Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812900610.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900610
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 289K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 234K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 469K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 284K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 298K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748942255387

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-PT-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 93 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Transformed 480 places.
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Transformed 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 480 places and 690 transitions and 2120 arcs in 186 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Support contains 480 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:17:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 312 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 287 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 634 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:17:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 155 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 126 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 166 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 170 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 206 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
(s164 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 111 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 120 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 127 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 118 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 105 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60244ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60259ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60927 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Support contains 480 out of 480 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 09:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 69 to 62
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1662 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 25/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 177 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 203 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
[2025-06-03 09:18:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:18:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:18:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 175/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 4/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 304/479 variables, 10/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 304/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 4/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 0/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/480 variables, 1/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 1/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 167 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 501 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/23 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 167/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 311/478 variables, 10/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 311/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 3/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/495 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/480 variables, 2/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 2/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 2/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 151 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 154 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 133 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10143ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Fused 22 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 167 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 480 transition count 622
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 1 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 412 transition count 545
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 335 transition count 545
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 335 transition count 511
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 358 place count 301 transition count 511
Applied a total of 358 rules in 68 ms. Remains 301 /480 variables (removed 179) and now considering 511/690 (removed 179) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 301/480 places, 511/690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 764 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 409134 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=136 ) properties seen :0 out of 22
Probabilistic random walk after 409134 steps, saw 69610 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=136 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 09:18:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 451 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 451 rows 301 cols
[2025-06-03 09:18:53] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 167/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 132/299 variables, 10/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 132/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/301 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 451/752 variables, 301/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/752 variables, 116/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/752 variables, 0/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/752 variables, 0/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 752/752 variables, and 740 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 6782 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 301/301 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 301/301 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/20 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 167/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 132/299 variables, 10/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 132/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/299 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/301 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 20/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 20/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 20/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 20/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/752 variables, and 423 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 45013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 301/301 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/301 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/20 constraints, Known Traps: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51821ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 167 out of 301 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 301/301 places, 511/511 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 301 /301 variables (removed 0) and now considering 511/511 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 301/301 places, 511/511 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 301/301 places, 511/511 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 301 /301 variables (removed 0) and now considering 511/511 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:19:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 451 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:19:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned [288, 289, 290, 291, 292]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 296/301 places, 511/511 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 296 /296 variables (removed 0) and now considering 511/511 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 296/301 places, 511/511 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 774 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 421506 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties seen :0 out of 21
Probabilistic random walk after 421506 steps, saw 72000 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=140 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 451 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 451 rows 296 cols
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 167/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 7/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 129/296 variables, 7/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 129/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 451/747 variables, 296/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/747 variables, 116/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/747 variables, 20/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/747 variables, 0/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/747 variables, 0/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 747/747 variables, and 750 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 32290 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 296/296 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 296/296 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/19 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 167/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 7/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 129/296 variables, 7/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 129/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 28/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 16/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 20 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 296/747 variables, and 434 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 20 unsolved in 75010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 296/296 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/296 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/19 constraints, Known Traps: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 107313ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 20 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 165 out of 296 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 296/296 places, 511/511 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 296 transition count 509
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 294 transition count 509
Applied a total of 4 rules in 19 ms. Remains 294 /296 variables (removed 2) and now considering 509/511 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 294/296 places, 509/511 transitions.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-03 09:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:35] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 09:21:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 338 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 930 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:21:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 114 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 122 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 123 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 122 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 150 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 131 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 110 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60116ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61420 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15213653323374132699.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 09:22:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13347805364518183250.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15213653323374132699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13347805364518183250.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:23:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:23:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14785706829060418216.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14785706829060418216.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14785706829060418216.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14785706829060418216.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14785706829060418216.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:23:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:23:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:23:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 487 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:23:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 71 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11714141109128301359.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10809148880531937939.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11714141109128301359.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10809148880531937939.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:23:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 631 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 857 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:23:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:23:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:23:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 106 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 106 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 107 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 116 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 116 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 131 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30045 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60132ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60134ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61016 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14489121321196955644.