22:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 918 ms returned [785, 805, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 919 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 829/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 829 /829 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 939 ms. Remains : 829/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[(NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 5 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-10 finished in 1361 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(((p1||G(p2)) U p3))&&p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:22:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1013 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 1015 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1042 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p3), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-11 finished in 1232 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||X(F(p1))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 359 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 359 transitions
Performed 359 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 359
Iterating post reduction 0 with 359 rules applied. Total rules applied 359 place count 834 transition count 883
Reduce places removed 359 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 359 rules applied. Total rules applied 718 place count 475 transition count 883
Performed 180 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 180 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 718 place count 475 transition count 703
Deduced a syphon composed of 180 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 180 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 360 rules applied. Total rules applied 1078 place count 295 transition count 703
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 1134 place count 267 transition count 675
Applied a total of 1134 rules in 47 ms. Remains 267 /834 variables (removed 567) and now considering 675/1242 (removed 567) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 555 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 555 rows 267 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:53] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 244 ms returned [230, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 245 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/834 places, 675/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 675/675 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 309 ms. Remains : 261/834 places, 675/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 249 reset in 176 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 656 steps with 1 reset with depth 413 and stack size 331 in 2 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-13 finished in 567 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(((p0||F(!p1)) U (G((p0||F(!p1)))||((p0||F(!p1))&&X(!p2)))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 35 ms. Remains 834 /834 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1122 rows 834 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:54] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 985 ms returned [785, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 986 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 828 /828 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1242/1242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1033 ms. Remains : 828/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16666 reset in 266 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 16666 reset in 290 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 84 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 7 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 252 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 2/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (1111 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-03 10:22:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 1122 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 1122 rows 828 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:56] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 135/140 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 135/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 132/272 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 132/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 394/666 variables, 272/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/666 variables, 21/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/666 variables, 0/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 148/814 variables, 32/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 32/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 4/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 20/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/814 variables, 0/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 520/1334 variables, 4/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1334 variables, 520/1182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1334 variables, 0/1182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/1338 variables, 4/1186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1338 variables, 4/1190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1338 variables, 0/1190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 612/1950 variables, 524/1714 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1950 variables, 164/1878 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1950 variables, 0/1878 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/1950 variables, 0/1878 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1950/1950 variables, and 1878 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1062 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 828/828 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 828/828 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
Problem apf3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/1950 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 5/828 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/828 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1121ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p2), (F (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 10 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-14 finished in 3469 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 834 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 834/834 places, 1242/1242 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 358 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 358 transitions
Performed 358 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 358
Iterating post reduction 0 with 358 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 834 transition count 884
Reduce places removed 358 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 358 rules applied. Total rules applied 716 place count 476 transition count 884
Performed 180 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 180 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 716 place count 476 transition count 704
Deduced a syphon composed of 180 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 180 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 360 rules applied. Total rules applied 1076 place count 296 transition count 704
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 1136 place count 266 transition count 674
Applied a total of 1136 rules in 37 ms. Remains 266 /834 variables (removed 568) and now considering 674/1242 (removed 568) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:22:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 554 rows 266 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:57] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 256 ms returned [230, 242, 243, 244, 245]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 257 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 261/834 places, 674/1242 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 261/834 places, 674/1242 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 195 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 224 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 401 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 3/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-03 10:22:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 554 rows 261 cols
[2025-06-03 10:22:59] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 815/815 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 352 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/641 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/641 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 815/815 variables, and 753 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1211 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1571ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 43 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (1428 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1001987 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1001987 steps, saw 146330 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 10:23:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:23:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:23:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 815/815 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 282 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 4/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/636 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 815/815 variables, and 752 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1138 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1425ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 36 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:23:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 837 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1064 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 668 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:23:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:23:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:23:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 14/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/815 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 260/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 668/668 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 95/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 9/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 20/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60151ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60152ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61237 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 510 edges and 261 vertex of which 179 / 261 are part of one of the 30 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 149 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 298 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 149 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 447 transitions.
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 112 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 83 transition count 198
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 82 transition count 197
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 71 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 36 edges and 71 vertex of which 30 / 71 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 25 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 46 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 30 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 30 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 106 edges and 42 vertex of which 20 / 42 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 27 transition count 166
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 60 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 63 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 123 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 27 transition count 43
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 27 transition count 40
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 27 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 26 transition count 39
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 26 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 21 transition count 24
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 21 transition count 19
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 21 transition count 19
Applied a total of 274 rules in 18 ms. Remains 21 /261 variables (removed 240) and now considering 19/674 (removed 655) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] After 20ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] After 14ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-03 10:24:06] [INFO ] After 49ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 95 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 539 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 554 rows 261 cols
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:24:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 915 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 668 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:24:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:24:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 14/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30109ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30111ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31269 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 444 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 108 ms. (366 steps per ms) remains 3/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (1290 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (1333 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-03 10:24:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:24:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 815/815 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 361 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf0 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/641 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/641 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 815/815 variables, and 753 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1203 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1571ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 31 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (1250 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1027908 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=342 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1027908 steps, saw 149690 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=342 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 10:24:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:24:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/517 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 815/815 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 298 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 75/78 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 75/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 186/265 variables, 79/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 20/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 130/395 variables, 30/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 30/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 220/615 variables, 40/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 40/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 180/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 108/723 variables, 4/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 108/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 4/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/723 variables, 0/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/727 variables, 4/636 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 4/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/727 variables, 0/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 88/815 variables, 112/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/815 variables, 0/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/815 variables, 0/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 815/815 variables, and 752 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1165 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 261/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 35 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 905 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 668 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:24:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:24:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:24:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 14/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/815 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 260/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 668/668 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 94/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 9/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 3/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 1/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/815 variables, and 388 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 260/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/668 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60110ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61258 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 510 edges and 261 vertex of which 179 / 261 are part of one of the 30 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 149 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 298 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 149 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 447 transitions.
