Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812800553.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-COL-3, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800553
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 136K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 114K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748921560016

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-COL-3
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 520 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Imported 11 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 256 PT places and 396.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 11 places and 14 transitions 42 arcs in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:32:41] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 16 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 911 ms. (43 steps per ms) remains 54/71 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 54/54 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 9 cols
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp61 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 9/23 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 54 solved, 0 unsolved in 135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/9 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 184ms problems are : Problem set: 54 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 54 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 7 formulas.
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Domain [Process(4), Tour(3), Process(4)] of place BeginLoop breaks symmetries in sort Process
Arc [2:1*[$i, (MOD (ADD $j 1) 3)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort Tour
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :Bool
Arc [1:1*[$i, 0]] contains constants of sort Bool
Transition Ask : constants on arcs in [[1:1*[$i, 0]]] introduces in Bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 256 places and 356 transitions 1112 arcs in 25 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Unfolded 6 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 24 transitions.
Support contains 224 out of 244 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-03 03:32:42] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 328 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 481 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:32:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/552 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 308/552 variables, 244/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 57/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 328/719 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 552/552 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60104ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60621 ms. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Support contains 224 out of 244 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 03:33:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1504 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 14/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 240 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 184 ms. (216 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 164 ms. (242 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
[2025-06-03 03:33:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:33:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:33:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/228 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/232 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 308/540 variables, 232/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 57/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 12/552 variables, 12/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/552 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 552/552 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved in 410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 224/228 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/232 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 308/540 variables, 232/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 57/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/540 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 12/552 variables, 12/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 3/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 13 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 552/552 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 14 solved, 0 unsolved in 744 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/14 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1178ms problems are : Problem set: 14 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 14 atomic propositions for a total of 6 simplifications.
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 240 /240 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 146 ms. Remains : 240/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10516095960548580161.gal : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 03:33:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8035252528935100650.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10516095960548580161.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8035252528935100650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,27.7091,709396,2,80492,5,2.06092e+06,6,0,1295,3.50939e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1452933920294359953.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1452933920294359953.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1452933920294359953.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1452933920294359953.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1452933920294359953.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 202 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3654782835571744268.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4264032521229158601.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3654782835571744268.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4264032521229158601.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,5.93882,174380,3802,336,227736,6558,693,1.20282e+06,108,50913,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(TRUE))))) * !(E(!(EX(TRUE)) U (!(EX(TRUE)) * !(EX(TRUE))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t112, t113, t114, t115, t252, t253, t254, t255, t256, t257, t258, t259, t264, t265, t266, t26...691
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
(forward)formula 0,1,8.51628,174380,1,0,227736,7003,3576,1.20282e+06,638,50913,616306
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 244 transition count 323
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 235 transition count 323
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 235 transition count 296
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 208 transition count 296
Applied a total of 72 rules in 40 ms. Remains 208 /244 variables (removed 36) and now considering 296/332 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 208 cols
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 334 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 494 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:34:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 10/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/208 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 272/480 variables, 208/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 30049ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30051ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 208/244 places, 296/332 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30611 ms. Remains : 208/244 places, 296/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:34:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 296 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17069608300750267830.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:34:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18282336686718250271.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17069608300750267830.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18282336686718250271.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08818e+06,24.058,664760,2,90406,5,1.98589e+06,6,0,1131,3.27365e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph445086885549833619.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph445086885549833619.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph445086885549833619.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph445086885549833619.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph445086885549833619.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 59 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 100 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3522203729491691963.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14164619767832551792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3522203729491691963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14164619767832551792.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08818e+06,21.9234,607400,2,71865,5,1.87927e+06,6,0,1163,3.08915e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 244 /244 variables (removed 0) and now considering 332/332 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 244 cols
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 310 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 435 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:35:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 57 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 126 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 9/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 1.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 timeout