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2012795478519147177.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14489121321196955644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2012795478519147177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5425581108363940959.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5425581108363940959.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5425581108363940959.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5425581108363940959.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5425581108363940959.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 487 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7397392512274399994.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability295768227614532475.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7397392512274399994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability295768227614532475.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 174 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 199 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3935486721974550940.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:25:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6914215702345599655.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3935486721974550940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6914215702345599655.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5512113337836204934.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5512113337836204934.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5512113337836204934.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5512113337836204934.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5512113337836204934.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 491 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5425356253814087693.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14723773903560248892.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5425356253814087693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14723773903560248892.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 150 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 163 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17247443163053651279.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:26:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14667416850866928794.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17247443163053651279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14667416850866928794.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph531342944137328888.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph531342944137328888.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph531342944137328888.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph531342944137328888.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph531342944137328888.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 517 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11958045533372637017.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11793008338923063492.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11958045533372637017.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11793008338923063492.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:27:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:27:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 254 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 266 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9161582466292138622.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1586137922797677751.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9161582466292138622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1586137922797677751.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1440372291950015768.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1440372291950015768.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1440372291950015768.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1440372291950015768.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1440372291950015768.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 504 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11487646599016742068.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15955117739606108592.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11487646599016742068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15955117739606108592.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 357 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 360 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 378 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:28:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability109813217539758512.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:28:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability904121116596962670.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability109813217539758512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability904121116596962670.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4782459645036795063.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4782459645036795063.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4782459645036795063.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4782459645036795063.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4782459645036795063.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 491 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10105515632589768413.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5115773382594222304.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10105515632589768413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5115773382594222304.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 370 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 09:29:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 118 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 1.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 1.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 1.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/1110 variables, and 519 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 475/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/480 variables, 10/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 5/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 98 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 119 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 117 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 114 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 128 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/1110 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 480/480 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/685 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60121ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60123ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60506 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16617275783599527013.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:30:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12541275249423607283.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16617275783599527013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12541275249423607283.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6001334912082531092.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6001334912082531092.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6001334912082531092.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6001334912082531092.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6001334912082531092.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 500 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17973455767794179100.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1988531366441692511.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17973455767794179100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1988531366441692511.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Iterating post reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 480 transition count 610
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 610
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 590
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 380 transition count 590
Applied a total of 200 rules in 31 ms. Remains 380 /480 variables (removed 100) and now considering 590/690 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 530 rows 380 cols
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned [367, 368, 369, 370, 371]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 375/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 375 /375 variables (removed 0) and now considering 590/590 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 147 ms. Remains : 375/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 590 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17839656485210736750.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:31:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11950761893677216310.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17839656485210736750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11950761893677216310.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9176987268788399861.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9176987268788399861.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9176987268788399861.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9176987268788399861.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9176987268788399861.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 517 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17476323101395092140.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6737170717736674677.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17476323101395092140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6737170717736674677.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 194 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 194 transitions
Performed 194 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 194
Iterating post reduction 0 with 194 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 480 transition count 496
Reduce places removed 194 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 286 transition count 494
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 284 transition count 494
Performed 98 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 98 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 392 place count 284 transition count 396
Deduced a syphon composed of 98 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 98 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 186 transition count 396
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 167 transition count 377
Applied a total of 626 rules in 28 ms. Remains 167 /480 variables (removed 313) and now considering 377/690 (removed 313) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:32:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 317 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 317 rows 167 cols
[2025-06-03 09:32:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [157, 158, 159, 160, 161]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 134 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 162/480 places, 377/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 162 /162 variables (removed 0) and now considering 377/377 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 171 ms. Remains : 162/480 places, 377/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 377 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1499343250617220304.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:32:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9274672529464628545.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1499343250617220304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9274672529464628545.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9570983875821930341.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9570983875821930341.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9570983875821930341.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9570983875821930341.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9570983875821930341.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 412 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 274 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18113420855639000509.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16733720106989412253.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18113420855639000509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16733720106989412253.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.56932e+06,25.824,574636,6153,899,709921,12039,803,2.99157e+06,194,118378,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 409 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 415 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 433 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6256401572382033211.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:33:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2882121896888922845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6256401572382033211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2882121896888922845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:34:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:34:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16864077527076499071.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16864077527076499071.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16864077527076499071.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16864077527076499071.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16864077527076499071.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:34:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:34:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:34:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 504 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1832963648747486121.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17420238601920579754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1832963648747486121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17420238601920579754.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 364 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 366 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 382 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1447169212148430314.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:34:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8049678809388067600.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1447169212148430314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8049678809388067600.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17843793732545335670.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17843793732545335670.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17843793732545335670.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17843793732545335670.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17843793732545335670.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 491 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18422352936304020376.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9113455899521589174.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18422352936304020376.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9113455899521589174.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 199 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 199 transitions
