Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r128-smll-174876524200249.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is MedleyA-PT-20, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524200249
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-15
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748885020775

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-20
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 220 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Transformed 273 places.
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Transformed 518 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 17:23:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 273 places and 518 transitions and 1795 arcs in 495 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 44 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 114 out of 273 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 273/273 places, 518/518 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 221 transition count 466
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 221 transition count 466
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 213 transition count 442
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 213 transition count 442
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 213 transition count 441
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 212 transition count 439
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 212 transition count 439
Applied a total of 123 rules in 128 ms. Remains 212 /273 variables (removed 61) and now considering 439/518 (removed 79) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 439 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 31 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 620 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:23:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 671 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1406 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 438 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 228 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 254 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 513 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 184 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 118 places in 227 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 193 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 208 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 221 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 206 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 239 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 173 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 12/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 162 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 236 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 299 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 287 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 274 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 168 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 8/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 251 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 282 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 257 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 283 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 132 places in 257 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 283 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 245 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 129 places in 228 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 200 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 226 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 252 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/651 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved in 30055 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 438/438 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 31/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 280 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 148 places in 246 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 297 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 126 places in 284 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 286 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 280 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 238 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 320 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 121 places in 307 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 120 places in 286 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 10/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 254 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 284 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 242 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 267 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 206 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 140 places in 271 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 141 places in 277 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 149 places in 260 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 254 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 439/651 variables, 212/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 438/711 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 651/651 variables, and 711 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 438/438 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 438 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60786ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/273 places, 439/518 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62369 ms. Remains : 212/273 places, 439/518 transitions.
Support contains 114 out of 212 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 17:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 134 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 17:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 439 transitions.
Support contains 110 out of 212 places (down from 114) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (25 resets) in 3362 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 26/73 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 56 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 25/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 22/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (18 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 20/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 18/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 14/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (14 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 11/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (13 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 8/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (18 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-02 17:24:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/133 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/165 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 47/212 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 439/651 variables, 212/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/651 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 651/651 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved in 474 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 116/133 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/165 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 47/212 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 439/651 variables, 212/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 6/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 297 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 213 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/651 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 651/651 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved in 2080 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/8 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2566ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 3104 steps, including 135 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 8 ms. (steps per millisecond=388 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 6 properties in 787 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 17:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 439 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 25 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 175 edges and 212 vertex of which 26 / 212 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 23 places
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 32 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 188 transition count 397
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 179 transition count 394
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 179 transition count 393
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 178 transition count 393
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 128 transition count 314
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 128 transition count 314
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 128 transition count 306
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 126 transition count 304
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 126 transition count 296
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 118 transition count 296
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 110 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 110 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 110 transition count 269
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 97 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 97 transition count 255
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 206 place count 89 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 89 transition count 231
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 89 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 88 transition count 222
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 225 place count 87 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 87 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 227 place count 86 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 86 transition count 217
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 86 transition count 216
