fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r142-tall-174876811900081
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for NeoElection-COL-7

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 3600000.00 0.00 0.00 FT??FTTFTT??TTTF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r142-tall-174876811900081.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is NeoElection-COL-7, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r142-tall-174876811900081
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 616K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748799458859

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=NeoElection-COL-7
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-01 17:37:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-01 17:37:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-01 17:37:40] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 627 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [INFO ] Detected 6 constant HL places corresponding to 3552 PT places.
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 22 HL transitions for a total of 7128 PT places and 22272.0 transition bindings in 29 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 22 transitions 98 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:37:41] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 56 edges and 18 vertex of which 15 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Remains 16 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 7 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 8 transitions.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 2 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40012 steps (960 resets) in 804 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 18/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 75 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 17/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (64 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 17/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 78 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 15/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (64 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 6 cols
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 5/13 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 0 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/6 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 159ms problems are : Problem set: 15 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 15 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 5 formulas.
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Domain [M(8), POS(7), M(8)] of place P_masterList breaks symmetries in sort M
Arc [15:1*[$m, (MOD (ADD $i 1) 7)]] contains successor/predecessor on variables of sort POS
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :MT
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAI2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 3, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnnP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnnP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 4, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 4 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP1 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP2 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP3 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [11:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP4 : constants on arcs in [[11:1*[$m, $s, 1, $p]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAnsP4 : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$s, $m, 2, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 5 subsets.
Arc [9:1*[$m, $s, 0, 0]] contains constants of sort MT
Transition T_poll__handleAskP : constants on arcs in [[9:1*[$m, $s, 0, 0]]] introduces in MT(6) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 6 subsets.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :STAGE
Arc [16:1*[$m, 0]] contains constants of sort STAGE
Transition T_poll__iAmPrimary : constants on arcs in [[16:1*[$m, 0]]] introduces in STAGE(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [16:1*[$m, 1]] contains constants of sort STAGE
Transition T_poll__iAmPrimary : constants on arcs in [[16:1*[$m, 1]]] introduces in STAGE(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :NEGSTEP
Arc [8:1*[$m, $r, 1]] contains constants of sort NEGSTEP
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[8:1*[$m, $r, 1]]] introduces in NEGSTEP(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
Arc [8:1*[$m, $r, 2]] contains constants of sort NEGSTEP
Transition T_poll__handleAI1 : constants on arcs in [[8:1*[$m, $r, 2]]] introduces in NEGSTEP(3) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 3 subsets.
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :BOOL
Arc [7:1*[$m, 0, $pm]] contains constants of sort BOOL
Transition T_poll__handleAI2 : constants on arcs in [[7:1*[$m, 0, $pm]]] introduces in BOOL(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 7128 places and 12460 transitions 70880 arcs in 203 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Unfolded 7 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 6688 places in 51 ms
Reduce places removed 6737 places and 11850 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Support contains 245 out of 383 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 383/383 places, 610/610 transitions.
Reduce places removed 42 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 341 transition count 610
Discarding 35 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 35 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 306 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 306 transition count 295
Applied a total of 112 rules in 20 ms. Remains 306 /383 variables (removed 77) and now considering 295/610 (removed 315) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 306 cols
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67]
Discarding 49 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 241 ms to find 49 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 257/383 places, 295/610 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 257 /257 variables (removed 0) and now considering 295/295 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 269 ms. Remains : 257/383 places, 295/610 transitions.
Support contains 245 out of 257 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-01 17:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (68 resets) in 1826 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 7/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 222 ms. (179 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 235 ms. (169 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 169 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 217 ms. (183 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 189 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-06-01 17:37:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 257 cols
[2025-06-01 17:37:44] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/245 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 18/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 504/516 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved in 3125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/13 constraints, State Equation: 245/257 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/6 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3172ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 7 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
Computed a total of 257 stabilizing places and 295 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 257 transition count 295
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 1 formulas.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 295/295 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 257 transition count 288
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 250 transition count 288
Applied a total of 14 rules in 22 ms. Remains 250 /257 variables (removed 7) and now considering 288/295 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 250 cols
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 281 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 17:37:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/250 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 281 unsolved
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/502 variables, 250/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 21/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 19/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 6/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/502 variables, 5/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 20/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 4/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 502/502 variables, and 349 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 281/281 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/250 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 63/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 252/502 variables, 250/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 21/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 280/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 3/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/502 variables, 5/642 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 502/502 variables, and 642 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 280/281 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60166ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 280 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 60169ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 250/257 places, 287/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 287/287 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60470 ms. Remains : 250/257 places, 287/295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 287 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14790011673151780452.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 17:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7088064387576979808.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14790011673151780452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7088064387576979808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6580124681553212609.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6580124681553212609.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6580124681553212609.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6580124681553212609.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6580124681553212609.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15599860290731605132.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1607938518365707850.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15599860290731605132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1607938518365707850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 295/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 257 /257 variables (removed 0) and now considering 295/295 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 257 cols
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 224 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 288 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 17:39:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/257 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 288 unsolved
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 259/516 variables, 257/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 21/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 20/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 13/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 20/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 12/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 9/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 368 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 257/257 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 288/288 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/257 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 77/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 259/516 variables, 257/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 21/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 287/655 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/655 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 2/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 657 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 257/257 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 287/288 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60127ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 287 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 60129ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 257/257 places, 294/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 257 /257 variables (removed 0) and now considering 294/294 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60460 ms. Remains : 257/257 places, 294/295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:40:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 294 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1860290828010416550.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 17:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14922592291950432279.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1860290828010416550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14922592291950432279.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12692562960637741499.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12692562960637741499.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12692562960637741499.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12692562960637741499.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12692562960637741499.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 342 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 180 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5839647836540561365.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11392778093669028386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5839647836540561365.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11392778093669028386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 295/295 transitions.