0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/552 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 75/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/244 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 308/552 variables, 244/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 57/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/552 variables, 328/719 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 552/552 variables, and 719 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 244/244 constraints, ReadFeed: 57/57 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60493 ms. Remains : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13875316440239746580.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:36:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6171879613533188305.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13875316440239746580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6171879613533188305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,28.7506,762456,2,86058,5,2.20358e+06,6,0,1311,3.77443e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17781646368573123691.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17781646368573123691.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17781646368573123691.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17781646368573123691.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17781646368573123691.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 25 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4953546509307824636.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6386926381183531784.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4953546509307824636.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6386926381183531784.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,27.7309,743356,2,94829,5,2.16453e+06,6,0,1327,3.84017e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 244 transition count 329
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 1 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 241 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 193 transition count 281
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 193 transition count 273
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 185 transition count 273
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 176 transition count 264
Applied a total of 136 rules in 35 ms. Remains 176 /244 variables (removed 68) and now considering 264/332 (removed 68) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 176 cols
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/244 places, 264/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 172 /172 variables (removed 0) and now considering 264/264 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 172/244 places, 264/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 264 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12958180637222328805.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:37:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15482676231155966902.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12958180637222328805.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15482676231155966902.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,930732,15.6484,441184,2,57138,5,1.34281e+06,6,0,955,2.11614e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3199991342973045290.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3199991342973045290.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3199991342973045290.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3199991342973045290.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3199991342973045290.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 189 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 50 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8710312952443291531.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8025654859514870161.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8710312952443291531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8025654859514870161.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,930732,15.0155,423084,2,55806,5,1.2512e+06,6,0,979,2.08596e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((((((gu35.BeginLoop_0+gu35.BeginLoop_1)+(gu35.BeginLoop_2+gu35.BeginLoop_3))+((gu35.BeginLoop_4+gu35.BeginLoop_5)+(gu35.BeginLoop_6+...1018
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((((((gu35.BeginLoop_0+gu35.BeginLoop_1)+(gu35.BeginLoop_2+gu35.BeginLoop_3))+((gu35.BeginLoop_4+gu3...1061
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 135/0/104
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 244/244 places, 332/332 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 244 transition count 296
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 208 transition count 260
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 172 transition count 260
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 172 transition count 248
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 160 transition count 248
Applied a total of 168 rules in 13 ms. Remains 160 /244 variables (removed 84) and now considering 248/332 (removed 84) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 224 transitions (discarded 24 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 224 rows 160 cols
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [0, 1, 2, 3]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 156/244 places, 248/332 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 156 /156 variables (removed 0) and now considering 248/248 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 156/244 places, 248/332 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 248 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1082416398521907279.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15414465528265441610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1082416398521907279.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15414465528265441610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,451736,9.90334,225204,2,43061,5,721122,6,0,875,1.04447e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG((((((EndTurn_0+EndTurn_1)+(EndTurn_2+EndTurn_3))+((EndTurn_4+EndTurn_5)+(EndTurn_6+EndTurn_7)))+((EndTurn_8+EndTurn_9)+(EndTurn_...884
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG((((((EndTurn_0+EndTurn_1)+(EndTurn_2+EndTurn_3))+((EndTurn_4+EndTurn_5)+(EndTu...944
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...612
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7134349010229412475.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7134349010229412475.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7134349010229412475.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7134349010229412475.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7134349010229412475.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 184 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17376275080075438216.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17502902203658578815.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17376275080075438216.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17502902203658578815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,451736,5.11766,179992,2,26148,5,560300,6,0,882,718492,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EG((((((gu17.EndTurn_0+gu17.EndTurn_1)+(gu17.EndTurn_2+gu17.EndTurn_3))+((gu17.EndTurn_4+gu17.EndTurn_5)+(gu17.EndTurn_6+gu17.EndTu...1184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EG((((((gu17.EndTurn_0+gu17.EndTurn_1)+(gu17.EndTurn_2+gu17.EndTurn_3))+((gu17.En...1244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gu17.t179, gu17.t180, gu17.t181, gu17.t182, gu17.t183, gu17.t184, gu17.t185, gu17.t186, gi0.g...1432
(forward)formula 0,1,22.5749,636800,1,0,548,3.3151e+06,507,245,7011,2.5332e+06,499
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10671875756975912545.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10671875756975912545.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10671875756975912545.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10671875756975912545.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10671875756975912545.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17474872375011080466.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:39:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality173831661738928769.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17474872375011080466.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality173831661738928769.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.40795e+06,23.1045,620968,2,77907,5,1.95436e+06,6,0,1343,3.06511e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF((((gu2.CS_0+gu2.CS_1)+(gu2.CS_2+gu2.CS_3))>((((((gu13.TestIdentity_0+gu13.TestIdentity_1)+(gu13.TestIdentity_2+gu13.TestIdentity_...1736
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((((gi3.gi0.gu0.TestTurn_0+gi3.gi0.gu0.TestTurn_1)+(gi3.gi0.gu0.TestTurn_2+gi3.gi0.gu0.Te...1794
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gu11.t320, gu11.t321, gu11.t322, gu11.t323, gu11.t324, gu11.t325, gu11.t326, gu11.t327, gi3.g...1196
(forward)formula 0,1,72.0004,1597132,1,0,592,6.14689e+06,625,307,8808,6.12112e+06,613
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AX(AG((((gu11.Idle_0+gu11.Idle_1)+(gu11.Idle_2+gu11.Idle_3))>((((((gu13.TestIdentity_0+gu13.TestIdentity_1)+(gu13.TestIdentity_2+gu13....1177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((gu11.Idle_0+gu11.Idle_1)+(gu11.Idle_2+gu11.Idle_3))>((((((gu13.TestId...1247
(forward)formula 1,0,86.0254,1985488,1,0,595,8.37198e+06,632,309,10249,7.03685e+06,623
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((((((((gu2.BeginLoop_0+gu2.BeginLoop_1)+(gu2.BeginLoop_2+gu2.BeginLoop_3))+((gu2.BeginLoop_4+gu2.BeginLoop_5)+(gu2.BeginLoop_6+gu2.Beg...966
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((((((gu2.BeginLoop_0+gu2.BeginLoop_1)+(gu2.BeginLoop_2+gu2.BeginLoop_3))+((gu2.BeginLoop_4+gu2.Begi...1009
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 196/0/104
(forward)formula 2,1,89.4464,2117080,1,0,598,8.75628e+06,640,310,12153,7.38333e+06,627
FORMULA Peterson-COL-3-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 519818 ms.

BK_STOP 1748922080999

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-COL-3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-COL-3, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800553"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-COL-3.tgz
mv Peterson-COL-3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;