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 85 transition count 215
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 85 transition count 212
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 82 transition count 209
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 79 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 79 transition count 200
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 79 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 77 transition count 195
Applied a total of 251 rules in 160 ms. Remains 77 /212 variables (removed 135) and now considering 195/439 (removed 244) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 185 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 185 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 170 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 185 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:24:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/76 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 131 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 184/261 variables, 77/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/261 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 261/262 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved in 17478 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 170/170 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/76 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/77 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 184/261 variables, 77/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 170/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 46 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/261 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 261/262 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved in 18986 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 170/170 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 36521ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 170 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36523ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/212 places, 195/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36984 ms. Remains : 77/212 places, 195/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11366585995010954979.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17982528636468357510.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11366585995010954979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17982528636468357510.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.40761e+06,10.6502,205964,2,9236,5,545696,6,0,502,777999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG((p83==1)) U ((p148==1) + AG(EF(!(((p142==0)||(p153==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!(((p148==1) + !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p142==0)||(p153==1)))))))))) * !(EG((p83==1)))) * !...319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t4, t5, t11, t14, t18, t19, t21, t26, t29, t32, t33, t39, t45, t62, t75, t81, t82, t83, t...497
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2763489137993835179.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2763489137993835179.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2763489137993835179.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2763489137993835179.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2763489137993835179.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 306 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 78 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 37 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12064014270844427514.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6897605698956306039.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12064014270844427514.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6897605698956306039.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.40761e+06,0.293823,9396,273,211,8299,2015,354,19187,114,9246,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EG((i3.u6.p83==1)) U ((i4.u7.p148==1) + AG(EF(!(((i4.u7.p142==0)||(i4.u8.p153==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!(((i4.u7.p148==1) + !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((i4.u7.p142==0)||(i4.u8.p153==1)))))))))) * !(...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t55, t68, t81, t82, t83, t93, t94, t95, t111, t112, t113, t138, t140, t142, t147, t150, ...473
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,13.5512,298772,1,0,420171,31943,2149,1.09806e+06,614,267768,861596
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 170 transition count 373
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 170 transition count 373
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 170 transition count 370
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 159 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 159 transition count 341
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 159 transition count 339
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 157 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 157 transition count 334
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 157 transition count 332
Applied a total of 117 rules in 13 ms. Remains 157 /212 variables (removed 55) and now considering 332/439 (removed 107) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 332 rows 157 cols
[2025-06-02 17:26:13] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:26:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 292 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 433 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 331 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:26:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 159 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 162 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 162 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 100 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 164 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 210 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 12/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 219 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 146 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 100 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 182 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 9/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 143 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 164 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 204 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 332/489 variables, 157/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 179 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 3/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 489/489 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 30/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 218 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 208 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 177 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 199 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 203 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 174 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 8/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 332/489 variables, 157/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 331/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 181 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/489 variables, 2/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 489/489 variables, and 539 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60189ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60195ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/212 places, 332/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60643 ms. Remains : 157/212 places, 332/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1297714717450256233.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12015146307547726695.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1297714717450256233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12015146307547726695.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10735702589853732434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10735702589853732434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10735702589853732434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10735702589853732434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10735702589853732434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 463 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3752824595167457465.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 17:27:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8374089159875605489.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3752824595167457465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8374089159875605489.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.12956e+09,7.67646,164156,1559,416,277761,11158,676,491524,202,62473,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((AX(((i1.u12.p77==0)&&(i4.u19.p134==1))) + EG((i6.i1.u26.p227==0))) + (((E(((i1.u15.p67==0)||(i1.u15.p74==1)) U (i6.i1.u27.p214==...717
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((((FwdU((Init * !(E(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i4.u19.p103==1)&&((i6.i1.u28.p231==0)||(i6.i1.u27.p177==1)))) * EX(...3127
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t95, t131, t132, t134, t156, t178, t203, t215, t216, t217, t218, t219, t220, t221, t2...908
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 150 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 150 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 150 transition count 344
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 126 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 126 transition count 284
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 126 transition count 282
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 119 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 119 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 119 transition count 261
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 118 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 118 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 118 transition count 257
