Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r128-smll-174876524000138.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is MedleyA-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524000138
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 412K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-15
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748847576203

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 06:59:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 06:59:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 318 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Transformed 124 places.
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Transformed 118 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 124 places and 118 transitions and 372 arcs in 568 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 32 ms.
Support contains 89 out of 124 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 118
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 119 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 119 transition count 115
Applied a total of 8 rules in 56 ms. Remains 119 /124 variables (removed 5) and now considering 115/118 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:39] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 508 ms returned [33]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 587 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/124 places, 115/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 115/115 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 681 ms. Remains : 118/124 places, 115/118 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 118 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
Support contains 88 out of 118 places (down from 89) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 77 to 76
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1109 resets) in 2427 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 11/76 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (244 resets) in 456 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (206 resets) in 300 ms. (132 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (305 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (239 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (204 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (236 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (237 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (245 resets) in 200 ms. (199 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (274 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (306 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (273 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:42] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 71/95 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/118 variables, 7/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 5/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 115/233 variables, 118/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved in 1024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 48/60 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/91 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 27/118 variables, 9/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 115/233 variables, 118/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved in 828 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/9 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1908ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 940 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 118 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 114 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 108 transition count 109
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 108 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 103
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 89 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 89 transition count 90
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 89 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 86 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 84 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 84 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 83 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 82 transition count 83
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 81 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 81 transition count 82
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 62 transition count 63
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 57 transition count 66
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 57 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 52 transition count 61
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 52 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 49 transition count 58
Applied a total of 134 rules in 99 ms. Remains 49 /118 variables (removed 69) and now considering 58/115 (removed 57) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 99 ms. Remains : 49/118 places, 58/115 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 33803 steps (2368 resets) in 648 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 118 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 97 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 95 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 94 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 94 transition count 84
Applied a total of 44 rules in 20 ms. Remains 94 /118 variables (removed 24) and now considering 84/115 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [20]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/118 places, 84/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 93/118 places, 84/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7074977882846739724.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7584367992427328191.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7074977882846739724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7584367992427328191.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.0379e+06,0.410035,12772,2,3108,5,33719,6,0,458,47704,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((AX((p83==1)) * (((p81==1)||(p22==1))||(((p70==1)&&(p80==1))||((p89==1)&&(p100==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((p83==1)))) * (((p81==1)||(p22==1))||(((p70==1)&&(p80==1))||((p89==1)&&(p100==...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t22, t24, t26, t33, t36, t41, Intersection with reachable at each ste...213
(forward)formula 0,0,2.46991,63440,1,0,245,282759,195,88,2868,270125,256
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 96 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 96 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 95 transition count 85
Applied a total of 42 rules in 18 ms. Remains 95 /118 variables (removed 23) and now considering 85/115 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 95 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned [20]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 139 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/118 places, 85/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 94/118 places, 85/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13972869826230937539.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7457089940647614515.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13972869826230937539.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7457089940647614515.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.27015e+06,0.431666,13176,2,3244,5,34990,6,0,463,50024,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(AX((p29==1))) + AX(AF((((p76==1)&&(p110==1))&&(p123==1))))) + EX(((p89==1)&&(p100==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(((Init * !(EX(((p89==1)&&(p100==1))))) * !(EX(!(EX(!((p29==1)))))))),!((((p76==1)&&(p110==1))&&(p123==1...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t17, t20, t21, t23, t25, t27, t34, t37, t42, Intersection with reachable at eac...218
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/7
(forward)formula 0,0,2.49556,63420,1,0,258,284572,199,94,2792,282829,262
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 113 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 108
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 101 transition count 102
