Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812900611.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-4, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900611
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 289K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 234K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 469K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 284K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 298K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748942279063

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-PT-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 92 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Transformed 480 places.
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Transformed 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 480 places and 690 transitions and 2120 arcs in 185 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 17 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 452 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 20 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 450 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 591 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1074 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 155 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30233 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 118 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 123 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 133 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 134 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60459ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61577 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Support contains 452 out of 480 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 09:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 62 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1974 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 3/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 444/450 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 444/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/455 variables, 5/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 5/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/460 variables, 5/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 630/1090 variables, 460/935 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 116/1051 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 0/1051 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 20/1110 variables, 20/1071 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 20/1091 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 4/1095 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 0/1095 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/1110 variables, 0/1095 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1110/1110 variables, and 1095 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1899 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 480/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 444/450 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 444/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/455 variables, 5/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 5/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/460 variables, 5/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 5/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 630/1090 variables, 460/935 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 116/1051 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 3/1054 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 0/1054 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 20/1110 variables, 20/1074 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 20/1094 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 4/1098 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 148 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 165 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 6987ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 178 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 199 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 199 transitions
Performed 199 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 199
Iterating post reduction 0 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 480 transition count 491
Reduce places removed 199 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 281 transition count 491
Performed 95 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 95 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 281 transition count 396
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 190 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 186 transition count 396
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 628 place count 166 transition count 376
Applied a total of 628 rules in 62 ms. Remains 166 /480 variables (removed 314) and now considering 376/690 (removed 314) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62 ms. Remains : 166/480 places, 376/690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 290 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 316 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 316 rows 166 cols
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 134/139 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 134/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/146 variables, 5/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 5/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 316/462 variables, 146/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 116/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 20/482 variables, 20/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/482 variables, 0/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 482/482 variables, and 467 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 174 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 166/166 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 134/139 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 134/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/141 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/146 variables, 5/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 5/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 316/462 variables, 146/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 116/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 1/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 20/482 variables, 20/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 4/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/482 variables, 20/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 482/482 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 6857 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 166/166 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 166/166 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7043ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 8 simplifications.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(X(p0)) U ((p1&&X(X(p0)))||X(X(G(p0))))) U (G((X(X(p0)) U ((p1&&X(X(p0)))||X(X(G(p0))))))||((p2||F(!p3))&&(X(X(p0)) U ((p1&&X(X(p0)))||X(X(G(p0)))))))))'
Support contains 320 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:19:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:19:18] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 370 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 376 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 396 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 552 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p3), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p3 (NOT p0)), true, (AND p3 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p3), p3]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25717 reset in 458 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25704 reset in 361 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p3 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND p3 (NOT p1))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p3)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 402 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 97 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p3 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND p3 (NOT p1))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p3)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 485 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 165 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 140 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 475 cols
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 638 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 884 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 119 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 117 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 141 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 124 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 139 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 142 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 113 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 123 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 130 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 152 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 150 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 174 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 157 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 120 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 123 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/1105 variables, and 549 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 475/475 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 60/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 137 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 117 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 156 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 164 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 116 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 147 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 125 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 140 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 123 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 161 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 112 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 127 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 158 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 475/1105 variables, and 589 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 475/475 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60140ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60142ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61036 ms. Remains : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 238 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 13456 steps (3 resets) in 129 ms. (103 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 372 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20933 reset in 286 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20974 reset in 277 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 140 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 96 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 475 transition count 690
Performed 68 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 68 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 475 transition count 754
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 475 transition count 754
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 180 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 475 transition count 754
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 459 transition count 738
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 459 transition count 738
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 212 rules in 56 ms. Remains 459 /475 variables (removed 16) and now considering 738/690 (removed -48) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 43 ms returned []
Running 733 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 678 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 678 rows 459 cols
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 180 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 147 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD287 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD289 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD292 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD299 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD305 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD309 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD311 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD314 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD369 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD370 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 459/1137 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 733/733 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 52 solved, 681 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD270 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD271 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD272 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD274 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD275 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD276 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD277 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD278 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD279 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD281 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD282 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD283 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD284 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD286 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD288 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD290 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD291 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD293 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD294 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD295 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD296 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD297 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD298 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD300 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD301 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD302 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD303 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD306 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD307 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD308 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD310 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD312 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD313 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD315 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD316 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD317 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD366 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD368 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD371 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD374 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD574 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD575 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD576 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD577 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD578 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD579 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD580 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD581 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD582 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD583 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD584 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD585 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD586 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD587 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD588 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD589 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 6/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 168 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/423 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 423/1137 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/733 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60135ms problems are : Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 228 dead transitions in 60138ms