Applied a total of 201 rules in 24 ms. Remains 118 /212 variables (removed 94) and now considering 257/439 (removed 182) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-02 17:28:14] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:28:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 331 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 529 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 256 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 178 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 149 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 148 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 177 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 128 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 14/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 257/375 variables, 118/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 3/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/375 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 375/375 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 27690 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 14/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 6/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 257/375 variables, 118/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 256/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 5/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 3/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/375 variables, 3/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 375/375 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 57795ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57797ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/212 places, 257/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58353 ms. Remains : 118/212 places, 257/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 257 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11539416918191693490.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14430852487257280433.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11539416918191693490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14430852487257280433.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.74457e+08,27.1133,443152,2,17628,5,1.34813e+06,6,0,731,1.98214e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12619753600873852283.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12619753600873852283.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12619753600873852283.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12619753600873852283.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12619753600873852283.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 380 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 13 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15862784806167836605.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16112902183102868577.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15862784806167836605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16112902183102868577.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.74457e+08,0.771438,21176,723,67,33048,975,496,53623,98,2168,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(((AX(FALSE) + EF(((i4.u10.p89==0)&&(u4.p17==1)))) + EX((i4.u9.p48==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + E(TRUE U ((i4.u10.p89==0)&&(u4.p17==1)))) + EX((i4.u9.p48==1))))))] = FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t16, t41, t93, t95, t170, t171, t172, t174, t175, t176, t177, t178, t179, t196, t197, t19...615
(forward)formula 0,1,3.53316,73656,1,0,110181,11474,2774,271051,519,30983,273335
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 150 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 150 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 150 transition count 343
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 127 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 127 transition count 283
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 127 transition count 280
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 120 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 120 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 120 transition count 259
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 119 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 119 transition count 256
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 119 transition count 255
Applied a total of 201 rules in 12 ms. Remains 119 /212 variables (removed 93) and now considering 255/439 (removed 184) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 255 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-02 17:29:46] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:29:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 426 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 254 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:29:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 185 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 192 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 169 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 147 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 148 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 170 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 175 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 14/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 137 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 164 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 255/374 variables, 119/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 374/374 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 254/254 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 161 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 131 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 152 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 255/374 variables, 119/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 254/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 165 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 180 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 2/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 1/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/374 variables, 3/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60076ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60077ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/212 places, 255/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60517 ms. Remains : 119/212 places, 255/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4844874331291033905.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7210415232276560622.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4844874331291033905.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7210415232276560622.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.05867e+08,29.9034,517624,2,18293,5,1.58472e+06,6,0,733,2.2683e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5381020311410219445.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5381020311410219445.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5381020311410219445.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5381020311410219445.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5381020311410219445.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 366 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 13 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality722956543477082140.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11163273886390675128.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality722956543477082140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11163273886390675128.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.05867e+08,0.751282,19136,598,86,29255,1345,498,49547,108,2766,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(AG((i3.u7.p53==0))) + AG(EX((i5.u13.p107==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((i3.u7.p53==0))))))),TRUE) * !(EX((i5.u13.p107==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t16, t41, t94, t96, t168, t169, t170, t172, t173, t174, t175, t176, t177, t197, t198, t19...622
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 165 transition count 372
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 165 transition count 372
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 165 transition count 367
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 146 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 146 transition count 321
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 146 transition count 319
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 143 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 143 transition count 312
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 143 transition count 309
Applied a total of 148 rules in 25 ms. Remains 143 /212 variables (removed 69) and now considering 309/439 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 309 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 265 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 347 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 616 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 308 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 235 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 228 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 227 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 211 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 217 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 200 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 157 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 178 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 185 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 200 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 164 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 176 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 180 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 173 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 189 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 174 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 157 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 155 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 165 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 169 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 309/452 variables, 143/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 187 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 6/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 452/452 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 308/308 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 29/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 309/452 variables, 143/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 308/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 1/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 1/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 452/452 variables, and 494 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 308/308 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 308 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/212 places, 309/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60772 ms. Remains : 143/212 places, 309/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 309 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1661191607858523471.