Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812800563.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-COL-4, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800563
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 468K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748923802040

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-COL-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 548 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:03] [INFO ] Imported 11 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 500 PT places and 795.0 transition bindings in 18 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 11 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 11 places and 14 transitions 42 arcs in 10 ms.
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 14 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 407 ms. (98 steps per ms) remains 1/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 213 ms. (186 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 9 cols
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 9/23 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 116 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 151ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [Process(5), Tour(4), Process(5)] of place BeginLoop breaks symmetries in sort Process
Arc [2:1*[$i, (MOD (ADD $j 1) 4)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort Tour
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :Bool
Arc [1:1*[$i, 0]] contains constants of sort Bool
Transition Ask : constants on arcs in [[1:1*[$i, 0]]] introduces in Bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 500 places and 730 transitions 2280 arcs in 28 ms.
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Unfolded 13 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 40 transitions.
Support contains 450 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 264 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:10:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:10:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 511 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 784 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:10:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:10:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 244 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 177 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 168 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 157 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 145 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 153 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 133 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 123 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 131 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 123 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 160 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 140 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 165 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 148 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 137 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 148 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 127 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 117 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 147 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 120 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 141 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 148 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30194ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30202ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31013 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Support contains 450 out of 480 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1328 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 5/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 3/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-03 04:10:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:10:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:10:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 450/455 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/460 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 630/1090 variables, 460/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 116/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 0/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/1110 variables, 20/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 4/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 0/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/1110 variables, 0/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1110/1110 variables, and 615 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 480/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 450/455 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/460 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 630/1090 variables, 460/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 116/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 3/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1090 variables, 0/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 20/1110 variables, 20/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 4/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 150 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 125 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 108 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 138 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1110 variables, 20/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 6817ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 228 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 480 transition count 490
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 490
Performed 95 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 95 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 395
Deduced a syphon composed of 95 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 95 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 190 rules applied. Total rules applied 590 place count 185 transition count 395
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 165 transition count 375
Applied a total of 630 rules in 57 ms. Remains 165 /480 variables (removed 315) and now considering 375/690 (removed 315) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 165/480 places, 375/690 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 291 ms. (136 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1073214 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1073214 steps, saw 179695 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=357 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-03 04:10:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 315 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 315 rows 165 cols
[2025-06-03 04:10:46] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 135/140 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/145 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 315/460 variables, 145/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 116/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/480 variables, 20/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 4/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/480 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/480 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 135/140 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/145 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 315/460 variables, 145/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 116/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/460 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 20/480 variables, 20/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 4/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/480 variables, and 363 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 5600 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 165/165 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5808ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(X(p0)) U (X(X(G(p0)))||(p1&&X(X(p0))))) U (G((X(X(p0)) U (X(X(G(p0)))||(p1&&X(X(p0))))))||((X(X(p0)) U (X(X(G(p0)))||(p1&&X(X(p0)))))&&(p2||F(!p3))))))'
Support contains 320 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 04:10:53] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 182 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 511 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p3), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND p3 (NOT p0)), true, (AND p3 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) p3), p3]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25670 reset in 492 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25656 reset in 320 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p3 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X p3), (X (AND p3 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 376 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 3416 steps (1 resets) in 16 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p3 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X p3), (X (AND p3 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 535 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 140 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 475 cols
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 506 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 667 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:10:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 169 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 150 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 117 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 153 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 136 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 130 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 143 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 137 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 138 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 121 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 129 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 173 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 140 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/1105 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 148 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 141 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 135 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 139 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 128 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 133 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 134 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60182ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60185ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60866 ms. Remains : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 186 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
RANDOM walk for 167 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 290 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20963 reset in 267 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 20962 reset in 273 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true]
Support contains 140 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 96 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 475 transition count 690
Performed 68 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 68 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 475 transition count 754
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 475 transition count 754
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 180 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 475 transition count 754
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 459 transition count 738
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 459 transition count 738
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 212 rules in 72 ms. Remains 459 /475 variables (removed 16) and now considering 738/690 (removed -48) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 35 ms returned []
Running 733 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:11:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 678 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 678 rows 459 cols
[2025-06-03 04:11:59] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-03 04:11:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 180 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 733 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 127 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 130 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD266 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD270 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD271 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD274 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD275 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD276 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD279 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD281 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD284 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD285 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD286 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD289 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD290 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD291 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD294 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD299 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD309 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD318 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD319 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD322 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD323 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD327 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD339 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD343 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD348 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD351 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD366 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD368 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD370 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD371 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD378 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD379 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD382 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD383 