Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876812400362.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812400362
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 632K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 164K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 174K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748879649817

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ParamProductionCell-PT-1
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 82 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Transformed 231 places.
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Transformed 202 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 231 places and 202 transitions and 846 arcs in 169 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 125 out of 231 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 231/231 places, 202/202 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 228 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 228 transition count 199
Applied a total of 6 rules in 28 ms. Remains 228 /231 variables (removed 3) and now considering 199/202 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 228 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 326 ms returned [1, 19, 41, 59, 79, 117, 119, 193, 194, 203]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 358 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/231 places, 199/202 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 218 /218 variables (removed 0) and now considering 199/199 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 406 ms. Remains : 218/231 places, 199/202 transitions.
Support contains 125 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 69 to 68
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1920 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 21/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (8 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 218 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 132/179 variables, 17/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 5/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/185 variables, 6/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 19 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 16/201 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 15 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 14 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 180/381 variables, 201/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 39/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 19/400 variables, 29/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/400 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 17/417 variables, 17/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 7/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/417 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 417/417 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved in 2714 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 127/137 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 36/173 variables, 9/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/177 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 19/196 variables, 16/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 174/370 variables, 196/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 30/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 25/395 variables, 38/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 22/417 variables, 22/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 9/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/417 variables, 8/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 20 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 417/417 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 0 unsolved in 1016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, ReadFeed: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/21 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3783ms problems are : Problem set: 21 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 21 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 199 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 218 places (down from 80) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned [14, 15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 43, 44, 60, 61, 69, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 112, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 31 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 218 ms to find 31 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 182 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 182 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 182 /184 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 182 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:16] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 318 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 406 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 182/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 651 ms. Remains : 182/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16696751926694169308.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10624995225730688470.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16696751926694169308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10624995225730688470.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.103357,7220,2,2888,5,15249,6,0,925,9370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(DB_deliver_run==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(DB_deliver_run==1)))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.130565,7476,1,0,7,15249,8,1,1521,9370,2
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 218 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 214 transition count 195
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 214 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 198 transition count 179
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 195 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 195 transition count 176
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 172 transition count 153
Applied a total of 92 rules in 79 ms. Remains 172 /218 variables (removed 46) and now considering 153/199 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 153 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 240 ms returned [1, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 25, 28, 29, 32, 36, 37, 47, 48, 54, 57, 62, 68, 69, 71, 83, 84, 86, 104, 117, 118, 120, 122, 145, 148, 149, 153, 155, 164]
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [69, 71, 68, 13, 36, 47, 57, 83, 84, 117, 118, 120, 148, 149, 155, 16, 20, 25, 32, 37, 48, 153, 164, 54, 122]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 241 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/218 places, 153/199 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 147 transition count 145
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 139 transition count 144
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 138 transition count 144
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 138 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 129 transition count 135
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 127 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 127 transition count 133
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 91 transition count 97
Applied a total of 112 rules in 20 ms. Remains 91 /147 variables (removed 56) and now considering 97/153 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:17] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [1, 7, 12, 13, 20, 21, 38, 49, 59, 78]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/218 places, 97/199 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 75 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 74 transition count 90