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14571667731633193852.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1661191607858523471.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14571667731633193852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11912485011047818254.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11912485011047818254.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11912485011047818254.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11912485011047818254.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11912485011047818254.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 478 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18090745033951302669.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5744535177178245485.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18090745033951302669.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5744535177178245485.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.86951e+09,5.12267,102612,1739,155,174392,1625,634,361078,116,4714,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((EF((i7.u35.p244==1)) + E((i5.u27.p204==0) U (i8.u37.p251==1)))) * AG(((i3.i0.u19.p126==0)||(i1.u16.p67==1)))) * (((AF((i3.i1.u22.p1...633
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U (i7.u35.p244==1)) + E((i5.u27.p204==0) U (i8.u37.p251==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TR...847
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t7, t20, t48, t113, t114, t116, t127, t128, t129, t139, t159, t165, t166, t167, t184, t19...1160
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 151 transition count 348
Iterating global reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 151 transition count 348
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 151 transition count 342
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 126 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 126 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 126 transition count 276
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 120 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 120 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 120 transition count 257
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 199 place count 119 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 119 transition count 254
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 119 transition count 253
Applied a total of 201 rules in 17 ms. Remains 119 /212 variables (removed 93) and now considering 253/439 (removed 186) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 253 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-02 17:33:48] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:33:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 249 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 180 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 168 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 161 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 156 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 145 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 165 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 143 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 116 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 15/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 253/372 variables, 119/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 139 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/372 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 372/372 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 253/372 variables, 119/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 252/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 164 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 147 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 134 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 156 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 7/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 158 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 174 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 158 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 4/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 372/372 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/212 places, 253/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60497 ms. Remains : 119/212 places, 253/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 253 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16644666484501004885.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality27347859337616002.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16644666484501004885.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality27347859337616002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.06006e+08,22.3184,388140,2,16607,5,1.1879e+06,6,0,731,1.65742e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2935087020405661254.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2935087020405661254.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2935087020405661254.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2935087020405661254.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2935087020405661254.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 359 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8319890951836617960.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12914001123014825809.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8319890951836617960.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12914001123014825809.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.06006e+08,1.01585,23644,796,80,39922,902,461,61294,108,1565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AG((i1.u8.p37==0)))) * AF(EX(EF(((i0.u7.p27!=0)&&(i5.u23.p212!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(!(E(TRUE U !((i1.u8.p37==0))))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!(EX(E(TRUE U ((i0.u7.p27!=0)&&...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t16, t42, t95, t97, t169, t170, t171, t192, t193, t194, t195, t196, t197, t198, t199, t20...580
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 153 transition count 350
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 153 transition count 350
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 153 transition count 344
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 132 transition count 291
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 132 transition count 291
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 132 transition count 288
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 127 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 127 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 127 transition count 273
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 126 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 126 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 126 transition count 269
Applied a total of 185 rules in 13 ms. Remains 126 /212 variables (removed 86) and now considering 269/439 (removed 170) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 269 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-02 17:35:49] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:35:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 261 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 427 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 268 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:35:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 178 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 167 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 167 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 142 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 10/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 213 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 187 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 145 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 155 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 148 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 9/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 149 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 151 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 269/395 variables, 126/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 126 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 149 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 169 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 5/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 395/395 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 268/268 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 27/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 160 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 146 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 269/395 variables, 126/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 268/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 135 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 122 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 6/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 3/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 395/395 variables, and 445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 268/268 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 268 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60114ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/212 places, 269/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60556 ms. Remains : 126/212 places, 269/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 269 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality49935618781460780.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5521744059039106162.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality49935618781460780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5521744059039106162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16697371807555096959.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16697371807555096959.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16697371807555096959.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16697371807555096959.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16697371807555096959.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 395 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5763134177849118005.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9108147075576038594.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5763134177849118005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9108147075576038594.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16733e+09,1.7636,40732,1018,69,69966,843,528,118287,99,1882,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((AX(((i4.u13.p74==0)||(i4.u13.p94==1))) * (i6.u20.p189==0)) * ((i6.u26.p170==1)&&(u5.p21==1))) * ((u4.p15==1)&&((i4.u13.p30==0)||(i8...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(((i4.u13.p74==0)||(i4.u13.p94==1))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((i6.u20.p189==0)))] = FALSE...297