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 85 transition count 75
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 85 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 81 transition count 71
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 80 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 80 transition count 70
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 79 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 79 transition count 69
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 61 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 60 transition count 50
Applied a total of 109 rules in 30 ms. Remains 60 /118 variables (removed 58) and now considering 50/115 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [8, 12, 33, 37, 41]
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [37, 8, 12, 41]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/118 places, 50/115 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 56 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 54 transition count 48
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 51 transition count 45
Applied a total of 10 rules in 6 ms. Remains 51 /56 variables (removed 5) and now considering 45/50 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [20, 44]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/118 places, 45/115 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 49 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 48 transition count 44
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 46 transition count 42
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 46 /49 variables (removed 3) and now considering 42/45 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 46/118 places, 42/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 351 ms. Remains : 46/118 places, 42/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability658534106253369776.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3043631767904908132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability658534106253369776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3043631767904908132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,42120,0.019381,4104,2,191,5,986,6,0,228,766,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((E((p5==1) U (p47==1)) * ((p91==0)||(p100==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(E((p5==1) U (p47==1)) * ((p91==0)||(p100==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,0.106478,6024,1,0,90,12674,111,42,1352,9770,107
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 106 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 106 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 105 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 105
Applied a total of 23 rules in 9 ms. Remains 105 /118 variables (removed 13) and now considering 105/115 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 06:59:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 104 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 06:59:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 11/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 14/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 06:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 105/210 variables, 105/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 8905 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 11/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 105/210 variables, 105/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 104/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 3/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 3/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38990ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38994ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/118 places, 105/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39336 ms. Remains : 105/118 places, 105/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17212017776894306967.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:00:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5676708442358247816.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17212017776894306967.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5676708442358247816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34452e+07,0.431297,15756,2,6940,5,50328,6,0,527,57117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX(A(EG(AF((((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))))) U AF((p111!=1)))) U ((AG((p11==1)) * ((E((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p...593
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p111!=1))))) U (!(EG(!(EG(!((((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))...1446
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t17, t21, t22, t23, t25, t27, t28, t29, t41, t42, t45, t89, t90, t91, t...323
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17358113481021514212.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17358113481021514212.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17358113481021514212.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17358113481021514212.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17358113481021514212.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12608216828455249278.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8764381426043525856.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12608216828455249278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8764381426043525856.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34452e+07,0.468524,12928,698,406,12754,4431,346,33060,114,30742,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX(A(EG(AF((((i1.u9.p20==1)&&(i1.u9.p26==1))&&((i1.u9.p31==1)&&(i1.u9.p40==1))))) U AF((i7.u26.p111!=1)))) U ((AG((i0.u3.p11==1)) * ((E...870
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(!((E(!(!(EG(!((i7.u26.p111!=1))))) U (!(EG(!(EG(!((((i1.u9.p20==1)&&(i1.u9.p26==1))&&(...1981
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t17, t22, i0.u1.t42, i0.u1.t45, i0.u3.t29, i0.u3.t41, i1.u9.t89, i1.u9.t90, i1.u9.t91, i1.u9....508
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,8.89696,175360,1,0,275051,10205,2011,580804,855,57838,425852
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 97 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 97 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 95 transition count 85
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 94 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 94 transition count 84
Applied a total of 44 rules in 8 ms. Remains 94 /118 variables (removed 24) and now considering 84/115 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned [20]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 132 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/118 places, 84/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 93/118 places, 84/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12855588352551027651.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14935084242606288037.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12855588352551027651.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14935084242606288037.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.0379e+06,0.399322,12912,2,3108,5,33719,6,0,458,47704,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(AX(EG((p18==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EX(!(EG((p18==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t22, t24, t26, t33, t36, t41, Intersection with reachable at each ste...213
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7795369187863761073.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7795369187863761073.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7795369187863761073.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7795369187863761073.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7795369187863761073.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4522669208644770333.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10948071625219890539.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4522669208644770333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10948071625219890539.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.0379e+06,0.146855,6820,665,47,6747,539,331,5793,71,1490,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(AX(EG((i2.u7.p18==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EX(!(EG((i2.u7.p18==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t16, i1.u1.t41, i4.u8.t36, i4.u15.t26, i5.u23.t14, i6.i0.u10.t33, i6.i0.u19.t20, i8.t...269