Reduce places removed 7 places and 7 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 250 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 243 transition count 281
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 236 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 236 transition count 274
Applied a total of 28 rules in 29 ms. Remains 236 /257 variables (removed 21) and now considering 274/295 (removed 21) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 238 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 267 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 238 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 17:41:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/236 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 267 unsolved
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 238/474 variables, 236/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 21/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 18/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/474 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 474/474 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved in 25213 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 267/267 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/236 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 58/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 238/474 variables, 236/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 21/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 266/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 4/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/474 variables, 1/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 474/474 variables, and 599 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 266/267 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55286ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 266 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 55287ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/257 places, 273/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55519 ms. Remains : 236/257 places, 273/295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:42:44] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-01 17:42:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
FORMULA NeoElection-COL-7-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
Support contains 0 out of 236 places (down from 175) after GAL structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 295/295 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 220 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 220 transition count 243
Applied a total of 74 rules in 18 ms. Remains 220 /257 variables (removed 37) and now considering 243/295 (removed 52) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 207 rows 220 cols
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 251 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 17:42:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/220 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 207/427 variables, 220/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 6/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 13/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 9/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 9/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 8/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/220 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 64/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 207/427 variables, 220/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 6/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 235/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 3/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 543 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/236 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 60059ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 220/257 places, 242/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 220 /220 variables (removed 0) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60512 ms. Remains : 220/257 places, 242/295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16032707247707288617.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 17:43:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11420111506543328456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16032707247707288617.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11420111506543328456.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4249493339106647830.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4249493339106647830.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4249493339106647830.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4249493339106647830.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4249493339106647830.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6165311521532448961.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13436583866021426792.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6165311521532448961.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13436583866021426792.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 257/257 places, 295/295 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 220 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 220 transition count 243
Applied a total of 74 rules in 15 ms. Remains 220 /257 variables (removed 37) and now considering 243/295 (removed 52) transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:44:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 17:44:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 17:44:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 236 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:44:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 207 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-01 17:44:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 17:44:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/220 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 236 unsolved
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 207/427 variables, 220/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 6/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 20/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 13/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 9/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 9/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 8/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/427 variables, 5/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 427/427 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 236/236 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/220 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 64/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 207/427 variables, 220/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 6/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 235/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 3/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 2/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 427/427 variables, and 543 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 235/236 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 235 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 60074ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 220/257 places, 242/295 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 220 /220 variables (removed 0) and now considering 242/242 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60370 ms. Remains : 220/257 places, 242/295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16667058872925749391.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 17:45:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16621741337315284276.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16667058872925749391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16621741337315284276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13377817747282041276.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13377817747282041276.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13377817747282041276.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13377817747282041276.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13377817747282041276.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9467192139278098516.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2978737264409856607.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9467192139278098516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2978737264409856607.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7844468905132127269.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7844468905132127269.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7844468905132127269.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7844468905132127269.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7844468905132127269.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 307 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 178 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13997175036073841866.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 17:46:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3092715722229195679.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13997175036073841866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3092715722229195679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 18:09:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 18:09:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 136 ms
[2025-06-01 18:09:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 422 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 161 ms
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14294146656674705773.gal : 56 ms
[2025-06-01 18:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5619676783898789787.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14294146656674705773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5619676783898789787.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 100 ms
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Transformed 257 places.
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Transformed 295 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17865442368598405246.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 18:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15302026824476757649.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17865442368598405246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15302026824476757649.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="NeoElection-COL-7"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is NeoElection-COL-7, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r142-tall-174876811900081"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/NeoElection-COL-7.tgz
mv NeoElection-COL-7 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;