Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812800546.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Peterson-COL-2, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800546
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748921219130

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=Peterson-COL-2
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 533 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Imported 11 HL places and 14 HL transitions for a total of 108 PT places and 159.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 11 places and 14 transitions 42 arcs in 4 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:27:00] [INFO ] Skeletonized 10 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 6 properties that had guard overlaps.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 7 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 316 steps (0 resets) in 15 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/9 properties
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Domain [Process(3), Tour(2), Process(3)] of place BeginLoop breaks symmetries in sort Process
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :Bool
Arc [1:1*[$i, 0]] contains constants of sort Bool
Transition Ask : constants on arcs in [[1:1*[$i, 0]]] introduces in Bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [2:1*[$i, (MOD (ADD $j 1) 2)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort Tour
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 108 places and 138 transitions 432 arcs in 23 ms.
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 12 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:27:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 114 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7099 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17026ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17036ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17309 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 29 to 25
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1698 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 3/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 325 ms. (122 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 78/99 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 120 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 78/99 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 18/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1146 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1275ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 151 ms.
Support contains 18 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 70 transition count 94
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 70 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 53 transition count 77
Applied a total of 98 rules in 16 ms. Remains 53 /102 variables (removed 49) and now considering 77/126 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 16 ms. Remains : 53/102 places, 77/126 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 285 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 24 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Probabilistic random walk after 24 steps, saw 20 distinct states, run finished after 9 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-03 03:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17330145468654876665.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15896953684713458995.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17330145468654876665.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15896953684713458995.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.175563,11480,2,2901,5,27572,6,0,525,36691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(((A((((((IsEndLoop_7>=1)||(IsEndLoop_6>=1))||((IsEndLoop_9>=1)||(IsEndLoop_10>=1)))||(((IsEndLoop_13>=1)||(IsEndLoop_12>=1))||((IsE...1308
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(((!((E(!(((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(CS_1>=1))||((WantSection_1>=1)&&(CS_0>=1)))||((WantSection_5>=...1596
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
(forward)formula 0,1,0.972763,43916,1,0,270,192853,287,140,3109,177275,284
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9199 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16305ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16458 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2486581572351838757.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5239107106269554001.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2486581572351838757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5239107106269554001.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.186312,12044,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(E(((AF((((((((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_3>=1))||((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_4>=1)))||(((AskForSection_2>=1)&&(Turn_0>=1))||((AskF...974
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((!(EG(!((((((((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_3>=1))||((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_4>=1)))||(((...1029
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,3.16403,100892,1,0,581,548430,294,357,3333,508558,575
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11309980717751804412.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14285101328471319588.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11309980717751804412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14285101328471319588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.166068,11652,2,2901,5,27572,6,0,525,36691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((EX(((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(CS_1>=1))||((WantSection_1>=1)&&(CS_0>=1)))||((WantSection_5>=1)&&(CS_2>=1)))) * EF(((((WantSection_3>...735
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((EX(((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(CS_1>=1))||((WantSection_1>=1)&&(CS_0>=1)))||((WantS...813
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
(forward)formula 0,1,1.5422,64828,1,0,282,346613,275,146,3160,225660,301
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5768710779605633658.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17467465130134918202.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5768710779605633658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17467465130134918202.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.163987,11652,2,2901,5,27572,6,0,525,36691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AX((EG((((((IsEndLoop_7<1)&&(IsEndLoop_6<1))&&((IsEndLoop_9<1)&&(IsEndLoop_10<1)))&&(((IsEndLoop_13<1)&&(IsEndLoop_12<1))&&((IsEndLoo...815
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX((((EndTurn_3>=1)||(EndTurn_5>=1))||(EndTurn_1>=1))))))) * !(EG((((((I...1238
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
(forward)formula 0,1,1.65732,71012,1,0,288,387556,284,147,3281,268975,306