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,5.77481,164388,1,0,353221,804,1523,384527,324,1997,489535
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 104 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 104 transition count 94
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 104 /118 variables (removed 14) and now considering 94/115 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/118 places, 94/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 103/118 places, 94/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5502699452093805045.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13212989856953470098.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5502699452093805045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13212989856953470098.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18487e+07,0.597342,18628,2,5194,5,57495,6,0,508,73614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((((((p88==0)||(p95==0)) * EG((p66==0))) + EG((p94==0))) * (((!(E(((p87==1)&&(p102==1)) U ((p14==1)&&(p104==1)))) + ((p58==0)&&(p99=...473
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((((([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p43==0)) * ((((p88==0)||(p95==0)) * EG((p66==0))) + EG((p94==0)))) * !(E(((p87==1)&&...938
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t10, t14, t15, t17, t21, t23, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30, t31, t37, t40, t43, t44, t...272
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12641733930344342677.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12641733930344342677.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12641733930344342677.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12641733930344342677.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12641733930344342677.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14882439140092019954.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17039722395845274831.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14882439140092019954.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17039722395845274831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18487e+07,0.065329,5476,380,89,3094,753,341,3680,96,1562,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(((((((i7.u23.p88==0)||(i7.u24.p95==0)) * EG((i6.i0.u15.p66==0))) + EG((i7.u23.p94==0))) * (((!(E(((i7.u23.p87==1)&&(i7.u23.p102==1))...697
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((((([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i3.u14.p43==0)) * ((((i7.u23.p88==0)||(i7.u24.p95==0)) * EG((i6.i0.u15.p66==0))) + E...1276
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t69, t72, i0.u0.t44, i0.u0.t46, i0.u0.t48, i2.u22.t15, i3.u5.t31, i3.u5.t43, i4.u9.t40, i...404
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,2.33189,69732,1,0,120417,1842,1709,160017,497,6258,150483
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 101 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 101 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 99 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 99 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 98 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 99
Applied a total of 36 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /118 variables (removed 20) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [22]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 97 /97 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 97/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1645674507069827812.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3040061676086898009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1645674507069827812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3040061676086898009.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.278038,12252,2,5296,5,37462,6,0,489,39063,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX(!(E(((p87==1)&&(p102==1)) U (((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1)))))) * AX(EG((((p19==0)||(p25==0))||((p30==0)||(p39==0))))...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!(!(E(((p87==1)&&(p102==1)) U (((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1)))))))) * !(EX(!(EG(((...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15250037931311591473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15250037931311591473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15250037931311591473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15250037931311591473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15250037931311591473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16385958763559020319.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12200470199897806940.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16385958763559020319.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12200470199897806940.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.139709,8112,564,321,7127,2302,362,12635,106,9474,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AX(!(E(((i7.u24.p87==1)&&(i7.u24.p102==1)) U (((i3.u7.p19==1)&&(i3.u7.p26==1))&&((i3.u7.p30==1)&&(i3.u7.p39==1)))))) * AX(EG((((i3.u...238
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EX(!(!(E(((i7.u24.p87==1)&&(i7.u24.p102==1)) U (((i3.u7.p19==1)&&(i3.u7.p26==1))&&((i3.u7.p30==1)...293
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, i0.u1.t41, i3.u7.t83, i3.u7.t84, i3.u7.t85, i3.u7.t86, i3.u7.t87, i3.u7.t88, i3...431
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,2.3525,71728,1,0,142696,5280,1826,170033,768,20543,230707
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 98 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 96 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 96 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 95 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 95 transition count 85
Applied a total of 42 rules in 9 ms. Remains 95 /118 variables (removed 23) and now considering 85/115 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 95 cols
[2025-06-02 07:02:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned [20]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 123 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/118 places, 85/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 134 ms. Remains : 94/118 places, 85/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4502365185140230864.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16714064840049705705.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4502365185140230864.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16714064840049705705.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.0379e+06,0.09674,7032,2,2473,5,14292,6,0,463,11565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(AX((!(E((p77==1) U (p64==1))) + (p24==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((!(E((p77==1) U (p64==1))) + (p24==1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t17, t20, t21, t23, t25, t27, t34, t37, t42, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,0,7.07758,199660,1,0,601,1.0238e+06,202,321,2797,1.36302e+06,536
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 114 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 110 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 109 transition count 109
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 109 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 104 transition count 104
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 92 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 92 transition count 92
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 92 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 90 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 88 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 88 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 87 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 86 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 85 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 85 transition count 85