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 74 /81 variables (removed 7) and now considering 90/97 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 74/218 places, 90/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 620 ms. Remains : 74/218 places, 90/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5326315446690756747.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4541398209329150286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5326315446690756747.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4541398209329150286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,516,0.020095,4496,2,543,5,2180,6,0,389,1575,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((A1_extended!=1)||(arm1_magnet_off!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((A1_extended!=1)||(arm1_magnet_off!=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t43, t44, t47, t49, t58, t63, t71, t75, t78, t79, t82, t83, t84, t85, t86, t88, t89, In...251
(forward)formula 0,0,0.222562,14864,1,0,435,57847,180,200,2360,45596,567
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [14, 15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 44, 60, 61, 69, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 112, 153, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 208 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 184 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 184 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 184 /186 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 547 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 646 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 184/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 866 ms. Remains : 184/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7885780230656794198.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6404625405539288795.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7885780230656794198.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6404625405539288795.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.08635,7440,2,2860,5,14772,6,0,933,9164,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((EG(EF((((arm1_retract_ext==1)&&(arm1_forward==1))&&(A1L_ext_run==1)))) + ((EF((PL_out==1)) * EX((((table_top_pos==1)&&(table_upwar...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((EG(E(TRUE U (((arm1_retract_ext==1)&&(arm1_forward==1))&&(A1L_ext_run==1)))) + ((E(TRUE U (PL_o...298
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,3.47035,126744,1,0,593,706903,387,355,5276,435882,841
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 218 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 214 transition count 195
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 214 transition count 180
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 199 transition count 180
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 196 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 196 transition count 177
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 179 transition count 160
Applied a total of 78 rules in 24 ms. Remains 179 /218 variables (removed 39) and now considering 160/199 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 179 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:22] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 188 ms returned [1, 14, 15, 16, 20, 25, 28, 29, 32, 36, 37, 48, 49, 56, 59, 64, 73, 74, 76, 88, 89, 91, 109, 124, 125, 127, 129, 130, 152, 155, 156, 160, 162, 171]
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [74, 76, 73, 36, 48, 59, 88, 89, 124, 125, 127, 155, 156, 162, 16, 20, 25, 32, 37, 49, 160, 171, 56, 64, 109, 129, 130]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 191 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/218 places, 160/199 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 152 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 140 transition count 148
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 140 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 135 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 132 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 132 transition count 140
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 96 transition count 104
Applied a total of 112 rules in 25 ms. Remains 96 /152 variables (removed 56) and now considering 104/160 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 96 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [1, 13, 14, 21, 22, 55, 83]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 137 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 89/218 places, 104/199 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 83 transition count 98
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 82 transition count 97
Applied a total of 14 rules in 16 ms. Remains 82 /89 variables (removed 7) and now considering 97/104 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 82 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 342 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 82/218 places, 97/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 735 ms. Remains : 82/218 places, 97/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability570542815460869061.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13432182029398022046.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability570542815460869061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13432182029398022046.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1560,0.028548,5068,2,1006,5,4184,6,0,428,3204,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((deposit_belt_empty==1)||((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((deposit_belt_empty==1)||((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==1)))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 87/10/10
(forward)formula 0,1,0.206201,13900,1,0,7,39779,20,1,2083,25816,8
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:23] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned [14, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 43, 44, 61, 69, 74, 93, 96, 108, 109, 112, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 27 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 223 ms to find 27 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 188/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 186 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 186 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 186 /188 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 457 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 554 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 186/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 786 ms. Remains : 186/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5170210399191858802.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16759108593051708785.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5170210399191858802.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16759108593051708785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.091689,7580,2,3141,5,15662,6,0,941,9516,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX(((ch_DC_full==1)&&(crane_store_free==1)))) + EF((((EF((((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt2_start==1))&&(DB_trans_run==1))) * A...324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((E(TRUE U (((belt2_light_barrier_false==1)&&(belt2_start==1))&&(DB_trans_run==1))) * ...390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,5.91332,211928,1,0,1335,1.34063e+06,392,640,5384,852301,1729