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD386 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD387 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD388 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD390 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD391 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD392 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD398 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD399 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD402 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD403 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD406 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD407 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD408 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD410 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD411 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD412 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD418 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD419 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD422 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD423 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD426 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD427 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD428 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD430 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD431 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD432 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD438 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD439 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD442 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD443 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD446 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD447 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD448 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD450 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD451 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD452 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD458 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD459 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD462 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD463 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD466 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD467 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD468 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD470 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD471 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD472 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD574 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD575 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD576 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD577 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD578 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD579 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD580 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD581 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 140 solved, 593 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 459/1137 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 140 solved, 593 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 733/733 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 140 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 140 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 80/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 140 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD263 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD267 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD272 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD277 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD278 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD282 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD283 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD287 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD288 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD292 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD293 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD320 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD321 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD324 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD325 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD329 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD333 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD341 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD345 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD360 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD364 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD365 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD369 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD380 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD381 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD384 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD385 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD389 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD393 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD400 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD401 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD404 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD405 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD409 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD413 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD420 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD421 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD424 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD425 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD429 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD433 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD440 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD441 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD444 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD445 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD449 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD453 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD460 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD461 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD464 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD465 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD469 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD473 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD582 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD583 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD584 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD585 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD586 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD587 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD588 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD589 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/459 variables, 3/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 147 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 459/1137 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/459 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/180 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/733 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60130ms problems are : Problem set: 228 solved, 505 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 228 dead transitions in 60132ms
Found 228 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 228 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 228 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 459/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1130 edges and 459 vertex of which 295 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 164 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 164 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 16 ms. Remains 295 /459 variables (removed 164) and now considering 510/510 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 295/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60263 ms. Remains : 295/475 places, 510/690 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5464893722416614888
[2025-06-03 04:12:59] [INFO ] Built C files in 22ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5464893722416614888
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5464893722416614888;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1094 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5464893722416614888;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 49 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5464893722416614888;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6184674458374780277.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 434 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 127858 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&G(p1)))))'
Support contains 100 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:13:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 04:13:00] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 197 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 332 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 649 steps with 0 reset with depth 650 and stack size 644 in 3 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 657 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(F(p0)))&&(G(p0)||F(p1)))))'
Support contains 125 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:13:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 240 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 249 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 202 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24388 reset in 347 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24409 reset in 345 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 86 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 81 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 121 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 120 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 475 cols
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:13:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 798 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1008 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:13:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:13:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:13:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 149 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 145 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 128 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 152 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 127 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 139 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 135 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 138 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 127 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 125 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 131 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/1105 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 0/475 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 121 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 107 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 166 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 161 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 144 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 140 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 134 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 128 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 142 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 143 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 138 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60197ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60201ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61224 ms. Remains : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 24 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (4 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 78 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 121 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24386 reset in 229 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24372 reset in 230 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 120 out of 475 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 475/475 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 100 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 475 transition count 690
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 475 transition count 690
Deduced a syphon composed of 105 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 475 transition count 690
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 140 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 475 transition count 690
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 456 transition count 671
Deduced a syphon composed of 121 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 456 transition count 671
Deduced a syphon composed of 121 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 178 rules in 39 ms. Remains 456 /475 variables (removed 19) and now considering 671/690 (removed 19) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 666 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:14:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 611 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 611 rows 456 cols
[2025-06-03 04:14:06] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 666 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD237 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD239 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD241 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD243 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD247 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD249 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD251 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD253 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD259 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 144 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30157ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 116 solved, 550 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 116 dead transitions in 30159ms