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 70 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 69 transition count 69
Applied a total of 92 rules in 44 ms. Remains 69 /118 variables (removed 49) and now considering 69/115 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [12, 23, 34, 45]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/118 places, 69/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 65 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 68
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 67
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 67/69 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 63/118 places, 67/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 284 ms. Remains : 63/118 places, 67/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2243215269367774028.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:02:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3869869017130729929.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2243215269367774028.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3869869017130729929.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,240968,0.153294,6848,2,1507,5,13883,6,0,321,14562,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AF(E(((p13==1)&&(p108==1)) U ((p71==1)&&(p82==1)))) + EG((p59==1))) U ((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))) + A(!(AG(((p14==...190
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(E(((p13==1)&&(p108==1)) U ((p71==1)&&(p82==1)))))) + EG((p59==1)))) * (((p20==1)&&(p25==1))...424
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t7, t9, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t59, t60, t61, t63, t65, t66, Intersecti...242
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.3837,281024,1,0,1084,1.97604e+06,188,576,2244,1.38081e+06,1230
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 104 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 104 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 103 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 103 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 102 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 102 transition count 103
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 102 /118 variables (removed 16) and now considering 103/115 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/118 places, 103/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 103/103 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 96 ms. Remains : 101/118 places, 103/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17337292418570889393.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3208997848705622150.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17337292418570889393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3208997848705622150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16198e+07,0.763215,23132,2,11689,5,78818,6,0,509,99895,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((p111==1) * ((EX((p5==1)) + AG((p120==1))) + (((p38==0) * (EF((p7==1)) + (p120==0))) * (((p20==0)||(p25==0))||((p31==0)||(p40==0))...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((p111==1) * ((EX((p5==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((p120==1))))) + (((p38==0) * (E(TRUE U (p7==1)) + (p12...224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t8, t9, t11, t16, t18, t22, t23, t24, t26, t28, t42, t44, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91...314
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6266417812353709611.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6266417812353709611.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6266417812353709611.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6266417812353709611.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6266417812353709611.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4548608785657984715.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8247199299140092564.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4548608785657984715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8247199299140092564.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16198e+07,0.649314,16204,1312,285,16303,1837,354,50174,105,60387,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((i7.u27.p111==1) * ((EX((i0.u2.p5==1)) + AG((i7.u29.p120==1))) + (((i8.u12.p38==0) * (EF((i0.u3.p7==1)) + (i7.u29.p120==0))) * (((...213
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((i7.u27.p111==1) * ((EX((i0.u2.p5==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !((i7.u29.p120==1))))) + (((i8.u12.p38==0) ...276
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t11, t23, u7.t87, u7.t88, u7.t89, u7.t90, u7.t91, u7.t92, u7.t93, u7.t94, u7.t95, u7.t96, u7....455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,12.3467,281880,1,0,688667,7976,1775,512518,785,78351,1071950
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 102 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 102 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 100 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 100 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 99 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 99 transition count 99
Applied a total of 35 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /118 variables (removed 19) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [22]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 98/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4704459943693243052.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13397361170732767329.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4704459943693243052.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13397361170732767329.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.381534,13792,2,5759,5,44982,6,0,493,47356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!((((p36==1)&&(p73==1)) + AF(((p1==1)&&(p23==1))))) * EF((EF((p47==1)) + AX(((p92==1)&&(p102==1))))))) U (!(EF(((p89==1)&&(p100==1)...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((p89==1)&&(p100==1)))) * !((E(!(E((((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40=...3499
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:04:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:04:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13364674283877803027.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13364674283877803027.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13364674283877803027.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13364674283877803027.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13364674283877803027.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:04:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:04:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:04:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15675837004359347270.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16196712736540926683.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15675837004359347270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16196712736540926683.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.192967,10656,500,413,7669,3047,308,21922,106,38626,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!((((i6.u10.p36==1)&&(i6.u10.p73==1)) + AF(((i1.u0.p1==1)&&(i2.u7.p23==1))))) * EF((EF((i4.u13.p47==1)) + AX(((i7.u21.p92==1)&&(i8....492
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((i8.u23.p89==1)&&(i8.u24.p100==1)))) * !((E(!(E((((u4.p19==1)&&(u4.p26==1...4416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, u4.t83, u4.t84, u4.t85, u4.t86, u4.t87, u4.t88, u4.t89, u4.t90, u4.t91, u4.t92,...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,9.1912,218528,1,0,428429,12006,2080,468734,852,117915,549603
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 3 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 102 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 102 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 100 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 100 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 99 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 99 transition count 99