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned [14, 15, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 43, 44, 60, 61, 69, 74, 93, 94, 96, 109, 112, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 29 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 189 ms to find 29 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 184 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 184 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 184 /186 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:30] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 362 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 452 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 184/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 648 ms. Remains : 184/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8211300505074866218.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16848657034247439280.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8211300505074866218.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16848657034247439280.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.086801,7444,2,2845,5,14742,6,0,933,9159,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((arm1_release_ext==1)&&(A1U_ext_run==1)) U A(A(AX(FALSE) U E((TL_out!=1) U AG((((arm2_retract_ext==1)&&(arm2_forward==1))&&(A2U_ext_ru...248
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,((arm1_release_ext==1)&&(A1U_ext_run==1))) * !(EG(!((((crane_pick_up_height==1)&&(CL_lower_run==1))...721
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 190/2/4
(forward)formula 0,0,4.53946,174244,1,0,1112,1.10422e+06,398,516,5298,753345,1412
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned [14, 15, 17, 22, 33, 39, 44, 60, 61, 69, 74, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 112, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 201 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 494 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 602 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 812 ms. Remains : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4040468498188728753.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10466877476915506881.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4040468498188728753.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10466877476915506881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.092921,7316,2,2778,5,14316,6,0,937,8935,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX((((press_at_lower_pos==0)||(press_up==0))||(PL_lower_run==0))) * (EG(EF(((arm1_release_angle==0)||(A1U_rot1_run==0)))) + (EG(((tab...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * EX((((press_at_lower_pos==0)||(press_up==0))||(PL_lower_run==0)))),E(TRUE U ((arm1_release_an...392
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,1.23776,56720,1,0,256,160004,382,169,5598,115774,377
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 216 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 216 transition count 197
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 216 /218 variables (removed 2) and now considering 197/199 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 216 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [15, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 44, 60, 61, 69, 74, 93, 108, 109, 112, 153, 154, 156, 158, 159, 182, 186, 192, 196, 207]
Discarding 25 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 169 ms to find 25 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 191/218 places, 197/199 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 191 /191 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 191/218 places, 197/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10350497137956666051.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1697485866121064143.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10350497137956666051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1697485866121064143.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.100144,8184,2,3559,5,17684,6,0,964,10878,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(E(AG(AF(((swivel==1)&&(arm2_waiting_for_swivel_2==1)))) U ((EX(((table_upward==1)&&(TL_lower_rs==1))) + ((robot_left==1)&&(A1L_rot1_...436
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((!((!(!((E(!(((crane_stop_v==1)&&(CU_unloaded==1))) U (!((arm2_having_swivel_2==1)) * !(((c...1362
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t80, t85, t89, t99, t107, t111, t1...332
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.7843,393804,1,0,2227,2.66779e+06,409,993,5824,1.67395e+06,2801
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned [14, 15, 17, 29, 33, 34, 39, 43, 44, 60, 61, 69, 93, 94, 96, 108, 109, 112, 152, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 186, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 218 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 447 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 538 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 765 ms. Remains : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1739041240836972662.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9208224688676116711.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1739041240836972662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9208224688676116711.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.097422,7988,2,3207,5,17632,6,0,937,11136,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EX(((belt1_start==1)&&(FB_deliver_rs==1))) + (((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))&&((arm1_stop==0)||(A1U_unloadet==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((EX(((belt1_start==1)&&(FB_deliver_rs==1))) + (((press_upward==1)&&(forge_rs==1))&&((arm...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,2.15104,86752,1,0,255,303040,379,171,5060,210502,370
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 199/199 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 215 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 215 transition count 196
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 215 /218 variables (removed 3) and now considering 196/199 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 215 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 49 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned [14, 15, 17, 22, 29, 33, 34, 39, 43, 44, 60, 61, 69, 93, 94, 96, 109, 112, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 181, 185, 191, 195, 206]
Discarding 28 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 168 ms to find 28 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 187/218 places, 196/199 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 185 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 185 transition count 194
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 185 /187 variables (removed 2) and now considering 194/196 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 322 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 423 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 597 ms. Remains : 185/218 places, 194/199 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9849107304531469033.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2290937777976878835.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9849107304531469033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2290937777976878835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25632,0.097085,8000,2,3313,5,17042,6,0,937,10761,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(((crane_stop_v==0)||(CL_in==0)))) * (A(AF((PU_out!=1)) U (((arm2_retract_ext==1)&&(arm2_forward==1))&&(A2U_ext_run==1))) + AX(EX(E...200
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(((crane_stop_v==0)||(CL_in==0))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!((((arm2_retract_ext...443
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t14, t22, t26, t30, t34, t42, t46, t54, t58, t65, t79, t84, t88, t98, t106, t110, t1...332
(forward)formula 0,1,2.41079,93604,1,0,460,425300,386,265,5281,257607,646
FORMULA ParamProductionCell-PT-1-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-02 15:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 15:54:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 44331 ms.

BK_STOP 1748879695389

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ParamProductionCell-PT-1"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ParamProductionCell-PT-1, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876812400362"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ParamProductionCell-PT-1.tgz
mv ParamProductionCell-PT-1 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;