Performed 199 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 199
Iterating post reduction 0 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 480 transition count 491
Reduce places removed 199 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 199 rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 281 transition count 491
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 398 place count 281 transition count 391
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 598 place count 181 transition count 391
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 638 place count 161 transition count 371
Applied a total of 638 rules in 23 ms. Remains 161 /480 variables (removed 319) and now considering 371/690 (removed 319) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:35:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 311 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 311 rows 161 cols
[2025-06-03 09:35:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned [151, 152, 153, 154, 155]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/480 places, 371/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 156 /156 variables (removed 0) and now considering 371/371 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 156/480 places, 371/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 371 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14671336209675796478.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 09:35:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8068524667309907342.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14671336209675796478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8068524667309907342.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9666298117073054439.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9666298117073054439.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9666298117073054439.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9666298117073054439.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9666298117073054439.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 413 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 293 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability971718530680952457.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16244015273626563485.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability971718530680952457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16244015273626563485.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 379 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 397 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14164184802764370510.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:36:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6108791665206321412.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14164184802764370510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6108791665206321412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8614242145135707436.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8614242145135707436.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8614242145135707436.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8614242145135707436.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8614242145135707436.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 504 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability538414557987363670.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6621149960569289005.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability538414557987363670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6621149960569289005.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 193 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 193 transitions
Performed 193 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 193
Iterating post reduction 0 with 193 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 480 transition count 497
Reduce places removed 193 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 195 rules applied. Total rules applied 388 place count 287 transition count 495
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 285 transition count 495
Performed 96 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 96 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 390 place count 285 transition count 399
Deduced a syphon composed of 96 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 96 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 192 rules applied. Total rules applied 582 place count 189 transition count 399
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 622 place count 169 transition count 379
Applied a total of 622 rules in 16 ms. Remains 169 /480 variables (removed 311) and now considering 379/690 (removed 311) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 319 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 319 rows 169 cols
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [159, 160, 161, 162, 163]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/480 places, 379/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 164 /164 variables (removed 0) and now considering 379/379 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 164/480 places, 379/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 379 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10794395027066628409.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:37:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16732488848011146409.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10794395027066628409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16732488848011146409.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2498033282621867796.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2498033282621867796.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2498033282621867796.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2498033282621867796.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2498033282621867796.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 415 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 263 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11730761533086841894.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11850911407454621157.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11730761533086841894.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11850911407454621157.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 360 ms returned [467, 468, 469, 470, 471]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 361 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 384 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2561340477573967102.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 09:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1285158096766995807.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2561340477573967102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1285158096766995807.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:39:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7250763456085437997.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7250763456085437997.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7250763456085437997.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7250763456085437997.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7250763456085437997.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:39:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:39:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:39:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 491 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7187618053579186667.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6644084467118129127.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7187618053579186667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6644084467118129127.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14651824824010207034.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14651824824010207034.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14651824824010207034.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14651824824010207034.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14651824824010207034.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 513 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12578549819706708783.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 09:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8553931237087851440.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12578549819706708783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8553931237087851440.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.29947e+08,898.945,9219344,33637,195,5.4186e+06,7135,1232,9.65585e+07,113,44802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(A((((((i4.u11.EndTurn_2_1==1)||(i4.u55.EndTurn_0_1==1))||((i4.u75.EndTurn_3_1==1)||(i13.u52.EndTurn_4_0==1)))||(((i13.u51.EndTurn_1...986
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((E(!((!(EG(!((((((i0.i0.u80.WantSection_1_F==1)&&(i6.u124.Idle_1==1))||((i2.u35.WantS...2183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t162, t166, t175, t311, t312, t313, t314, t315, t316, t317, t31...1604
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
(forward)formula 0,1,1016.43,9228716,1,0,5.4186e+06,7135,7298,9.65585e+07,642,44802,17188074
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((((EX((((((((AX((((((i0.i0.u80.WantSection_1_F==0)||(i6.u124.Idle_1==0))&&((i2.u35.WantSection_2_F==0)||(i13.u42.Idle_2==0)))&&(((i16....12178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((i13.u123.WantSection_4_T==1)&&(i6.u18.CS_4==1))||((i13.u41.WantSection_3_T==1)&&(i6....12259
(forward)formula 1,1,1108.44,9228716,1,0,5.4186e+06,7135,9424,9.65585e+07,699,44802,21835049
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((AX(AF(AG((((((((i3.u72.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i3.u73.Turn_2_3==1))||((i4.u15.TestTurn_4_1==1)&&(i4.u15.Turn_1_4==1)))||(((i6.u19.TestTur...15751
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(EX(!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((((i3.u72.TestTurn_3_2==1)&&(i3.u73.Turn_2_3==1))||((i...15846
(forward)formula 2,0,1405.7,11738184,1,0,6.66348e+06,7135,4381,1.23389e+08,324,44802,3968547
FORMULA Peterson-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG((AF(!(E(((((((i16.i0.u3.TestIdentity_2_1_2==1)||(i20.u111.TestIdentity_4_3_4==1))||((i22.i0.u2.TestIdentity_1_3_1==1)||(i14.i0.u64....13569
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(!(E(((((((i16.i0.u3.TestIdentity_2_1_2==1)||(i20.u111.TestIdentity_4_3_...10962
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 420 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 180 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability925180561744643419.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 10:07:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4281624144513777559.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability925180561744643419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4281624144513777559.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.29947e+08,64.6356,1836912,24591,11789,3.23913e+06,367452,792,3.85079e+06,1191,2.74401e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AF(!(E(((((((u4.TestIdentity_2_1_2==1)||(u1.TestIdentity_4_3_4==1))||((u1.TestIdentity_1_3_1==1)||(u2.TestIdentity_0_1_0==1)))||((...11323
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(!(E(((((((u4.TestIdentity_2_1_2==1)||(u1.TestIdentity_4_3_4==1))||((u1....11399
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t73, t75, t76, t77, t88, t94, t95, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t161, t162, t165, ...784
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900610"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-4.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;