(forward)formula 0,0,1.77401,40860,1,0,69966,843,727,118287,126,1882,1677
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 154 transition count 355
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 154 transition count 355
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 154 transition count 350
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 133 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 133 transition count 298
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 133 transition count 296
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 126 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 126 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 126 transition count 276
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 125 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 125 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 125 transition count 272
Applied a total of 186 rules in 11 ms. Remains 125 /212 variables (removed 87) and now considering 272/439 (removed 167) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-02 17:37:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:37:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 360 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 191 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 186 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 183 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 183 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 157 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 160 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 9/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 168 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 144 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 171 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 4/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 272/397 variables, 125/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 397/397 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 145 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 183 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 168 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 272/397 variables, 125/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 271/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 2/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/397 variables, 3/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 397/397 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/212 places, 272/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60444 ms. Remains : 125/212 places, 272/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 272 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8169131751672473382.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6187208571717081872.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8169131751672473382.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6187208571717081872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16429179725951940243.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16429179725951940243.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16429179725951940243.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16429179725951940243.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16429179725951940243.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 391 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8412160618163613717.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2858092056184119650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8412160618163613717.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2858092056184119650.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.11208e+08,4.1756,76440,1069,104,125829,1041,549,229839,118,2768,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i6.u23.p226==1) * (E((i5.u18.p148!=1) U (((i1.u2.p12==0)||(i3.u7.p35==1))||(i6.u20.p184==1))) + AG(AX(((i3.u11.p71!=0)&&(i0.u21.p215...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i6.u23.p226==1)),(i5.u18.p148!=1)) * (((i1.u2.p12==0)||(i3.u7.p35==1))||(i6.u20.p184...288
(forward)formula 0,1,4.91505,76440,1,0,125829,1041,1189,229839,204,2768,120139
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 152 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 152 transition count 349
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 152 transition count 343
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 127 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 127 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 127 transition count 277
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 122 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 122 transition count 265
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 122 transition count 261
Applied a total of 193 rules in 10 ms. Remains 122 /212 variables (removed 90) and now considering 261/439 (removed 178) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 226 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 172 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 183 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 166 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 135 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 162 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 143 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 13/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 261/383 variables, 122/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 131 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 1.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/383 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 15/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 261/383 variables, 122/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 260/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 173 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 172 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 188 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 183 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 150 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 6/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 4/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60091ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/212 places, 261/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60452 ms. Remains : 122/212 places, 261/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7200764734921778847.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality105750634407712385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7200764734921778847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality105750634407712385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11768442707993291716.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11768442707993291716.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11768442707993291716.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11768442707993291716.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11768442707993291716.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 356 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 15 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1067296402083500956.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15958430559051989230.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1067296402083500956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15958430559051989230.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.64646e+08,1.42541,32436,840,105,55510,1654,494,90276,131,4945,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(((i9.u28.p268==0) + ((EG(((i4.u13.p125==0)||(i5.u21.p169==1))) + AX((i2.u7.p69==0))) * AX((i7.u24.p246==1)))) U AX(AF((i5.u18.p180...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((i5.u18.p180==0))))))))) * !(((i9.u28.p268==0) + ((EG(((i4.u13.p...351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t17, t47, t99, t100, t102, t171, t172, t173, t181, t182, t183, t200, t201, t202, t203, t2...635
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 158 transition count 357
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 158 transition count 357
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 158 transition count 353
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 138 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 138 transition count 300
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 138 transition count 298
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 132 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 132 transition count 284
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 132 transition count 279