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 112 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 83 transition count 198
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 82 transition count 197
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 71 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 36 edges and 71 vertex of which 30 / 71 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 25 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 46 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 30 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 30 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 106 edges and 42 vertex of which 20 / 42 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 15 places
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 27 transition count 166
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 60 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 63 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 123 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 123 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 27 transition count 43
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 27 transition count 40
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 27 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 26 transition count 39
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 26 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 21 transition count 24
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 21 transition count 19
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 21 transition count 19
Applied a total of 274 rules in 11 ms. Remains 21 /261 variables (removed 240) and now considering 19/674 (removed 655) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] After 21ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] After 7ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-03 10:25:46] [INFO ] After 32ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 66 ms.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 518 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 41 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 189 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 214 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11834089963360688604
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 19 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:25:47] [INFO ] Built C files in 138ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11834089963360688604
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11834089963360688604;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1735 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11834089963360688604;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 59 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11834089963360688604;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4926239207689924238.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 3 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 674/674 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:26:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 554 rows 261 cols
[2025-06-03 10:26:02] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 862 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1086 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 668 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:26:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 554 transitions (discarded 120 similar events)
[2025-06-03 10:26:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 10:26:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 205 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 20/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 14/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/815 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 260/261 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/17 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 668/668 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 260/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 15/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 95/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 9/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/261 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 20/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60162ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 668 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60164ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61275 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 674/674 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin757430279829375491
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 674 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 5 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:27:04] [INFO ] Built C files in 99ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin757430279829375491
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin757430279829375491;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1551 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin757430279829375491;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 42 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin757430279829375491;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased13101932725570414551.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-03 10:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL7849115043605944581.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1813672721939810362.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL7849115043605944581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut4379183148050121202.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL1813672721939810362.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL1813672721939810362.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut4379183148050121202.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 10:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2395304875191151715.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL16417580357093987728.ltl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2395304875191151715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL16417580357093987728.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G("((WantSection_0_F==1)&&(Idle_0==1))"))||(G("(((TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(WantSection_0_F==0))||(Idle_0==0))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : G(F!"((WantSection_0_F==1)&&(Idle_0==1))" & F!"(((TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(WantSection_0_F==0))||(Idle_0==0))")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16346890265103062073.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16346890265103062073.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16346890265103062073.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16346890265103062073.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16346890265103062073.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 914 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 260 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2703115423319858397.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 10:27:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL6535796061758178759.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2703115423319858397.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL6535796061758178759.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G("((i0.u36.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(i0.u36.Idle_0==1))"))||(G("(((i9.u35.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(i0.u36.WantSection_0_F==0))||(i0...177
Formula 0 simplified : G(F!"((i0.u36.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(i0.u36.Idle_0==1))" & F!"(((i9.u35.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(i0.u36.WantSection_0_F==0))||(i0.u36...169
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-5-LTLFireability-15 finished in 307060 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1))))'
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2465280359008090500
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 1242 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 1242 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10772780288242412327.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10772780288242412327.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10772780288242412327.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10772780288242412327.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10772780288242412327.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1033 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 1242 transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 65 ms
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 11 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Built C files in 280ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2465280359008090500
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2465280359008090500;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability14795084773504951543.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 10:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability2085116533394589642.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability14795084773504951543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability2085116533394589642.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G("((i26.i1.u45.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(i5.u82.Idle_0==1))"))||(G("(((i25.i1.u195.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(i26.i1.u45.WantSection_...190
Formula 0 simplified : G(F!"((i26.i1.u45.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(i5.u82.Idle_0==1))" & F!"(((i25.i1.u195.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(i26.i1.u45.WantSection_0_F=...182
Compilation finished in 3833 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2465280359008090500;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 61 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2465280359008090500;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '<>(([]((LTLAPp0==true))||[]((LTLAPp1==true))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 10:51:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 10:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 256 ms
[2025-06-03 10:51:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 10:51:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 10:51:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 768 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:51:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 604 ms
[2025-06-03 10:51:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 390 labels/synchronizations in 55 ms.
[2025-06-03 10:51:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability9496479255172056908.gal : 58 ms
[2025-06-03 10:51:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability105372230900617453.ltl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability9496479255172056908.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability105372230900617453.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G("((u17.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(u6.Idle_0==1))"))||(G("(((u1.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(u17.WantSection_0_F==0))||(u6.Idle_0==0))")...159
Formula 0 simplified : G(F!"((u17.WantSection_0_F==1)&&(u6.Idle_0==1))" & F!"(((u1.TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(u17.WantSection_0_F==0))||(u6.Idle_0==0))")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 11:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 230 ms
[2025-06-03 11:14:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1242 transitions.
[2025-06-03 11:14:49] [INFO ] Transformed 834 places.
[2025-06-03 11:14:49] [INFO ] Transformed 1242 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-03 11:14:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability11949006099595016979.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 11:14:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability6560780692396375810.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability11949006099595016979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability6560780692396375810.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...343
Read 1 LTL properties
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
Checking formula 0 : !((F((G("((WantSection_0_F==1)&&(Idle_0==1))"))||(G("(((TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(WantSection_0_F==0))||(Idle_0==0))")))))
Formula 0 simplified : G(F!"((WantSection_0_F==1)&&(Idle_0==1))" & F!"(((TestIdentity_2_4_5==0)||(WantSection_0_F==0))||(Idle_0==0))")

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-5"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-5, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876813000620"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-5.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-5 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;