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 102 transition count 125
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 101 transition count 125
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 99 transition count 123
Applied a total of 6 rules in 17 ms. Remains 99 /102 variables (removed 3) and now considering 123/126 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 117 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/102 places, 123/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 123/123 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 96/102 places, 123/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14209114841903491244.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1807352203835834546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14209114841903491244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1807352203835834546.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20211,0.163404,11000,2,2796,5,25825,6,0,510,33571,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((((EG(((((((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(TestAlone_1>=1))||((WantSection_3>=1)&&(TestAlone_13>=1)))||(((WantSection_5>=1)&&(TestAlone_5>...1208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((((EG(((((((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(TestAlone_1>=1))||((WantSection_3>=1)&&(Tes...1272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...311
(forward)formula 0,0,1.35959,51380,1,0,271,236787,278,136,3160,201802,282
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 102 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 90
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 48 transition count 72
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 120 rules in 13 ms. Remains 42 /102 variables (removed 60) and now considering 66/126 (removed 60) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /39 variables (removed 0) and now considering 66/66 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 39/102 places, 66/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9003379911685403751.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16477933424296471082.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9003379911685403751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16477933424296471082.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1254,0.03414,5204,2,735,5,5332,6,0,225,5676,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((Turn_1>=1)&&(TestTurn_2>=1))||((Turn_5>=1)&&(TestTurn_5>=1)))||(((Turn_4>=1)&&(TestTurn_3>=1))||((Turn_3>=1)&&(TestTurn_1>=1))...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((Turn_1>=1)&&(TestTurn_2>=1))||((Turn_5>=1)&&(TestTurn_5>=1)))||(((Turn_4>=1)...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, ...288
(forward)formula 0,1,0.140912,9812,1,0,172,30355,153,70,1524,26514,146
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 102 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 86 transition count 110
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 86 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 75 transition count 99
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 69 transition count 93
Applied a total of 66 rules in 12 ms. Remains 69 /102 variables (removed 33) and now considering 93/126 (removed 33) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/102 places, 93/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 66 /66 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 66/102 places, 93/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14286659467412805013.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13501467869305184390.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14286659467412805013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13501467869305184390.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7914,0.09064,8256,2,2134,5,16705,6,0,360,19448,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(E((((((TestIdentity_11>=1)||(TestIdentity_13>=1))||((TestIdentity_12>=1)||(TestIdentity_15>=1)))||(((TestIdentity_1>=1)||(TestIdenti...1017
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((((((TestIdentity_11>=1)||(TestIdentity_13>=1))||((TestIdentity_12>=1)||(TestIdentity_15>=1)))||(...1078
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t61, t62, ...288
(forward)formula 0,0,0.731036,34996,1,0,219,165060,218,103,2373,133019,216
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:27:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9111 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16247ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16247ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16369 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3678644141793072131.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15896723055031699012.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3678644141793072131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15896723055031699012.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.174397,12048,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((Idle_1>=1)&&(WantSection_2>=1))||((Idle_0>=1)&&(WantSection_0>=1)))||((Idle_2>=1)&&(WantSection_4>=1))) U AG(((EX(!((((EndTurn_4>=1...452
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((Idle_1>=1)&&(WantSection_2>=1))||((Idle_0>=1)&&(WantSection_0>=1)))||((Idle_2>=1)&&(WantSection_...510
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
(forward)formula 0,0,1.15893,48320,1,0,263,215597,275,133,3212,171816,268
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13431737168806465937.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5905772842925647657.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13431737168806465937.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5905772842925647657.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.166393,11524,2,2901,5,27572,6,0,525,36691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A((((((Turn_1>=1)&&(TestTurn_2>=1))||((Turn_5>=1)&&(TestTurn_5>=1)))||(((Turn_4>=1)&&(TestTurn_3>=1))||((Turn_3>=1)&&(TestTurn_1>=1))...1598
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!((E(!((EG(((((IsEndLoop_8>=1)||(IsEndLoop_11>=1))||((IsEndLoop_14>=1)||(IsEndLoop_...5416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.31604,95120,1,0,345,575061,290,196,3251,414952,368
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 102 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 90
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 66 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 51 transition count 75
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 45 transition count 69