Applied a total of 35 rules in 9 ms. Remains 99 /118 variables (removed 19) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [22]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 109 ms. Remains : 98/118 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14719274150485586199.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:04:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15842148916307980904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14719274150485586199.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15842148916307980904.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.438585,13404,2,5791,5,43361,6,0,493,45119,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1))) + AF(((p104==1)&&(p115==1)))) + A(((p87==1)&&(p102==1)) U ((p41==1)&&(p112==1))))) ...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p29==1)) * !(EX(!((((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1))) + !(EG(!(((p104==1)&&(p11...302
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16135399219420334932.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16135399219420334932.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16135399219420334932.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16135399219420334932.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16135399219420334932.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15391943455902847047.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14360456806098754032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15391943455902847047.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14360456806098754032.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.207675,7748,683,323,6712,1417,360,13546,105,7280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((((i3.u5.p19==1)&&(i3.u5.p25==1))&&((i3.u5.p30==1)&&(i3.u5.p39==1))) + AF(((i4.i1.u25.p104==1)&&(i4.i1.u26.p115==1)))) + A(((i8....247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i2.u9.p29==1)) * !(EX(!((((((i3.u5.p19==1)&&(i3.u5.p25==1))&&((i3.u5.p30==1)&&(i3.u5.p39==...414
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, i0.u1.t41, i3.u5.t83, i3.u5.t84, i3.u5.t85, i3.u5.t86, i3.u5.t87, i3.u5.t88, i3...431
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,5.02925,132036,1,0,267420,4574,1735,296201,736,17040,394596
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 113 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 108
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 107 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 102 transition count 103
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 85 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 85 transition count 75
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 85 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 81 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 79 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 79 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 78 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 77 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 76 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 76 transition count 66
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 56 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 55 transition count 45
Applied a total of 119 rules in 30 ms. Remains 55 /118 variables (removed 63) and now considering 45/115 (removed 70) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned [10, 19, 29, 33, 37, 48]
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [48, 33, 10, 19, 37]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/118 places, 45/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 50 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 49 transition count 44
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 49 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 47 transition count 42
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 43 transition count 38
Applied a total of 14 rules in 9 ms. Remains 43 /50 variables (removed 7) and now considering 38/45 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/118 places, 38/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 42 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 37
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /42 variables (removed 1) and now considering 37/38 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 41/118 places, 37/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 324 ms. Remains : 41/118 places, 37/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4683563795058228853.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18230987495955268956.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4683563795058228853.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18230987495955268956.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15132,0.010156,4044,2,172,5,741,6,0,204,495,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p15==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p15==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 35/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.026346,4556,1,0,9,4615,19,3,1010,1857,8
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 114 transition count 115
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 103 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 103 transition count 104
Applied a total of 26 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /118 variables (removed 15) and now considering 104/115 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 103 cols
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/118 places, 104/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 83 ms. Remains : 102/118 places, 104/115 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5531766419876566926.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3988685845546789636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5531766419876566926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3988685845546789636.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42432e+07,0.570976,15488,2,5912,5,51520,6,0,514,54599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(E((((!((p6==1)&&(p116==1)))||((p104==1)&&(p118==1)))||((p58==1)&&(p7==1))) U E((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))) U ((p49...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E((((!((p6==1)&&(p116==1)))||((p104==1)&&(p118==1)))||((p58==1)&&(p7==1))) U E((((p19==1)&&(...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, t28, t43, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, ...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7093899027028094987.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7093899027028094987.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7093899027028094987.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7093899027028094987.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7093899027028094987.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4019367828656057505.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 07:05:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4957569494452863621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4019367828656057505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4957569494452863621.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42432e+07,0.476531,15628,908,300,13700,3058,348,44191,108,71596,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(E((((!((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i7.u27.p116==1)))||((i7.u26.p104==1)&&(i7.u27.p118==1)))||((i4.i1.u16.p58==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))) U E((((u5.p19...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E((((!((i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i7.u27.p116==1)))||((i7.u26.p104==1)&&(i7.u27.p118==1)))||((i4.i1.u16...298
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, u5.t88, u5.t89, u5.t90, u5.t91, u5.t92, u5.t93, u5.t94, u5.t95, u5.t96, u5.t97, u5.t...422
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,22.1316,483116,1,0,889861,12063,1863,1.09287e+06,821,129632,955316
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-02 07:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 07:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 381727 ms.

BK_STOP 1748847960614

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524000138"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-06.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;