Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812900601.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-PT-3, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900601
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.4M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 189K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 237K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 284K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748939756045

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-PT-3
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Transformed 244 places.
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Transformed 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 244 places and 332 transitions and 1016 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 21 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 226 out of 244 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 313 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:35:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:35:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 08:35:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 293 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 638 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:35:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:35:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 08:35:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 240/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 6/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 17/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/552 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 240/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 68/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 6/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/552 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/328 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60111ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60126ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60796 ms. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Support contains 226 out of 244 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 08:36:58] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-03 08:36:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 08:36:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 08:36:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1833 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 42/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 42/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 35/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 56 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (71 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
[2025-06-03 08:36:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:36:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 08:36:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 224/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 21 solved, 14 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 4/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/228 variables, 4/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 4/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/232 variables, 4/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 308/540 variables, 232/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 57/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 12/552 variables, 12/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 12/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 3/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 0/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/552 variables, 0/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 552/552 variables, and 560 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved in 570 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 215/226 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 215/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/228 variables, 2/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/232 variables, 4/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 4/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 308/540 variables, 232/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 57/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 1/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 12/552 variables, 12/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 12/558 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 3/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 1/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 7/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 34 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 0/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 34 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/552 variables, 0/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 34 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 552/552 variables, and 569 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 34 solved, 1 unsolved in 1555 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/33 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2196ms problems are : Problem set: 34 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 50 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 244 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 88 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 88 transitions
Performed 88 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 88
Iterating post reduction 0 with 88 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 244 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 88 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 156 transition count 242
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 154 transition count 242
Performed 45 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 45 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 154 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 109 transition count 197
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 97 transition count 185
Applied a total of 294 rules in 35 ms. Remains 97 /244 variables (removed 147) and now considering 185/332 (removed 147) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 97/244 places, 185/332 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 192 ms. (207 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 92918 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 184 ms. (steps per millisecond=504 )
Probabilistic random walk after 92918 steps, saw 18823 distinct states, run finished after 188 ms. (steps per millisecond=494 ) properties seen :1
Successfully simplified 34 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 244 places (down from 126) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 169 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 194 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14294404852304136430.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16079209539857785533.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14294404852304136430.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16079209539857785533.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,14.8941,389340,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7775929238171126007.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7775929238171126007.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7775929238171126007.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7775929238171126007.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7775929238171126007.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3550548234332404495.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3707800431899300114.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3550548234332404495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3707800431899300114.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,3.17472,113820,3050,208,148553,3636,727,760925,114,25345,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(TRUE))))) * !(E(!(EX(TRUE)) U (!(EX(TRUE)) * !(EX(TRUE))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...809
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,1,5.33966,130972,1,0,189798,3761,3671,810704,589,25345,559025
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 244 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 235 transition count 323
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 235 transition count 296
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 208 transition count 296
Applied a total of 72 rules in 22 ms. Remains 208 /244 variables (removed 36) and now considering 296/332 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 208 cols
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 277 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 404 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 08:37:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 204/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 10/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/208 variables, 6/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 20/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 12/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 6/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 208/480 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 208/208 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 204/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 73/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/208 variables, 6/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 208/480 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 208/208 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/208 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/292 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/244 places, 296/332 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60519 ms. Remains : 208/244 places, 296/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 296 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16909994166537454663.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:38:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3448391774653347526.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16909994166537454663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3448391774653347526.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08818e+06,15.2234,366976,2,65763,5,980121,6,0,1131,1.52345e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3619783995328664488.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3619783995328664488.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3619783995328664488.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3619783995328664488.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3619783995328664488.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 45 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 112 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:39:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9359994106421555016.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9539542596564758133.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9359994106421555016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9539542596564758133.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08818e+06,13.3559,355680,2,56941,5,929323,6,0,1159,1.56609e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 358 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 523 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 08:39:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 240/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 6/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 20/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 17/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/552 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 240/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 68/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 6/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/552 variables, and 329 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 244/244 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/328 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60581 ms. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4392286801387894465.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 08:40:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18264961716145867208.