Applied a total of 114 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /102 variables (removed 57) and now considering 69/126 (removed 57) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/102 places, 69/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 42 /42 variables (removed 0) and now considering 69/69 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 42/102 places, 69/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16369793182936820819.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10459962295521865457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16369793182936820819.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10459962295521865457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1590,0.043718,5508,2,852,5,6128,6,0,240,7024,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((((((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_3>=1))||((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_4>=1)))||(((AskForSection_2>=1)&&(Turn_0>=1))||((AskForSecti...724
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((((((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_3>=1))||((AskForSection_3>=1)&&(Turn_4>=1)))||(((AskFo...776
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/121/42
(forward)formula 0,0,0.122791,8836,1,0,8,24084,20,1,1384,17879,8
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16236ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16236ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16325 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1965142886209566629.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1269511254139158941.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1965142886209566629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1269511254139158941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.179134,12048,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(AG(AF(EG(((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(CS_1>=1))||((WantSection_1>=1)&&(CS_0>=1)))||((WantSection_5>=1)&&(CS_2>=1)))))) U (((((IsEndLoop_7>=...3532
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(EG(((((WantSection_3>=1)&&(CS_1>=1))||((WantSection_1>=1)&&(CS_0>=1)))||((WantS...10987
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/155/48
(forward)formula 0,1,1.8635,76408,1,0,319,363113,306,178,3947,308542,348
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 9143 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 6977 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16129ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16219 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6818529142134030581.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12675903980630197564.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6818529142134030581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12675903980630197564.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.183459,12048,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG((A(((((TestIdentity_10>=1)||(TestIdentity_14>=1))||((TestIdentity_17>=1)||(TestIdentity_0>=1)))||((TestIdentity_3>=1)||(TestIdentit...3913
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,(EG((!((E(!(((((((BeginLoop_5>=1)||(BeginLoop_6>=1))||((BeginLoop_7>=1)||(BeginLoop_8>=1)))|...8550
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.94074,145456,1,0,404,936174,296,215,3551,615274,427
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [0, 1, 2]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 99/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3532791250546328344.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability738561124570997268.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3532791250546328344.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability738561124570997268.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.165637,11656,2,2901,5,27572,6,0,525,36691,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(AG(!(A(!(((((((WantSection_2<1)||(TestAlone_16<1))&&((WantSection_4<1)||(TestAlone_11<1)))&&(((WantSection_2<1)||(TestAlone_13<1))&...1007
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(!(((((((WantSection_2<1)||(TestAlone_16<1))&&((WantSection_4<1)||(TestAlo...2061
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
(forward)formula 0,0,1.71794,71340,1,0,284,387598,281,147,3244,268673,310
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 8847 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 6984 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15854ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15854ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15953 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12052441736774940443.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5856350486093612249.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12052441736774940443.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5856350486093612249.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.178663,12048,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(((AF(EX(((((((Turn_0>=1)&&(TestTurn_4>=1))||((Turn_1>=1)&&(TestTurn_0>=1)))||(((Turn_2>=1)&&(TestTurn_0>=1))||((Turn_5>=1)&&(TestT...2866
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(((!(EG(!(EX(((((((Turn_0>=1)&&(TestTurn_4>=1))||((Turn_1>=1)&&(TestTurn_0>=1)))||(((Turn_2>=1)&&(...3526
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,8.01654,269432,1,0,596,1.72335e+06,314,380,3586,1.31905e+06,634
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 22 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 8976 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 21/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/102 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/222 variables, 102/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 123/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16090ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16240 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 126/126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2609926109802866238.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13955450827528992427.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2609926109802866238.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13955450827528992427.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,20754,0.181578,12044,2,3064,5,29503,6,0,537,38664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(A((((EG(((((((IsEndLoop_8>=1)||(IsEndLoop_11>=1))||((IsEndLoop_14>=1)||(IsEndLoop_17>=1)))||(((IsEndLoop_2>=1)||(IsEndLoop_5>=1))||((...1635
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(((((((Idle_1>=1)&&(WantSection_2>=1))||((Idle_0>=1)&&(WantSection_0>=1)))||(((I...2650
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t45, t46, ...312
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.43972,97496,1,0,341,536725,301,182,3578,473859,374
FORMULA Peterson-COL-2-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-03 03:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 03:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 150923 ms.

BK_STOP 1748921371233

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Peterson-COL-2"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Peterson-COL-2, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812800546"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Peterson-COL-2.tgz
mv Peterson-COL-2 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;