Applied a total of 171 rules in 14 ms. Remains 132 /212 variables (removed 80) and now considering 279/439 (removed 160) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 279 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 352 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 552 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 278 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 181 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 198 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 199 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 186 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 186 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 159 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 177 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 166 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 146 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 14/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 183 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 159 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 134 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 180 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 169 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 151 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 175 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 175 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 144 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/411 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 278/278 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 31/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 141 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 159 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 172 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 279/411 variables, 132/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 278/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 1/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/411 variables, 1/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 411/411 variables, and 463 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 278/278 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60111ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 278 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60113ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/212 places, 279/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60681 ms. Remains : 132/212 places, 279/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 279 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10047763171864331006.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10942657619560732100.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10047763171864331006.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10942657619560732100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7201900417733297719.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7201900417733297719.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7201900417733297719.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7201900417733297719.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7201900417733297719.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 383 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16812587378613641994.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2450849652635313479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16812587378613641994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2450849652635313479.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.81711e+09,1.87004,38684,887,96,60092,1755,575,112157,116,6025,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((EX((u5.p19==1)) * EG((i8.u27.p247==0))) * (EX(!(A(((i1.u7.p26==0)||(i8.u27.p248==1)) U (i3.u10.p51==0)))) * AF((((((i3.u8.p40==0)||...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((EX((u5.p19==1)) * EG((i8.u27.p247==0))) * (EX(!(!((E(!((i3.u10.p51==0)) U (!(((i1....1163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t48, t107, t108, t110, t129, t149, t172, t186, t187, t188, t196, t197, t198, t215, t216, ...744
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,27.9293,595372,1,0,941097,19061,3378,2.21746e+06,586,72573,2023903
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 149 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 149 transition count 346
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 149 transition count 340
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 124 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 1 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 124 transition count 277
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 124 transition count 274
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 117 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 117 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 117 transition count 253
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 205 place count 116 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 116 transition count 250
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 207 place count 116 transition count 249
Applied a total of 207 rules in 11 ms. Remains 116 /212 variables (removed 96) and now considering 249/439 (removed 190) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 249 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-02 17:42:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 295 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 494 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 248 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 203 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 192 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 181 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 164 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 12/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 249/365 variables, 116/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/365 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 365/365 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved in 26932 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 248/248 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 21/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 144 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 166 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 150 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 146 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 249/365 variables, 116/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 248/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 2/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 2/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 3/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 57017ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57018ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/212 places, 249/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57525 ms. Remains : 116/212 places, 249/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 249 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5576461899436407544.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12440111822308151405.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5576461899436407544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12440111822308151405.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.17259e+08,23.8727,392092,2,17357,5,1.19708e+06,6,0,715,1.74293e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2432410500866649576.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2432410500866649576.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2432410500866649576.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2432410500866649576.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2432410500866649576.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 372 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 13 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality122327061620513069.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16588405587956644123.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality122327061620513069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16588405587956644123.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.17259e+08,0.549262,18640,662,39,29168,399,452,45781,69,653,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((i3.u17.p150==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((i3.u17.p150==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t16, t41, t91, t93, t165, t166, t167, t188, t189, t190, t191, t192, t193, t194, t195, t19...574
(forward)formula 0,1,0.868835,18640,1,0,29168,515,2123,54130,316,1613,93876
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 153 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 153 transition count 352
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 153 transition count 346
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 129 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 129 transition count 286
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 129 transition count 283
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 122 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 122 transition count 267
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 122 transition count 262
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 195 place count 121 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 121 transition count 259
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 121 transition count 258
