About the Execution of ITS-Tools for Peterson-COL-2
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 63102.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | FFFFFTFFFFFFTFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812800548.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-COL-2, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800548
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748921419184
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-COL-2
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 03:30:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 03:30:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 03:30:20] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-03 03:30:20] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 530 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Imported 11 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 108 PT places and 159.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 11 places and 14 transitions 42 arcs in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Skeletonized 14 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 2 properties that had guard overlaps.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 10 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 3038 steps (0 resets) in 66 ms. (45 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Domain [Process(3), Tour(2), Process(3)] of place BeginLoop breaks symmetries in sort Process
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :Bool
Arc [1:1*[$i, 0]] contains constants of sort Bool
Transition Ask : constants on arcs in [[1:1*[$i, 0]]] introduces in Bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [2:1*[$i, (MOD (ADD $j 1) 2)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort Tour
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 108 places and 138 transitions 432 arcs in 19 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Unfolded 14 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 12 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 277 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:30:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16817ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17108 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 21 to 18
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2763 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 4/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 489 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 253 ms. (157 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 158 ms. (251 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 190 ms. (209 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-03 03:30:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:30:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/102 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 137 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 54/102 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 4/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 7/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 4/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1497 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1645ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 3 properties in 260 ms.
Support contains 18 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 102 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 90
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 54 transition count 78
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 72
Applied a total of 108 rules in 21 ms. Remains 48 /102 variables (removed 54) and now considering 72/126 (removed 54) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 48/102 places, 72/126 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 401 ms. (99 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 44 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Probabilistic random walk after 44 steps, saw 35 distinct states, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 3 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 102 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 67 transition count 91
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 67 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 51 transition count 75
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 72
Applied a total of 108 rules in 12 ms. Remains 48 /102 variables (removed 54) and now considering 72/126 (removed 54) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 66 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/102 places, 72/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 72/72 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 71 ms. Remains : 45/102 places, 72/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10430 reset in 207 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11 steps with 1 reset with depth 5 and stack size 5 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-01 finished in 486 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 15 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 973 reset in 149 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 68 steps with 0 reset with depth 69 and stack size 69 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-02 finished in 376 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 102 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 90
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 72
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 120 rules in 10 ms. Remains 42 /102 variables (removed 60) and now considering 66/126 (removed 60) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 13/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/42 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/102 variables, 42/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 22/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 2147 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 14/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/42 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/102 variables, 42/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 22/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 63/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1594 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3763ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3763ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3886 ms. Remains : 42/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12465 reset in 101 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 60 steps with 9 reset with depth 6 and stack size 6 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-03 finished in 4074 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X((X(p0)&&(X(p2)||p1)))) U (p3&&X(X((X(p0)&&(X(p2)||p4))))))))'
Support contains 24 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:30:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 1247 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p4))), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1361 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)&&X(X(G((p1||X(X(F(!p2))))))))))'
Support contains 18 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:30:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9197 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7104 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16314ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16459 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 319 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) p2)), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, p2]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4145 reset in 150 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 54 steps with 4 reset with depth 16 and stack size 16 in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-06 finished in 16954 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 12 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 102 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 90
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 72
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 120 rules in 7 ms. Remains 42 /102 variables (removed 60) and now considering 66/126 (removed 60) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 66/66 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60 ms. Remains : 39/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 143 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11 steps with 0 reset with depth 12 and stack size 12 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-07 finished in 249 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(((G(p1) U G(p2))||p0)) U (p3&&X(p2)))))'
Support contains 30 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 451 ms :[(OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), true, (AND p2 (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-08 finished in 542 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(!p0)||(!p1&&X(F(!p2)))) U (G((X(!p0)||(!p1&&X(F(!p2)))))||((X(!p0)||(!p1&&X(F(!p2))))&&X(p0)))))'
Support contains 24 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 191 ms :[true, p2, (OR (AND p0 p1) (AND p0 p2)), (AND p0 p2), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 225 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 261 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 406 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 365 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 11 to 10
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 6/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 442 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 2/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 1157 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (274 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 72/96 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/219 variables, 99/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 22/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/0 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 72/96 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/99 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/219 variables, 99/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 22/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 396 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/0 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 615ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 9 ms.
Support contains 24 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 99 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 94
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 50 transition count 77
Applied a total of 98 rules in 4 ms. Remains 50 /99 variables (removed 49) and now considering 77/126 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 50/99 places, 77/126 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 20090 steps (4 resets) in 55 ms. (358 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 796 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 384 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 371 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Support contains 24 out of 99 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 99/99 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 99 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 94
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 67 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 50 transition count 77
Applied a total of 98 rules in 11 ms. Remains 50 /99 variables (removed 49) and now considering 77/126 (removed 49) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:31:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 71/121 variables, 50/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 22/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2851 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/121 variables, 50/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 22/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 74/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 2130 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4989ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4990ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/99 places, 77/126 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5086 ms. Remains : 50/99 places, 77/126 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 17 factoid took 396 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 305 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 11 to 10
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 267 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 2/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-03 03:31:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:31:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf8 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/121 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 18 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 18 factoid took 793 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 9 states, 23 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 327 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 370 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 348 ms :[true, p2, (AND p0 p2), (AND p0 p2), p0, false, false, (AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p2 p0 p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 286 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 315 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14132340337497369624
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 77 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 77 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 77 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Built C files in 32ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14132340337497369624
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14132340337497369624;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 312 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14132340337497369624;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 49 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14132340337497369624;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased207712876056632393.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 91 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-10 finished in 13418 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0) U G((F(!p0) U X(X(p1))))))'
Support contains 21 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 564 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), false, false, (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), false, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5342 reset in 192 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 259 steps with 16 reset with depth 13 and stack size 13 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-11 finished in 841 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X(p0))&&(G((!(!p0 U p1)||G(p2)))||X(p2))))'
Support contains 27 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 335 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), true, (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 39978 reset in 146 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 40003 reset in 163 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p2 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 18 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-12 finished in 747 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 24 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 85 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-13 finished in 152 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G(p0))||((!p1 U !p2) U p0)))'
Support contains 30 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 222 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p2), true, p2]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 11 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-14 finished in 297 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 36 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 102 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 101 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 95 transition count 119
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 95 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 92 transition count 116
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 90 transition count 114
Applied a total of 24 rules in 10 ms. Remains 90 /102 variables (removed 12) and now considering 114/126 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 108 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/102 places, 114/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 87 /87 variables (removed 0) and now considering 114/114 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 87/102 places, 114/126 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 175 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 92 steps with 0 reset with depth 93 and stack size 93 in 0 ms.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property Peterson-COL-2-LTLFireability-15 finished in 355 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 61838 ms.
BK_STOP 1748921482286
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-COL-2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-COL-2, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800548"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-COL-2.tgz
mv Peterson-COL-2 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;