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4392286801387894465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18264961716145867208.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,17.0992,420764,2,73296,5,1.12801e+06,6,0,1311,1.8281e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7798802343955692805.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7798802343955692805.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7798802343955692805.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7798802343955692805.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7798802343955692805.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 173 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17704139677068320843.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality221126992054134811.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17704139677068320843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality221126992054134811.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,20.1462,508696,2,76012,5,1.29192e+06,6,0,1331,2.28186e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:41:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 158 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 163 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13435820583700517767.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 08:41:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7499051741817547071.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13435820583700517767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7499051741817547071.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,16.0657,389092,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9582593061281708416.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9582593061281708416.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9582593061281708416.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9582593061281708416.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9582593061281708416.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 214 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4780537370495260431.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3515427523503885009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4780537370495260431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3515427523503885009.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,9.86686,210636,2594,156,270405,4458,748,1.2746e+06,93,24047,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AX(((i3.u19.Turn_2_0==0)||(i5.i1.u18.CS_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i3.u19.Turn_2_0==0)||(i5.i1.u18.CS_2==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t37, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150...863
(forward)formula 0,1,14.8089,212812,1,0,270405,4458,3872,1.35754e+06,459,24047,909575
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 153 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12143674561414153654.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11923270272116289260.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12143674561414153654.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11923270272116289260.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,15.6365,389000,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11904430115892600860.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11904430115892600860.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11904430115892600860.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11904430115892600860.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11904430115892600860.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 210 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14115140720414875877.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:42:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16080971400389602818.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14115140720414875877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16080971400389602818.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,20.4959,471588,4657,241,554830,9802,703,3.60533e+06,106,69285,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EF(AG(EX(((i15.u69.EndTurn_2_2==0)||(i14.u58.EndTurn_1_0==1))))) * ((i15.u18.TestTurn_1_2==0)||(i0.i0.u54.TestAlone_2_1_1==1))) * ((...561
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i15.u69.EndTurn_2_2==0)||(i14.u58.EndTurn_1_0==1))))))) * ((...1390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...806
(forward)formula 0,1,25.6481,471588,1,0,554830,11419,4788,3.60533e+06,580,69342,1459765
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15762077975120309735.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2571751964200688459.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15762077975120309735.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2571751964200688459.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,14.3444,388868,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9458337828021988840.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9458337828021988840.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9458337828021988840.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9458337828021988840.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9458337828021988840.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 214 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 9 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14580937120200822461.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15568368414084915691.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14580937120200822461.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15568368414084915691.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,4.12303,135824,3852,220,183603,2145,800,879431,98,13184,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(AX(((i3.i0.u46.IsEndLoop_2_2_1==0) * (EG(((i4.u17.IsEndLoop_0_0_3==0)||(i8.i1.u62.BeginLoop_0_1_0==1))) + (i9.i0.u13.TestIdentity_2...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE))) * !((i3.i0.u46.IsEndLoop_2_2_1==0)))] = FALSE * [((EY(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE))) * !((i9.i0...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t36, t37, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149,...813
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,7.31413,206480,1,0,291113,5282,3920,1.36446e+06,504,26624,836078
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 94 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 94 transitions
Performed 94 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 94
Iterating post reduction 0 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 244 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 94 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 150 transition count 238
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 150 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 101 transition count 189
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 90 transition count 178
Applied a total of 308 rules in 15 ms. Remains 90 /244 variables (removed 154) and now considering 178/332 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 154 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/244 places, 178/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 86 /86 variables (removed 0) and now considering 178/178 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 113 ms. Remains : 86/244 places, 178/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 178 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17481220371924734116.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 08:43:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6342712275314686386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17481220371924734116.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6342712275314686386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72094,0.744086,35240,2,7697,5,94666,6,0,525,113881,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((IsEndLoop_3_1_3==1) + AF((TestTurn_1_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((IsEndLoop_3_1_3==1) + !(EG(!((TestTurn_1_2==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t66, t67, t68, t87, t90,...622
(forward)formula 0,1,9.50436,319828,1,0,513,1.95755e+06,387,220,3939,1.32326e+06,461
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned [230, 231, 232, 233]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 176 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 183 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15154234667720394640.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10929574229836732223.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15154234667720394640.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10929574229836732223.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,14.1318,388652,2,67085,5,1.03827e+06,6,0,1295,1.68407e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14805651420521051865.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14805651420521051865.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14805651420521051865.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14805651420521051865.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14805651420521051865.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 202 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12286659033181986338.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5390009075040809516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12286659033181986338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5390009075040809516.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,3.83793,121424,3140,253,175818,5058,662,654804,115,31865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF((EX((i11.u56.IsEndLoop_1_0_3==0)) * AG((i2.i1.u76.TestIdentity_0_1_3==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!((EX((i11.u56.IsEndLoop_1_0_3==0)) * !(E(TRUE U !((i2.i1.u76.TestIdentity_0_1_3==...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t64, t65, t66, t67, t71, t141, t142, t143, t144, t145, t146, t147, t148, t149, t150, t15...760
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,0,6.47352,144336,1,0,211290,5434,4172,832864,692,31865,652531
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14795927877215258642.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14795927877215258642.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14795927877215258642.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14795927877215258642.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14795927877215258642.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 77 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6140375041728669938.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 08:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2164085990584178650.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6140375041728669938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2164085990584178650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,17.4992,480656,2,76074,5,1.49942e+06,6,0,1351,2.03518e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF((((gu39.CS_3+gu39.CS_1)+(gu39.CS_2+gu39.CS_0))>((((((gu39.TestIdentity_0_1_0+gu39.TestIdentity_3_0_0)+(gu39.TestIdentity_2_0_0+gu...1914
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((((gi10.gu38.TestTurn_0_0+gi10.gu38.TestTurn_1_0)+(gi10.gu38.TestTurn_2_0+gi10.gu38.Test...1972
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gu20.t67, gu20.t69, gu20.t70, gu20.t71, gu20.t72, gu20.t73, gu20.t74, gu20.t75, gi10.gu38.t36...891
(forward)formula 0,1,65.7785,1503988,1,0,556,6.85801e+06,601,295,10757,5.89435e+06,589
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AX(AG((((gu20.Idle_3+gu20.Idle_2)+(gu20.Idle_1+gu20.Idle_0))>((((((gu39.TestIdentity_0_1_0+gu39.TestIdentity_3_0_0)+(gu39.TestIdentity...1331
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((gu20.Idle_3+gu20.Idle_2)+(gu20.Idle_1+gu20.Idle_0))>((((((gu39.TestId...1401
(forward)formula 1,0,118.029,2266864,1,0,558,1.30345e+07,14,296,4576,7.86589e+06,8
FORMULA Peterson-PT-3-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 647220 ms.

BK_STOP 1748940404498

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-PT-3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-PT-3, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812900601"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-PT-3.tgz
mv Peterson-PT-3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;