Found 116 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 116 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 116 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 456/475 places, 555/690 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1175 edges and 456 vertex of which 340 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 116 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 116 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 1 rules in 15 ms. Remains 340 /456 variables (removed 116) and now considering 555/555 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 340/475 places, 555/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 30231 ms. Remains : 340/475 places, 555/690 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin461115406301764023
[2025-06-03 04:14:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin461115406301764023
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin461115406301764023;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 980 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin461115406301764023;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin461115406301764023;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9604402319407494137.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 5865 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 101627 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0||F((p1&&X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 205 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Performed 80 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 80
Iterating post reduction 0 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 480 transition count 610
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 610
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 400 transition count 590
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 380 transition count 590
Applied a total of 200 rules in 21 ms. Remains 380 /480 variables (removed 100) and now considering 590/690 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 530 rows 380 cols
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 576 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 777 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 585 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 530 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:14:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 107 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/910 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 585/585 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 100/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 375/910 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/380 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/585 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 585 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 380/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60902 ms. Remains : 380/480 places, 590/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 128 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 1440 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 387 steps with 0 reset with depth 388 and stack size 370 in 7 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 62493 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 25 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 200 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 200 transitions
Performed 200 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 200
Iterating post reduction 0 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 480 transition count 490
Reduce places removed 200 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 490
Performed 80 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 80 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 280 transition count 410
Deduced a syphon composed of 80 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 80 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 160 rules applied. Total rules applied 560 place count 200 transition count 410
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 600 place count 180 transition count 390
Applied a total of 600 rules in 21 ms. Remains 180 /480 variables (removed 300) and now considering 390/690 (removed 300) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:15:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 330 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 330 rows 180 cols
[2025-06-03 04:15:45] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 127 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 175/480 places, 390/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 175 /175 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 175/480 places, 390/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 202 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10 steps with 0 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 403 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||X((p1||G(!p0)))))))'
Support contains 125 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 229 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:15:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1039 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 685 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:15:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:15:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:15:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 151 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 130 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 151 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 128 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 145 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 131 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 149 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 143 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 131 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 152 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 103 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 122 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 105 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 107 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 110 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 143 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 101 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 144 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 105 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 105 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 102 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 125 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/1110 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/480 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 685/685 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 80/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 106 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 134 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 136 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 125 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 131 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 126 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 139 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 145 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 155 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 148 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 120 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60215ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 685 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60219ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61499 ms. Remains : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[true, false, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0, false, false]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 238 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 246 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 62207 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(F((p0&&F(p1))))||G(!p1))))'
Support contains 220 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:16:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:16:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 240 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 254 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0)), (AND p1 (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 49 reset in 522 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 332 steps with 0 reset with depth 333 and stack size 333 in 2 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 966 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 85 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 120 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 120 transitions
Performed 120 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 120
Iterating post reduction 0 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 480 transition count 570
Reduce places removed 120 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 360 transition count 570
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 360 transition count 470
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 200 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 260 transition count 470
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 480 place count 240 transition count 450
Applied a total of 480 rules in 24 ms. Remains 240 /480 variables (removed 240) and now considering 450/690 (removed 240) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 390 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 390 rows 240 cols
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 390 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 269 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 371 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 445 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 390 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:16:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/630 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/240 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 445/445 constraints, Known Traps: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 129/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 7/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/630 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/240 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/445 constraints, Known Traps: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 445 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/480 places, 450/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60484 ms. Remains : 240/480 places, 450/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5 reset in 334 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 244 steps with 15 reset with depth 197 and stack size 195 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 60936 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(X(G(p0))))&&(G(F(p1))||(F(p1)&&F(!p0)))))'
Support contains 125 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 480 /480 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 630 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 630 rows 480 cols
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 178 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 475 /475 variables (removed 0) and now considering 690/690 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 197 ms. Remains : 475/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 256 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 482 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 105 out of 480 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 480/480 places, 690/690 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 480 transition count 686
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 100 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 100
Iterating post reduction 1 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 476 transition count 586
Reduce places removed 100 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 376 transition count 586
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 376 transition count 566
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 356 transition count 566
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 340 transition count 550
Applied a total of 280 rules in 28 ms. Remains 340 /480 variables (removed 140) and now considering 550/690 (removed 140) transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 490 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 490 rows 340 cols
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 490 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 04:17:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 848 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1009 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 545 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 04:17:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 490 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-03 04:17:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 04:17:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/830 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/340 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 545/545 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 100/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 20/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 04:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/830 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/340 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/545 constraints, Known Traps: 141/141 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60084ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 545 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60085ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/480 places, 550/690 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61135 ms. Remains : 340/480 places, 550/690 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 408 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 79 steps with 0 reset with depth 80 and stack size 80 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-4-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 61595 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 528987 ms.

BK_STOP 1748924332247

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-COL-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-COL-4, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800563"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-COL-4.tgz
mv Peterson-COL-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;