Applied a total of 197 rules in 8 ms. Remains 121 /212 variables (removed 91) and now considering 258/439 (removed 181) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 258 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-02 17:44:26] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:44:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 266 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 257 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 197 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 206 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 182 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 168 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 153 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 160 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 155 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 133 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 144 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 134 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 152 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 132 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 8/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 153 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 258/379 variables, 121/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 121 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 379/379 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 257/257 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 22/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 258/379 variables, 121/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 257/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 169 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 1/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 159 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 154 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 182 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 182 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 6/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 163 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 4/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60086ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/212 places, 258/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60486 ms. Remains : 121/212 places, 258/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality791904965561399034.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9750713630417185973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality791904965561399034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9750713630417185973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10295125047934511287.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10295125047934511287.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10295125047934511287.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10295125047934511287.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10295125047934511287.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 352 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 29 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16339687252103056292.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7771857684821267290.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16339687252103056292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7771857684821267290.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02592e+09,1.13232,33464,716,193,52358,2856,491,102942,150,8358,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(AF((EX(((u6.p22==0)&&(i8.u23.p248==1))) + ((i2.u10.p42==0)&&(i2.u8.p74==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),!((EX(((u6.p22==0)&&(i8.u23.p248==1))) + ((i2.u10.p42==0)&&(i2.u8.p74==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t17, t42, t96, t168, t169, t170, t171, t172, t173, t174, t204, t205, t206, t207, t208, t2...598
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,1.61911,33720,1,0,52358,4359,2493,102942,777,18085,125232
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 439/439 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 164 edges and 212 vertex of which 26 / 212 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 23 places
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 32 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 188 transition count 397
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 179 transition count 394
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 179 transition count 393
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 178 transition count 393
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 128 transition count 314
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 128 transition count 314
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 308
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 127 transition count 307
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 127 transition count 301
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 121 transition count 301
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 113 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 113 transition count 277
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 113 transition count 275
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 100 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 100 transition count 261
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 196 place count 93 transition count 240
Iterating global reduction 6 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 93 transition count 240
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 93 transition count 235
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 92 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 92 transition count 233
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 91 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 91 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 91 transition count 229
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 90 transition count 228
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 90 transition count 223
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 87 transition count 220
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 85 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 85 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 85 transition count 212
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 85 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 83 transition count 210
Applied a total of 236 rules in 106 ms. Remains 83 /212 variables (removed 129) and now considering 210/439 (removed 229) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 202 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 202 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 202 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 202 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:45:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/82 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 201/284 variables, 83/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 284/285 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 15474 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/82 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 201/284 variables, 83/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 181/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 284/285 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 15885 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 31400ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31400ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/212 places, 210/439 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31775 ms. Remains : 83/212 places, 210/439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14122225277270381860.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2813192921189744790.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14122225277270381860.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2813192921189744790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46547e+07,4.82638,103044,2,9907,5,308801,6,0,541,389834,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((((p241==0)&&(p252==1))&&((p206==0)||(p48==1))) + (AF((p145==1)) * (((p226==0)&&(p92==1))||((p114==0)&&(p31==1))))) + (AF((p15==0)) ...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p241==0)&&(p252==1))&&((p206==0)||(p48==1))))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p226=...294
(forward)formula 0,1,4.83828,103044,1,0,7,308801,8,1,553,389834,1
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-20-CTLCardinality-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16996437036267173965.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16996437036267173965.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16996437036267173965.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16996437036267173965.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16996437036267173965.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 663 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6025430176172007778.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7841531575212109732.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6025430176172007778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7841531575212109732.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.51776e+10,33.2952,578620,6707,1159,876483,36186,986,2.00213e+06,187,226295,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((AX(((i3.u16.p77==0)&&(i4.i0.u29.p134==1))) + EG((i5.i1.u43.p227==0))) + (((E(((i2.i2.u20.p67==0)||(i2.i2.u20.p74==1)) U (i5.i1.u...763
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((((FwdU((Init * !(E(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i4.i0.u24.p103==1)&&((i0.u45.p231==0)||(i5.i1.u44.p177==1)))) * EX(...3263
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t26, t172, t183, t190, t192, t194, t196, t204, t205, t206, t208, t227, t228, t229, t231, ...1648
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 479 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 281 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11002259582384410090.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality47315800643018751.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11002259582384410090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality47315800643018751.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.51776e+10,357.345,7146076,6949,9364,9.69758e+06,423663,328,4.71791e+07,475,1.82055e+07,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((((AX(((i0.i1.i0.u11.p77==0)&&(i0.i1.i0.u12.p134==1))) + EG((i0.i1.u13.p227==0))) + (((E(((i0.i1.i0.u11.p67==0)||(i0.i1.i0.u11.p74=...823
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((((FwdU((Init * !(E(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i0.i1.i0.u12.p103==1)&&((i0.i1.u13.p231==0)||(i0.i1.u13.p177==1))))...3494
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t193, t206, t260, t271, i0.t366, i0.t344, i0.t292, i0.i0.t172, i0.i0.u3.t181, i0.i0.u3.t183, ...1319
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 439 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Transformed 212 places.
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Transformed 439 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5859984014849803700.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3211611760260405247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5859984014849803700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3211611760260405247.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-20"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-20, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524200249"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-20.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-20 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;