Found 228 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 228 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 228 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 459/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1130 edges and 459 vertex of which 295 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 164 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 164 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 20 ms. Remains 295 /459 variables (removed 164) and now considering 510/510 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 295/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60272 ms. Remains : 295/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin8290366470360879927
[2025-06-03 09:21:24] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin8290366470360879927
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8290366470360879927;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1168 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin8290366470360879927;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 41 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin8290366470360879927;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16891116360176698060.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 570 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 128727 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&G(p1)))))'
Support contains 100 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:21:26] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 301 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 314 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 318 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 267 steps with 0 reset with depth 268 and stack size 268 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 772 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(F(p0)))&&(G(p0)||F(p1)))))'
Support contains 125 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:21:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 420 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 440 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 453 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24392 reset in 295 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24377 reset in 358 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 60 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 125 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 124 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 120 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 475 cols
[2025-06-03 09:21:29] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 390 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:21:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:21:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1402 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1807 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 147 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 140 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 114 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 122 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 128 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 151 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 123 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 122 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 126 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 172 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 135 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 158 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 149 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 163 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 164 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 168 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 112 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 145 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 154 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/1105 variables, and 549 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 475/475 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 60/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 155 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 158 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 119 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 142 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 128 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 475/1105 variables, and 589 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 475/475 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60109ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60110ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61921 ms. Remains : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 61 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 67 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24385 reset in 236 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24354 reset in 225 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 120 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 104 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 475 transition count 690
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 475 transition count 690
Deduced a syphon composed of 109 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 475 transition count 690
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 471 transition count 686
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 471 transition count 686
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 136 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 471 transition count 686
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 456 transition count 671
Deduced a syphon composed of 121 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 456 transition count 671
Deduced a syphon composed of 121 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 178 rules in 35 ms. Remains 456 /475 variables (removed 19) and now considering 671/690 (removed 19) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 666 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 611 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 611 rows 456 cols
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 151 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD32 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD37 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD41 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD577 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD599 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD605 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD623 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD653 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD659 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 50 solved, 616 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 112 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 111 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD10 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD35 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD587 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD593 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD611 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD617 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD629 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD635 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD641 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD647 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD665 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 163 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 116 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 456/1067 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/456 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 666/666 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 96/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 121/456 variables, 5/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 113 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 140 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 456/1067 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/456 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/666 constraints, Known Traps: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60113ms problems are : Problem set: 121 solved, 545 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 121 dead transitions in 60115ms
Found 121 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 121 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 121 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 456/475 places, 550/690 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1170 edges and 456 vertex of which 335 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 121 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 121 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 335 /456 variables (removed 121) and now considering 550/550 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 335/475 places, 550/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60198 ms. Remains : 335/475 places, 550/690 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2616619333487251037
[2025-06-03 09:23:32] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2616619333487251037
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2616619333487251037;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 993 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2616619333487251037;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 32 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2616619333487251037;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16081417958084678761.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 10873 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 137352 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||F((p1&&X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 205 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Iterating post reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 480 transition count 610
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 610
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 590
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 380 transition count 590
Applied a total of 200 rules in 21 ms. Remains 380 /480 variables (removed 100) and now considering 590/690 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:23:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 530 rows 380 cols
[2025-06-03 09:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 302 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:23:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:23:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 929 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1235 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 585 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:23:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:23:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:23:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 375/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 4/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/380 variables, 10/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 126 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/910 variables, and 459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 380/380 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 585/585 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 375/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 4/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 60/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/380 variables, 10/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 5/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 20/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/910 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved in 30037 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 380/380 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/585 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60118ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60119ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61393 ms. Remains : 380/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 1143 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 601 steps with 0 reset with depth 602 and stack size 580 in 10 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 62704 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 25 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 480 transition count 490
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 490
Performed 80 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 80 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 410
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 560 place count 200 transition count 410
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 180 transition count 390
Applied a total of 600 rules in 19 ms. Remains 180 /480 variables (removed 300) and now considering 390/690 (removed 300) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:24:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 330 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 330 rows 180 cols
[2025-06-03 09:24:47] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned [167, 168, 169, 170, 171]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 233 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 175/480 places, 390/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 175 /175 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 258 ms. Remains : 175/480 places, 390/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 210 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 31 steps with 0 reset with depth 32 and stack size 32 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 529 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||X((p1||G(!p0)))))))'
Support contains 125 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 424 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:24:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1889 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2326 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:24:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:24:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:24:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 147 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 138 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 159 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 155 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 133 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 138 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 150 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 127 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 132 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60106ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62440 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[true, false, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, false, false]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 228 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 243 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 12 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 63112 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F((p0&&X(X(F(p1)))))&&X(p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 379 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 388 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 398 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39951 reset in 194 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 40034 reset in 206 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p2 p1), (X p2), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p0)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 9 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 1010 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:25:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 409 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 432 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 443 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 85 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-PT-4-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 539 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 472470 ms.

BK_STOP 1748942752764

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-4, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900611"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-4.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;